1
|
Tsui PK, Chau PH, Wong JYH, Wang MP, Gao X, Lam OLT, Leung KCM, Lo ECM, Tiwari A. Oral care knowledge, attitude and practice among nursing staff in acute hospital settings in Hong Kong. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289953. [PMID: 37582111 PMCID: PMC10427009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Investigating the oral care delivered by nursing staff in acute hospital setting is having a remarkable shortage within the current literature. This was provoked due to lack of previous performed investigation in the acute hospital setting besides inconsistent existence of a standardized and comprehensive oral care knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) instrumentation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the oral care KAP level for inpatients among nursing staff; to identify possible barriers to the provision of oral care; and to identify training preferences to improve the oral care of inpatients, in acute hospital settings in Hong Kong; and to provide standardized comprehensive KAP based assessment tool that would benefit and guide other future studies. In this study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted after a 55-item self-administered structured questionnaire was developed. A modified KAP tool was developed. The tool includes 4 domains: oral care knowledge, attitude, practice, and experience. Nursing staff was recruited from July 2018 to April 2019 via convenience sampling. Either online or printed questionnaires were completed. Proportions of nursing staff with good KAP, as defined by having 60% of the total score in the respective domain, were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis of covariance was used to compare the mean scores of KAP among different independent variables and identify the factors associated with good KAP. 404 nursing staff were recruited. Approximately 29.5%, 33.7% and 14.9% of the respondents had good oral care knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively, and 53.2% of the respondents had unpleasant oral care experience. Better oral care practice was associated with higher levels of oral care knowledge (β = 0.1) and oral care attitude (β = 0.3). To conclude: nursing staff in acute hospital settings reported low levels of oral care KAP with variations between the RN, EN and HCA. This study adds to the literature the association between oral care unpleasant experiences and the oral care practice, as well as oral care knowledge and attitude which also in turns associated with practice. The developed standardised tool could be applied for future studies. Recommendations on the future research, training and practices were made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Ki Tsui
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Childcare, Elderly and Community Services, Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Sha Tin), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pui Hing Chau
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Janet Yuen Ha Wong
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
- School of Nursing & Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Man Ping Wang
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xiaoli Gao
- Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Otto Lok Tao Lam
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Katherine Chiu Man Leung
- Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Edward Chin Man Lo
- Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| | - Agnes Tiwari
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital Limited, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oral care to reduce costs and increase clinical effectiveness in preventing nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2023; 23:101834. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
3
|
Interventions to promote oral care regimen adherence in the critical care setting: A systematic review. Aust Crit Care 2022; 35:583-594. [PMID: 34764003 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral care is a fundamental nurse-led intervention in the critical care setting that provides patient comfort and prevents adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. To date, there has been minimal focus on nurse-focused interventions to improve adherence to oral care regimens in the adult intensive care unit setting. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to (i) identify types and characteristics of interventions to improve oral care adherence amongst critical care nurses and intervention core components, (ii) evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to improve adherence of oral care regimens, and (iii) identify the types of outcome measures used to assess oral care regimen adherence. DESIGN This is a systematic review in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. DATA SOURCES Key bibliographic databases and platforms, including Scopus, Cochrane, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and Web of Science, were searched for studies published before July 2020. The Joanna Briggs Institute's quality appraisal tool was used to assess risk of bias in included studies. RESULTS A total of 21 original research studies were identified, of which 18 studies used multifaceted interventions. In accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's quality appraisal tools, four of the 20 quasi-experimental studies were rated as high quality. The one randomised control trial was of moderate quality. Outcome measures included oral care adherence behaviours, oral care knowledge, self-reported adherence, and documentation. Improved effectiveness in oral care adherence was reported in 20 studies. CONCLUSIONS Review findings confirm interventions to change behaviours improve oral care adherence. The most effective interventional approach could not be determined owing to heterogeneity in intervention design and outcome measures. Oral care in the intensive care unit is a vital, nurse-led activity that reduces the risk of hospital-acquired infection. It is recommended that future research adopt implementation science methods to ensure stakeholder engagement and feasibility. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER This review was submitted and subsequently registered on PROSPERO, the International Perspective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019123142.
