Limitations and Pitfalls of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements and Adenosine-Induced Hyperemia

Effect of coronary tortuosity on invasive physiology

We present a case of angina, where extreme coronary tortuosity affected invasive physiology interpretation. Extreme coronary tortuosity may lower fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Therefore, invasive physiology can be misleading in this setting, when used to evaluate stenosis significance, or when used post-percutaneous coronary (PCI) intervention for physiology guided stent optimisation.

Does fractional flow reserve overestimate severity of LAD lesions?

BACKGROUND

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is increasingly used to estimate the severity of coronary stenoses, prior to coronary revascularization. However, it has been suggested that FFR overestimates the severity of Left Anterior Descending (LAD) lesions. Our aim was to verify whether in patients without ischemia on Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, FFR of the LAD is more often abnormal in comparison to FFR of other coronary arteries.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent FFR measurement because of persistent or worsening of angina complaints, within 6 months after normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. FFR measurements of a graft or diagonal branch were excluded. A FFR ≤ 0.80 denoted a functionally relevant stenosis.

RESULTS

In 133 patients, 167 FFR measurements were performed, of which 85 in the LAD. Mean age of the patients was 64.8 ± 10.5 years, 40% were women. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients undergoing LAD and non-LAD measurements. An abnormal FFR was observed in 35.3% of the LAD measurements, compared to 9.8% in the non-LAD measurements (P = 0.001). Also after adjusting for age and gender, the FFR remained more frequently abnormal in the LAD with OR 5.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 12.3). Of the abnormal FFR LAD measurements, 70% were visually considered non-obstructive on invasive angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients without ischemia on MPI, FFR measurement of the LAD is significantly more often abnormal. The majority of these patients has no obstructive lesions on invasive angiography. Possibly, FFR overestimates severity of LAD lesions, with risk of unnecessary revascularization.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) provides an objective measurement of the severity of ischemia caused by coronary stenoses in downstream myocardial regions. Data from the interventional cardiology realm have suggested benefits of a FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy. Limited evidence is available on the use of FFR to guide coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The most recent data have shown that FFR might simplify CABG procedures and optimize patency of arterial grafts without any clear impact on clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarize the available data on FFR-based CABG and discuss the rationale and potential consequences of a switch toward FFR-based surgical revascularization strategy.

Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE

Current studies on endovascular intervention for intracranial atherosclerosis select patients based on luminal stenosis. Coronary studies demonstrated that fractional flow measurements assess ischemia better than anatomical stenosis and can guide patient selection for intervention. We similarly postulated that fractional flow can be used to assess ischemic stroke risk.

METHODS

This was a feasibility study to assess the technical use and safety of applying a pressure guidewire to measure fractional flow across intracranial stenoses. Twenty patients with severe intracranial stenosis were recruited. The percentage of luminal stenosis, distal to proximal pressure ratios (fractional flow) and the fractional flow gradients across the stenosis were measured. Procedural success rate and safety outcomes were documented.

RESULTS

All 20 patients had successful crossing of stenosis by the pressure guidewire. Ten patients underwent angioplasty, and 5 had stenting performed. There was one perforator stroke, but not related to the use of the pressure wire. For the 13 patients with complete pre- and postintervention data, the mean preintervention stenosis, fractional flow and translesional pressure gradient were 76.2%, 0.66 and 29.9 mm Hg, whilst the corresponding postintervention measurements were 24.7%, 0.88 and 10.9 mm Hg, respectively. Fractional flow (r = -0.530, p = 0.001) and the translesional pressure gradient (r = 0.501, p = 0.002) only had a modest correlation with the luminal stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Fractional flow measurement by floating a pressure guidewire across the intracranial stenosis was technically feasible and safe in this study. Further studies are needed to validate its use for ischemic stroke risk assessment.