Triple marker composed of p16, CD56, and TTF1 shows higher sensitivity than INSM1 for diagnosis of pulmonary small cell carcinoma: proposal for a rational immunohistochemical algorithm for diagnosis of small cell carcinoma in small biopsy and cytology specimens

Gastric metastasis of small cell lung carcinoma: Three case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is highly susceptible to metastasis in the early stages of the disease. However, the stomach is an uncommon site of metastasis in SCLC, and only a few cases of this type of metastasis have been reported. Therefore, SCLC gastric metastases have not been systematically characterized and are easily missed and misdiagnosed.

CASE SUMMARY

We report three cases of gastric metastasis from SCLC in this article. The first patient presented primarily with cough, hemoptysis, and epigastric fullness. The other two patients presented primarily with abdominal discomfort, epigastric distension, and pain. All patients underwent gastroscopy and imaging examinations. Meanwhile, the immunohistochemical results of the lesions in three patients were suggestive of small cell carcinoma. Finally, the three patients were diagnosed with gastric metastasis of SCLC through a comprehensive analysis. The three patients did not receive appropriate treatment and died within a short time.

CONCLUSION

Here, we focused on summarizing the characteristics of gastric metastasis of SCLC to enhance clinicians' understanding of this disease.

Comparison of INSM1 immunostaining with established neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A in over 14,000 neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors

INSM1 is a transcription factor protein which is increasingly used as an immunohistochemical marker for neuroendocrine differentiation. To determine the prevalence of INSM1 expression in tumors and its expression pattern in normal tissues, tissue microarrays containing 14,908 samples from 117 different tumor types/subtypes as well as 76 different normal tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. INSM1 was positive in 89.2% of 471 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and in 3.5% of 11,815 non-neuroendocrine neoplasms that were successfully analyzed. At least an occasional weak INSM1 positivity was observed in 59 different non-neuroendocrine tumor entities, of which 15 entities contained at least one case with strong INSM1 staining. A comparison with synaptophysin and chromogranin A staining revealed that in NEN, synaptophysin showed the highest sensitivity (93.3%), followed by INSM1 (89.2%) and chromogranin A (87.5%). In neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), sensitivity was highest for INSM1 (88.0%), followed by synaptophysin (86.5%) and chromogranin A (66.4%). If INSM1 was used as an additional marker, the sensitivity for detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in NEN increased from 96.6% (synaptophysin and chromogranin A) to 97.2% (synaptophysin, chromogranin A and INSM1). Our study shows that INSM1 is a useful additional marker for neuroendocrine differentiation with high sensitivity, particularly in NEC.

Role of cytoblock on pleural effusion for diagnosis of malignant disease

BACKGROUND

Thoracocentesis of pleural effusion is a simple technique for pleural fluid examination through cytology. In addition to cytological examination to assess the nature of pleural fluid content, we can also perform more detailed examinations through cytoblocks of residual fluid. These paraffin-embedded cytoblock samples are important because we can perform examinations as in other bioptic samples. In these samples, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses can be performed.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-five cytological samples from patients with pleural effusion were examined. In cases in which the presence of malignant cells was identified in the cytological examination, as well as cases that were suspicious but not definitive for the presence of a malignant effusion, a cytoblock was prepared. Histological examination and immunohistochemical analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Among 255 cases with pleural effusion, 152 had the presence of malignant cells and 6 cases were suspicious, but uncertain for the presence of malignant cells, while 86 cases had inflammatory pleural effusion or other pathologies but were not malignant. After histological analysis of the cytoblock and immunohistochemical analysis, we identified 82 malignant tumors of the lung, 8 malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, 15 malignant tumors of the breast, and 6 malignant tumors of the female genital tract, as well as 24 tumors of undetermined origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoblocks are important for the diagnosis of the primary nature of malignant pleural effusions. The highest importance is primary lung tumors, as well as those tumors in which the primary site of the tumor cannot be determined clinically.

