Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid causes of angioedema

Practical guidelines for the response to perioperative anaphylaxis

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a severe adverse event during anesthesia that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment by physicians, including anesthesiologists. Muscle relaxants and antibiotics are the most common drugs that cause perioperative anaphylaxis in Japan, as in many countries. In addition, sugammadex appears to be a primary causative agent. Obtaining previous anesthesia records is necessary in a patient with a history of allergic reactions during anesthesia, whenever possible, to avoid recurrence of anaphylaxis. Although medical staff are likely to notice abnormal vital signs because of complete monitoring during anesthesia, surgical drapes make it difficult to notice the appearance of skin symptoms. Even if there are no skin symptoms, anaphylaxis should be suspected, especially when hypotension resistant to inotropes and vasopressors persists. For improving the diagnostic accuracy of anaphylaxis, it is helpful to collect blood samples to measure histamine/tryptase concentrations immediately after the events and at baseline. The first-line treatment for anaphylaxis is adrenaline. In the perioperative setting, adrenaline should be administered through the intravenous route, which has a faster effect onset and is secured in most cases. Adrenaline can cause serious complications including severe arrhythmias if the appropriate dose is not selected according to the severity of symptoms. The anesthesiologist should identify the causative agent after adverse events. The gold standard for identifying the causative agent is the skin test, but in vitro tests including specific IgE antibody measurements and basophil activation tests are also beneficial. The Working Group of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists has developed this practical guide to help appropriate prevention, early diagnosis and treatment, and postoperative diagnosis of anaphylaxis during anesthesia.Grade of recommendations and levels of evidence Anaphylaxis is a relatively rare condition with few controlled trials, and thus a so-called evidence-based scrutiny is difficult. Therefore, rather than showing evidence levels and indicating the level of recommendation, this practical guideline only describes the results of research available to date. The JSA will continue to investigate anaphylaxis during anesthesia, and the results may lead to an amendment of this practical guideline.

Hereditary Angio-Oedema for Dermatologists

Among angio-oedema patients, hereditary angio-oedema (HAE) should not be overlooked. Besides skin swellings, these patients might have very painful abdominal attacks and potentially life-threatening angio-oedema of the upper airway. They will not respond to traditional anti-allergic therapy with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and adrenaline, and instead need specific drugs targeting the kallikrein-kinin pathway. Classically, patients with HAE have a quantitative or qualitative deficiency of the C1 inhibitor (C1INH) due to different mutations in SERPING1, although a new subtype with normal C1INH has been recognised more recently. This latter variant is diagnosed based on clinical features, family history, or molecular genetic testing for mutations in F12, ANGPT1,or PLG.The diagnosis of HAE is often delayed due to a general unfamiliarity with this orphan disease. However, undiagnosed patients are at an increased risk of unnecessary surgical interventions or life-threatening laryngeal swellings. Within the last decade, new and effective therapies have been developed and launched for acute and prophylactic therapy. Even more drugs are under evaluation in clinical trials. It is therefore of utmost importance that patients with HAE are diagnosed as soon as possible and offered relevant therapy with orphan drugs to reduce morbidity, prevent mortality, and improve quality of life.

Acquired and hereditary forms of recurrent angioedema: Update of treatment

The aim of treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is either treating acute attacks or preventing attacks by using prophylactic treatment. For treating acute attacks, plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, and a recombinant human C1-INH are available in Europe. In the United States, a plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, and a plasma kallikrein inhibitor were approved for the treatment of acute attacks. Fresh frozen plasma is also available for treating acute attacks. Short-term prophylactic treatment focuses on C1-INH and attenuated androgens. Long-term prophylactic treatments include attenuated androgens such as danazol, stanozolol, and oxandrolone, antifibrinolytics, and a plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate. Plasma-derived C1-INH and a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist are admitted for self-administration and home therapy. So the number of management options increased considerably within the last few years thus helping to diminish the burden of HAE.