Collapse
|
4
|
Research on Effects of Oropharyngeal Aspiration on Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage in ICU. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2022; 2022:6433666. [PMID: 35087650 PMCID: PMC8789453 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6433666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Cerebral hemorrhage is a kind of intracranial hemorrhage caused by nontraumatic vascular rupture of the cerebral parenchyma, which is a common cerebrovascular disease with a high disability rate and mortality. This study aimed to explore the effects of oropharyngeal aspiration in reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with cerebral hemorrhage in ICU. In this study, 96 patients with cerebral hemorrhage were selected as the subjects. They received surgical treatment, and then they were transferred into ICU of Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from December 2019 to March 2020. The patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, with 48 in each group. The intervention group received periodic oropharyngeal aspiration, while the control group received routine nursing measures. After the intervention, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and the positive rate of amylase α-trachea cannula specimens were recorded and compared between the two groups. After the intervention, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was 14.89% in the intervention group and 39.58% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference. And, the α-amylase positive rate, mechanical ventilation time, and ICU care duration of endotrachea cannula specimens in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group. In conclusion, oropharyngeal aspiration can effectively reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia after cerebral hemorrhage and shorten mechanical ventilation and ICU care duration. It promotes the rehabilitation of patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Effect of breast milk oral care in infants who underwent surgical correction of ventricular septal defect. Cardiol Young 2021; 31:2015-2018. [PMID: 33883048 DOI: 10.1017/s1047951121001438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored the clinical effect of employing breast milk oral care for infants who underwent surgical correction of ventricular septal defect. METHODS A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted in a provincial hospital between January, 2020 and July, 2020 in China. Patients were randomly divided into an intervention group (breast milk oral care, n = 28) and a control group (physiological saline oral care, n = 28). The intervention group was given oral nursing using breast milk for infants in the early post-operative period, and the control group was given oral nursing using physiological saline. Related clinical data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in age, gender, weight, operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, or aortic cross-clamping time between the two groups. Compared with the physiological saline oral care group, the mechanical ventilation duration, the length of ICU stay in the breast milk oral care group were significantly shorter. The time of start feeding and total enteral nutrition were significantly earlier in the intervention group than those in the control group. The incidence of post-operative pneumonia in the breast milk oral care group was 3.6%, which was significantly lower than that of the physiological saline oral care group. CONCLUSION The use of breast milk for oral care in infants who underwent surgical correction of VSD can reduce the incidence of post-operative pneumonia and promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function.
Collapse
|
6
|
Özdemir S, Türk G. The effect of different concentrations of chlorhexidine on microbial colonization: A double-blinded randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Pract 2021; 28:e13025. [PMID: 34687483 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Study aims were to determine the most effective chlorhexidine concentration to be used in reducing microbial colonization in patients under mechanical ventilation and to examine the effect of oral care using different concentrations on the integrity of the oral mucous membranes. DESIGN This research was a randomized controlled double-blinded experimental study. METHOD The sample of study consisted of the 116 adult patients who remained intubated. Oral care was given to patients 4 times/day as per nurse protocol. Every morning during for 4 days, the intraoral mucosa of all groups of patients was assessed. Microbial colonization samples from oral mucosa were taken in the morning before oral care. A determination of the species of microorganisms in these samples was made. RESULTS A statistically significant difference was found with regard to the reproduction of microorganisms between the oral mucosa samples taken from patients using 2% and 1% chlorhexidine solutions (P < 0.001). In the cultures taken from patients on the first and fourth days of intubation, a total of 36 different microorganisms were seen to be reproducing. CONCLUSION It was concluded that the most effective oral solution for the prevention of microbial colonization in patients under mechanical ventilation was chlorhexidine 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sercan Özdemir
- Anesthesia Intensive Care Unit, Nazilli State Hospital, Aydın, Turkey
| | - Gülengün Türk
