Prognostic significance of centromere 17 copy number gain in breast cancer depends on breast cancer subtype

Patterns of Chromosomal Instability and Clonal Heterogeneity in Luminal B Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

Chromosomal instability (CIN), defined by variations in the number or structure of chromosomes from cell to cell, is recognized as a distinctive characteristic of cancer associated with the ability of tumors to adapt to challenging environments. CIN has been recognized as a source of genetic variation that leads to clonal heterogeneity (CH). Recent findings suggest a potential association between CIN and CH with the prognosis of BC patients, particularly in tumors expressing the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+). In fact, information on the role of CIN in other BC subtypes, including luminal B BC, is limited. Additionally, it remains unknown whether CIN in luminal B BC tumors, above a specific threshold, could have a detrimental effect on the growth of human tumors or whether low or intermediate CIN levels could be linked to a more favorable BC patient prognosis when contrasted with elevated levels. Clarifying these relationships could have a substantial impact on risk stratification and the development of future therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting CIN in BC. This study aimed to assess CIN and CH in tumor tissue samples from ten patients with luminal B BC and compare them with established clinicopathological parameters. The results of this study reveal that luminal B BC patients exhibit intermediate CIN and stable aneuploidy, both of which correlate with lymphovascular invasion. Our results also provide valuable preliminary data that could contribute to the understanding of the implications of CIN and CH in risk stratification and the development of future therapeutic strategies in BC.

Breast Cancer Therapeutics and Biomarkers: Past, Present, and Future Approaches

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death in women and the second-most common cancer. An estimated 281 550 new cases of invasive BC will be diagnosed in women in the United States, and about 43 600 will die during 2021. Continual research has shed light on all disease areas, including tumor classification and biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis. As research investigations evolve, new classes of drugs are emerging with potential benefits in BC treatment that are covered in this manuscript. The initial sections present updated classification and terminology used for diagnosis and prognosis, which leads to the following topics, discussing the past and present treatments available for BC. Our review will generate interest in exploring the complexity of the cell cycle and its association with cancer biology as part of the plethora of target factors toward developing newer drugs and effective therapeutic management of BC.

Impact of chromosome 17 centromere copy number increase on patient survival and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma

The accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is essential for the appropriate use of targeted therapies. An increased number of chromosome 17 centromere enumeration probe (CEP17) signals may underrate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) outcomes, resulting in false-negative or a false-equivocal HER2 status assessment. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of CEP17 copy number increase (CNI), its effects on HER2 protein expression (and the subsequent effects on tumor cells), and the survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. Archival primary tumor samples from 244 patients that underwent gastric resection for adenocarcinoma were retrieved for both HER2 protein expression analysis (using immunochemistry) and HER2 gene amplification (using FISH). The associations between HER2 status, CEP17 CNI and multiple clinicopathological parameters (including survival outcome), were assessed. The relationship between CEP17 CNI and HER2 protein upregulation was also investigated. CEP17 CNI was detected in 17.2% of cases, and a strong association between CEP17 CNI and HER2 upregulation was revealed. The impact of CEP17 CNI on survival did not reach statistical significance. Consequently, CEP17 CNI was discovered to be strongly associated with HER2 upregulation in tumor cells, which may characterize a critical issue in HER2 testing. Therefore, the eligibility for HER2-targeted agents in CEP17 CNI-positive patients warrants further recognition.

HER2 splice variants in breast cancer: investigating their impact on diagnosis and treatment outcomes

Overexpression of the HER2 receptor occurs in approximately 20% of breast cancer patients. HER2 positivity is associated with poor prognosis and aggressive tumour phenotypes, which led to rapid progress in HER2 targeted therapeutics and diagnostic testing. Whilst these advances have greatly increased patients' chances of survival, resistance to HER2 targeted therapies, be that intrinsic or acquired, remains a problem. Different forms of the HER2 protein exist within tumours in tandem and can display altered biological activities. Interest in HER2 variants in breast cancer increased when links between resistance to anti-HER2 therapies and a particular variant, Δ16-HER2, were identified. Moreover, the P100 variant potentially reduces the efficacy of the anti-HER2 therapy trastuzumab. Another variant, Herstatin, exhibits 'auto-inhibitory' behaviour. More recently, new HER2 variants have been identified and are currently being assessed for their pro- and anti-cancer properties. It is important when directing the care of patients to consider HER2 variants collectively. This review considers HER2 variants in the context of the tumour environment where multiple variants are co-expressed at altered ratios. This study also provides an up to date account of the landscape of HER2 variants and links this to patterns of resistance against HER2 therapies and treatment plans.

