Identifying barriers to early mobilisation among mechanically ventilated patients in a trauma intensive care unit

Impact of knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practices of nurses on early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU

BACKGROUND

Many ICUs worldwide are striving to integrate early mobilization as part of critical care rehabilitation. However, ICU nurses, who are essential contributors to the early mobilization of critically ill patients, still lack comprehensive surveys assessing their knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients.

AIM

To analyse the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients and to explore the effects of these practices.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicentre cross-sectional study. ICU nurses in five tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China, were selected by convenience sampling and invited to complete an online questionnaire between 1 June 2021 and 15 June 2021. Sociodemographic data and the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU nurses regarding early mobilization.

RESULTS

A total of 296 valid questionnaires were collected, for a response rate of approximately 77.5%. The average scores for knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU nurses regarding the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients were 42.7 ± 7.4, 34.3 ± 6.5, and 47.1 ± 6.5, respectively, which were good scores. Quantile regressions showed that at the 25% and 50% quartiles, increases in knowledge and attitude scores resulted in increases in practice scores (p < .001); however, at the 75% quartile, increases in knowledge scores did not result in practice score increases (t = 0.000, p = .999); moreover, there was still a 0.5-point increase in practice scores per 1-point increase in attitude scores (t = 0.500, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices of ICU nurses were good, although there is room for improvement. Considering that the influence of attitudes on practice improvement is more important than knowledge, ICU managers should promote knowledge transformation, strengthen attitudes, and adopt comprehensive measures to promote the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

To optimize the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU, introducing multipronged support strategies based on the knowledge and attitudes of ICU nurses is recommended to promote the implementation of such practices.

Clinicians' knowledge and attitude towards early mobilization in intensive care units in Ethiopian tertiary hospitals: A multi-centre study

Objectives

To assess clinicians' knowledge, attitude and associated factors towards patients' early mobilization in intensive care units in the tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A multi-centre, cross-sectional study was conducted at the tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia from April to June, 2022. Data were collected by using self-administered, structured questionnaire; ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed and associations were described in adjusted odds ratios.

Results

A total of 304 clinicians were included (response rate of 89.7%). The proportions of poor, fair and good knowledge towards early mobilization in intensive care unit among clinicians were 16.8%, 57.9% and 25.3%, respectively; while that of negative, fair and positive attitude were 16.4%, 60.2% and 23.4%, respectively. Factors associated with better knowledge were being a physiotherapist (adjusted odds ratio = 2.9, confidence interval = 1.2-6.7), having a total work experience >5 years (adjusted odds ratio = 4.6, confidence interval = 1.7-12.1), having an intensive care unit work experience >5 years (adjusted odds ratio = 2.8, confidence interval = 1.1-6.8), previous in-service training (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8, confidence interval = 1.1-3.0) and reading guidelines (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, confidence interval = 1.1-3.2). Better attitude was associated with in-service training (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, confidence interval = 1.2-3.1), attending early mobilization courses (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8, confidence interval = 1.1-3.0), presence of mobilization advocators (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7, confidence interval = 1.0-2.8), good knowledge (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, confidence interval = 1.2-5.8) and fair knowledge (adjusted odds ratio = 2.5, confidence interval = 1.3-4.8).

Conclusion

Most of the clinicians had demonstrated fair knowledge and attitude towards early mobilization in intensive care unit. However, there were significant proportion of clinicians who had poor knowledge and negative attitude. We recommended active engagement of physiotherapists and experienced clinicians in intensive care units. Clinicians need to have self-learning habits and attend regular training/courses related to early mobilization in intensive care unit.

ICU quasi-speciality nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding early mobilization: A cross-sectional survey

AIM

Early mobilization (EM) improves critical illness survivors' clinical outcomes. This study examines ICU quasi-specialty nurses' EM-related knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP).

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a provincial ICU specialty nurse training site from 2019 to 2021. KAP data were collected using a self-report questionnaire.

