Older patients' recovery following intensive care: A follow-up study with the RAIN questionnaire

A scoping review of older patients' health-related quality of life, recovery and well-being after intensive care

AIMS

In the present study, we aimed to determine how Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), recovery (function and capacity in daily life) and well-being are followed up and characterised in persons ≥65 years of age who were being cared for in an intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid) and PsycINFO databases were searched in October 2021. 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The scoping review followed the principles outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework were used.

RESULTS

Results are presented under five subheadings: Study characteristics, Type of studies, Methods for follow-up, health-related quality of life, and Recovery. Time seems to be an important factor regarding HRQoL among older patients being cared for in an ICU, with most elderly survivors perceiving their HRQoL as acceptable after 1 year. Nevertheless, several studies showed patients' willingness to be readmitted to the ICU if necessary, indicating that life is worth fighting for.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Due to the design of the study, this study involves no patient or public contribution.

Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L in critical care survivors: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and related factors in intensive care unit survivors one-12 months after discharge.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

This cross-sectional survey included survivors who had been admitted to an intensive care unit for ≥48 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

HRQOL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L profile, which evaluates five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) on five levels (no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems), EQ-VAS (score range 0-100, 100 indicating best health) and EQ values (score range -0.066-1, 1 indicating best health). The factors influencing HRQOL were analyzed by Tobit regression.

SETTING

Survivors treated in an intensive care unit at six institutions in Korea.

RESULTS

Only 7.9% of the 534 participants had self-reported profiles of no health problems in all five dimensions. The proportion of participants with slight problems was highest in pain/discomfort with 85.0%. The proportion with severe problems was highest in usual activities with 21.7%, followed by mobility with 21.0%. The median and interquartile range of the EQ-VAS and EQ values were 60.00 (45.00 to 75.00) and 0.72 (0.52 to 0.80), respectively. Negative impact factors on HRQOL included older age, women, residing in a long term care facility, unemployment, emergency intensive care admission, and intensive care stay ≥ 7 days.

CONCLUSION

HRQOL among Korean intensive care survivors is low. The level of problems in physical dimensions is more severe than that in mental health dimensions. Early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit should be provided to facilitate long-term recovery.