- Faculty of Nursing, Fundamentals of Nursing Department, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Branco A, Lourençone EMS, Monteiro AB, Fonseca JP, Blatt CR, Caregnato RCA. Education to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit. Rev Bras Enferm 2020; 73:e20190477. [PMID: 32813804 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to evaluate nursing adherence to the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Bundle and the incidence rate, before and after Continuing education. METHODS a quasi-experimental, retrospective study with a total of 302 patients on mechanical ventilator admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Data obtained from the application of the bundle, from June 2017 to June 2018. In December 2017, a training on the infection was carried out with 48 professionals. RESULTS the mean age of patients was 62.39±17.06 years old. Appropriate measures before and after training, respectively: position of the ventilator filter 94.8% and 96.2%, p=0.074; elevated headboard 88.4% and 94.5%, p<0.001; oral hygiene with chlorhexidine 89.5% and 98.2%, p<0.001; teeth brushing 80.8% and 96.4%, p<0.001; and cuff pressure 92.7% and 95.6%, p=0.002. Incidence density was 7.99 for 4.28 infections/1000 ventilators per day. CONCLUSION the bundle application and education made it possible to increase adherence and decrease infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Branco
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Carine Raquel Blatt
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ciampoli N, Bouchoucha S, Currey J, Hutchinson A. Evaluation of prevention of ventilator-associated infections in four Australian intensive care units. J Infect Prev 2020; 21:147-154. [PMID: 32655696 DOI: 10.1177/1757177420908006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective approaches to practice improvement require development of tailored interventions in collaboration with knowledge users. Objectives To explore critical care nurses' knowledge and adherence to best practice guidelines for management of patients with an artificial airway to minimise development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Methods A cross-sectional study was undertaken across four intensive care units that involved three phases: (1) survey of critical care nurses regarding their current practice; (2) observation of respiratory care delivery; and (3) chart audit. Key care processes evaluated were: (1) technique and adherence to standard precautions when performing endotracheal suction, cuff pressure checks and extubation; and (2) frequency of endotracheal suctioning and mouth care. Results Observational and chart audit data on the provision and documentation of respiratory care were collected for 36 nurse/patient dyads. Forty-six nurses were surveyed and the majority responded that endotracheal suctioning and mouth care should be performed 'as required' or every 2 hours (h). During observations of practice, no patient received mouth care every 2 h, nor had documentation of such. Inconsistent adherence to standard precautions and hand hygiene during respiratory care provision was observed. Chart audit indicated that nurses varied in the frequency of suctioning consistent with documented clinical assessment findings. Conclusion Although nurses had good knowledge for the management of artificial airways, this was not consistently translated into practice. Gaps were identified in relation to respiratory related infection prevention, the prevention of micro-aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions and in the provision of mouth care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Ciampoli
- Epworth HealthCare, Epworth Eastern Intensive Care Unit, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephane Bouchoucha
- Deakin University, Geelong. Faculty of Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery & The Institute for Health Transformation, Centre for Quality and Patient safety Research. Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Judy Currey
- Deakin University, Geelong. Faculty of Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery & The Institute for Health Transformation, Centre for Quality and Patient safety Research. Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ana Hutchinson
- Deakin University, Geelong. Faculty of Health, School of Nursing & Midwifery & The Institute for Health Transformation, Centre for Quality and Patient safety Research. Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Deakin University and Epworth HealthCare Partnership, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Danielis M, Palese A, Terzoni S, Destrebecq ALL. What nursing sensitive outcomes have been studied to-date among patients cared for in intensive care units? Findings from a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 102:103491. [PMID: 31862529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many studies have considered mortality and adverse effects as outcomes sensitive to nursing practice, it seems that other outcomes of nursing care in intensive care units have been explored less commonly. OBJECTIVES To describe the state-of-science in research in the field of nursing sensitive outcomes in intensive care units and to synthesize outcomes that have been documented to date as being influenced by nursing care. DESIGN A scoping review study based on the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, further refined by the Levac and Joanna Briggs Institute was performed in 2019. DATA SOURCES The Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched. In addition, the reference list of included articles was screened. REVIEW METHODS Two researchers independently identified publications on the basis of the following criteria: (a) articles that reported nursing sensitive outcomes on critically-ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, (b) as primary and secondary studies, (c) written in English, and (d) without any time frame limitation. RESULTS Of the 4,231 records, 112 fully met the inclusion criteria and were included. Publications were mainly authored in the US