Computational modeling of tracheal angioedema due to swelling of the submucous tissue layer

Angioedema is a tissue-swelling pathology due to rapid change in soft tissue fluid content. Its occurrence in the trachea is predominantly localized to the soft mucous tissue that forms the innermost tracheal layer. The biomechanical consequences, such as airway constriction, are dependent upon the ensuing mechanical interactions between all of the various tissues that comprise the tracheal tube. We model the stress interactions by treating the trachea organ as a three-tissue system consisting of swellable mucous in conjunction with nonswelling cartilage and nonswelling trachealis musculature. Hyperelastic constitutive modeling is used by generalizing the standard anisotropic, incompressible soft tissue framework to incorporate the swelling effect. Finite element stress analysis then proceeds with swelling of the mucous layer providing the driving factor for the mechanical analysis. The amount of airway constriction is governed by the mechanical interaction between the three predominant tissue types. The detailed stress analysis indicates the presence of stress concentrations near the various tissue junctions. Because of the tissue's nonlinear mechanical behavior, this can lead to material stiffness fluctuations as a function of location on the trachea. Patient specific modeling is presented. The role of the modeling in the interpretation of diagnostic procedures and the assessment of therapies is discussed.

Hyperelastic modeling of swelling in fibrous soft tissue with application to tracheal angioedema

Angioedema, the rapid swelling of under-skin tissue, is typically triggered by complex biochemical processes that disrupt an original steady state filtration of liquid through the tissue. Swelling stabilizes once a new steady state is achieved in which the tissue has significantly increased liquid content. These processes are controlled by events at the molecular to the cellular length scale. For describing consequences at organ level length scales it is useful to invoke consolidated continuum mechanics treatments within a generalized hyperelastic framework. We describe the challenges associated with such modeling and demonstrate their use in the context of tracheal angioedema. The trachea is modeled as a two layered cylindrical tube. The inner layer and outer layer represent the soft mucosal tissue and the stiffer cartilaginous tissue respectively. Axially oriented fibers contribute anisotropy to the inner layer, and the swelling is largely confined to this layer. A boundary value problem is formulated; existence and uniqueness is verified. Numerical solutions track airway constriction as a function of mucosal swelling.

Chronic idiopathic angioedema: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Chronic idiopathic angioedema (CIA) is defined as three or more episodes of angioedema in a period of > 6 months without a clear etiology. In the study, we tried to explore clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with CIA unaccompanied by urticaria.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical and laboratory characteristics of 1238 patients with chronic urticaria and/or angioedema referred to our allergy clinic.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and forty-one (67.9%) subjects had chronic urticaria without angioedema (CU Group), 323 (26.1%) had both urticaria and angioedema (CU + CA group), and 74 (5.9%) had chronic angioedema without urticaria (CA). In 29 (39.2%) cases of CA, no etiologic factor of angioedema was discovered, thus the patients were defined as having chronic idiopathic angioedema (CIA Group). Twenty-two (75.8%) subjects had antihistamine-responsive CIA and seven (24.1%) had antihistamine-unresponsive CIA. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical (except of urticarial eruptions) and laboratory characteristics between CU, CA + CU, and CIA groups. Antihistamine responsive and antihistamine-unresponsive CIA groups had no distinguishable clinical or laboratory features.

CONCLUSIONS

We suppose that CIA, at least its antihistamine-responsive form, represents a rare form of chronic spontaneous urticaria. The reasons why in CIA there are no other clinical signs of mast cell/basophil activation, such as pruritus, urticarial, and dermatographism, are largely unknown and have to be elucidated in future studies.

Angioedema with normal laboratory values: the next step

When faced with a patient with recurrent swelling, a thorough laboratory evaluation to determine the underlying etiology ensues. When the laboratory work-up is unrevealing, health care practitioners are frequently left in a quandary. This review will attempt to provide up-to-date information on how to approach the diagnosis and management of angioedema in a patient with normal laboratory values. The subtypes that will be reviewed in detail include: hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor (HAE with normal C1INH), drug-induced angioedema, and idiopathic angioedema. We present literature to aid the physician in the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.

