Perioperative Anaphylaxis

Perioperative anaphylaxis associated with peripheral inserted central catheter: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is a commonly utilized medical device for long-term intravenous therapy in healthcare settings. However, there has been a notable increase in anaphylaxis associated with PICC catheterization, which should not be neglected.

AIMS

The purpose is to raise awareness about the occurrence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions associated with PICC and to emphasize the need to explore effective methods to prevent this emergency event in the future.

METHOD

This retrospective observational study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2021 and August 2023.

RESULTS

0.10% (13 out of 12,612) of cancer patients suffered from anaphylactic reactions during PICC catheterization. The duration time of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions was approximately 8 min, with a range of 5-10 min. The signs and symptoms combined with respiratory and cardiovascular system symptoms. Most patients were relieved spontaneously by oxygen inhalation and completed catheterization after their symptoms were alleviated.

CONCLUSION

The increasing incidence of anaphylaxis related to PICC catheterization necessitates greater awareness among healthcare providers. Further research is needed to identify the exact culprits during PICC insertion and develop effective strategies for preventing anaphylactic reactions.

Cardiac Arrest Due to Perioperative Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Re-Exposure to Propofol: A Case Report

Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that can result in fatal outcomes if not promptly and appropriately treated. The diagnosis of the cause of anaphylaxis during anesthesia can be challenging due to the complexity of the perioperative environment. Propofol-induced perioperative anaphylaxis is uncommon, occurring in perioperative anaphylactic shock cases. We present a case of perioperative anaphylactic shock in a patient with no known allergies who had been exposed to the same anesthetic agents, propofol, rocuronium, and remifentanil, three times previously without incident. Cardiac arrest occurred 50 min after induction, which showed pulseless electrical activity with decreasing saturation without bronchial spasm and skin erythema or edema. After prompt and appropriate management including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient recovered without complications. The diagnosis was confirmed as propofol-induced anaphylactic shock by an elevated serum tryptase level, measured in a timely manner, and by skin tests (skin prick test and intradermal test), which revealed strong hypersensitivity to propofol. This case is notable for the cardiovascular collapse that occurred without respiratory symptoms or skin manifestations, as well as the delayed onset of anaphylaxis (>50 min). This case underscores the importance of vigilance for anaphylaxis, even with repeated exposure to previously well-tolerated drugs, as sensitization can lead to more severe reactions. It also highlights the potential for anaphylaxis to occur outside the acute phase and without typical clinical features.

A case of anaphylactic shock to human fibrinogen infusion during cardiac surgery

Human fibrinogen (FIB) has been clinically proven to be considerably effective for the treatment of postoperative bleeding, with reported cases of allergic reactions to human FIB being rare. Here, we report a case of an anaphylactic shock in 27-year-old patients with rheumatic heart valve disease who received a human FIB infusion during mitral valve replacement, aortic valve replacement, and tricuspid valve-shaping surgery. The patients showed generalised profuse sweating, a barely noticeable skin rash, faint pulse, systolic pressure < 50 mmHg, and a heart rate of 71 beats/min. We share insights from a case of severe allergy to human FIB infusion during cardiac surgery, through which we have gained experience in the processes of diagnosing and treating. This report aims to provide a preliminary summary of the characteristics of this case to serve as a reference for fellow clinicians.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Perioperative Allergic Complications: A Practical Review

Background

Reported drug allergies are commonly encountered by surgeons and can lead to uncertainty in selecting an appropriate agent due to concerns of associated risks with related and cross-reactive drugs. This uncertainty can ultimately lead to increased infection rates.

Methods

A literature review was conducted in PubMed using a combination of the terms "allergy," "allergic reaction," "anaphylaxis," and "surgery," "surgical," or "operating room" for articles published within the last 10 years. Publications identified with these search terms were then filtered for review articles, sorted by "best match," and a maximum of 100 articles were manually reviewed for each combination of search terms.

Results

Search results yielded 46,484 articles, 676 of which were ultimately included for manual review, based on selection criteria. Specifically, articles selected for inclusion focused on surgical allergic reactions that were either related to mechanism of action, causative agent for the allergic reaction, timing of allergic reaction, or recommendations for appropriate management.

Conclusions

Allergic reactions can be a common occurrence in the operative room. Knowledge of likely causative agents, timing of a reaction to various agents, and appropriate management in the immediate and delayed setting can improve outcomes and safety for plastic surgery patients.