METHODS

Participants were registered nurses enrolled in the training programme; 485 nurses from 188 hospitals completed the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 37.7% had EM training, and 30.7% reported their wards performed EM. Median (IQR) scores for knowledge, attitudes and practices were 14.0 (4.0), 47.0 (9.0) and 37.0 (8.0), belonging to medium, high and medium levels. Scores were lowest for EM scope, implementation indicators and out-of-bed mobilization. There were significant deviations in KAP scores amongst nurses at different levels of hospitals with EM training and whose departments performed EM. Significant positive correlations between knowledge and practice, and attitude and practice were identified.

Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients: An Integrative Literature Review

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lack of mobilization in ventilated neurosurgery patients is problematic due to significant consequences. Although early mobility addresses these complications, few studies have been conducted in this population, resulting in infrequent mobilization efforts. Nurses prioritize and implement patient care interventions, including mobilization, with multidisciplinary teams. This integrative literature review examines what is known regarding nursing perceptions on mobilization and their role within a multidisciplinary team for mobilization in ventilated neurosurgery patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using online databases to identify research articles on early mobility studies in ventilated critically ill and neurosurgical patients from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified and indicated a paucity of research specific to mobilizing ventilated neurosurgery patients. Nurses understand the purpose and benefits of early mobility in critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients. Mixed perceptions exist regarding the responsibility for prioritizing and initiating mobilization. Main barriers include patient safety concerns, untimeliness due to limited resources, unit culture, lack of nursing knowledge, and need for improved teamwork. Associations between teamwork-based interventions and decreased length of stay, increased rates of mobility, and faster time to early mobilization exist. Nurse-led interventions showed additional benefits including positive perceptions such as empowerment, confidence, increased knowledge, and a progressive shift in unit culture. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates a continued need for understanding nursing perceptions and role in teamwork to mobilize ventilated neurosurgery patients. Future research should focus on testing nurse-led mobility interventions so higher rates of mobilization and provision of holistic patient care can be achieved.

What are the barriers to nurses mobilising adult patients in intensive care units? An integrative review

OBJECTIVES

There is a need for early mobilisation of patients in intensive care units to prevent acquired weaknesses which can have a long-term impact on health and quality of life. This need is not always fulfilled. We therefore sought to conduct an integrative review of international evidence to answer the question: What are the barriers to nurses mobilising adult patients in intensive care units?

REVIEW METHOD USED

We conducted a systematic search and thematic analysis. We were able to present a descriptive quantitative synthesis of the survey articles included.

DATA SOURCES

We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases between and including 2010 and 2020 using search terms synonymous with "intensive care unit" and "nurse" and "early mobilisation" and "barrier using Boolean operators" and "truncation". We completed backwards and forwards citation searches on included studies.

RESULTS

We included seven articles which we synthesised into three themes and 13 subthemes as follows: (i) organisational barriers (subthemes were staffing levels, time and workload, resources, and care coordination), (ii) individual barriers (subthemes were self and team safety, knowledge and training, beliefs about the consequences of early mobilisation, stress, and other barriers), and (iii) patient-related barriers (subthemes were medical instability/physical status, patient safety, neurological deficits and sedation, and nonconcordance of patients).

CONCLUSION

Nurses' barriers were wide ranging, and interventions to improve concordance with early mobilisation need to be tailored to address this group's specific barriers.

Perceived barriers to early goal-directed mobility in the intensive care unit: Results of a quality improvement evaluation

BACKGROUND

A multicentre randomised trial demonstrated improved outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) patients using early, goal-directed mobility implemented by nurses.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate barriers to nursing mobility, using a validated survey, during an ongoing quality improvement (QI) project (2019) in a medical ICU and determine changes from the pre-QI (2017) baseline.

