Lymphomas with pseudo-double-hit BCL6-MYC translocations due to t(3;8)(q27;q24) are associated with a germinal center immunophenotype, extranodal involvement, and frequent BCL2 translocations

Localized large B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements as an unexpected finding in an appendectomy specimen

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBLs) comprise a genetically heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas, frequently exhibiting overlapping features with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt's lymphoma. We report a case of a 24-year-old, previously healthy male with a classical clinical presentation of acute appendicitis. The pathologic examination discovered a large B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in the excised appendix. The patient was assigned Stage IEA, IPI = 0 and received chemotherapy. This case depicts a very uncommon occurrence of fully localized LBL in a patient of an unusually young age and clinical presentation for this type of lymphoma.

The high-grade B-cell lymphomas: double hit and more

ABSTRACT

Both the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, 5th Edition and the International Consensus Classification of lymphoma have refined the way we now approach high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements moving the previous generation of classification a step forward. The unifying biology of MYC/BCL2 tumors has become clearer and their inferior prognosis confirmed compared with those with morphologic similar phenotypes but lacking the classifcation defining cytogenetic abnormalities. Fluorescent in situ hybridization testing has now become largely population based, and we have learned much from this. We can readily define molecular categories and apply these widely to clinical practice. Uncertainty has, however, been shed on the place of MYC/BCL6 translocations in defining a common disease group of double hit lymphoma due to biological heterogeneity. We have enhanced our knowledge of outcomes and the role of therapy intensification to overcome chemotherapy resistance in HGBL. For those patients failed by initial induction chemotherapy, immunotherapy approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, are improving outcomes. Novel inhibitors, targeting dysregulated oncogenic proteins, are being explored at pace. The rare, but difficult, diagnostic classification HGBL (not otherwise specified) remains a diagnosis of exclusion with limited data on an optimal clinical approach. The days of talking loosely of double- and triple-hit lymphoma are numbered as biology and outcomes may not be shared. This review synergizes the current data on biology, prognosis, and therapies in HGBL.

How I diagnose high-grade B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), introduced in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) revised fourth edition classification, included cases defined by MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements or by high-grade morphology. Diagnostic criteria and nomenclature for these lymphomas were refined in the 2022 WHO fifth edition (WHO-5) classification and International Consensus Classification (ICC). This review describes our approach to the diagnosis of HGBL.

METHODS

Two cases are presented illustrating how we diagnose HGBL, including 1 case harboring MYC and BCL6 rearrangements and a second showing TdT expression in an HGBL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. The ways in which these cases are distinguished from other lymphomas with high-grade features and the appropriate nomenclature using WHO-5 and ICC classifications are emphasized.

RESULTS

An HGBL diagnosis requires integration of morphology, immunophenotype, and genetics and exclusion of other lymphomas with high-grade morphology, including Burkitt lymphoma, B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-LBL/ALL), and blastoid mantle cell lymphoma. A diagnosis of HGBL/large B-cell lymphoma with 11q aberration should also be considered in certain patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade B-cell lymphomas are subclassified based on morphologic and genetic features. There are differences in the nomenclature and definition of these lymphomas in the WHO-5 and ICC classifications. Distinguishing HGBLs from other mature B-cell lymphomas and B-LBL/ALL is critical so that patients receive appropriate treatment.

A Diagnostic Approach in Large B-Cell Lymphomas According to the Fifth World Health Organization and International Consensus Classifications and a Practical Algorithm in Routine Practice

In this article, we provide a review of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs), comparing the recently published fifth edition of the WHO classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) on hematolymphoid tumors. We focus on updates in the classification of LBCL, an heterogeneous group of malignancies with varying clinical behaviors and different pathological and molecular features, providing a comparison between the two classifications. Besides the well-recognized diagnostic role of clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical data, both classifications recognize the ever-growing impact of molecular data in the diagnostic work-up of some entities. The main aim is to offer a guide for clinicians and pathologists on how the new classifications can be applied to LBCL diagnosis in routine practice. In the first part of the paper, we review the following categories: LBLs transformed from indolent B-cell lymphomas, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), double-hit/triple-hit lymphomas (DH/TH), high-grade large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBCL, NOS), LBCL with IRF4 rearrangement, Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and HGBCL/LBCL with 11q aberration, focusing on the differences between the two classifications. In the second part of the paper, we provide a practical diagnostic algorithm when facing LBCLs in routine daily practice.

