Histologic and immunohistochemical differences between hereditary and sporadic diffuse gastric carcinoma

A Systematic Review of Surgical and Pathological Outcomes in Patients With a CDH1 Mutation Undergoing Total Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

CDH1 (E-cadherin) genetic mutations are associated with a 30%-70% increased lifetime risk of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Although prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) reduces long-term risk of gastric cancer, the associated morbidity and mortality remain unclear. This systematic review aims to characterise postoperative surgical outcomes in patients undergoing total gastrectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting endoscopic surveillance, surgical and pathological outcomes for patients with CDH1 mutation undergoing a total gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies included 1849 patients, of which 96% had a CDH1 (n = 1777) or CTNNA1 (n = 3) mutation. Endoscopy outcomes were reported for 1640 patients. Cancer foci were identified in 32% (n = 523/1640) and 71% of these patients went on to have a total gastrectomy (n = 369/523). The remaining 78% of patients did not have cancer foci detected on endoscopy (n = 1117/1640). Of these patients, 62% underwent a total gastrectomy (n = 688/1117) and 81% were found to have cancer on surgical histology (n = 556/688). Pathological staging was reported for 790 patients undergoing surgery, of which 68% had pT1 disease (n = 537). Postoperative complications were reported for 430 patients across 23 studies, with the most common complications being anastomotic strictures (25%), anastomotic leaks (13%), wound infections (12%) and pulmonary complications (11%). Only one postoperative death was reported within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Rates of early cancers are high in CDH1 patients undergoing PTG, highlighting the need for improvement in reliable endoscopic surveillance. Although postoperative mortality in this surgical cohort remains low, high rates of postoperative complications warrant careful patient counselling.

Glutamine metabolism genes prognostic signature for stomach adenocarcinoma and immune infiltration: potential biomarkers for predicting overall survival

Background

Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), caused by mutations in stomach cells, is characterized by poor overall survival. Chemotherapy is commonly administered for stomach cancer patients following surgical resection. An imbalance in tumor metabolic pathways is connected to tumor genesis and growth. It has been discovered that glutamine (Gln) metabolism plays a crucial role in cancer. Metabolic reprogramming is associated with clinical prognosis in various cancers. However, the role of glutamine metabolism genes (GlnMgs) in the fight against STAD remains poorly understood.

Methods

GlnMgs were determined in STAD samples from the TCGA and GEO datasets. The TCGA and GEO databases provide information on stemness indices (mRNAsi), gene mutations, copy number variations (CNV), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and clinical characteristics. Lasso regression was performed to build the prediction model. The relationship between gene expression and Gln metabolism was investigated using co-expression analysis.

Results

GlnMgs, found to be overexpressed in the high-risk group even in the absence of any symptomatology, demonstrated strong predictive potential for STAD outcomes. GSEA highlighted immunological and tumor-related pathways in the high-risk group. Immune function and m6a gene expression differed significantly between the low- and high-risk groups. AFP, CST6, CGB5, and ELANE may be linked to the oncology process in STAD patients. The prognostic model, CNVs, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and medication sensitivity all revealed a strong link to the gene.

Conclusion

GlnMgs are connected to the genesis and development of STAD. These corresponding prognostic models aid in predicting the prognosis of STAD GlnMgs and immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may be possible therapeutic targets in STAD. Furthermore, the glutamine metabolism gene signature presents a credible alternative for predicting STAD outcomes, suggesting that these GlnMgs could open a new field of study for STAD-focused therapy Additional trials are needed to validate the results of the current study.

Constructing and validating of m6a-related genes prognostic signature for stomach adenocarcinoma and immune infiltration: Potential biomarkers for predicting the overall survival

Background

Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) arises from the mutations of stomach cells and has poor overall survival. Chemotherapy is commonly indicated for patients with stomach cancer following surgical resection. The most prevalent alteration that affects cancer growth is N6-methyladenosine methylation (m6A), although the possible function of m6A in STAD prognosis is not recognized.