METHODS

Nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical technicians completed the 26-item Patient Mobilization Attitudes and Beliefs Survey for the ICU (PMABS-ICU). An overall score and three subscale scores (knowledge, attitudes, behaviour), each ranging from 0 to 100, were calculated; higher scores indicated greater barriers.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (93% response rate) nurses, eight (100%) nurse practitioners and physician assistants, and 11 (100%) clinical technicians completed the PMABS-ICU. For all respondents (N = 94), the mean (standard deviation) overall PMABS-ICU score was 32 (8) and the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour subscale scores were 22 (11), 33 (11), and 34 (8), respectively. Among all respondents completing the survey in both 2017 and 2019 (N = 46), there was improvement in the mean (95% confidence interval) overall score [-3.1 (-5.8, -0.5); p = .022] and in the knowledge [-5.1 (-8.9, -1.3); p = .010] and attitudes [-3.9 (-7.3, -0.6); p = .023] subscale scores. Among all respondents (N = 48) taking the PMABS-ICU for the first time in 2019 compared with those taking the survey before the QI project in 2017 (N = 99), there was improvement in the mean (95% confidence interval) overall score [-3.8 (-6.5, -1.1); p = .007] and in the knowledge [-6.9 (-11.0, -2.7); p = .001] and attitude [-4.3 (-8.1, -0.5); p = .027] subscale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a validated survey administered to ICU nurses and other staff, before and during a structured QI project, there was a decrease in perceived barriers to mobility. Reduced barriers among those taking the survey for the first time during the QI project compared with those taking the survey before the QI project suggests a positive culture change supporting early, goal-directed mobility implemented by nurses.

Tradução e adaptação cultural para a língua portuguesa falada no Brasil da Canadian survey of mobilization of ICU patients

RESUMO Este estudo teve como objetivo traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o questionário Canadian survey of mobilization of intensive care unit patients para a língua portuguesa falada no Brasil. Este instrumento avalia profissionais de unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) em relação aos conhecimentos sobre a mobilização precoce (MP) e sua importância, as percepções sobre barreiras e as práticas de reabilitação com o paciente crítico. O protocolo incluiu as etapas: autorização e cessão de direitos de uso; tradução do instrumento para a língua portuguesa; reconciliação; retrotradução para a língua original; revisão e harmonização da retrotradução; aprovação da autora principal do questionário original; revisão da versão em português; desdobramento cognitivo; e reconciliação e elaboração da versão final. Devido a algumas diferenças conceituais e culturais entre os dois países, algumas dúvidas foram discutidas com a autora principal do instrumento, a qual concordou com as alterações sugeridas. No desdobramento cognitivo, os 10 profissionais selecionados testaram a clareza, compreensão e aceitabilidade do questionário, e demonstraram suas dificuldades quanto ao conteúdo deste. Muitos entrevistados evidenciaram que o instrumento desperta reflexões importantes sobre as práticas diárias e os benefícios com a realização da MP. O questionário intitulado Pesquisa de mobilização de pacientes em unidade de terapia intensiva: conhecimento, perspectivas e práticas atuais encontra-se traduzido e adaptado culturalmente para a língua portuguesa falada no Brasil, podendo ser utilizado para avaliar aspectos da MP por profissionais que participam deste processo em UTIs adulto e pediátricas. Estudos futuros utilizando esta versão serão necessários para verificar se o questionário fornece medidas reprodutíveis e válidas.

Perceived barriers to early mobilization of intensive care unit patients by nurses in hospitals affiliated to Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences of Ahvaz in 2019

Early mobilization (EM) of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a safe, feasible, and beneficial approach. However, the implementation of EM as a part of routine clinical care can be challenging. As a result, the present study aimed to identify the potential barriers to EM of ICU patients. The statistical population of this descriptive-analytical study included 107 critical care nurses working in hospitals affiliated with the Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences of Ahvaz. The participants were selected using the census method among the eligible critical care nurses, and the researcher-made questionnaire was used for data collection. This questionnaire included a demographic questionnaire and an inventory of barriers to EM. In total, 72% of the nurses had a highly positive attitude towards EM implementation, whereas relatively few had a slightly positive attitude. The major human-resource-related barriers included the lack of trained staff (76.6%), inadequate shift nurses (74%), and inadequate time for this procedure (57.9%). Approximately 88.9%, 82.2%, 62%, and 57.9% of the nurses reported coma or a deep degree of sedation, mobilization of obese patients, mobilization of patients with agitation, and pain, respectively, as the major patient-related barriers. The lack of EM implementation and recording according to the checklist (90.4%), the lack of an approved EM implementation protocol (88.8%), and inadequate equipment for the mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients (58%) were among the major equipment-related barriers. The participating nurses were aware of the EM advantages, and the majority of them had a highly positive attitude towards its implementation in the ICU. However, nurses believed that the actual EM implementation is associated with challenges such as human resources limitations, equipment-related barriers, and patient-related barriers.