Characteristics and Clinical Value of MYC , BCL2, and BCL6 Rearrangement Detected by Next-generation Sequencing in DLBCL

MYC , BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements are clinically important events of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The ability and clinical value of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the detection of these rearrangements in DLBCL have not been fully determined. We performed targeted NGS (481-gene-panel) and break-apart FISH of MYC , BCL2, and BCL6 gene regions in 233 DLBCL cases. We identified 88 rearrangements (16 MYC ; 20 BCL2 ; 52 BCL6 ) using NGS and 96 rearrangements (28 MYC ; 20 BCL2 ; 65 BCL6 ) using FISH. The consistency rates between FISH and targeted NGS for the detection of MYC , BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements were 93%, 97%, and 89%, respectively. FISH-cryptic rearrangements (NGS+/FISH-) were detected in 7 cases (1 MYC ; 3 BCL2 ; 2 BCL6 ; 1 MYC::BCL6 ), mainly caused by small chromosomal insertions and inversions. NGS-/FISH+ were detected in 38 cases (14 MYC ; 4 BCL2 ; 20 BCL6 ).To clarify the cause of the inconsistencies, we selected 17 from the NGS-/FISH+ rearrangements for further whole genome sequencing (WGS), and all 17 rearrangements were detected with break points by WGS. These break points were all located outside the region covered by the probe of targeted NGS, and most (16/17) were located in the intergenic region. These results indicated that targeted NGS is a powerful clinical diagnostics tool for comprehensive MYC , BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangement detection. Compared to FISH, it has advantages in describing the break point distribution, identifying uncharacterized partners, and detecting FISH-cryptic rearrangements. However, the lack of high-sensitivity caused by insufficient probe coverage is the main limitation of the current technology.

Extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting with extensive organ involvement

Extranodal involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is defined as disease outside of the lymph nodes and occurs in up to one-third of patients, though multiorgan extranodal involvement is rare. Here, we describe a case of a patient presenting with widely metastatic lesions, including involvement of the lung, parotid gland, breast, pancreas, femur and multiple soft tissue masses, with initial concern for primary breast malignancy. Breast pathology and imaging were consistent with triple-expressor, double-hit stage IV high-grade B-cell lymphoma with extensive extranodal involvement. Extranodal involvement is a poor prognostic factor associated with high rates of treatment failure, and novel therapies targeting CD19 are currently being studied for relapsed and refractory DLBCL. Extranodal disease is a complex entity that can involve virtually any organ system and should be considered for new presentations of malignancy.

Cytogenetic and pathologic characterization of MYC-rearranged B-cell lymphomas in pediatric and young adult patients

MYC-rearranged B-cell lymphoma (BCL) in the pediatric/young adult (YA) age group differs substantially in disease composition from adult cohorts. However, data regarding the partner genes, concurrent rearrangements, and ultimate diagnoses in these patients is scarce compared to that in adult cohorts. We aimed to characterize the spectrum of MYC-rearranged (MYC-R) mature, aggressive BCL in the pediatric/YA population. A retrospective study of morphologic, immunophenotypic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results of patients age ≤ 30 years with suspected Burkitt lymphoma (BL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and a MYC-R by FISH between 2013-2022 was performed. Two-hundred fifty-eight cases (129 (50%) pediatric (< 18 years) and 129 (50%) YA (18-30 years)) were included. Most MYC-R BCL in pediatric (89%) and YA (66%) cases were BL. While double-hit (DH) cytogenetics (MYC with BCL2 and/or BCL6-R, HGBCL-DH) was rare in the pediatric population (2/129, 2%), HGBCL-DH increased with age and was identified in 17/129 (13%) of YA cases. Most HGBCL-DH had MYC and BCL6-R, while BCL2-R were rare in both groups (3/258, 1%). MYC-R without an IG partner was more common in the YA group (14/116 (12%) vs 2/128 (2%), p = 0.001). The pediatric to YA transition is characterized by decreasing frequency in BL and increasing genetic heterogeneity of MYC-R BCL, with emergence of DH-BCL with MYC and BCL6-R. FISH to evaluate for BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements is likely not warranted in the pediatric population but should continue to be applied in YA BCL.

