Electronic structures of highly symmetrical compounds of f elements

Structural and thermodynamic aspects of hydration of Gd(iii) systems

A first systematic experimental study on the thermodynamic description of the hydration equilibrium of Gd(iii) compounds is presented.

The first example of ab initio calculations of f–f transitions for the case of [Eu(DOTP)]5− complex—experiment versus theory

Structure, IR and UV-vis-NIR spectra of the [Eu(DOTP)]⁵⁻ complex in single crystals were studied experimentally. Ab initio calculations of the excited states of the [Eu(DOTP)]⁵⁻ complex provide new insights into the interpretation of the observed f–f electronic transitions spectra.

Thermodynamics of the hydration equilibrium derived from the luminescence spectra of the solid state for the case of the Eu–EDTA system

Spectroscopic evidence of the hydration equilibrium for the case of the Eu–EDTA system.

What factors affect the 5D0 energy of Eu3+? An investigation of nephelauxetic effects

Relationships involving the interelectronic repulsion parameters, F(k) (k = 2, 4, 6), the spin-orbit coupling constant, ζf, and J-mixing, with the (5)D0-(7)F0 energy, E, have been investigated for Eu(3+) using various approaches. First, the linear relationship between E and the (7)F1 splitting (or the second rank crystal field parameter) is shown to be applicable not only to glasses but also to solid-state crystalline systems with Eu(3+) site symmetry of C2, C2v, or lower. In these cases, the change in (5)D0-(7)F0 energy is mainly due to the J-mixing effect of (7)F(J) (J = 2, 4, 6: most notably J = 2) which depresses (7)F0, whereas the (5)D0 energy is relatively constant. The (5)D0-(7)F0 energy also depends upon certain energy parameters in the Hamiltonian, in particular, F(k) and ζf. Model calculations show that increase in F(4) or F(6) produces an increase in E, whereas increase in F(2) produces a decrease in E. An increase in ζf produces a decrease in E. These findings are rationalized. Most previous 4f(6) crystal field calculations have only considered the F and D terms of Eu(3+) so that the Slater parameters are not well-determined. More reliable energy level data sets and crystal field calculations for Eu(3+) with fluoride, oxide, or chloride ligands have been selected, and certain of these have been repeated since most previous calculations have errors in matrix elements. The fitted Slater parameters have been corrected for the effects of three-body Coulomb interactions. Some systems do not follow the ligand trend F ~ O > Cl for Slater and spin-orbit parameters. From the limited data available, the average values of the corrected Slater parameters are greater for fluoride compared with chloride ligands, but the differences are comparable with the standard deviations of the parameters. There is no clear nephelauxetic series for these three types of ligands, with respect to spin-orbit coupling. Previous correlations of E with various parameters are of limited value because the (5)D0-(7)F0 energy difference not only depends upon the F(k) and ζf parameters but in addition is sensitive to the importance of J-mixing for low symmetry systems.