Latex Allergy - From Discovery to Component-resolved Diagnosis

Latex allergy is a hypersensitivity response to natural rubber latex (NRL) proteins or rubber chemicals used in the manufacture of latex products. An accurate diagnosis is the first step in the effective management of individuals with latex allergy, especially in high-risk groups, such as healthcare workers and those affected by spina bifida. Diagnosis is based on the clinical history and an accurate allergological evaluation. In the case of type I IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, which can manifest urticaria, angioedema, rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma and anaphylaxis after latex exposure, skin prick tests or latex-specific IgE (sIgE) antibody detection using serological assays can be performed to confirm sensitization. Instead, in the case of contact dermatitis, a patch test can be applied to confirm the presence of a type IV T cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to rubber accelerators or additives. Basophils activation tests or challenge tests may be performed if there's an incongruity between the clinical history and the results of in vivo and in vitro tests. The aim of this review is to analyze the current state of the art of diagnostic techniques for latex allergy and algorithms employed in clinical practice and possible future developments in this field.

Anaphylactic Shock After Cervical Conization Hemostasis With a Packing Soaked in Monsel's Solution

Anaphylactic shock is a life-threatening medical emergency, and its successful approach depends on early recognition and treatment. We present a case report of a 54-year-old female, with the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification III, admitted for cervical conization. She presented with known allergies to paracetamol, diclofenac, and nimesulide, and a history of nickel contact dermatitis, with no reports of complicated anesthesia. During conization, adrenaline was infiltrated in the cervix, and hemostasis was performed with packing soaked in Monsel's solution. The immediate postoperative period in the post-anesthesia care unit was uneventful, and no drugs were administered during this period. Three hours after discharge to the ward, the patient had progressive dyspnea with desaturation and maculopapular exanthema. Anesthesia medical emergency was activated. Upon arrival of the emergency team, the patient presented: marked edema of the lips and tongue, respiratory distress, SpO2 82% (under non-rebreathing high concentration oxygen mask), audible vesicular murmur but diminished in all lung fields (without bronchospasm), blood pressure of 60/40 mmHg, increased capillary refill time (4-5 seconds), Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14, as well as generalized maculopapular exanthema and eyelid edema. Gas analysis revealed the following: pH 7.36, pO2 150, pCO2 33, HCO3 22, and lactate 2.2 mmol/L. Anaphylactic shock was immediately diagnosed without an identified causative agent. Intramuscular adrenaline (0.5mg), endovenous hydrocortisone (200 mg), clemastine (2 mg), and profuse fluid therapy were administered. There was an initial slight improvement followed by subsequent worsening. Additional administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline and endovenous methylprednisolone (125 mg) provided similar results. Considering that no other drugs were administered in the ward, the emergency team and the attending gynecologist assumed an association between nickel allergy and the chemical composition of Monsel's solute. Thus, it was decided to remove the packing soaked in Monsel's solute from the vaginal cavity and wash it with saline solution. After removing the packing and further administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline, there was progressive improvement in the blood pressure and SpO2. Tryptase samples collected one hour later were increased (23.9 ug/L; normal: <11.4 ug/L). The patient was shifted to the intensive care unit for surveillance, from which she was discharged after 2 days, with scheduled immunoallergology consultation, which is waiting. This case highlights the importance of causative agent identification as a key point for anaphylactic shock resolution, as well as a multidisciplinary discussion among professionals.

Anaphylaxis in Pregnancy

Anaphylaxis in pregnancy is a rare event, but has important implications for the pregnant patient and fetus. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment all carry important considerations unique to the pregnant patient. Common culprits of anaphylaxis are primarily medications, particularly antibiotics and anesthetic agents. Diagnosis can be difficult given the relative lack of cutaneous symptoms, and normal physiologic changes in pregnancy such as low blood pressure and tachycardia. Apart from patient positioning, treatment is similar to that of the general population, with a focus on prompt epinephrine administration.

Penicillin Allergy and Perioperative Anaphylaxis

Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy, while perioperative anaphylaxis is overall rare. This review covers the epidemiology of both penicillin allergy and perioperative anaphylaxis both separately and taken together. Considerations regarding anaphylaxis to penicillin during pregnancy are also discussed, since penicillin is the drug of choice for Group B Streptococcus prophylaxis. The minimal cross reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins is addressed, since the vast majority of patients with a penicillin allergy label can receive perioperative cephalosporins. The management of the patient who has experienced perioperative anaphylaxis, including the importance of allergy referral is covered. Approaches to pre-operative penicillin allergy evaluations and opportunities for education are highlighted.