Optimal Combination of Neuroendocrine Markers for the Detection of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Sinonasal Tract and Lung

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Identification of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation is critical to the classification of head and neck (HN) and lung tumors. In combination with tumor morphology, immunohistochemical (IHC) documentation of NE differentiation is necessary for the diagnosis of NE tumors. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity and concordance of two novel NE markers (mASH1, INSM1) across a group of high-grade NE tumors of the sinonasal tract and lung, and to compare their expression with the current widespread use of conventional NE markers, synaptophysin (SYN) and chromogranin A (CGA). In addition, expression of PARP1 is examined as a potential novel therapeutic target.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-nine high-grade NE tumors, 23 of the HN and 16 of the lung, were reevaluated by two subspecialized HN and thoracic pathologists, and subsequently stained with mASH1, INSM1, and PARP1. Sensitivity and degree of concordance of all possible combinations of markers were assessed. Sensitivities (standard error) were as follows: mASH1 41% (0.08), INSM1 44% (0.08), SYN 56% (0.08), and CGA 42% (0.09); combination of all four NE markers: 73% (0.08). Sensitivity and standard error for PARP1 was 90% and 0.05, respectively. Highest sensitivity to detect NE differentiation in high-grade NE tumors of the HN and thoracic region was achieved with a combination of four NE markers. Moderate concordance was found with combinations of mASH1 and INSM1 and traditional NE markers, respectively. Consistent overexpression of PARP1 in high-grade tumors with NE differentiation in the HN and lung opens eligibility for PARP1 inhibitor trials.

Miniaturized microfluidic-based nucleic acid analyzer to identify new biomarkers of biopsy lung cancer samples for subtyping

Identifying new biomarkers is necessary and important to diagnose and treat malignant lung cancer. However, existing protein marker detection methods usually require complex operation steps, leading to a lag time for diagnosis. Herein, we developed a rapid, minimally invasive, and convenient nucleic acid biomarker recognition method, which enabled the combined specific detection of 11 lung cancer typing markers in a microliter reaction system after only one sampling. The primers for the combined specific detection of 11 lung cancer typing markers were designed and screened, and the microfluidic chip for parallel detection of the multiple markers was designed and developed. Furthermore, a miniaturized microfluidic-based analyzer was also constructed. By developing a microfluidic chip and a miniaturized nucleic acid analyzer, we enabled the detection of the mRNA expression levels of multiple biomarkers in rice-sized tissue samples. The miniaturized nucleic acid analyzer could detect ≥10 copies of nucleic acids. The cell volume of the typing reaction on the microfluidic chip was only 0.94 μL, less than 1/25 of that of the conventional 25-μL Eppendorf tube PCR method, which significantly reduced the testing cost and significantly simplified the analysis of multiple biomarkers in parallel. With a simple injection operation and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), real-time detection of 11 lung cancer nucleic acid biomarkers was performed within 45 min. Given these compelling features, 86 clinical samples were tested using the miniaturized nucleic acid analyzer and classified according to the cutoff values of the 11 biomarkers. Furthermore, multi-biomarker analysis was conducted by a machine learning model to classify different subtypes of lung cancer, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.934. This method shows great potential for the identification of new nucleic acid biomarkers and the accurate diagnosis of lung cancer.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Use in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is an aggressive and difficult to treat cancer. Although immunohistochemistry is not mandatory for a SCLC diagnosis, it might be required, especially in small samples. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is expressed in endocrine and nervous tissues during embryogenesis, generally absent in adults and re-expressed in SCLC and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Its high specificity propelled its use as diagnostic biomarker and an attractive therapeutic target. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic and critical review on the use of INSM1 for diagnosis, prognostication and the treatment of SCLC. An extensive bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed® focusing on articles published since 2015. According to the literature, INSM1 is a highly sensitive (75–100%) and specific (82–100%) neuroendocrine immunohistochemical marker for SCLC diagnosis. It can be used in histological and cytological samples. Although advantageous, its standalone use is currently not recommended. Studies correlating INSM1 expression and prognosis have disclosed contrasting results, although the expression seemed to entail a worse survival. Targeting INSM1 effectively suppressed SCLC growth either as a suicide gene therapy regulator or as an indirect target of molecular-targeted therapy. INSM1 represents a valuable biomarker for a SCLC diagnosis that additionally offers vast opportunities for the development of new prognostic and therapeutic strategies.