Method

The research measured predictive FRGs in BLCA samples from the TCGA and GEO datasets. Data on the stemness indices (mRNAsi), gene mutations, copy number variations (CNV), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and corresponding clinical characteristics were obtained from TCGA and GEO. STAD from TCGA and GEO at 24 m6A was investigated. Lasso regression was used to construct the prediction model to assess the m6A prognostic signals in STAD. In addition, the correlation between m6a and immune infiltration in STAD patients was discussed using GSVA and ssGSEA analysis. Based on these genes, GO and KEGG analyses were performed to identify key biological functions and key pathways.

Result

A significant relationship was discovered between numerous m6A clusters and the tumor immune microenvironment, as well as three m6A alteration patterns with different clinical outcomes. Furthermore, GSVA and ssGSEA showed that m6A clusters were significantly associated with immune infiltration in the STAD. The low-m6Ascore group had a lower immunotherapeutic response than the high-m6Ascore group. ICIs therapy was more effective in the group with a higher m6Ascore. Three writers (VIRMA, ZC3H13, and METTL3) showed significantly lower expression, whereas five authors (METTL14, METTL16, WTAP, RBM15, and RBM15B) showed considerably higher expression. Three readers (YTHDC2, YTHDF2, and LRPPRC) had higher levels of expression, whereas eleven readers (YTHDC1, YTHDF1, YTHDF3, HNRNPC, FMR1, HNRNPA2B1, IGFBP1, IGFBP2, IGFBP3, and RBMX) had lower levels. As can be observed, the various types of m6 encoders have varied ramifications for STAD control.

Conclusion

STAD occurrence and progression are linked to m6A-genes. Corresponding prognostic models help forecast the prognosis of STAD patients. m6A-genes and associated immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may serve as potential therapeutic targets in STAD, which requires further trials. In addition, the m6a-related gene signature offers a viable alternative to predict bladder cancer, and these m6A-genes show a prospective research area for STAD targeted treatment in the future.

Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A 2022 Update

Gastric cancer is ranked fifth among the most commonly diagnosed cancers, and is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The majority of gastric cancers are sporadic, while only a small percentage, less than 1%, are hereditary. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare malignancy, characterized by early-onset, highly-penetrant autosomal dominant inheritance mainly of the germline alterations in the E-cadherin gene (CDH1) and β-catenin (CTNNA1). In the present study, we provide an overview on the molecular basis of HDGC and outline the essential elements of genetic counseling and surveillance. We further provide a practical summary of current guidelines on clinical management and treatment of individuals at risk and patients with early disease.

Constructing and Validating a Pyroptosis-Related Genes Prognostic Signature for Stomach Adenocarcinoma and Immune Infiltration: Potential Biomarkers for Predicting the Overall Survival

Background

Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a kind of cancer that begins in the stomach cells and has a poor overall survival rate. Following resection surgery, chemotherapy has been suggested as a curative method for stomach cancer. However, it is ineffective. Pyroptosis, a kind of inflammatory programmed cell death, has been shown to play a significant role in the development and progression of STAD. However, whether pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) can be utilized to predict the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer remains unknown.

Method

The research measured at predictive PRGs in STAD samples from TCGA and GEO. Lasso regression was used to build the prediction model. Coexpression analysis revealed that gene expression was linked to pyroptosis. PRGs were found to be overexpressed in high-risk individuals, implying that they could be used in a model to predict STAD prognosis.

Result

Immunological and tumor-related pathways were discovered using GSEA. In STAD patients, the genes GPX3, PDGFRL, RGS2, and SERPINE1 may be connected to the cancer process. The levels of expression also differed between the two risk groups.

Conclusion

The purpose of this study is to identify and verify STAD-associated PRGs that can effectively guide prognosis and the immunological milieu in STAD patients as well as offer evidence for the development of pyroptosis-related molecularly targeted therapeutics. Therefore, PRGs and the link between immunological and PRGs in STAD may be therapeutic targets.