Occupational Therapy in the ICU: A Scoping Review of 221 Documents

OBJECTIVES

Occupational therapists have specialized expertise to enable people to perform meaningful "occupations" that support health, well-being, and participation in life roles. Given the physical, cognitive, and psychologic disability experienced by ICU survivors, occupational therapists could play an important role in their recovery. We conducted a scoping review to determine the state of knowledge of interventions delivered by occupational therapists in adult ICU patients.

DATA SOURCES

Eight electronic databases from inception to 05/2018.

STUDY SELECTION

We included reports of adult patients receiving direct patient care from an occupational therapist in the ICU, all study designs, and quantitative and qualitative traditions.

DATA EXTRACTION

Independently in duplicate, interprofessional team members screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted report and intervention characteristics. From original research articles, we also extracted study design, number of patients, and primary outcomes. We resolved disagreements by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 50,700 citations, 221 reports met inclusion criteria, 74 (79%) published after 2010, and 125 (56%) appeared in critical care journals. The three most commonly reported types of interventions were mobility (81%), physical rehabilitation (61%), and activities of daily living (31%). We identified 46 unique original research studies of occupational therapy interventions; the most common study research design was before-after studies (33%).

CONCLUSIONS

The role of occupational therapists in ICU rehabilitation is not currently well established. Current interventions in the ICU are dominated by physical rehabilitation with a growing role in communication and delirium prevention and care. Given the diverse needs of ICU patients and the scope of occupational therapy, there could be an opportunities for occupational therapists to expand their role and spearhead original research investigating an enriched breadth of ICU interventions.

[Early mobilisation on the intensive care unit : What we know]

BACKGROUND

Early mobilization is defined as intervention within the first 72 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. According to the current state of relevant studies, evidence on early mobilization in critically ill patients is still inconsistent. This leads to insecurity in caretakers and subsequently to incomplete implementation in German ICUs.

OBJECTIVES

What type of intervention is suitable for certain patient groups? Which issues remain unresolved?

RESULTS

To obtain best possible outcomes, early mobilization should be initiated during the first 72 h after ICU admission. Implementation of early mobilization improves clinical outcome and should be integrated in a patient-centered bundle (such as ABCDEF). Mechanical ventilation is not a contraindication to intervention. Evidence in neurocritical care as well as functionally dependent patients is still low. Mode of intervention and dosage of early mobilisation remain unclear.

CONCLUSION

Early mobilization is safe and feasible, resulting in improved outcomes in surgical and medical ICU patients. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the optimal dosage and duration of intervention, especially in neurocritical care patients.

Recent evidence on early mobilization in critical-Ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the benefits of early mobilization and summarize the results of most recent clinical studies examining early mobilization in critically ill patients followed by a presentation of recent developments in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early mobilization of ICU patients, defined as mobilization within 72 h of ICU admission, is still uncommon. In medical and surgical critically ill patients, mobilization is well tolerated even in intubated patients. In neurocritical care, evidence to support early mobilization is either lacking (aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage), or the results are inconsistent (e.g. stroke). Successful implementation of early mobilization requires a cultural change; preferably based on an interprofessional approach with clearly defined responsibilities and including a mobilization scoring system. Although the evidence for the majority of the technical tools is still limited, the use of a bed cycle ergometer and a treadmill with strap system has been promising in smaller trials.

SUMMARY

Early mobilization is well tolerated and feasible, resulting in improved outcomes in surgical and medical ICU patients. Implementation of early mobilization can be challenging and may need a cultural change anchored in an interprofessional approach and integrated in a patient-centered bundle. Scoring systems should be integrated to define daily goals and used to verify patients' achievements or identify barriers immediately.