and Canada (n = 44, 39.2%), and the majority (n = 62, 55.3%) had an observational design. A total of 233 nursing sensitive outcomes emerged, categorized in 35 outcomes, with, on average, two per study included. The most often measured outcomes were pressure ulcers (20 studies) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (19 studies); the less studied outcomes were quality of life, secretion clearance, patient-ventilator dysynchrony, and post-extubation dysphagia. When categorizing outcomes, the ones concerning safety (n = 77, 33.1%) were represented the most, followed by those concerning the clinical (n = 72, 30.9%), functional (n = 70, 30.0%), and perceptual (n = 14, 6.0%) domains. The interdependent outcomes linked to multi-professional interventions (e.g., ventilator-associated pneumonias) were the most frequently studied nursing sensitive outcomes (n = 20, 57.1%), while independent outcomes resulting from autonomous interventions performed by nurses were less often studied (n = 8, 22.9%). CONCLUSIONS From a clinical point of view, a large heterogeneity of outcomes influenced by nursing care emerged. However, identified outcomes have been studied with different approaches and metrics, so that future efforts will need to establish homogeneous conceptual and operative definitions. Moreover, increasing efforts in establishing perceptual outcomes, or those close to the fundamentals of nursing care, are suggested in order to better depict the contribution of critical care nurses in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Danielis
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via Vanzetti 5, 20133 Milan, Italy; School of Nursing, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
| | - Alvisa Palese
- School of Nursing, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Terzoni
- School of Nursing, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sole ML, Talbert S, Yan X, Penoyer D, Mehta D, Bennett M, Emery KP, Middleton A, Deaton L, Abomoelak B, Deb C. Impact of deep oropharyngeal suctioning on microaspiration, ventilator events, and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:3045-3057. [PMID: 31241194 PMCID: PMC8331062 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate a deep oropharyngeal suction intervention (NO-ASPIRATE) in intubated patients on microaspiration, ventilator-associated events and clinical outcomes. DESIGN Prospective, two-group, single-blind, randomized clinical trial. METHODS The study was conducted between 2014 - 2017 in 513 participants enroled within 24 hr of intubation and randomized into NO-ASPIRATE or usual care groups. Standard oral care was provided to all participants every 4 hr and deep oropharyngeal suctioning was added to the NO-ASPIRATE group. Oral and tracheal specimens were obtained to quantify α-amylase as an aspiration biomarker. RESULTS Data were analysed for 410 study completers enrolled at least 36 hr: NO-ASPIRATE (N = 206) and usual care (N = 204). Percent of tracheal specimens positive for α-amylase, mean tracheal α-amylase levels over time and ventilator-associated events were not different between groups. The NO-ASPIRATE group had a shorter hospital length of stay and a subgroup with moderate aspiration at baseline had significantly lower α-amylase levels across time. CONCLUSION Hospital length of stay was shorter in the NO-ASPIRATE group and a subgroup of intervention participants had lower α-amylase across time. Delivery of standardized oral care to all participants may have been an intervention itself and possibly associated with the lack of significant findings for most outcomes. IMPACT This trial compared usual care to oral care with a deep suctioning intervention on microaspiration and ventilator-associated events, as this has not been systematically studied. Further research on the usefulness of α-amylase as an aspiration biomarker and the role of oral suctioning, especially for certain populations, is indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02284178.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Lou Sole
- University of Central Florida College of Nursing, Orlando, Florida
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Steven Talbert
- University of Central Florida College of Nursing, Orlando, Florida
| | - Xin Yan
- Department of Statistics, University of Central Florida College of Sciences, Orlando, Florida
| | - Daleen Penoyer
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Devendra Mehta
- Pediatric Specialty Diagnostic Laboratory, Arnold Palmer Hospital, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Melody Bennett
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | | | - Aurea Middleton
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Lara Deaton
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Bassam Abomoelak
- Pediatric Specialty Diagnostic Laboratory, Arnold Palmer Hospital, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| | - Chirajyoti Deb