New Insights into First-Line Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Are We Improving Outcomes?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most prevalent subtype of lymphoma, comprising heterogeneous patient subgroups with distinctive biological and clinical characteristics. The R-CHOP combination (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the standard initial treatment, yielding prolonged remissions in over 60% of patients with advanced-stage disease. Several attempts to enhance the outcomes of this regimen over the last two decades have shown limited success. Various novel therapeutic approaches have recently emerged in lymphoma, demonstrating promising results. These include small molecules, novel monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. This review explores recent advancements in therapeutic strategies for DLBCL and their potential impact on the initial management of DLBCL patients.

The fifth edition of the WHO classification of mature B-cell neoplasms: open questions for research

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5) is the product of an evidence-based evolution of the revised fourth edition with wide multidisciplinary consultation. Nonetheless, while every classification incorporates scientific advances and aims to improve upon the prior version, medical knowledge remains incomplete and individual neoplasms may not be easily subclassified in a given scheme. Thus, optimal classification requires ongoing study, and there are certain aspects of some entities and subtypes that require further refinements. In this review, we highlight a selection of these challenging areas to prompt more research investigations. These include (1) a 'placeholder term' of splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) to accommodate many of the splenic lymphomas previously classified as hairy cell leukaemia variant and B-prolymphocytic leukaemia, a clear new start to define their pathobiology; (2) how best to classify BCL2 rearrangement negative follicular lymphoma including those with BCL6 rearrangement, integrating the emerging new knowledge on various germinal centre B-cell subsets; (3) what is the spectrum of non-IG gene partners of MYC translocation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/high-grade B-cell lymphoma and how they impact MYC expression and clinical outcome; how best to investigate this in a routine clinical setting; and (4) how best to define high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with 11q aberrations to distinguish them from their mimics and characterise their molecular pathogenetic mechanism. Addressing these questions would provide more robust evidence to better define these entities/subtypes, improve their diagnosis and/or prognostic stratification, leading to better patient care. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Non-IG::MYC in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confers variable genomic configurations and MYC transactivation potential

MYC translocation occurs in 8-14% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and may concur with BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocation, known as double-hit (DH) or triple-hit (TH). DLBCL-MYC/BCL2-DH/TH are largely germinal centre B-cell like subtype, but show variable clinical outcome, with IG::MYC fusion significantly associated with inferior survival. While DLBCL-MYC/BCL6-DH are variable in their cell-of-origin subtypes and clinical outcome. Intriguingly, only 40-50% of DLBCL with MYC translocation show high MYC protein expression (>70%). We studied 186 DLBCLs with MYC translocation including 32 MYC/BCL2/BCL6-TH, 75 MYC/BCL2-DH and 26 MYC/BCL6-DH. FISH revealed a MYC/BCL6 fusion in 59% of DLBCL-MYC/BCL2/BCL6-TH and 27% of DLBCL-MYC/BCL6-DH. Targeted NGS showed a similar mutation profile and LymphGen genetic subtype between DLBCL-MYC/BCL2/BCL6-TH and DLBCL-MYC/BCL2-DH, but variable LymphGen subtypes among DLBCL-MYC/BCL6-DH. MYC protein expression is uniformly high in DLBCL with IG::MYC, but variable in those with non-IG::MYC including MYC/BCL6-fusion. Translocation breakpoint analyses of 8 cases by TLC-based NGS showed no obvious genomic configuration that enables MYC transactivation in 3 of the 4 cases with non-IG::MYC, while a typical promoter substitution or IGH super enhancer juxtaposition in the remaining cases. The findings potentially explain variable MYC expression in DLBCL with MYC translocation, and also bear practical implications in its routine assessment.

