Approach for reclassification of collecting duct carcinoma and comparative histopathological analysis with SMARCB1/INI1-deficient renal cell carcinoma and fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma

Comparative analyses of tumour immune microenvironment between collecting duct carcinoma and fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma

AIMS

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) have similar histological morphologies and both show a poor prognosis. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor has been approved for the treatment of RCC. However, tumour-infiltrating neutrophils stimulated by interleukin-8 (IL-8) interfere with PD-L1 inhibitors. Here, we retrospectively analysed PD-L1 and IL-8 expression, and examined its relationship with infiltrating immune cells.

METHODS

Nine cases of CDC and seven cases of FH-deficient RCC were selected. We defined PD-L1 and IL-8 expression by the Tumour Proportion Score and Combined Positive Score (CPS). We counted the numbers of CD8+, CXCR2+, CD11b+, CD66b+ and CD33+ immune cells located in the tumour components.

RESULTS

A number of CXCR2+ (p=0.0058), CD11b+ (p=0.0070) and CD66b+ (p=0.0067) immune cells infiltrating into CDC were significantly higher than those infiltrating into FH-deficient RCC. In CDC, PD-L1 expression was correlated with a high density of CD8+ lymphocytes (p=0.0389), but was not in FH-deficient RCC (p=0.6985). IL-8 CPS was significantly higher in CDC than in FH-deficient RCC (p=0.0069). In addition, among the CDC cases, IL-8 CPS showed significant positive correlations with CXCR2+, CD11b+ and CD66b+ immune cell densities (p=0.0250, p=0.0104 and p=0.0374, respectively), whereas FH-deficient RCC showed no significant correlations between IL-8 CPS and immune cell densities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the difference of each tumour microenvironment between CDC and FH-deficient RCC, and IL-8 is a potential therapeutic target for treating CDC, but not FH-deficient RCC.

Underreporting of SMARCB1 alteration by clinical sequencing: Integrative patho-genomic analysis captured SMARCB1/INI-1 deficiency in a vulvar yolk sac tumor

•SMARCB1/INI1-deficient gynecologic tumors are rare and clinically aggressive. A subset shows primitive yolk sac tumor features.•Due to technical limitation of next generation sequencing (NGS) and interlaboratory variability in sequencing methodologies and analytical pipelines, SMARCB1 deficiency caused by somatic copy number variations (SCNV) may be underreported by NGS.•To improve identification of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient neoplasm, we propose the following strategy: First, careful pathology slide review and detection of rhabdoid cells should raise the possibility of SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency. Second, INI1 IHC is a useful complementary test to exclude clinical suspicion of SMARCB1 deficiency in the context of negative molecular reporting. Third, knowledge of potential underreporting of SMARCB1 mutation would avoid underdiagnosis.