Emerging concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with undifferentiated angioedema

Angioedema is a sudden, transient swelling of well-demarcated areas of the dermis, subcutaneous tissue, mucosa, and submucosal tissues that can occur with or without urticaria. Up to 25% of people in the US will experience an episode of urticaria or angioedema during their lifetime, and many will present to the emergency department with an acute attack. Most cases of angioedema are attributable to the vasoactive mediators histamine and bradykinin. Histamine-mediated (allergic) angioedema occurs through a type I hypersensitivity reaction, whereas bradykinin-mediated (non-allergic) angioedema is iatrogenic or hereditary in origin.Although their clinical presentations bear similarities, the treatment algorithm for histamine-mediated angioedema differs significantly from that for bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Corticosteroids, and epinephrine are effective in the management of histamine-mediated angioedema but are ineffective in the management of bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Recent advancements in the understanding of angioedema have yielded pharmacologic treatment options for hereditary angioedema, a rare hereditary form of bradykinin-mediated angioedema. These novel therapies include a kallikrein inhibitor (ecallantide) and a bradykinin β2 receptor antagonist (icatibant). The physician's ability to distinguish between these types of angioedema is critical in optimizing outcomes in the acute care setting with appropriate treatment. This article reviews the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical presentations, and diagnostic laboratory evaluation of angioedema, along with acute management strategies for attacks.

Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor

Until recently it was assumed that hereditary angioedema is a disease that results exclusively from a genetic deficiency of the C1 inhibitor. In 2000, families with hereditary angioedema, normal C1 inhibitor activity and protein in plasma were described. Since then numerous patients and families with that condition have been reported. Most of the patients by far were women. In many of the affected women, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy containing estrogens, and pregnancies triggered the clinical symptoms. Recently, in some families mutations in the coagulation factor XII (Hageman factor) gene were detected in the affected persons.

Acute symptoms of drug hypersensitivity (urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock)

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are the adverse effects of drugs which, when taken at doses generally tolerated by normal subjects, clinically resemble allergy. Immediate-reaction of drug HSRs are those that occur less than 1 hour after the last drug intake, usually in the form of urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, bronchospasm, and anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock. Acute urticarial and angioedema reactions are common clinical problems frequently encountered by internists and general practitioners. They are not specific to drug allergic reaction, and can be caused by various pathogenic mechanisms. Despite the benign course of urticaria and angioedema, a mucocutaneous swelling of the upper respiratory tract could be life-threatening by itself or a feature of anaphylaxis. This article reviews acute symptoms of drug HSR-related urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, and anaphylactic shock, and how clinicians should approach these problems.

Recurrent angioedema and the threat of asphyxiation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent angioedema may affect the skin or, less commonly, the tongue, gastrointestinal tract, and larynx. Angioedema is a clinical sign that can be produced by a variety of diseases. Asphyxiation due to edematous obstruction of the upper airway is rare, but, for the affected patients, it is a permanent risk.

METHODS

Review of the literature based on a selective search and the authors' decades of experience treating patients with angioedema in a dedicated ambulatory care unit.

RESULTS

Hereditary angioedema due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency has been intensively studied, and nearly all steps in its pathogenesis are known, from the causative gene defect all the way to the clinical presentation of angioedema. Bradykinin is the main mediator in this pathway. New treatment options (icatibant; C1-inhibitor concentrate for self-administration and long-term treatment) have helped patients considerably. In recent years, a new type of hereditary angioedema has been described, resulting not from a lack of C1 inhibitor, but rather from mutations of coagulation factor XII or other, as yet unidentified genetic abnormalities. There are major differences in the pharmacological treatment of the different diseases that cause angioedema. In an emergency, when severe upper airway obstruction can be life-threatening, immediate treatment is needed to keep the upper airway open.

CONCLUSION

In patients with recurrent angioedema, the diagnostic classification of the underlying disorder as a particular type of hereditary or acquired angioedema is a prerequisite for appropriate treatment.

The spectrum and treatment of angioedema

Angioedema manifests as episodes of localized swelling in the dermis and submucosa. The key to successful management is detection and avoidance of triggers, early recognition of attacks, and aggressive airway management when warranted. Review of a patient's medication list may identify drugs that include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers as the cause. Initial treatment in a patient presenting with most forms of angioedema includes antihistamines and glucocorticoids if required. Epinephrine should be administered if there is concern for laryngeal edema. Patients who have a known history of hereditary angioedema should receive C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate or fresh-frozen plasma.