Alternative genetic alterations of MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 in high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Can we identify different prognostic subgroups?

High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL)/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rearrangements (R) in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 are correlated with poor prognosis. Little is known about the impact of other genetic alterations (gain (G) or amplification (A)) of these genes. The aim of the study was to investigate whether we can identify new prognostic subgroups. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 169 HGBL/DLBCL were retrospectively categorized into: (1) concurrent MYC-R and BCL2-R and/or BCL6-R-samples with MYC-R and BCL2-R (+/- BCL6-R); n = 21, and HGBL/DLBCL with MYC-R and BCL6-R; n = 11; (2) concurrent R and G/A in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 called "alternative HGBL/DLBCL"-samples with (n = 16) or without (n = 6) BCL2 involvement; (3) BCL2 and/or BCL6 alterations without MYC involvement (n = 35); (4) concurrent G/A in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 without R (n = 25); and (5) "No alterations" (n = 55). Patients with HGBL/DLBCL-MYC/BCL2 and "alternative" HGBL/DLBCL (with BCL2 involvement) had significantly worse survival rates compared to the "no alterations" group. G/A of these genes in the absence of rearrangements did not show any prognostic significance. HGBL/DLBCL with MYC-R and BCL6-R without BCL2 involvement showed a better survival rate compared to HGBL/DLBCL-MYC/BCL2. According to immunohistochemistry, "double/triple" expression (DEL/TEL) did not show a significantly worse outcome compared to absent DEL/TEL. This study highlights the continued value of FISH assessment of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in the initial evaluation of HGBL/DLBCL with different survival rates between several genetic subgroups.

Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: a report of the lymphoma workshop of the 20th meeting of the European Association for Haematopathology

Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases and our concepts are evolving as we learn more about their clinical, pathologic, molecular genetic features. Session IV of the 2020 EAHP Workshop covered aggressive, predominantly high-grade B-cell lymphomas, many that were difficult to classify. In this manuscript, we summarize the features of the submitted cases and highlight differential diagnostic difficulties. We specifically review issues related to high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements including TdT expression in these cases, HGBCL, not otherwise specified, large B-cell lymphomas with IRF4 rearrangement, high-grade/large B-cell lymphomas with 11q aberration, Burkitt lymphoma, and pleomorphic mantle cell lymphoma. Since the workshop, the 5th edition of the WHO Classification for Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) 2022 were published. We endeavor to use the updated terminology.

Cytogenomics of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: The "old" meets the "new"

For the routine diagnosis of haematological neoplasms an integrative approach is used considering the morphology, and the immunophenotypic, and molecular features of the tumor sample, along with clinical information. The identification and characterization of recurrent chromosomal aberrations mainly detected by conventional and molecular cytogenetics in the tumor cells has a major impact on the classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Some of the B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas are characterized by particular chromosomal aberrations, highlighting the relevance of conventional and molecular cytogenetic studies in their diagnosis and prognosis. In the current genomics era, next generation sequencing provides relevant information as the mutational profiles of haematological malignancies, improving their classification and also the clinical management of the patients. In addition, other new technologies have emerged recently, such as the optical genome mapping, which can overcome some of the limitations of conventional and molecular cytogenetics and may become more widely used in the cytogenetic laboratories in the upcoming years. Moreover, epigenetic alterations may complement genetic changes for a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis underlying B-cell neoplasms and a more precise risk-based patient stratification. Overall, here we describe the current state of the genomic data integrating chromosomal rearrangements, copy number alterations, and somatic variants, as well as a succinct overview of epigenomic changes, which altogether constitute a comprehensive diagnostic approach in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Cytogenetics in the management of mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Guidelines from the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hematologique (GFCH)