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a novel immunohistochemical marker of neuroendocrine differentiation

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is originally described as an epididymis specific protein and now clinically used as a serum marker for ovarian carcinoma. However, the expression of HE4 in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has not been studied. By immunohistochemistry, the expressions of HE4 in 94 normal tissues and 484 NENs which included 242 well-differentiated NENs and 242 poorly differentiated NENs were studied. HE4 was positive in 90/94 (95.7%) of the neuroendocrine cells in normal tissues, 228/242 (94.2%) of well-differentiated NENs, and 206/242 (85.1%) of poorly differentiated NENs, and the expression of HE4 decreased progressively with loss of histological differentiation, with the positive rate of 96.2%, 92.7%, 92.3%, 85.4%, and 84.4% in NET-G1/carcinoid, NET-G2/atypical carcinoid, NET-G3, NEC-LC, and NEC-SC respectively. In NET-G1 and NET-G2, HE4 staining showed a peculiar polarized distribution, with an extraordinarily strong granular staining in subnuclear cytoplasm. A diffuse and uniform cytoplastic HE4 staining was observed in NET-G3 and poorly differentiated NENs. The positive rate of HE4 in primary tumors (91.1%, 387/425) was significantly higher than that of metastases (79.7%, 47/59) (p < 0.05). In a series of 70 pure non-NENs poorly differentiated carcinomas, the specificity rate of HE4 was 92.9% (65/70), which was in line with that of Syn. The negative rate of HE4 was 87.0% (40/46) in the non-neuroendocrine components of the MiNEN cases, which was lower than that of the pure non-neuroendocrine carcinomas (92.9%, 65/70) but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). HE4 may prove to be a useful immunohistochemical marker of neuroendocrine differentiation, although comparative studies and a more extensive analysis of other tissue types are necessary.

INSM1, a Novel Biomarker for Detection of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Cytopathologists’ View

Background: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been considered as a novel immunostain for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and is hypothesized to be more reliable than first-generation NET biomarkers, such as CGA (chromogranin A), SYP (synaptophysin) and CD56 (neural cell adhesion molecule). In this review, we summarize existing literature on INSM1′s reliability as an immunostain for detection of various NETs, its results in comparison to first-generation NET biomarkers, and its expression in both non-NETs and benign tissues/cells on cytology specimens (cell blocks/smears).

Insulinoma-associated Protein 1 Expression and Its Diagnostic Significance in Female Genital Tract Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare, but aggressive malignant tumors of the female genital tract, especially in the uterine the cervix. Beside histologic morphology, positivity of neuroendocrine markers with immunohistochemistry plays an important role in diagnosis of NECs. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a novel marker reported to be widely expressed in a variety of neuroendocrine tumors. A previous study also suggested INSM1 has superior performance to conventional neuroendocrine markers in cervical NECs. In our present study, comparison between immunomarkers was performed in female genital tract NECs. Forty-nine patients with gynecologic NECs (4 vagina, 39 cervix, 5 endometrium, 1 ovary) were included from 1993 to 2019 at our center. Immunohistochemistry was performed with INSM1, CD56, synaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin-A (CgA), and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1). The results show INSM1 has superior sensitivity and intensity compared with CD56, SYN, CgA, and TTF1 in cervical small cell NECs, but not in large cell NECs. In contrast to cervical NECs, INSM1 immunohistochemistry shows only focal and weak staining in endometrial NECs. Our result suggested INSM1 is a sensitive marker which can be used as first-line test in histologic suspicious cervical cases, especially small cell NECs. However, negative INSM1 stain does not exclude the possibility of NECs. In endometrial NECs, conventional panel with CD56, SYN, CgA has better diagnostic performance than INSM1 alone.

Expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 in non-small cell lung cancers: a diagnostic pitfall for neuroendocrine tumors

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported as a highly sensitive and specific marker of neuroendocrine tumors. INSM1 expression has also been reported, although uncommonly, in non-neuroendocrine tumors. This study aimed to elucidate potential nonspecific INSM1 expression in non-small cell non-neuroendocrine lung cancers (NSCNELCs), especially in squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs) with basaloid features to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed for 324 NSCNELCs, including 196 adenocarcinomas (AdCs), 86 SqCCs, and 42 other NSCNELCs. In addition, 38 whole-tissue sections of SqCCs with basaloid features were examined. INSM1 immunostain was semiquantitively evaluated based on the percentage of nuclear staining in tumor cells, categorized as negative, focal (<10% tumor cells), and positive (>10% tumor cells). Among 324 TMAs, 6.2% (20/324) were positive for INSM1, 4.9% (16/324) were focal, and 88.9% (289/34) were negative. Of 196 AdCs, 5.1% (10/196) were positive for INSM1, 4.7% (9/196) were focal, and 90.3% (177/196) were negative. Of 86 SqCCs, 9.3% (8/86) were positive for INSM1, 5.8% (5/86) were focal, and 84.9% (73/86) were negative. Of the remaining 42 NSCNELCs, 4.8% (2/42) were positive for INSM1, 4.8% (2/42) were focal, and 90.4% (38/44) were negative. Among 38 cases of whole-tissue sections of SqCCs with basaloid features, 15.8% (6/38) were positive for INSM1, 18.4% (7/38) were focal, and 65.8% (25/38) were negative. Our study demonstrates that INSM1 is expressed in a significant subset of NSCNELCs, suggesting caution in interpreting INSM1 staining, especially with limited samples. INSM1 should not be used as a stand-alone neuroendocrine marker in differentiating primary lung tumors.

A limited panel of INSM1 and LEF1 immunostains accurately distinguishes between pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) can show significant cytomorphological overlap. In this study, we evaluated the role of INSM1 and LEF1 immunohistochemical stains in distinguishing between these two tumors. 22 SPN and 25 PNET surgically resected cases were stained for both INSM1 and LEF1. All the 22 cases of SPN showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining for LEF1 (in >95 % of tumor cells), while all 25 PNET were negative for LEF1. All 25 PNET cases were positive for INSM1 (moderate to strong intensity nuclear staining in >50 % of the tumor cells), while all 22 cases of SPN were negative for INSM1. The results of our study show that a limited panel comprising of INSM1 and LEF1 immunostains accurately distinguishes between SPN and PNET.

INSM1 Is Less Sensitive But More Specific Than Synaptophysin in Gynecologic High-grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: An Immunohistochemical Study of 75 Cases With Specificity Test and Literature Review

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a promising diagnostic marker for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs); however, it is controversial whether INSM1 is more sensitive than conventional markers chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Here, we investigated immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 75 gynecologic HGNECs using full tissue sections (30 small-cell carcinomas [SmCCs], 34 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas [LCNECs], and 11 mixed SmCC and LCNEC), with specificity analysis in 422 gynecologic non-neuroendocrine tumors (410 in tissue microarrays and 12 full sections) and comparison with conventional neuroendocrine markers for their sensitivity and specificity. Positive INSM1 staining was seen in 69 (92%) HGNECs, whereas chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 staining was seen in 61 (81%), 72 (96%), and 44 (69%) tumors, respectively (INSM1 vs. chromogranin, P=0.09; INSM1 vs. synaptophysin, P=0.4942; and INSM1 vs. CD56, P<0.001). The mean percentage of INSM1-positive tumor cells was 54% (median: 60%, range: 0% to 100%), similar to chromogranin (58%, P=0.2903) and higher than CD56 (30%, P=0.00001) but significantly lower than synaptophysin (89%, P<0.00001). INSM1 showed no staining difference among SmCCs, LCNECs, and mixed SmCC-LCNECs. Among the 422 non-neuroendocrine tumors, positive staining was seen in 5% tumors for INSM1, 18% for chromogranin, 19% for synaptophysin, and 25% for CD56. Our study indicates that INSM1 is a highly specific marker (95% specificity) for gynecologic HGNECs with high sensitivity (92%), but it is less sensitive than synaptophysin (96% sensitivity). INSM1 is more specific than chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 for gynecologic HGNECs. Our literature review reveals that INSM1 has consistently (the same antibody clone A8 used for all reported studies) shown higher or similar sensitivity to chromogranin (for all 3 chromogranin antibody clones LK2H10, DAK-A3, DAKO polyclonal); however, whether INSM1 is more or less sensitive than synaptophysin or CD56 for HGNECs is highly dependent on the antibody clones used for synaptophysin (clones MRQ-40 and SNP88 showing higher sensitivity than clones 27G12 and DAK-SYNAP) or CD56 (clones CD564, MRQ-42, and MRQ-54 showing higher sensitivity than clones 123C3D5, 1B6, and Leu243).