- Pediatric Specialty Diagnostic Laboratory, Arnold Palmer Hospital, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ladbrook E, Bouchoucha SL, Hutchinson A. Lessons learned from a rapid implementation of a ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention bundle. J Infect Prev 2019; 20:274-280. [PMID: 31762789 DOI: 10.1177/1757177419846588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common avoidable healthcare associated infection in ventilated critical care patients that can have a detrimental impact on patient recovery. To increase uptake at a local level, care bundles should be designed and implemented in collaboration with the end-users who will implement the bundle into practice. Aim/objective The aim in this study was to evaluate critical care nurses' perceptions of the usability of a respiratory care bundle as an effective approach to VAP prevention. Methods An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted. A respiratory care bundle consisting of five components was implemented over a 4-week period. Following implementation, a focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain nurses' feedback on the useability of the care bundle. Seven intensive care nurses caring for ventilated patients participated in the study. Findings/results Participants confirmed that using a care bundle provided a structured approach to nursing care of a ventilated patient and that the use of checklist reminders at the bedside was useful in a busy practice environment. Barriers to uptake and implementation of the bundle were that the unit culture did not prioritise preventative care and the need for a structured interdisciplinary approach to sedation and weaning of mechanical ventilation. Discussion To successfully imbed all elements of a respiratory care bundle into practice; an interdisciplinary approach is needed in which there is a strong emphasis on preventative care. These findings highlight the advantages of involving end-users in the development of strategies to decrease VAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse Ladbrook
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Australia
| | - Stéphane L Bouchoucha
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Australia.,Deakin University Geelong, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Epworth Healthcare Partnership, Australia
| | - Ana Hutchinson
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Australia.,Deakin University Geelong, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Epworth Healthcare Partnership, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alecrim RX, Taminato M, Belasco AGS, Barbosa D, Kusahara DM, Fram D. Boas práticas na prevenção de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica. ACTA PAUL ENFERM 2019. [DOI: 10.1590/1982-0194201900003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a adesão dos profissionais de saúde a um conjunto de boas práticas de prevenção de Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica, índice de conformidade às medidas individuais e associação de características clínicas dos pacientes e adesão ao conjunto de boas práticas com a pneumonia. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo realizado em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva de um hospital universitário no período de maio de 2017 a outubro de 2017. A amostra foi composta por pacientes internados no período do estudo, que preencheram os critérios de inclusão, a coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de consulta a prontuários. Resultados: O item com maior adesão foi a avaliação diária da sedação e redução sempre que possível, 81 (91,0%), seguido da troca do circuito a cada 7 dias, 76 (82,6). A manutenção da pressão do cuff entre 20 e 30 mm H2O foi o item com menor adesão 22 (23,9%). A adesão ao conjunto completo apresentou conformidade em 20 (21,7%) das oportunidades. O estudo mostrou que quanto maior a adesão às medidas de boas práticas, menor é o risco de Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica, porém não foi um dado estatisticamente significante. Os pacientes cirúrgicos e em uso de ventilação mecânica apresentaram maior risco de desenvolver PAV (p= 0,05). Conclusão: A Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica pode trazer grave repercussão para o paciente, a aplicação de medidas com embasamento científico é fundamental, a fim de se prevenir a ocorrência deste agravo, que é uma das mais frequentes infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde dentro das Unidades de Terapia Intensiva brasileiras.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Dayana Fram
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Andersson M, Wilde-Larsson B, Persenius M. Intensive care nurses fail to translate knowledge and skills into practice - A mixed-methods study on perceptions of oral care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2018; 52:51-60. [PMID: 30297151 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify intensive care nurses' perceptions of oral care according to Coker et al.'s (2013) conceptual framework and to contribute to the knowledge base of oral care in intensive care. DESIGN/METHODS This was a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design, with more weight given to the quantitative part. Participants responded to the Nursing Care related to Oral Health questionnaire, including perceptions of oral care antecedents (18 items), defining attributes (17 items), and consequences (6 items) and two open-ended questions. The data were analysed with descriptive and correlation statistics and qualitative content analysis. SETTING Intensive care nurses (n = 88) in six general intensive care units. RESULTS Intensive care nurses perceived that an important part of nursing care was oral care, especially to intubated patients. They perceived that the nursing staff was competent in oral care skills and had access to different kinds of equipment and supplies to provide oral care. The oral cavity was inspected on a daily basis, mostly without the use of any assessment instruments. Oral care seemed to be task-oriented, and documentation of the patients' experiences of the oral care process was rare. CONCLUSIONS The antecedents, knowledge and skills are available to provide quality oral care, but intensive care nurses seem to have difficulties translating these components into practice. Thus they might have to shift their task-oriented approach towards oral care to a more person-centred approach in order to be able to meet patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Andersson
- Department of Health Science, Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad, Sweden.