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) consist of a wide range of clinically, phenotypically and genetically distinct neoplasms. The accurate diagnosis of mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma relies on a multidisciplinary approach that integrates morphological, phenotypical and genetic characteristics together with clinical features. Cytogenetic analyses remain an essential part of the diagnostic workup for mature B-cell lymphomas. Karyotyping is particularly useful to identify hallmark translocations, typical cytogenetic signatures as well as complex karyotypes, all bringing valuable diagnostic and/or prognostic information. Besides the well-known recurrent chromosomal abnormalities such as, for example, t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH::BCL2 in follicular lymphoma, recent evidences support a prognostic significance of complex karyotype in mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization is also a key analysis playing a central role in disease identification, especially in genetically-defined entities, but also in predicting transformation risk or prognostication. This can be exemplified by the pivotal role of MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements in the diagnostic of aggressive or large B-cell lymphomas. This work relies on the World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classification of hematolymphoid tumors together with the recent cytogenetic advances. Here, we review the various chromosomal abnormalities that delineate well-established mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma entities as well as newly recognized genetic subtypes and provide cytogenetic guidelines for the diagnostic management of mature B-cell lymphomas.

Progression of follicular lymphoma and related entities: Report from the 2021 SH/EAHP Workshop

OBJECTIVES

The 2021 Society for Hematopathology and European Association for Haematopathology Workshop addressed the molecular and cytogenetic underpinnings of transformation and transdifferentiation in lymphoid neoplasms.

METHODS

Session 4, "Transformations of Follicular Lymphoma," and session 5, "Transformations of Other B-Cell Lymphomas," included 45 cases. Gene alteration analysis and expression profiling were performed on cases with submitted formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue.

RESULTS

The findings from session 4 suggest that "diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2" is a distinct category arising from the constraints of a preexisting BCL2 translocation. TdT expression in aggressive B-cell lymphomas is associated with MYC rearrangements, immunophenotypic immaturity, and a dismal prognosis but must be differentiated from lymphoblastic -lymphoma. Cases in session 5 illustrated unusual morphologic and immunophenotypic patterns of transformation. Additionally, the findings support the role of cytogenetic abnormalities-specifically, MYC and NOTCH1 rearrangements-as well as single gene alterations, including TP53, in transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these unique cases and their accompanying molecular and cytogenetic data suggest potential mechanisms for and unusual patterns of transformation in B-cell lymphomas and indicate numerous opportunities for further study.

[Classification of aggressive B-cell lymphomas : News and open questions]

The 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) show a broad consensus in the categorization of aggressive, large B‑cell lymphomas with expected minor impact only on the daily diagnostic routine. The changes compared to the 2017 revised WHO-HAEM4R are moderate and include updated names of entities, sharpened diagnostic criteria, and upgrades from provisional to definite entities. The definition of the most common aggressive B‑cell lymphoma, diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS), remains unchanged, and both classifications strongly encourage subtyping into germinal center B‑like (GCB) or the activated B‑like (ABC or non-GCB) DLBCL. DLBCL, NOS, should be separated from other large B‑cell lymphomas including large B‑cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement (upgraded to a definite entity in both classifications) and large-cell/high-grade B‑cell lymphomas with 11q aberration. Aggressive B‑cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements form a molecularly distinct group and are listed as definite entities in both classifications. This is in contrast to the more heterogeneous group of aggressive B‑cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements that are recognized as a provisional entity in the ICC, while they fall into the DLBCL, NOS, or the HGBL, NOS, groups in the WHO-HAEM5.

Large B-Cell Lymphomas in the 5th Edition of the WHO-Classification of Haematolymphoid Neoplasms-Updated Classification and New Concepts

The family/class of the large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) features only a few major changes as compared to the 4th edition. In most entities, there are only subtle changes, many of them only representing some minor modifications in diagnostic terms. Major changes have been made in the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL)/high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) associated with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. This category now consists of MYC and BCL2 rearranged cases exclusively, while the MYC/BCL6 double hit lymphomas now constitute genetic subtypes of DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) or of HGBL, NOS. Other major changes are the conceptual merger of lymphomas arising in immune-privileged sites and the description of LBCL arising in the setting of immune dysregulation/deficiency. In addition, novel findings concerning underlying biological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of the different entities are provided.

