RNAscope CSF1 chromogenic in situ hybridization: a potentially useful tool in the differential diagnosis of tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Chondroid Synoviocytic Neoplasm: A Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of a Distinctive Tumor of Synoviocytes

Tumors resembling tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) but additionally forming chondroid matrix are rare and most often involve the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). We studied 21 tumors consisting of synoviocytes (large, eosinophilic mononuclear cells containing hemosiderin) and chondroid matrix to better understand these unusual neoplasms. The tumors occurred in 10 males and 11 females, in the age group of 31 to 80 years (median, 50 years) and involved the TMJ region (16), extremities (4), and spine (1). As in conventional TGCT, all were composed of synoviocytes, small histiocytes, foamy macrophages, siderophages, and osteoclast-like giant cells in variably hyalinized background. Expansile nodules of large, moderately atypical synoviocytes were present, in addition to "chondroblastoma-like," "chondroma-like," or "phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor-like" calcified matrix. The synoviocytes expressed clusterin (17/19) and less often desmin (3/15). The tumors were frequently CSF1 positive by chromogenic in situ hybridization (8/13) but at best weakly positive for CSF1 by immunohistochemistry (0/3). Background small histiocytes were CD163 positive (12/12). All were FGF23 negative (0/10). Cells within lacunae showed a synoviocytic phenotype (clusterin positive; S100 protein and ERG negative). RNA-Seq was successful in 13 cases; fusions were present in 7 tumors, including FN1::TEK (5 cases); FN1::PRG4 (2 cases); and MALAT1::FN1, PDGFRA::USP35, and TIMP3::ZCCHC7 (1 case each). Three tumors contained more than 1 fusion (FN1::PRG4 with TIMP3::ZCCHC7, FN1::TEK with FN1::PRG4, and FN1::TEK with MALAT1::FN1). Clinical follow-up (17 patients; median follow-up duration 38 months; range 4-173 months) showed 13 (76%) to be alive without evidence of disease and 4 (24%) to be alive with persistent/recurrent local disease. No metastases or deaths from disease were observed. We conclude that these unusual tumors represent a distinct category of synoviocytic neoplasia, which we term "chondroid synoviocytic neoplasm," rather than simply ordinary TGCT with cartilage. Despite potentially worrisome morphologic features, they appear to behave in at most a locally aggressive fashion.

CSF1 expression in xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor/keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor

"Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor" (XGET) and "keratin-positive giant cell-rich soft tissue tumor" (KPGCT), two recently described mesenchymal neoplasms, likely represent different aspects of a single entity. Both tumors are composed of only a small minority of tumor cells surrounded by large numbers of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells and histiocytes, suggesting production of a paracrine factor with resulting "landscape effect," as seen in tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Recent evidence suggests that the paracrine factor in XGET/KPGCT may be CSF1, as in tenosynovial giant cell tumor. We hypothesized that CSF1 is overexpressed in XGET/KPGCT. To test our hypothesis, we performed quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) for CSF1 expression and CSF1 RNAscope chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) on 6 cases of XGET/KPGCT. All cases were positive with CSF1 CISH and showed increased expression of CSF1 by qPCR. Our findings provide additional evidence that the CSF1/CSF1R pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of XGET/KPGCT. These findings suggest a possible role for CSF1R inhibition in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic XGET/KPGCT.

Diagnostic utility of CSF1 immunohistochemistry in tenosynovial giant cell tumor for differentiating from giant cell-rich tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone and soft tissue

BACKGROUND

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor that affects the synovium of joints, bursa, and tendon sheaths and is categorized into localized TSGCT (LTSGCT) and diffuse TSGCT (DTSGCT). LTSGCT and DTSGCT are characterized by recurrent fusions involving the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene and its translocation partner collagen type VI alpha 3 chain. The fusion gene induces intratumoral overexpression of CSF1 mRNA and CSF1 protein. CSF1 expression is a characteristic finding of TSGCT and detection of CSF1 mRNA and CSF1 protein may be useful for the pathological diagnosis. Although there have been no effective anti-CSF1 antibodies to date, in situ hybridization (ISH) for CSF1 mRNA has been performed to detect CSF1 expression in TSGCT. We performed CSF1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti-CSF1 antibody (clone 2D10) in cases of TSGCT, giant cell-rich tumor (GCRT), and GCRT-like lesion and verified its utility for the pathological diagnosis of TSGCT.

METHODS

We performed CSF1 IHC in 110 cases including 44 LTSGCTs, 20 DTSGCTs, 1 malignant TSGCT (MTSGCT), 10 giant cell tumors of bone, 2 giant cell reparative granulomas, 3 aneurysmal bone cysts, 10 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, 10 leiomyosarcomas, and 10 myxofibrosarcomas. We performed fluorescence ISH (FISH) for CSF1 rearrangement to confirm CSF1 expression on IHC in TSGCTs. We considered the specimens to have CSF1 rearrangement if a split signal was observed in greater than 2% of the tumor cells.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 of 65 TSGCT cases, including 35 of the 44 LTSGCTs and 15 of the 20 DTSGCTs, showed distinct scattered expression of CSF1 in the majority of mononuclear tumor cells. MTSGCT showed no CSF1 expression. Non-TSGCT cases were negative for CSF1. FISH revealed CSF1 rearrangement in 6 of 7 CSF1-positive cases on IHC. On the other hand, FISH detected no CSF1 rearrangement in all CSF1-negative cases on IHC. Thus, the results of IHC corresponded to those of FISH.