| | - Bodil Wilde-Larsson
- Department of Health Science, Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad, Sweden; Faculty of Public Health Studies, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway
| | - Mona Persenius
- Department of Health Science, Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Impact of selective digestive decontamination without systemic antibiotics in a major heart surgery intensive care unit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156:685-693. [PMID: 29628347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence density of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is higher in patients undergoing major heart surgery than in other populations, despite the introduction of bundles of preventive measures, because many risk factors are not amenable to intervention. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has been shown to be efficacious for decreasing the frequency of VAP, although it has not been incorporated into the routine of most intensive care units. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of SDD without parenteral antibiotics for preventing VAP in a major heart surgery intensive care unit. METHODS We compared the incidence of VAP before the introduction of SDD (17 months) and during the 17 months after the introduction of SDD and examined its ecologic influence. RESULTS The rates of VAP in the overall population before and during the intervention were 16.26/1000 days and 6.80 episodes/1000 days of mechanical ventilation, respectively (P = .01). The rates of VAP in the 173 patients remaining under mechanical ventilation > 48 hours after surgery were, respectively, 25.85/1000 days of mechanical ventilation versus 12.06 episodes/1000 days of mechanical ventilation (P = .04). We found a significant reduction in the number of patients with multidrug-resistant microorganisms (P = .01) in the second period of the study. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that SDD without parenteral antibiotics can reduce the incidence of VAP in high-risk patients after major heart surgery, with no significant ecologic influence.
Collapse
|
15
|
Marino PJ, Hannigan A, Haywood S, Cole JM, Palmer N, Emanuel C, Kinsella T, Lewis MAO, Wise MP, Williams DW. Comparison of foam swabs and toothbrushes as oral hygiene interventions in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised split mouth study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2016; 3:e000150. [PMID: 27843549 PMCID: PMC5073587 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction During critical illness, dental plaque may serve as a reservoir of respiratory pathogens. This study compared the effectiveness of toothbrushing with a small-headed toothbrush or a foam-headed swab in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods This was a randomised, assessor-blinded, split-mouth trial, performed at a single critical care unit. Adult, orally intubated patients with >20 teeth, where >24 hours of mechanical ventilation was expected were included. Teeth were cleaned 12-hourly using a foam swab or toothbrush (each randomly assigned to one side of the mouth). Cleaning efficacy was based on plaque scores, gingival index and microbial plaque counts. Results High initial plaque (mean=2.1 (SD 0.45)) and gingival (mean=2.0 (SD 0.54)) scores were recorded for 21 patients. A significant reduction compared with initial plaque index occurred using both toothbrushes (mean change=−1.26, 95% CI −1.57 to −0.95; p<0.001) and foam swabs (mean change=−1.28, 95% CI −1.54 to −1.01; p<0.001). There was significant reduction in gingival index over time using toothbrushes (mean change=−0.92; 95% CI −1.19 to −0.64; p<0.001) and foam swabs (mean change=−0.85; 95% CI −1.10 to −0.61; p<0.001). Differences between cleaning methods were not statistically significant (p=0.12 for change in gingival index; p=0.24 for change in plaque index). There was no significant change in bacterial dental plaque counts between toothbrushing (mean change 3.7×104 colony-forming units (CFUs); minimum to maximum (−2.5×1010 CFUs, 8.7×107 CFUs)) and foam swabs (mean change 9×104 CFUs; minimum to maximum (−3.1×1010 CFUs, 3.0×107 CFUs)). Conclusions Patients admitted to adult intensive care had poor oral health, which improved after brushing with a toothbrush or foam swab. Both interventions were equally effective at removing plaque and reducing gingival inflammation. Trial registration number NCT01154257; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ailish Hannigan
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick , Limerick , Ireland
| | - Sean Haywood
- School of Dentistry, Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| | - Jade M Cole
- Adult Critical Care , University Hospital of Wales , Cardiff , UK
| | - Nicki Palmer
- Adult Critical Care , University Hospital of Wales , Cardiff , UK
| | | | | | | | - Matt P Wise