Diagnostic approaches and future directions in Burkitt lymphoma and high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Since the 2016 WHO update, progress has been made in understanding the biology of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and the concept of high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCL) that allows some degree of refinement. The summary presented here reviews in detail the discussions of the Clinical Advisory Committee and expands upon the newly published 2022 International Consensus Classification for lymphoid malignancies (Campo et al. Blood, 2022). BL remains the prototypic HGBCL and diagnostic criteria are largely unchanged. HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and HGBCL with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements are now separated to reflect biologic and pathologic differences. HGBCL, NOS remains a diagnosis of exclusion that should be used only in rare cases. FISH strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and HGBCL are discussed in detail for these diseases. Advances in integrative analysis of mutations, structural abnormalities, copy number, and gene expression signatures allow a more nuanced view of the heterogeneity of DLBCL, NOS as well as definitions of HGBCL and point to where the future may be headed for classification of these diseases.

Burkitt lymphoma

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive form of B cell lymphoma that can affect children and adults. The study of BL led to the identification of the first recurrent chromosomal aberration in lymphoma, t(8;14)(q24;q32), and subsequent discovery of the central role of MYC and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in tumorigenesis. Most patients with BL are cured with chemotherapy but those with relapsed or refractory disease usually die of lymphoma. Historically, endemic BL, non-endemic sporadic BL and the immunodeficiency-associated BL have been recognized, but differentiation of these epidemiological variants is confounded by the frequency of EBV positivity. Subtyping into EBV⁺ and EBV^- BL might better describe the biological heterogeneity of the disease. Phenotypically resembling germinal centre B cells, all types of BL are characterized by dysregulation of MYC due to enhancer activation via juxtaposition with one of the three immunoglobulin loci. Additional molecular changes commonly affect B cell receptor and sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling, proliferation, survival and SWI-SNF chromatin remodelling. BL is diagnosed on the basis of morphology and high expression of MYC. BL can be effectively treated in children and adolescents with short durations of high dose-intensity multiagent chemotherapy regimens. Adults are more susceptible to toxic effects but are effectively treated with chemotherapy, including modified versions of paediatric regimens. The outcomes in patients with BL are good in high-income countries with low mortality and few late effects, but in low-income and middle-income countries, BL is diagnosed late and is usually treated with less-effective regimens affecting the overall good outcomes in patients with this lymphoma.

Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms

With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee

Since the publication of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms in 1994, subsequent updates of the classification of lymphoid neoplasms have been generated through iterative international efforts to achieve broad consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, molecular scientists, and clinicians. Significant progress has recently been made in the characterization of malignancies of the immune system, with many new insights provided by genomic studies. They have led to this proposal. We have followed the same process that was successfully used for the third and fourth editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms. The definition, recommended studies, and criteria for the diagnosis of many entities have been extensively refined. Some categories considered provisional have now been upgraded to definite entities. Terminology for some diseases has been revised to adapt nomenclature to the current knowledge of their biology, but these modifications have been restricted to well-justified situations. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many disease entities. These changes will have an impact on optimal clinical management. The conclusions of this work are summarized in this report as the proposed International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid, histiocytic, and dendritic cell tumors.

Decreased CD11c-positive dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment predict double-hit/triple-hit genotype and survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is a potentially curable disease. However, it is heterogenous, and the prognosis is poor if the tumor cells harbor fusions involving MYC and BCL2 or MYC and BCL6 (double-hit [DH] lymphoma), or fusions involving all three genes (triple-hit [TH] lymphoma). Fluorescence in situ hybridization is currently the gold standard for confirming the presence of DH/TH genotypes. However, the test is laborious and not readily available in some laboratories. Germinal center B (GCB) signatures and dual expression of MYC and BCL2 are commonly used as initial screening markers (traditional model) in clinical practice. Our study proposes immunohistochemical markers for more conveniently and accessibly screening DH/TH genotypes in DLBCL. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological parameters of patients with DLBCL. We assessed the proliferative index, apoptotic index, and tumor microenvironment (TME), with regard to T cells and CD11c(+) dendritic cells, in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We then generated a decision tree as a screening algorithm to predict DH/TH genotypes and employed decision curve analysis to demonstrate the superiority of this new model in prediction. We also assessed the prognostic significance of related parameters. Our study revealed that GCB subtypes, a Ki67 proliferative index higher than 70%, and BCL2 expression were significantly associated with DH/TH genotypes. Decreased CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the TME indicated additional risk. Our proposed screening algorithm outperformed a traditional model in screening for the DH/TH genotypes. In addition, decreased CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the DLBCL TME were an independent unfavorable prognosticator. In conclusion, we provide a convenient, well-performing model that predicts DH/TH genotypes in DLBCL. The prognostic significance of CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the TME might influence the classification and development of immunotherapy for DLBCL in the future.