Familial and hereditary gastric cancer, an overview

There are three major hereditable syndromes that affect primarily the stomach: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) and familial intestinal gastric cancer (FIGC). HDGC is caused by germline mutations in CDH1 gene that occur in 10-40% of HDGC families and, in a minority of cases, by mutations in CTNNA1 gene. GAPPS is caused by germline mutations in the promoter 1B of APC gene, and the genetic cause of FIGC is not fully elucidated. Gastric cancer can also be observed as part of other inherited cancer disorders, namely in familial adenomatous polyposis, MUTYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, Lynch syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Cowden syndrome, and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. In this article, the state of the art of familial gastric cancer regarding the clinical, molecular and pathology features is reviewed, as well as the practical aspects for a correct diagnosis and clinical management.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). An overview

It is estimated that up to 10% of gastric carcinomas show familial aggregation. In contrast, around 1-3 % (approximately 33,000 yearly) are genuinely hereditary. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare malignancy characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance of pathological variants of the CDH1 and CTNNA1 genes encoding the adhesion molecules E-cadherin and α-catenin, respectively. The multifocal nature of the disease and the difficulty of visualizing precursor lesions by endoscopy underscore the need to be aware of this malignancy as surgical prevention can be fully protective. Here, we provide an overview of the main epidemiological, clinical, genetic, and pathological features of HDGC, as well as updated guidelines for its diagnosis, genetic testing, counseling, surveillance, and management. We conclude that HDGC is a rare, highly penetrant disease that is difficult to diagnose and manage, so it is necessary to correctly identify it to offer patients and their families' adequate management following the recommendations of the IGCL. A critical point is identifying a mutation in HDGC families to determine whether unaffected relatives are at risk for cancer.

Molecular Landscapes of Gastric Pre-Neoplastic and Pre-Invasive Lesions

Gastric carcinoma (GC) represents one of the most common and most lethal malignancies worldwide. The histopathological characterization of GC precursor lesions has provided great knowledge about gastric carcinogenesis, with the consequent introduction of effective strategies of primary and secondary prevention. In recent years, a large amount of data about the molecular events in GC development is emerging, flanking the histomorphological descriptions. In this review, we describe the landscape of molecular alterations in gastric pre-invasive lesions with a glance at their potential use in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

CDH1 Gene Mutation Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Outcomes: Analysis of a Large Cohort, Systematic Review of Endoscopic Surveillance, and Secondary Cancer Risk Postulation

Simple Summary

Some patients carry a mutated copy of the CDH1 gene that can lead to a very rare form of hereditary gastric cancer called signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC). SRCCs rarely form visible tumors prior to spreading. Hence, patients are recommended to have prophylactic gastrectomies at a young age. Many patients wish to avoid surgery and thus have regular checks with upper endoscopy with biopsies to rule out cancer. Further, these patients may also be at risk of other cancers beyond the already known breast cancer risks, but this is not known. In this study, we show that despite systematic biopsy protocols, many early cancers might be missed on endoscopy. Therefore, patients should not rely on endoscopy to delay surgery. These patients may also be at increased risk of colorectal SRCC, which has very poor survival outcomes. To confirm this, we need a central database that captures outcomes for this patient population.

Abstract

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC) linked to CDH1 (E-cadherin) inactivating germline mutations, and increasingly other gene mutations. Female CDH1 mutation carriers have additional risk of lobular breast cancer. Risk management includes prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG). The utility of endoscopic surveillance is unclear, as early disease lacks macroscopic lesions. The current systematic biopsy protocols have unknown efficacy, and other secondary cancer risks are postulated. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive asymptomatic HDGC patients undergoing PTG, detailing endoscopic, pathologic, and outcome results. A systematic review compared endoscopic biopsy foci detection via random sampling versus Cambridge Protocol against PTG findings. A population-level secondary-cancer-risk postulation among sporadic gastric SRCC patients was completed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Of 97 patients, 67 underwent PTG, with 25% having foci detection on random endoscopic biopsy despite 75% having foci on final pathology. There was no improvement in the endoscopic detection rate by Cambridge Protocol. The postulated hazard ratio among sporadic gastric SRCC patients for a secondary colorectal SRCC was three-fold higher, relative to conventional adenocarcinoma patients. Overall, HDGC patients should not rely on endoscopic surveillance to delay PTG, and may have secondary SRCC risks. A definitive determination of actual risk requires collaborative patient outcome data banking.