- Adult Critical Care , University Hospital of Wales , Cardiff , UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Parisi M, Gerovasili V, Dimopoulos S, Kampisiouli E, Goga C, Perivolioti E, Argyropoulou A, Routsi C, Tsiodras S, Nanas S. Use of Ventilator Bundle and Staff Education to Decrease Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Patients. Crit Care Nurse 2016; 36:e1-e7. [PMID: 27694363 DOI: 10.4037/ccn2016520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), one of the most common hospital-acquired infections, has a high mortality rate. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence of VAP in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit and to examine the effects of the implementation of ventilator bundles and staff education on its incidence. METHODS A 24-month-long before/after study was conducted, divided into baseline, intervention, and postintervention periods. VAP incidence and rate, the microbiological profile, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit were recorded and compared between the periods. RESULTS Of 1097 patients evaluated, 362 met the inclusion criteria. The baseline VAP rate was 21.6 per 1000 ventilator days. During the postintervention period, it decreased to 11.6 per 1000 ventilator days (P = .01). Length of stay in the intensive care unit decreased from 36 to 27 days (P = .04), and duration of mechanical ventilation decreased from 26 to 21 days (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS VAP incidence was high in a general intensive care unit in a Greek hospital. However, implementation of a ventilator bundle and staff education has decreased both VAP incidence and length of stay in the unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Parisi
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Gerovasili
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Stavros Dimopoulos
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathia Kampisiouli
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Goga
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathia Perivolioti
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Athina Argyropoulou
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Routsi
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Sotirios Tsiodras
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Serafeim Nanas
- Maria Parisi is a high-dependency unit nurse, Vasiliki Gerovasili is a pulmonologist, Efstathia Kampisiouli is a nursing specialization manager and surgical nurse specialist, Christina Goga is a pulmonologist, Christina Routsi is an associate professor of intensive care medicine, and Serafeim Nanas is a professor of intensive care medicine, First Department of Critical Care, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Stavros Dimopoulos is an internal medicine-intensive care medicine specialist, John Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrookes Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Efstathia Perivolioti is a consultant and Athina Argyropoulou is a consultant and director, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.Sotirios Tsiodras is an associate professor of medicine and infectious diseases, University of Athens Medical School, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hollaar V, van der Maarel-Wierink C, van der Putten GJ, van der Sanden W, de Swart B, de Baat C. Defining characteristics and risk indicators for diagnosing nursing home-acquired pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents, using the electronically-modified Delphi Method. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:60. [PMID: 26951645 PMCID: PMC4782327 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0231-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In nursing home residents, it is not possible to distinguish pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia clinically. International literature reveals no consensus on which and how many characteristics and risk indicators must be present to diagnose (nursing home-acquired) pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia. The aim of this survey was to reach consensus among a panel of clinical medical experts in geriatrics and pulmonology about the characteristics required for diagnosing pneumonia, and about the risk indicators needed to consider the diagnosis aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents with pneumonia. METHODS Literature review and three expert-rating iterations using the electronically-modified Delphi Method were carried out. After each expert rating iteration, data analysis was performed. Qualitative responses and additional (nursing home-acquired) pneumonia characteristics which were mentioned in reply to structured open-ended questions were summarised, whilst similar responses were combined and these combinations were ordered by frequency in order to use them in the next iteration. Characteristics which failed to reach consensus were considered as inconclusive and eliminated. Consensus was reached when at least 70 % of the participants agreed. RESULTS Literature review revealed 16 currently used common characteristics for diagnosing (nursing home-acquired) pneumonia. No consensus was reached about characteristics and the number of characteristics required for diagnosing (nursing home-acquired) pneumonia. However, 57 % agreed that dyspnea, fever, deterioration of general functioning, tachypnea and crepitation with auscultation are the most important characteristics and the responses by the participants suggested that two or three characteristics should