Diagnostic Value of Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1) and Comparison With Established Neuroendocrine Markers in Pulmonary Cancers

CONTEXT.—

The diagnostic distinction of pulmonary neuroendocrine (NE) tumors from non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) is clinically relevant for prognostication and treatment. Diagnosis is based on morphology and immunohistochemical staining.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine the diagnostic value of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), in comparison with established NE markers, in pulmonary tumors.

DESIGN.—

Fifty-four pulmonary NE tumors and 632 NSCLCs were stained for INSM1, CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. In a subset, gene expression data were available for analysis. Also, 419 metastases to the lungs were stained for INSM1. A literature search identified 39 additional studies with data on NE markers in lung cancers from the last 15 years. Seven of these included data on INSM1.

RESULTS.—

A positive INSM1 staining was seen in 39 of 54 NE tumors (72%) and 6 of 623 NSCLCs (1%). The corresponding numbers were 47 of 54 (87%) and 14 of 626 (2%) for CD56, 30 of 54 (56%) and 6 of 629 (1%) for chromogranin A, and 46 of 54 (85%) and 49 of 630 (8%) for synaptophysin, respectively. Analysis of literature data revealed that CD56 and INSM1 were the best markers for identification of high-grade NE pulmonary tumors when considering both sensitivity and specificity, while synaptophysin also showed good sensitivity. INSM1 gene expression was clearly associated with NE histology.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The solid data of both our and previous studies confirm the diagnostic value of INSM1 as a NE marker in pulmonary pathology. The combination of CD56 with INSM1 and/or synaptophysin should be the first-hand choice to confirm pulmonary high-grade NE tumors. INSM1 gene expression could be used to predict NE tumor histology.

INSM1 Is a Highly Specific Marker of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Primary Neoplasms of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Appendix, and Pancreas

OBJECTIVES

INSM1 has been described as a sensitive and specific neuroendocrine marker. This study aims to compare INSM1 with traditional neuroendocrine markers in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

Retrospective review (2008-2018) was used to retrieve paraffin-embedded tissue from 110 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms and controls that was subsequently stained with INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, and Ki-67.

RESULTS

INSM1 was positive in 16 of 17 (94.1%) gastric, 17 of 18 (94.4%) pancreatic, 13 of 18 (72.2%) small bowel, 17 of 21 (81.0%) colonic, and 26 of 36 (72.2%) appendiceal tumors. INSM1 was positive in 58 of 70 (82.9%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 17 of 20 (85.0%) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, 8 of 11 (72.7%) low-grade goblet cell adenocarcinomas (grade 1), and 6 of 9 (66.7%) high-grade goblet cell adenocarcinomas (grade 2/3). INSM1 sensitivity for neuroendocrine neoplasms (80.9%) was less than that of synaptophysin (99.1%), chromogranin (88%), and CD56 (95.3%); specificity was higher (95.7% vs 86.0%, 87.3%, and 86.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 is a useful marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine and mixed neuroendocrine neoplasms. Compared with traditional neuroendocrine markers, INSM1 is less sensitive but more specific.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

Expression of novel neuroendocrine marker insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) in genitourinary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas: An immunohistochemical study with specificity analysis and comparison to chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56

Confirmation of genitourinary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (GU-HGNECs) often requires immunohistochemical staining. Here we evaluated a novel neuroendocrine marker, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), in GU-HGNECs with comparison to chromogranin, synaptophysin and CD56. Immunohistochemical expression of INSM1, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 was evaluated in 39 GU-HGNECs using full tissue sections [4 in kidney, 28 in urinary bladder, and 7 in prostate; 31 small cell carcinomas (SmCCs), 6 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs), 2 mixed SmCC-LCNECs]. In 33 SmCCs/components, INSM1 showed similar sensitivity (93.9 %) to chromogranin (87.8 %), synaptophysin (93.9 %) and CD56 (87.8 %), and stained a similar percentage of tumor cells (52 %) to chromogranin (49 %) and CD56 (52 %), but lower than synaptophysin (87 %) (p < 0.0001). In 8 LCNECs/components, INSM1 is similar to chromogranin, synaptophysin or CD56 in sensitivity (62.5 %, 62.5 %, 75 %, 62.5 %, respectively) and the mean percentage of positively stained tumor cells (21 %, 44 %, 48 %, 37 %, respectively). INSM1 is more sensitive for SmCCs than LCNECs (93.9 % vs. 62.5 %, p = 0.015). INSM1 showed 97.4 % specificity upon analyzing 273 genitourinary non-neuroendocrine tumors on tissue microarrays. Our study indicates that INSM1 is a sensitive marker for genitourinary HGNECs with high specificity. For genitourinary SmCCs, INSM1 shows similar sensitivity to chromogranin, synaptophysin and CD56 but stains a lower percentage of tumor cells than synaptophysin. For genitourinary LCNECs, INSM1 showed similar sensitivity to chromogranin, synaptophysin and CD56. INSM1 is more sensitive for genitourinary SmCCs than LCNECs. Our result and literature review indicate that whether INSM1 is more sensitive than conventional neuroendocrine markers for HGNECs depends on the tumor primary sites.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1): a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), a transcriptional regulator with a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain, has been validated as a cytoplasmic marker for neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor cells. Next to its abundant expression in the fetal pancreas, it is expressed in brain tumors, pheochromocytomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas, insulinomas and pituitary and small-cell lung carcinomas. INSM1 is not expressed in normal adult tissues and/or most non-neuroendocrine tumors. It regulates various downstream signaling pathways, including the Sonic Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT, MEK/ERK1/2, ADK, p53, Wnt, histone acetylation, LSD1, cyclin D1, Ascl1 and N-Myc pathways. Although INSM1 appears to be a subtle and specific biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors, its role in tumor development has remained unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we highlight INSMI expression, as well as its diagnostic significance and use as a therapeutic target in various neuroendocrine tumors. Targeting signaling pathways or gene expression alterations associated with INSM1 expression may be instrumental for the design of novel therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine tumors.

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the head and neck: human papillomavirus tumour status/p16 status and impact on overall survival

AIMS

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) of the head and neck is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status and p16 status are as yet unclear among PDNECs, owing to a lack of statistical analysis. The objective of the present study was therefore to evaluate their potential clinicopathological associations, and their prognostic impact on overall survival in PDNECs of the head and neck, regardless to HPV genotype.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All cases of PDNEC of the head and neck between 1998 and 2019 were identified from the database of the Lyon university hospital pathology department (n = 21); for these cases, p16 immunohistochemistry and HPV in-situ hybridisation were performed. Published cases of PDNEC of the head and neck with assessment of HPV status and p16 status were identified in PubMed (n = 57). Local and published cases were pooled for analysis. HPV positive (HPV+) tumour status was found to be significantly associated with oropharyngeal localisation (P < 0.001) and overexpression of p16 (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis, adjusted on tumour site, histological subtype, p16 status, HPV status, and source of the case, showed that oropharyngeal localisation [hazard ratio (HR) 3.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.257-7.310] and being a small-cell variant (HR 2.859, 95% CI 1.150-7.109) were significant predictors of worse overall survival; HPV+ tumour status was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.388, 95% CI 0.146-0.995).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV+ tumour status was associated with oropharyngeal PDNECs and with a better prognosis.