EBV-positive high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements: a multi-institutional study

AIMS

It is unknown whether Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection can occur in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, also known as double-hit or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we report 16 cases of EBV+ DHL/THL from screening 846 cases of DHL/THL and obtaining additional EBV+ cases through multi-institutional collaboration: 8 MYC/BCL2 DHL, 6 MYC/BCL6 DHL, and 2 THL. There were 8 men and 8 women with a median age of 65 years (range, 32-86). Two patients had a history of follicular lymphoma and one had AIDS. Nine of 14 patients had an International Prognostic Index of ≥3. Half of the cases showed high-grade/Burkitt-like morphology and the other half diffuse large B-cell lymphoma morphology. By immunohistochemistry, the lymphoma cells were positive for MYC (n=14/16), BCL2 (n=12/16), BCL6 (n=14/16), CD10 (n=13/16), and MUM1 (n=6/14). By Hans algorithm, 13 cases were classified as GCB and 3 as non-GCB. The lymphomas frequently showed an EBV latency type I with a median EBV-encoded small RNAs of 80% positive cells (range, 20-100%). After a median follow-up of 36.3 months (range, 2.0-41.6), 7 patients died with a median survival of 15.4 months (range, 3.4-47.3) after diagnosis of EBV+ DHL/THL. Five of 6 patients with MYC/BCL6 DHL were alive including 4 in complete remission. In contrast, only 4/10 patients with MYC/BCL2 DHL or THL were alive including 2 in complete remission. The median survival in patients with MYC/BCL6 DHL was unreached and was 21.6 months in patients with MYC/BCL2 DHL or THL.

CONCLUSIONS

EBV infection in DHL/THL is rare (~1.5%). Cases of EBV+ DHL/THL are largely similar to their EBV-negative counterparts clinicopathologically. Our findings expand the spectrum of EBV+ B-cell lymphomas currently recognized in the WHO classification and suggest differences between EBV+ MYC/BCL2 and MYC/BCL6 DHL that may have therapeutic implications.

Molecular profiling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: why so many types of subtypes?

The term diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes a heterogeneous collection of biologically distinct tumours. This heterogeneity currently presents a barrier to the successful deployment of novel, biologically targeted therapies. Molecular profiling studies have recently proposed new molecular classification systems. These have the potential to resolve the biological heterogeneity of DLBCL into manageable subgroups of tumours that rely on shared oncogenic programmes. In many cases these biological programmes straddle the boundaries of our existing systems for classifying B-cell lymphomas. Here we review the findings from these major molecular profiling studies with a specific focus on those that propose new genetic subgroups of DLBCL. We highlight the areas of consensus and discordance between these studies and discuss the implications for current clinical practice and for clinical trials. Finally, we address the outstanding challenges and solutions to the introduction of genomic subtyping and precision medicine in DLBCL.

Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnostic workup of small lymph node biopsies

All pathology subspecialties are more frequently receiving small needle core biopsies for the diagnosis of new lesions. While this results in potential diagnostic pitfalls, the tools available for hematopathology, including extensive panels of immunostains, PRC-based clonality assessment, and flow cytometry often allow accurate diagnoses even with very small specimens. This review presents a brief approach to such biopsies, using morphologic cues as well as ancillary studies, which provides an experience-based framework for approaching these cases and coming to a clear diagnosis while avoiding diagnostic errors. The approach is divided into three parts based on H & E cell morphology.