be present. Subsequently, 80 % of the participants agreed on the risk indicators dysphagia, choking incident, (history of) tube feeding, neurological disease and cognitive impairment for considering the diagnosis aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents with pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS No final consensus could be reached about which and how many characteristics are required for diagnosing pneumonia in nursing home residents. However, the results indicated that dyspnea, fever, deterioration of general functioning, tachypnea and crepitation with auscultation are characteristics of some importance and that at least two or three characteristics should be present. With regard to considering aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents with pneumonia, final consensus was reached about the risk indicators dysphagia, choking incident, (history of) tube feeding, neurological disease and cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Hollaar
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Ghent, Belgium. .,BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Claar van der Maarel-Wierink
- BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Ghent, Belgium. .,BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Center for Special Care in Dentistry, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gert-Jan van der Putten
- BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Ghent, Belgium. .,Center for Special Care in Dentistry, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Amaris Gooizicht, Paulus van Loolaan 21, 1217, SH, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
| | - Wil van der Sanden
- Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Bert de Swart
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Rehabilitation, division Speech Therapy, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Cees de Baat
- BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Ghent, Belgium. .,BENECOMO, Flemish-Netherlands Geriatric Oral Research Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wong T, Schlichting AB, Stoltze AJ, Fuller BM, Peacock A, Harland KK, Ahmed A, Mohr N. No Decrease in Early Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia After Early Use of Chlorhexidine. Am J Crit Care 2016; 25:173-7. [PMID: 26932921 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2016823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral chlorhexidine prophylaxis can decrease occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, the importance of timing has never been fully explored. OBJECTIVE To see if early administration of oral chlorhexidine is associated with lower incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia (within 5 days of admission to intensive care unit) in intubated air ambulance patients. METHODS A single-center, retrospective cohort study of intubated adults transported by a university-based air ambulance service and admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from July 2011 through April 2013. Primary exposure was time from helicopter retrieval to the first dose of oral chlorhexidine in the intensive care unit. Early chlorhexidine was defined as receipt of the drug within 6 hours of helicopter departure. The primary outcome was clinical diagnosis of early ventilator-associated pneumonia. Patients who were less than 18 years old, died within 72 hours of admission, or had pneumonia at admission were excluded. RESULTS Among 134 patients, 49% were treated with chlorhexidine before 6 hours, 84% were treated before 12 hours, and 11% were treated for early pneumonia. Early chlorhexidine (before 6 hours; 15%) was not associated (P = .21) with early pneumonia (8%). Furthermore, median times to chlorhexidine did not differ significantly (P = .23) between patients in whom pneumonia developed (5.2 hours) and patients with no pneumonia (6.1 hours). CONCLUSIONS Early administration of oral chlorhexidine in intubated patients was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a surgical intensive care unit with high rates of chlorhexidine administration before 12 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terrence Wong
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Adam B Schlichting
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine.
| | - Andrew J Stoltze
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Brian M Fuller
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Amanda Peacock
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Kari K Harland
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Azeemuddin Ahmed
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Nicholas Mohr
- Terrence Wong is a medical student, Andrew J. Stoltze is a resident physician, Kari K. Harland is a biostatistician, and Azeemuddin Ahmed is a clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Adam B. Schlichting is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Brian M. Fuller is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine and Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Amanda Peacock is an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. Nicholas Mohr is a clinical assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|