Recent advances in the pathology of heritable gastric cancer syndromes

Despite the relative rarity of hereditary gastric cancer syndromes, the prompt recognition of their specific clinical features and histopathological characteristics is pivotal in offering patients the most appropriate treatment. In this article, we address the three major inherited syndromes that primarily affect the stomach: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), caused by germline variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1; gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach, caused by germline mutations in promoter 1B of APC; and familial intestinal gastric cancer, which has a poorly defined genetic cause. The main focus will be on HDGC, in light of the recent publication of updated clinical practice guidelines and emerging concepts regarding HDGC histopathology. In particular, we describe the broad morphological spectrum of HDGC lesions, stressing the importance of recognising indolent and aggressive phenotypes. Moreover, we discuss the increased risk of gastric (pre)malignancies developing in patients with other well-defined hereditary cancer syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Pathways of Gastric Carcinogenesis, Helicobacter pylori Virulence and Interactions with Antioxidant Systems, Vitamin C and Phytochemicals

Helicobacter pylori is a class one carcinogen which causes chronic atrophic gastritis, gastric intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. The mechanisms by which H. pylori interacts with other risk and protective factors, particularly vitamin C in gastric carcinogenesis are complex. Gastric carcinogenesis includes metabolic, environmental, epigenetic, genomic, infective, inflammatory and oncogenic pathways. The molecular classification of gastric cancer subtypes has revolutionized the understanding of gastric carcinogenesis. This includes the tumour microenvironment, germline mutations, and the role of Helicobacter pylori bacteria, Epstein Barr virus and epigenetics in somatic mutations. There is evidence that ascorbic acid, phytochemicals and endogenous antioxidant systems can modify the risk of gastric cancer. Gastric juice ascorbate levels depend on dietary intake of ascorbic acid but can also be decreased by H. pylori infection, H. pylori CagA secretion, tobacco smoking, achlorhydria and chronic atrophic gastritis. Ascorbic acid may be protective against gastric cancer by its antioxidant effect in gastric cytoprotection, regenerating active vitamin E and glutathione, inhibiting endogenous N-nitrosation, reducing toxic effects of ingested nitrosodimethylamines and heterocyclic amines, and preventing H. pylori infection. The effectiveness of such cytoprotection is related to H. pylori strain virulence, particularly CagA expression. The role of vitamin C in epigenetic reprogramming in gastric cancer is still evolving. Other factors in conjunction with vitamin C also play a role in gastric carcinogenesis. Eradication of H. pylori may lead to recovery of vitamin C secretion by gastric epithelium and enable regression of premalignant gastric lesions, thereby interrupting the Correa cascade of gastric carcinogenesis.

Precancerous lesions of the stomach, gastric cancer and hereditary gastric cancer syndromes

Gastric cancer accounts for about 6% of cancers worldwide, being the fifth most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer related death. Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep and multifactorial process and is the result of the complex interplay between genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. The identification of predisposing conditions and of precancerous lesions is the basis for screening programs and early stage treatment. Furthermore, although most gastric cancers are sporadic, familial clustering is observed in up to 10% of patients. Among them, hereditary cases, related to known cancer susceptibility syndromes and/or genetic causes are thought to account for 1-3% of all gastric cancers. The pathology report of gastric resections specimens therefore requires a standardized approach as well as in depth knowledge of prognostic and treatment associated factors.

Overview on new progress of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer with CDH1 variants

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), comprising 1%-3% of gastric malignances, has been associated with CDH1 variants. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated more than 100 germline CDH1 variant types. E-cadherin encoded by the CDH1 gene serves as a tumor suppressor protein. CDH1 promoter hypermethylation and other molecular mechanisms resulting in E-cadherin dysfunction are involved in the tumorigenesis of HDGC. Histopathology exhibits characteristic signet ring cells, and immunohistochemical staining may show negativity for E-cadherin and other signaling proteins. Early HDGC is difficult to detect by endoscopy due to the development of lesions beneath the mucosa. Prophylactic gastrectomy is the most recommended treatment for pathogenic CDH1 variant carriers. Recent studies have promoted the progression of promising molecular-targeted therapies and management strategies. This review summarizes recent advances in CDH1 variant types, tumorigenesis mechanisms, diagnosis, and therapy, as well as clinical implications for future gene therapies.

Hereditary Gastric and Breast Cancer Syndromes Related to CDH1 Germline Mutation: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Review

E-cadherin (CDH1 gene) germline mutations are associated with the development of diffuse gastric cancer in the context of the so-called hereditary diffuse gastric syndrome, and with an inherited predisposition of lobular breast carcinoma. In 2019, the international gastric cancer linkage consortium revised the clinical criteria and established guidelines for the genetic screening of CDH1 germline syndromes. Nevertheless, the introduction of multigene panel testing in clinical practice has led to an increased identification of E-cadherin mutations in individuals without a positive family history of gastric or breast cancers. This observation motivated us to review and present a novel multidisciplinary clinical approach (nutritional, surgical, and image screening) for single subjects who present germline CDH1 mutations but do not fulfil the classic clinical criteria, namely those identified as-(1) incidental finding and (2) individuals with lobular breast cancer without family history of gastric cancer (GC).

Is prophylactic gastrectomy indicated for healthy carriers of CDH1 gene mutations associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer?

INTRODUCTION

hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a recently reported hereditary cancer syndrome. Patients with suspected HDGC must be under surveillance via endoscopy and multiple biopsies. As an alternative, some studies suggest prophylactic gastrectomy (PG) for disease carriers. The goal of this article was to report our experience with a CDH1 mutation positive family who underwent PG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

the index case was a 34-year-old female diagnosed with diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma and massive carcinomatosis. There was a family history of gastric adenocarcinoma in seven family members. A genetic study identified the c.1577G>A mutation, in exon 11 of the CDH1 gene via sequencing analysis.

RESULTS

this mutation was also present in other six family members, who subsequently underwent prophylactic gastrectomy. The pathology study of resected gastric segments revealed multiple microscopic foci of adenocarcinoma in five of these individuals. These foci were not detected in the multiple endoscopies performed before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

we recommend prophylactic gastrectomy for CDH1 mutation carriers even in the absence of lesions during endoscopic screening.

CDH1 Gene and Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Syndrome: Molecular and Histological Alterations and Implications for Diagnosis And Treatment

Gastric cancer, a group of common malignancies, results in the most cancer mortality worldwide after only lung and colorectal cancer. Although familial gastric cancers have long been recognized, it was not until recently that they were discovered to be associated with mutations of specific genes. Mutations of CDH1, the gene encoding E-cadherin, are the most common germline mutations detected in gastric cancer and underlie hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome. All reported HDGCs are the pure diffuse type by Lauren classification and are associated with dismal prognosis once the tumor invades the submucosa. Because CDH1 germline mutations are inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion and have high penetrance, the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC) developed criteria to facilitate the screening of CDH1 mutation carriers; these criteria have been proven to have excellent sensitivity and specificity. Recent histologic studies suggest that HDGC progresses through several stages. Even when the tumor becomes "invasive" in lamina propria, it may stay indolent for a long time. However, the molecular mechanisms that induce the transitions between stages and determine the length of the indolent phase remain to be determined. Although the standard management for CDH1 mutation carriers is prophylactic total gastrectomy, many questions must be answered before the surgery can be done. These include the optimal surveillance strategy, the best strategy to choose surgical candidates, and the ideal time to perform surgery. In addition to increasing the risk of gastric cancer, CDH1 germline mutations also increase the risk of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast, and possibly colorectal adenocarcinoma, and are associated with blepharocheilodontic syndrome (a congenital development disorder). However, the optimal management of these conditions is less established owing to insufficient data regarding the risk of cancer development. This review focuses on molecular and histological findings in HDGC, as opposed to sporadic diffuse gastric cancer, and their implications for the management of CDH1 mutation carriers and the diagnosis and treatment of HDGC. Other conditions associated with CDH1 germline mutations and future research directions are also discussed.

Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Summary of Analogous Contributing Factors for Its Molecular Pathogenicity

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths and ranks as the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Incidence and mortality differ depending on the geographical region and gastric cancer ranks first in East Asian countries. Although genetic factors, gastric environment, and Helicobacter pylori infection have been associated with the pathogenicity and development of intestinal-type gastric cancer that follows the Correa’s cascade, the pathogenicity of diffuse-type gastric cancer remains mostly unknown and undefined. However, genetic abnormalities in the cell adherence factors, such as E-cadherin and cellular activities that cause impaired cell integrity and physiology, have been documented as contributing factors. In recent years, H. pylori infection has been also associated with the development of diffuse-type gastric cancer. Therefore, in this report, we discuss the host factors as well as the bacterial factors that have been reported as associated factors contributing to the development of diffuse-type gastric cancer.