CONCLUSION

We revealed characteristic CSF1 expression on IHC in cases of TSGCT, whereas the cases of non-TSGCT exhibited no CSF1 expression. CSF1 IHC may be useful for differentiating TSGCTs from histologically mimicking GCRTs and GCRT-like lesions.

Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 39 tumors, with evidence for a CSF1-producing "null cell" population

Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor (PFHT) is a mesenchymal tumor of intermediate malignancy, typically occurring in the superficial soft tissues of young patients and displaying a biphasic pattern, with nodules of histiocytoid cells surrounded by fascicles of myofibroblastic spindled cells. The pathogenesis of PHFT is unknown. We comprehensively studied 39 PFHT, occurring in 25 females (66%) and 13 males (34%), ranging from 2 to 55 years of age (median 21 years). The tumors most often occurred in the upper extremity (n = 16, 41%) and ranged from 0.4 to 6.1 cm in size (median 1.5 cm). One patient with known neurofibromatosis type 1 presented with metachronous tumors of the finger and back. Clinical follow-up (29 patients; range 5-168 months; median 60 months) showed 3 tumors to have recurred locally; none was metastasized. One patient died of an unrelated cause; all others were alive without disease at the time of last follow-up. Immunohistochemistry showed the histiocytoid nodules of all cases to contain CD163/CD11c-positive histiocytes and cells negative for both markers ("null cells"). CSF1 expression was present in "null cells" in 7/10 cases (RNAscope chromogenic in situ hybridization). The Ki-67 labeling index was very low (< 5%); Ki-67-positive cells within histiocytoid nodules appeared to represent "null cells." All tested cases were negative for significant mutations or fusion events (TruSight Mutation Panel, TruSight Fusion Panel, Mayo Clinic Melanoma Targeted Gene Panel). We conclude that PHFT may be even more indolent than has been appreciated, although classification as an "intermediate" tumor is correct. We hypothesize that the CSF1-producing "null cells" of PHFT may represent the neoplastic element, with the bulk of the tumor masses comprising recruited and reactive cell populations.

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Versus Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor - Similarities and Differences

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) share misleadingly similar names, soft texture and brown color macroscopically, osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells microscopically and localisation in the musculoskeletal system. However, these two tumor types are biologically and clinically two distinct entities with different natural courses of progression and considerably different modes of surgical and medical treatment. In this article, we provide a detailed update on the similarities and the differences between both tumor types.GCTB is a locally aggressive osteolytic bone tumor, commonly seen in patients in their third decade of life. It usually occurs as a solitary lesion in the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones. It can be diagnosed using plain radiographic imaging, CT radiography or MRI to estimate the tumor extent, soft tissue and joint involvement. GCTB is usually treated with intralesional excision by curettage. Systemically, it can be treated with bisphosphonates and denosumab or radiotherapy.TGCT is a rare, slowly progressing tumor of synovial tissue, affecting the joint, tendon sheath or bursa, mostly seen in middle-aged patients. TGCT is usually not visible on radiographs and MRI is mostly used to enable assessment of potential bone involvement and distinguishing between two TGCT types. Localised TGCT is mostly treated with marginal surgical resection, while diffuse TGCT is optimally treated with total synovectomy and is more difficult to remove. Additionally, radiotherapy, intraarticular injection of radioactive isotopes, anti-TNF-α antibodies and targeted medications may be used.

Targeting p21Cip1 highly expressing cells in adipose tissue alleviates insulin resistance in obesity

Insulin resistance is a pathological state often associated with obesity, representing a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Limited mechanism-based strategies exist to alleviate insulin resistance. Here, using single-cell transcriptomics, we identify a small, critically important, but previously unexamined cell population, p21Cip1 highly expressing (p21high) cells, which accumulate in adipose tissue with obesity. By leveraging a p21-Cre mouse model, we demonstrate that intermittent clearance of p21high cells can both prevent and alleviate insulin resistance in obese mice. Exclusive inactivation of the NF-κB pathway within p21high cells, without killing them, attenuates insulin resistance. Moreover, fat transplantation experiments establish that p21high cells within fat are sufficient to cause insulin resistance in vivo. Importantly, a senolytic cocktail, dasatinib plus quercetin, eliminates p21high cells in human fat ex vivo and mitigates insulin resistance following xenotransplantation into immuno-deficient mice. Our findings lay the foundation for pursuing the targeting of p21high cells as a new therapy to alleviate insulin resistance.