Medulloblastoma with myogenic and/or melanotic differentiation does not align immunohistochemically with the genetically defined molecular subgroups

Embryonal and pineal tumours

Embryonal and pineal tumours represent a diverse group of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. While many of the small round blue cell tumours that make up the embryonal neoplasms share similar histologic qualities, there are several morphologic and cytologic characteristics that are useful in distinguishing different tumour types. Similarly, pineal parenchymal tumours represent clinically diverse tumours, ranging from benign to overtly malignant. The most recent iteration of the World Health Organization Classification of CNS Tumours expanded greatly on the significance of molecular alterations in brain tumour diagnostics. In this article, we summarize the salient cytologic and histologic features of CNS embryonal and pineal tumours, and highlight diagnostically relevant molecular alterations within each tumour type.

Immunohistochemical Surrogates for Molecular Stratification in Medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND

The WHO classification of central nervous system neoplasms (2016) recognized 4 histologic variants and genetically defined molecular subgroups within medulloblastoma (MB). Further, in the 2021 classification, new subtypes have been provisionally added within the existing subgroups reflecting the biological diversity. YAP1, GAB1, and β-catenin were conventionally accepted as surrogate markers to identify these genetic subgroups.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to stratify MB into molecular subgroups using 3 immunohistochemical markers. TP53 mutation was also assessed in Wingless (WNT), and Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) subgroups. Demographic profiles, imaging details, and survival outcomes were compared within these molecular subgroups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our cohort included 164 MB cases diagnosed over the last 10 years. The histologic variants were identified on histology, and tumors were molecularly stratified using YAP1, GAB1, and β-catenin. Further, TP53 mutation was assessed using immunohistochemical in WNT and SHH subgroups. The clinical details and survival outcomes were retrieved from the records, and the mentioned correlates were evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

The age ranged from 1 to 52 years with M:F ratio of 2:1. Group 3/group 4 constituted the majority (48.4%), followed by SHH (45.9%) and WNT subgroups (5.7%). Desmoplastic/nodular and MB with extensive nodularity had the best survival, whereas large cell/anaplastic had the worst. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 129 months. The best outcome was observed for the WNT subgroup, followed by the SHH subgroup; group 3/group 4 had the worst. Among the SHH subgroup, TP53 mutant tumors had a significantly poorer outcome compared with SHH-TP53 wildtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular stratification significantly contributes to prognostication, and a panel of 3 antibodies is helpful in stratifying MB into its subgroups in centers where access to advanced molecular testing is limited. Our study reinforces the efficacy of incorporating this cost-effective, minimal panel into routine practice for stratification. Further, we propose a 3-risk stratification grouping, incorporating morphology and molecular markers.

Pathology, diagnostics, and classification of medulloblastoma

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common CNS embryonal tumor. While the overall cure rate is around 70%, patients with high‐risk disease continue to have poor outcome and experience long‐term morbidity. MB is among the tumors for which diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical management has shown the most rapid advancement. These advances are largely due to technological improvements in diagnosis and risk stratification which now integrate histomorphologic classification and molecular classification. MB stands as a prototype for other solid tumors in how to effectively integrate morphology and genomic data to stratify clinicopathologic risk and aid design of innovative clinical trials for precision medicine. This review explores the current diagnostic and classification of MB in modern neuropathology laboratories.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Reduced Immunohistochemical Panel in Medulloblastoma Molecular Subtyping, Correlated to DNA-methylation Analysis

Medulloblastomas (MBs) are the most frequent childhood malignant brain tumor. Four histopathologic variants and 4 genetic subgroups have been defined in the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 Classification and constitute major risk stratification items directly affecting the patient management. Although MB subgroups have been molecularly defined, immunohistochemical surrogates are needed. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the concordance between immunohistochemistry, using 4 antibodies (YAP1, GAB1, OTX2, and β-catenin), and DNA-methylation profiling in MB subgrouping. From a series of 155 MBs, the κ coefficient of concordance was almost perfect (0.90), with only 8/152 discrepant cases (no DNA-methylation analysis was available in 3 cases). Interestingly, the discrepancies mostly concerned (7/8 cases) MBs with divergent differentiations (myogenic, melanotic, and others) with all of those classified into group 3 (n=6) and group 4 (n=1) by DNA-methylation profiling. Another discrepant case concerned a WNT-activated MB (showing only 1% of immunopositive tumor cell nuclei), highlighting the difficulties of determining an appropriate β-catenin immunostaining cutoff. The high concordance of the routine immunohistochemical panel (YAP1, GAB1, OTX2, and β-catenin) and DNA-methylation profiling confirm its utility as a reliable predictive marker of molecular subtype in MBs. We analyzed the accuracy of 10 different IHC combinations for the determination of MB subtype and found that a combination of 2 antibodies (YAP1 and OTX2) allows for the successful characterization of 144 cases of 152 cases. Finally, our series extends the molecular data of the rare morphologic variant of MBs with melanotic/myogenic differentiations.

Squash cytology of a case of medulloblastoma with myogenic differentiation

Medulloblastoma with myogenic differentiation is not a distinct entity but a pattern of differentiation seen in <1% of medulloblastomas. Although squash cytology of medulloblastoma is well described, there are no reports available describing squash cytomorphology of this unusual variant of medulloblastoma. Intraoperative squash smears on a 2-year-old girl with a midline posterior fossa space occupying lesion revealed features of an embryonal tumor composed of small, round, and blue cells. In addition, it had several large, round, eosinophilic rhabomyoblasts, and a few strap cells scattered among the sea of small blue cells. Subsequent histology showed features of a medulloblastoma, classic type with myogenic differentiation. Molecular subtyping, based on immunohistochemistry alone, was in keeping with a non-Wnt/non-SHH activated type. Here we describe the squash cytomorphological details of a case of medulloblastoma with myogenic differentiation, along with its cytological differentials.