The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) interpretation in breast cancer compared with that of the previous guidelines and also the significance of in situ hybridization (ISH) groups proposed by the updated guideline. HER2 ISH reports and immunohistochemistry (IHC) data from 1,348 invasive breast cancers diagnosed at a single institution were included in this study. HER2 IHC was reassessed using the 2018 guideline, and HER2 ISH status was determined by the 2007, 2013, and 2018 guidelines. When applying the updated guideline, most of the HER2 ISH-equivocal cases as per the previous guidelines were reclassified as ISH negative, and 0.8% of HER2 ISH-positive tumors as per the 2007 guideline and 2.5% of those as per the 2013 guideline were changed to ISH negative. Accordingly, the negative HER2 ISH results significantly increased in the 2018 guideline compared with the 2013 guideline. HER2 ISH-positive tumors in ISH group 3 (HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio <2.0 and average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 per cell) were characterized by equivocal HER2 protein expression, CEP17 copy number gain, and low HER2 copy numbers compared with classic HER2 ISH-positive tumors in ISH group 1 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 and average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 per cell). HER2 ISH-negative tumors in ISH group 4 (HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 with average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and < 6.0 per cell) revealed more aggressive clinicopathologic features and poorer clinical outcomes than those in ISH group 5 (HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 and average HER2 copy number <4.0 per cell), especially in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup. In conclusion, implementation of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline leads to a significant increase in HER2 ISH-negative results compared with the 2013 guideline, mainly via reclassification of the ISH-equivocal cases to ISH-negative ones. ISH groups proposed by the updated guideline provide additional information on the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumors.

Amplification of Chromosome 17 Centromere (CEP17) in Breast Cancer Patients with a Result of HER2 2± by Immunohistochemistry

Background: Amplification of the centromeric region of chromosome 17 (CEP17) as measured by In Situ Hybridization (ISH) of the CEP17 probe is used clinically as part of the ISH assay for HER2 status determination in breast cancer. The value of amplification of CEP17 beyond its use in the HER2 ISH test has not been fully explored.Methods: A retrospective review of patients with breast cancer that had a dual probe HER2/CEP17 FISH test during an eight-year period was performed. Data on demographic and cancer-specific characteristics of the included patients were extracted. The group of patients with an amplified CEP17 defined as mean copy number of ≥3 per nucleus was compared with the group without amplification.Results: Two hundred and twelve patients were eligible and included in the analysis. Amplification of CEP17 was observed in 39 patients (18.4%). All patients in the amplified group had a concomitant amplification of HER2 (mean copy number ≥3 per nucleus). In the CEP17 non-amplified group 82 of 172 patients (47.7%) had an amplified HER2 status. More patients in the amplified group had a clinical HER2+ status according to the 3-protein classifier (30.8% versus 12.3% in the non-amplified group) and fewer patients in the amplified group had a clinical ER+/HER2- status (66.7% versus 81.3% in the non-amplified group, x² p = .01). Other significant differences between the amplified and CEP17 non-amplified groups were observed in their lymph node (LN) status (56.4% of patients in the amplified group versus 38.8% in the non-amplified group were lymph node positive, p = .04) and in the nuclear heterogeneity component of grade (91.2% of patients in the amplified group were nuclear grade 3 versus 67.1% in the non-amplified group, p = .005). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in overall stage, grade, menopause status or histology. Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) was shorter in stage I to III patients with an amplified CEP17 compared with the non-amplified group.Conclusion: Patients with amplification of CEP17 had a co-amplified HER2 and were more commonly HER2+, LN positive and grade 3 in the nuclear component of grade.

Centromere 17 copy number gain reflects chromosomal instability in breast cancer

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is known to be associated with prognosis and treatment response in breast cancer. This study was conducted to determine whether copy number gain of centromere 17 (CEP17) reflects CIN, and to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of CIN in breast cancer. CIN status was determined by summing copy number gains of four centromeric probes (CEP1, CEP8, CEP11, and CEP16) based on fluorescence in situ hybridization and CIN scores were calculated using next generation sequencing data. High CIN was associated with adverse clinicopatholgical parameters of breast cancer. Among them, positive HER2 status, high Ki-67 index and CEP17 copy number gain were found to be independent predictors of high CIN. High CIN was associated with poor clinical outcome of the patients in the whole group, as well as in luminal/HER2-negative and HER2-positive subtypes. CEP17 copy number was significantly higher in the high-CIN-score group than in the low-CIN-score group. A positive linear correlation between the mean CEP17 copy number and the CIN score was found. In conclusion, CEP17 copy number was confirmed as a useful predictor for CIN in breast cancer, and high CIN was revealed as an indicator of poor prognosis in breast cancer.

HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and/or HER2 gene amplification is found in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. It is a sole predictive marker for treatment benefits from HER2 targeted therapy and thus, HER2 testing is a routine practice for newly diagnosed breast cancer in pathology. Currently, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used for a screening test, and in situ hybridization is used as a confirmation test for HER2 IHC equivocal cases. Since the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines on HER2 testing was first released in 2007, it has been updated to provide clear instructions for HER2 testing and accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. During HER2 interpretation, some pitfalls such as intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity and increase in chromosome enumeration probe 17 signals may lead to inaccurate assessment of HER2 status. Moreover, HER2 status can be altered after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or during metastatic progression, due to biologic or methodologic issues. This review addresses recent updates of ASCO/CAP guidelines and factors complicating in the interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancers.