Morphological, immunohistochemical, and genomic analyses of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

CT imaging analysis differentiating papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity from papillary renal cell carcinoma: combined with a radiomics model

PURPOSE

To assess the computed tomography (CT) findings of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) and develop a radiomics-based model to distinguish PRNRPs from papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 31 PRNRPs and 68 PRCCs using preoperative kidney CT. We evaluated CT features that could discriminate PRNRPs from PRCCs. A radiomics signature was constructed using features selected through a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. A radiomics-based model incorporating a radiomics signature and subjective CT parameters using multivariate logistic regression was developed. The diagnostic performance of the CT parameters, radiomics model, and their combination was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Most of PRNRPs had a round shape (93.5%), well-defined margin (100%), and persistent enhancement (77.4%). Compared with PRCC, PRNRPs exhibited distinct CT features including small size (16.7 vs. 37.7 mm, P < 0.001), heterogeneity (64.5 vs. 32.4%, P = 0.004), enhancing dot sign (16.1 vs. 1.5%, P = 0.001), and high attenuation in pre-contrast CT (44.2 vs. 35.5 HU, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed smaller mass size (odds ratio [OR]: 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.0, P = 0.013), heterogeneity (OR: 8.8; 95% CI 1.9-41.4, P = 0.006), and higher attenuation in pre-contrast CT (OR: 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, P = 0.011) as significant independent factors for identifying PRNRPs. The diagnostic performance of the combination model was excellent (AUC: 0.923).

CONCLUSION

Smaller tumor size, heterogeneity, and higher attenuation in pre-contrast CT were more closely associated with PRNRPs than with PRCCs. Though the retrospective design, small sample size, and single-center data of this study may affect the generalizability of the findings, combining subjective CT features with a radiomics model is beneficial for distinguishing PRNRPs from PRCCs.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity has low frequency of alterations in chromosomes 7, 17, and Y

In papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP), the status of chromosomal copy number alterations, especially chromosomes 7/17 gain and chromosome Y loss, has remained controversial. In the literatures, there is a discrepancy among the results of chromosomal alteration in PRNRP depending on the analytical methods. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the status of chromosomal abnormalities in PRNRP. Nineteen PRNRP cases were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), five of which were additionally subjected to array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis. Fifteen cases of PRCC were used as controls. From the aCGH results, no genome copy number abnormalities were found in the five PRNRP cases. By FISH, numbers of nuclei with abnormal chromosomal signals in PRNRP (centromere 7 gain: 11-21% of nuclei, centromere 17 gain: 11% of nuclei, centromere Y loss: 14-31% of nuclei) were similar to those in non-neoplastic tubular cells (centromere 7 gain: 11-15% of nuclei, centromere 17 gain: 12-15% of nuclei, centromere Y loss: 13-45% of nuclei). c-MET immunohistochemical overexpression, a substitute marker for chromosome 7 trisomy, was observed in 0 of 19 PRNRP cases, consistent with the analyses by aCGH and NGS regarding chromosome 7 gain. Taken together, the frequency of chromosomal alterations in PRNRP is similar to that in non-neoplastic tubular cells, and lower than that in PRCC. Our data suggest that PRNRP has a different tumorigenesis and is a distinct entity from PRCC.

Non-coding RNA and gene expression analyses of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) reveal distinct pathological mechanisms from other renal neoplasms

Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (PRNRP) is a recently described rare renal neoplasm. Traditionally, it was considered a variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). However, several studies reported significant differences between PRNRP and PRCC in terms of clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features. Nonetheless, PRNRP remains a poorly understood entity. We used microarray analysis to elucidate the non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and gene expression profiles of 10 PRNRP cases and compared them with other renal neoplasms. Unsupervised cluster analysis showed that PRNRP had distinct expression profiles from either clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) or PRCC cases at the level of ncRNA but were less distinct at the level of gene expression. An integrated omic approach determined miRNA:gene interactions that distinguished PRNRP from PRCC and we validated 10 differentially expressed miRNAs and six genes by quantitative RT-PCR. We found that levels of the miRNAs, miR-148a, miR-375 and miR-429, were up-regulated in PRNRP cases compared to ccRCC and PRCC. miRNA target genes, including KRAS and VEGFA oncogenes, and CXCL8, which regulates VEGFA, were also differentially expressed between renal neoplasms. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) determined different activation of metabolic pathways between PRNRP and PRCC cases. Overall, this study is by far the largest molecular study of PRNRP cases and the first to investigate either ncRNA expression or their gene expression by microarray assays.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evolving Classification by Combined Morphologic and Molecular Means

Papillary renal cell carcinoma classification has evolved as a result of attentive morphologic observations by pathologists coupled with specific immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical data. Refinement of this relatively common diagnostic category of renal neoplasia has resulted in the parsing out of specific renal cell carcinoma subtypes that no longer belong in the papillary renal cell carcinoma category and can have distinct familial and prognostic implications (eg, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas). In addition, evolving classification has enabled more accurate diagnosis by surgical pathologists (through the description of recognizable morphologic variants). In many cases, molecular findings have aided and confirmed morphologic categorization. The combination of morphologic and molecular findings continues to provide important prognostic information for patients and their clinicians.

L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule (L1CAM) Expression and Molecular Alterations Distinguish Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor From Eosinophilic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) is a recently recognized renal cell neoplasm designated within the "other oncocytic tumors" category in the 2022 World Health Organization classification system. Although the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features reported for LOT have been largely consistent, the data are relatively limited. The morphologic overlap between LOT and other low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, particularly eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (E-chRCC), remains a controversial area in renal tumor classification. To address this uncertainty, we characterized and compared large cohorts of LOT (n = 67) and E-chRCC (n = 69) and revealed notable differences between the 2 entities. Clinically, LOT predominantly affected women, whereas E-chRCC showed a male predilection. Histologically, although almost all LOTs were dominated by a small-nested pattern, E-chRCC mainly showed solid and tubular architectures. Molecular analysis revealed that 87% of LOT cases harbored mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, most frequently in MTOR and RHEB genes; a subset of LOT cases had chromosomal 7 and 19q gains. In contrast, E-chRCC lacked mTORC1 mutations, and 60% of cases displayed chromosomal losses characteristic of chRCC. We also explored the cell of origin for LOT and identified L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a collecting duct and connecting tubule principal cell marker, as a highly sensitive and specific ancillary test for differentiating LOT from E-chRCC. This distinctive L1CAM immunohistochemical labeling suggests the principal cells as the cell of origin for LOT, unlike the intercalated cell origin of E-chRCC and oncocytoma. The ultrastructural analysis of LOT showed normal-appearing mitochondria and intracytoplasmic lumina with microvilli, different from what has been described for chRCC. Our study further supports LOT as a unique entity with a benign clinical course. Based on the likely cell of origin and its clinicopathologic characteristics, we propose that changing the nomenclature of LOT to "Oncocytic Principal Cell Adenoma of the Kidney" may be a better way to define and describe this entity.

Concordance of MTOR Pathway Mutations and the Diagnosis of Renal Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor (LOT)

The differential diagnosis for oncocytic renal tumors spans the spectrum from benign entities to more aggressive renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Recent work has characterized a provisional renal oncocytic neoplasm, namely the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), which demonstrates overlapping morphologic features with oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, but also has a unique immunoprofile (ie, diffusely positive for KRT7, negative for KIT) and a high rate (80% to 100%) of mTOR pathway gene alterations. Given the diagnostic overlap among oncocytic tumors, we looked for concordance between mTOR pathway mutations and LOT. Thirty low-grade renal oncocytic neoplasms underwent histologic review and immunohistochemistry for KRT7 and KIT. Tumors were classified as "determinate" (eg, LOT) for tumors with solid, nested or vaguely tubular growth and diffuse KRT7 staining and negative KIT, or "indeterminate" if the morphology and/or immunostains did not fully support a definitive LOT diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing was performed without any knowledge of the diagnoses, and identified mTOR pathway mutations in 80% (12/15) of the determinate tumors, compared with 7% (1/15) in the indeterminate group. One determinate tumor was reclassified as papillary RCC (MTOR mutation negative) and 6 indeterminate tumors were confirmed to be oncocytoma (N = 4), clear cell RCC or papillary RCC with reverse polarity, respectively. Overall, integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular data enabled a final definitive diagnosis for 70% of tumors (21 of the total 30), with a high concordance (93%) for LOT specifically in the determinate group; the remaining 9 tumors (30%) were classified as renal oncocytic neoplasm, not otherwise specified.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: a clinicopathologic study of 43 cases with a focus on the expression of KRAS signaling pathway downstream effectors

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a renal tumor with frequent KRAS mutations. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics of PRNRP and the protein expression of various KRAS signaling pathway downstream effectors in PRNRP. PRNRP samples from patients who underwent surgical resection at Seoul National University Hospital over an 11-year period (January 2011 to December 2021) were analyzed. We identified 43 PRNRPs, defined as papillary renal tumors with a thin papillary architecture, eosinophilic finely granular cytoplasm, and apical nuclear position. Immunohistochemistry revealed typical characteristics of PRNRP, including exclusively positive GATA3 (43/43); highly positive L1CAM (43/43), PAX8 (43/43), and EMA (43/43); and low positive AMACR (4/43), RCC (1/43), and vimentin (1/43). KRAS signaling pathway effectors, such as p-ERK, RalA, and RalB, were highly expressed in PRNRP compared to papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) with low or high nuclear grade (P < .001, all). Compared to pRCC with high nuclear grade, patients with PRNRP exhibited significantly longer progression-free survival (P < .001). PRNRP showed the best clinical outcome, with no disease progression in any of the cases. Our study analyzed the largest number of PRNRP cases and is the first to analyze the association between PRNRP and the KRAS downstream signaling pathway. PRNRP was found at a high frequency among all papillary renal tumors (43/207) and demonstrated a very good prognosis. PRNRP showed high GATA3, L1CAM, PAX8, and EMA protein expression as well as high p-ERK, RalA, and RalB protein expression.

Cytomorphology of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse nuclear polarity (PRNRP) is an emerging oncocytic renal tumor. Cytomorphologic features of this tumor have not been described in the literature before. The objective of this study was to review the cytomorphology of a case PRNRP and compare with cytomorphologic features of papillary renal cell carcinomas (pRCCs) reported in the literature. 1 case of core needle biopsy (CNB) with touch preparation (TP) of a renal mass diagnosed as PRNRP was reviewed retrospectively. Clinical presentation, cytomorphologic features, ancillary tests and histopathology results were analyzed. The touch preparation was cellular and showed tight 3-D clusters of cuboidal epithelial cells with variable presence of fibrovascular cores (FC), granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, round apically located grade 1 nuclei compared to cases of pRCC that consistently showed presence of FCs lined by cuboidal to columnar epithelial cells with variable degree of cytologic atypia. Features characteristic of pRCC like foamy macrophages, hemosiderin laden macrophages, nuclear grooves or psammoma bodies were not present. No necrosis or mitosis were identified. By immunohistochemistry (IHC) the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7, GATA-3 and AMACR (focal) and negative for CA-IX, CD117 and vimentin. Cytomorphologic features of PRNRP are unique and characterized by tight 3-D clusters (with or without FCs) of cuboidal cells with small round apically located nuclei and finely granular oncocytic cytoplasm. Specific diagnosis of PRNRP on cytology or CNB is feasible along with use of ancillary tests IHC and /or molecular tests.

Ipsilateral synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and urothelial carcinoma in a renal transplant recipient: a rare case report with molecular analysis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a 3- to 5-fold higher risk of developing malignant tumors than the general population, with new malignant tumors after transplantation considered to be the leading cause of death in RTRs. In pathological practice, it is rare for neoplasms with different histology to be located in the same organ. We report the first case of a synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the ipsilateral kidney in an RTR. Molecular detection was conducted by next-generation sequencing.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old female suffered from uremia 19 years ago and underwent renal transplantation (RT) after receiving dialysis for 6 months. Hematuria occurred one month ago and an enhanced CT showed that there were two abnormal density foci in the middle and lower parts of the autologous left kidney. A laparoscopic left nephrectomy and ureterectomy were performed. Gross examination revealed a mass (I) in the left renal parenchyma, 2*1.8*1.5 cm in size, that protruded from the renal capsule, and a cauliflower-like mass (II), 5*2.5*2 cm in size, adjacent to the mass (I). Microscopic findings revealed these lesions were PRNRP and UC, respectively. PCR analysis revealed a KRAS gene mutation (G12D in exon 2) in the PRNRP, while NGS analysis revealed FGFR3 (S249C in exon 7) and KDM6A (Q271Ter in exon 10 and A782Lfs in exon 17) mutations in the UC.

CONCLUSIONS

We report here for the first time an extraordinarily rare case of synchronous renal tumors of a PRNRP and UC in the ipsilateral kidney of an RTR. We identified simultaneous KRAS, FGFR3, and KDM6A mutations in two different renal masses in the ipsilateral kidney. Pathologic assessment with comparative molecular analysis of mutational profiles facilitates tumor studies after RT and may be of great value in clinical management strategies.

Rare papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A case report and review of the literature

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a rare renal tumour and was newly named in 2019. This study reported a case of a 30-year-old female patient with a left renal tumour without any clinical symptoms and whose CT scan of her left kidney showed a mass of 2.6 cm×2.3 cm, which was considered to be renal clear cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed, and histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, which had unique clinicopathological features, immunophenotype, KRAS gene mutation and relatively indolent biological behaviour. As newly diagnosed cases, rigorous and regular follow-up is necessary. In addition, a literature review was performed from 1978 to 2022, and 97 cases of papillary renal neoplasms with reverse polarity were identified and analysed.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A case report

As a recently named rare renal tumor of epithelial origin, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) has unique histomorphological features and immunophenotypes, often associated with KRAS mutations and showing indolent biological behavior. In this study, we report a case of PRNRP. In this report, nearly all tumor cells were positive for GATA-3, KRT7, EMA, E-Cadherin, Ksp-Cadherin, 34βE12, and AMACR in varying intensities, focally positive for CD10 and Vimentin, while negative for CD117, TFE3, RCC, and CAIX. KRAS mutations (exon 2) were detected by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR), while no NRAS (exon 2-4) and BRAF V600 mutations (exon 15) were detected. A transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy was performed on the reported patient. No recurrence or metastasis was found during the 18 months of follow-up.

Papillary renal cell neoplasm with reverse polarity: A new subtype of renal tumour with favorable prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Papillary renal cell neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) has recently been recognized as an entity separate from the traditional classification of papillary renal cell carcinomas, due to its specific histopathological, immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics, as well as its indolent behavior.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We provide 6 new cases and a review of the literature published until the present time, which comprises a total number of 104 cases.

RESULTS

Our PRNRP cases correspond to 5 men and one woman aged between 47 and 91 years. In 5 of the 6 cases, the PRNRP was an incidental finding in nephrectomy specimens. Nephrectomy had been indicated due to the presence of another renal tumor, except for one case, in which surgical intervention was indicated due to PRNRP. Our cases present mass sizes between 2 and 13 mm, as well as papillary histology with a monolayered lining of eosinophilic cells with low-grade nuclei in apical location. Immunohistochemically, they show a constant positivity for GATA3 and negativity for vimentin. KRAS mutations were identified in 50% of our cases. After a follow-up ranging between one and 60 months, 5 of the cases were still alive without recurrences or metastases, and one died from urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases agree with the clinical and pathological characteristics described in the PRNRP cases published to date. With the present study, we provide the first series of national cases corroborating the existence of well-defined and constant diagnostic criteria that allow PRNRP to be considered as a distinctive entity.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity-a comparative study with CCPRCC, OPRCC, and PRCC1

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. In this study, we aimed to identify and analyze the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical (IHC), and molecular features of PRNRP in our center and to evaluate its differential diagnosis with other tumors with which it is easily confused: clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma (OPRCC), and papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 (PRCC1). Nephrectomy specimens of PRNRP (n = 15), CCPRCC (n = 11), and OPRCC (n = 12) were retrieved from our pathology archives. We also selected typical cases of PRCC1 (n = 15) as a control group. PRNRP accounted for 3.05% (15/492) of all PRCC cases at our center. The median follow-up period was 41.3 months. All PRNRP cases were pT1N0M0, and only one involved recurrence (1 year after surgery). IHC analysis showed diffuse staining of CK7, EMA, and GATA3 but weak or negative staining of CD10, CD117, p504s, and vimentin in the PRNRP samples and distinctive IHC features in the other three tumor types. KRAS mutation was detected in 4/10 PRNRP cases. Among the 40 most commonly mutated genes identified, 5 (BCLAF1, PDE4DIP, NCOR1, PARP4, and PABPC1) have actionable alterations. Our study supports the suggestion that PRNRP is an entity distinct from CCPRCC, OPRCC, and PRCC1.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity with a favorable prognosis: Two cases report and literature review

Background

Papillary Renal Neoplasm (PRN) with polarity inversion is a less common subtype of kidney cancer with an apparently recognizable morphology, distinct immunohistochemical profiles, and frequent KRAS mutations. It has been estimated to account 4% of previously diagnosed PRN.

Case presentation

This is a retrospective case report of two patients diagnosed with PRNRP. Two males were found to have kidney mass accidentally through imaging examination in clinic. Both of the patients had no obvious discomfort and abnormal test indicators. Subsequently, they underwent partial nephrectomy in our center by the same surgeon and followed up closely with an impressive clinical outcome. The pathology reports indicated that their pathological features were consistent with PRNRP. The HE staining showed a monolayer of papillary or tubular structures, with small nuclei away from the cytoplasmic top of the basement membrane. The immunohistochemical results were GATA3 (+), vimentin (-).

Conclusion

Our case reports and literature review suggested that PRNRP should be separated from traditional PRN and partial nephrectomy is a robust modality for PRNRP. The morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic information of the cases we presented would provide important material for PRNRP to become a distinct category with benign clinical outcome.

WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems contains relevant revisions and introduces a group of molecularly defined renal tumour subtypes. Herein we present the World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 perspectives on papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on their evolving classification, differential diagnosis, and emerging entities. The WHO 2022 classification eliminated the type 1/2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subcategorization, given the recognition of frequent mixed tumour phenotypes and the existence of entities with a different molecular background within the type 2 pRCC category. Additionally, emerging entities such as biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC, biphasic hyalinising psammomatous RCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like pRCC are included as part of the pRCC spectrum, while additional morphological and molecular data are being gathered. In addition to oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), a category of 'other oncocytic tumours' with oncocytoma/chRCC-like features has been introduced, including emerging entities, most with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations (eosinophilic vacuolated tumour and so-called 'low-grade' oncocytic tumour), deserving additional research. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC was accepted as a new and independent tumour entity. Finally, a highly reproducible and clinically relevant universal grading system for chRCC is still missing and is another niche of ongoing investigation. This review discusses these developments and highlights emerging morphological and molecular data relevant for the classification of renal cell carcinoma.

Recurrent KRAS mutations are early events in the development of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

We evaluated the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of mostly incidentally detected, small, papillary renal neoplasms with reverse polarity (PRNRP). The cohort comprised 50 PRNRP from 46 patients, divided into 2 groups. The clinically undetected (<5 mm) neoplasms (n = 34; 68%) had a median size of 1.1 mm (range 0.2-4.3 mm; mean 1.4 mm), and the clinically detected (≥5 mm) neoplasms (n = 16; 32%) which had a median size of 13 mm (range 9-30 mm; mean 16 mm). Neoplasms were positive for GATA3 (n = 47; 100%) and L1CAM (n = 34/38; 89%) and were negative for vimentin (n = 0/44; 0%) and, to a lesser extent, AMACR [(n = 12/46; 26%; weak = 9, weak/moderate = 3)]. KRAS mutations were found in 44% (n = 15/34) of the clinically undetected PRNRP and 88% of the clinically detected PRNRP (n = 14/16). The two clinically detected PRNRP with wild-type KRAS gene were markedly cystic and contained microscopic intracystic tumors. In the clinically undetected PRNRP, the detected KRAS mutations rate was higher in those measuring ≥1 mm vs <1 mm [n = 14/19 (74%) vs n = 1/15 (7%)]. Overall, the KRAS mutations were present in exon 2-codon 12: c.35 G > T (n = 21), c.34 G > T (n = 3), c.35 G > A (n = 2), c.34 G > C (n = 2) resulting in p.Gly12Val, p. Gly12Asp, p.Gly12Cys and p.Gly12Arg, respectively. One PRNRP had a G12A/V/D complex mutation. Twenty-six PRNRP were concurrently present with other tumors of different histologic subtypes in the ipsilateral kidney; molecular testing of 8 of the latter showed wild-type KRAS gene despite the presence of KRAS mutations in 5 concurrent PRNRP. On follow up, no adverse pathologic events were seen (range 1-160 months; mean 44 months). In conclusion, the presence of KRAS mutations in small, clinically undetected PRNRP provides a unique finding to this entity and supports its being an early event in the development of these neoplasms.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity may be a novel renal cell tumor entity with low malignant potential

AIMS

This study retrospectively investigated the morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic features of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP), a recently described renal tumor.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven cases of PRNRP were collected, and 16 cases of type I and 9 cases of type II papillary renal cell carcinoma were included as a control series. Pathological features were evaluated based on HE staining and immunohistochemistry. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF V600E mutations were detected by Real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was conducted for identification of chromosomal abnormalities. Hemosiderin deposition was found in a small amount of tumor cells in 6 cases. Multifocal or patchy necrosis (5/11), small focal invasion of the pseudocapsules or renal parenchyma (6/11), and breakthrough of renal capsule with nerve invasion (1/11) were revealed, inconsistent with the previous view that the tumor lacks necrosis and intercellular hemosiderin. Immunohistochemical staining (diffusely positive for CK7 and GATA3, negative for CD117 and vimentin, and negative to weakly positive for P504S) and high frequency of KRAS mutations in exon 2 (9/10) supported the identification and inclusion of our cases. Chromosome 7 trisomy (1/7), chromosome 17 trisomy (0/7) and chromosome Y deletion (0/5 male patients) were seldom detected in this tumor. All patients were alive without metastasis or recurrence at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings may highlight the possibility of a low malignant potential of this emerging entity. We suggest that the tumor be classified as a novel renal cell tumor subtype independent of papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A clinicopathological and molecular genetic characterization of 16 cases with expanding the morphologic spectrum and further support for a novel entity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a recently described, rare renal tumor that differs clinically, morphologically, and molecularly from papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To further characterize the pathological spectrum of this rare tumor, in this study, we retrospectively identified 16 cases of PRNRP from three institutions to comprehensively investigate the clinicopathological and molecular genetic features, using immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). The patients included nine men and seven women, with age ranging from 47 to 80 years (median = 67.5 years, mean = 65 years). The tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 9.5 cm in the greatest dimension (median = 1.8 cm, mean = 2.6 cm). Most tumors (12/16) were incidentally identified by imaging studies. By AJCC stage, 15 were categorized as pT1 and 1 was pT2. Follow-up showed no recurrences, metastases, or disease-related deaths in all the 16 patients. Grossly, 14 cases demonstrated at least a partially cystic appearance. Microscopically, all PRNRPs except 1 (case 13) were composed predominantly of thin, branching papillary architecture covered by a single layer of cuboidal cells with finely granular cytoplasm, and low-grade nuclei typically located toward the apical surface away from the basement. Case 13 consisted mostly of solid, densely packed tubules with only a minor papillary component (5%). Other commonly seen histological features included hyalinized or edematous papillae (n = 11), lymphocyte aggregation in fibrovascular cores (n = 10), mast cell infiltration (n = 8), and intralesional hemorrhage (n = 7). Uncommonly seen histological features included lymphoid cuff (n = 4), hemosiderin deposition (n = 5), foci of clear cell change (n = 4), intracytoplasmic vacuoles (n = 4), eosinophilic hobnail cells (n = 2), and infarct-type necrosis (n = 1). Two PRNRPs were concurrent with ipsilateral clear cell papillary RCC and clear cell RCC, respectively. By IHC, the tumors were consistently positive for GATA3, CK7, and PAX8. Fourteen out of 16 tumors showed a basolateral-membranous E-cadherin expression pattern, and 12/16 cases were positive for 34βE12.The expression of AMACR, CD10, and vimentin was either absent or only weak and focal. By targeted NGS, 13/14 evaluated PRNRPs harbored KRAS missense mutations involving c.35G>T resulting in p.G12V (7/13), c.35G>A resulting in p.G12D (4/13), and c.34G>T resulting in p.G12C (2/13). By FISH, 1/15 had gains of chromosomes 7 and 17, and 2/8 male cases had deletion of chromosomes Y. In conclusion, our study confirms that PRNRP is an indolent renal cell neoplasm with unique morphology, consistent immunohistochemical profile, and recurrent KRAS mutation. Our study expands the morphologic spectrum of PRNRP and provides further evidence supporting it as a novel entity.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: current and controversial issues

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most frequent renal cancer subtype and represents 15-20% of all RCC. Classification of pRCC is changing because novel tumour entities have been discovered in the last years. In this review, we summarise recent studies relevant for the understanding of the molecular complexity and the broader differential diagnosis of pRCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been 25 years ago, that pRCC was morphologically subdivided into type 1 and type 2. Recently described tumour entities in the 2022 WHO classification challenged this concept and allow a new view on the molecular background in pRCC. Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC and papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity are emerging tumour entities derived from the new concept of molecularly defined RCC subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibition and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced as the new backbone in the first-line treatment of advanced pRCCs. To identify novel targeted treatments for patients with pRCC it is crucial to investigate the specific molecular background of pRCC considering emerging pRCC subtypes.

SUMMARY

In the future, a deeper understanding of the correlation between molecular aberrations and new pRCC subtypes may improve the classification of pRCC patients and could reveal potential predictive biomarkers for each subgroup.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity with a favorable prognosis should be separated from papillary renal cell carcinoma

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly documented renal entity with an easily recognizable morphology, distinct immunohistochemical profiles, and frequent KRAS mutations. The latest practice guidelines regard PRNRP as a subtype of papillary renal cell carcinoma due to the documented chromosomal alterations of 7, 17, and Y. This study included 20 patients with PRNRP and 30 patients with PRCC. Statistically significant differences were observed in size, WHO/ISUP grade, macrophages in the papillae, reverse polarity, CK7, basolateral positivity for Claudin7, GATA3 expression, KRAS mutation, and chromosomal alterations. No adverse events such as perinephric invasion, lymphovascular invasion, sarcomatoid of rhabdoid differentiation, metastasis, or recurrence were found in PRNRP. However, PRCC can cause these adverse events. Basolateral positivity for Claudin7 together with GATA3 expression indicated distal tubule derivation of PRNRP. KRAS mutations were detected in 89% (16/18) of PRNRP. No KRAS mutations were detected in PRCC. Six patients with PRNRP had one chromosomal alteration and the other 12 had no chromosomal alterations. However, only four patients with PRCC showed no chromosomal alterations. Eighteen patients had two or three chromosomal alterations. PRCC can metastasize, recur, and even cause death, whereas PRNRP has a favorable prognosis. We recommend that PRNRP should be separated from PRCC and partial nephrectomy is more suitable for PRNRP.

Papillary Renal Neoplasm With Reverse Polarity Is Often Cystic: Report of 7 Cases and Review of 93 Cases in the Literature

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly proposed entity with distinct histology and frequent KRAS mutations. To date, 93 cases of PRNRPs have been reported. In this study, we present 7 new cases of PRNRP and review the literature. Most of the pathologic features in our 7 cases are similar to those previously reported cases. However, all 7 of our cases showed at least partial cystic changes, which was not stressed in prior studies. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-microarray based chromosomal analysis demonstrated no trisomy or other alteration of chromosomes 7 or 17; and no loss or other alteration of chromosome Y was detected in all 7 cases. Next-generation sequencing detected KRAS missense mutations in 4 of 7 cases. No fusion genes were detected. In summary, PRNRP is a small, well-circumscribed often encapsulated and cystic neoplasm with loose papillary formations. Cuboidal tumor cells always have eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclei located at the pole opposite the basement membrane with a low World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) nuclear grade. The fibrovascular cores can be hyalinized or edematous. Macrophage aggregates and intracellular hemosiderin are uncommon, and no psammoma bodies or necrosis should be seen. Immunophenotypically, this tumor is always positive for CK7 and GATA3, and negative for CD117 and vimentin. CD10 and AMACR can be positive, but often weakly and focally. PRNRP often has KRAS mutations, however, only 32% of cases have chromosomal abnormalities in chromosomes 7, 17, and Y. No recurrences, metastases, or tumor-related deaths have been reported following complete resection.

The Morphological Spectrum of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Prevalence of Provisional/Emerging Renal Tumor Entities with Papillary Growth

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a heterogeneous disease, encompassing an increasing number of tumor subtypes. Post-2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognized that the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma is evolving and has long surpassed the dichotomic simplistic "type 1 versus type 2" classification. The differential diagnosis of pRCC includes several new provisional/emerging entities with papillary growth. Type 2 tumors have been cleared out of several confounding entities, now regarded as independent tumors with specific clinical and molecular backgrounds. In this work we describe the prevalence and characteristics of emerging papillary tumor entities in two renal tumor cohorts (one consisting of consecutive papillary tumors from a single institute, the other consisting of consultation cases from several centers). After a review of 154 consecutive pRCC cases, 58% remained type 1 pRCC, and 34% type 2 pRCC. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (1.3%), biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC (1.3%), and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC (4.5%) were rare. Among 281 consultation cases, 121 (43%) tumors had a dominant papillary growth (most frequently MiT family translocation RCCs, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary RCC). Our data confirm that the spectrum of RCCs with papillary growth represents a major diagnostical challenge, frequently requiring a second expert opinion. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity, biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC, and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC are rarely sent out for a second opinion, but correct classification and knowledge of these variants will improve our understanding of the clinical behavior of renal tumors with papillary growth.