Pain, nausea, vomiting, thirst, cold, … the challenge of well-being in post-operative patients

Factors influencing thirst in ICU patients: A mixed methods systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the factors influencing thirst in ICU patients, providing a reference for effective management of thirst in ICU patients and the formulation of intervention measures.

METHODS

A total of 12 electronic databases were searched from inception to July 2023. The synthesis method of JBI mixed methods research systematic review was used. The quantitative studies were analyzed by Stata17.0 and RevMan 5.3 software, and the qualitative studies by meta-aggregation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, including 2 qualitative studies and 11 quantitative studies. The quantitative study was carried out by meta-aggregation, extracting seven categories to form two synthesized findings. Quantitative meta-analysis revealed that 11 factors, including marital status, whether to use mechanical ventilation for the first time, air leakage, mechanical ventilation mode, simplified acute physiology score, respiratory rate, mask comfort, serum sodium concentration, breathing pattern, diuretics, and vasoactive drugs, were all associated with the occurrence of thirst in ICU patients. The qualitative and quantitative results were integrated into 5 categories, namely personal characteristics and lifestyle, disease factors, treatment factors, psychological factors, and nurse factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirst is a prevalent and severe issue among ICU patients, and effective interventions are required to address it. Considering its various causes, managing thirst in ICU patients should involve multiple levels of intervention. Treatment-related factors contribute significantly to thirst, and these factors should be taken into consideration when developing a thirst management strategy. Personal characteristics and lifestyle, psychological factors, drug-related factors, and nursing factors should be identified and optimized as soon as possible.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals should pay attention to thirst symptoms in ICU patients and promptly take effective preventive or intervention measures based on the influencing factors.

Thirst in adult patients in the intensive care unit: A scoping review

PURPOSE

To review the literature on thirst in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and report potential causes, risk factors, diagnosis and measurement tools, as well as potential co-occurrence with other distressing symptoms, and the management of thirst in the ICU.

DESIGN

A scoping review employing the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2024. Any type of empirical study reporting thirst or associated xerostomia in adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to an ICU or high dependency unit for more than 24 h were included.

RESULTS

The search yielded 907 unique records, and after evaluating 65 full-text publications, 21 studies were included. Thirst intensity was addressed most often (eleven studies), whereas the experience (or quality) of thirst and the validation of a measurement instrument, were addressed in only one study. Although co-occurrence of symptoms was addressed in four studies, only one pilot study looked into the interaction of thirst with other symptoms. Intervention studies have been focussing primarily on mouth-care interventions.

CONCLUSION

Thirst is a distressing symptom in the ICU, with reported high prevalence and intensity. Knowledge about its causes, interventions that incorporate minimising its risk, occurrence and intensity are limited.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Health care providers should acknowledge thirst as a prominent symptom for ICU patients. They should possess knowledge on the factors that potentially evoke or aggravate thirst. Regular and timely relief of thirst by oral care with cold swabs and the application of menthol can be regarded as a first choice of intervention.

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Thirst: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Thirst is a symptom of dehydration and one of the main complications affecting postoperative outcomes and comfort. Persistent water scarcity can have a detrimental effect on the cognitive function and psychology of patients. However, the current evidence about the prevalence and risk factors for postoperative thirst is not fully understood. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of postoperative thirst and provide guidance for clinical practice.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. Eligible studies were evaluated using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The collected data were pooled and analyzed using Stata15.0.

FINDINGS

A total of 11 cross-sectional studies were included involving 20,612 patients. Eight studies reported prevalence and the pooled prevalence of postoperative thirst was 76.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.664 to 0.858). Five studies contributed to meta-syntheses of risk factors for postoperative thirst. The results indicated that sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.84, I2 = 80.2%, P = .006), anesthesia drug (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.06, I2 = 94.8%, P < .001), surgical type (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.9, I2 = 77.9%, P = .004) were statistically associated with postoperative thirst.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows a high prevalence of postoperative thirst. Sex, anesthesia drug, and surgical type are risk factors that influence postoperative thirst. Nurses and other health care professionals should routinely assess the postoperative thirst of patients and perform targeted interventions to alleviate their distressing symptoms and improve the quality of care.

Construction of an assessment scale for thirst severity in critically ill patients and its reliability and validity

OBJECTIVE

Developing a severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst and conducting reliability and validity tests, aiming to provide healthcare professionals with a scientific and objective tool for assessing the level of thirst.

METHODS

Based on literature review and qualitative interviews, a pool of items was generated, and a preliminary scale was formed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Convenience sampling was employed to select 178 ICU patients in a top-three hospital from May 2023 to October 2023 as the study subjects to examine the reliability and validity of the severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst.

RESULTS

The developed severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst consists of 8 evaluation items and 26 evaluation indicators. The agreement coefficients for two rounds of expert consultation were 100% and 92.6% for the positive coefficient, and the authority coefficients were .900 and .906. Kendall's concordance coefficients were .101 and .120 (all p < .001). The overall Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was .827. The inter-rater reliability coefficient was .910. The Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranged from .800 to 1.000, and the Scale-Content Validity Index/Average (S-CVI/Ave) was .950.

CONCLUSION

The critically ill patients' thirst assessment scale is reliable and valid and can be widely used in clinical practice.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The AiMi Academic Services (www.aimieditor.com) for English language editing and review services.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The scale developed in this study is a simple and ICU-specific scale that can be used to assess the severity of thirst in critically ill patients. As such, the severity of thirst in critically ill patients can be evaluated quickly so that targeted interventions can be implemented according to the patient's specific disease and treatment conditions. Therefore, patient comfort can be improved, and thirst-related health problems can be prevented.

Simplified Pain Management Including Fentanyl TTS in PACU Patients With Hip Fracture Surgery to Improve Patients' Well-Being: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

Adequate pain management is eminently relevant for elderly and more vulnerable patients with hip fractures in the setting of pre and postoperative pain. This study compares postoperative hip fracture patients treated with standard pain management with a variety of medications or an approach with only one option in each medication category (nonopioid: acetaminophen; opioid: fentanyl TTS 12,5 mcg/hour; rescue medication: piritramide) to simplify the treatment algorithm for nurses and improve patient well-being.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The sample was cognitively intact patients (N = 141) with hip fractures in a tertiary university hospital. Administration of fentanyl 12 mcg/hour transdermal therapeutic system was administered by the nurses in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to address basal wound pain to improve patient well-being and patient treatment in the PACU for 24 hours to better control for early complications.

FINDINGS

Well-being was equally increased in both groups in comparison to our preintervention data from 35.7% to over 60% and did not differ significantly between the intervention and control group. No statistically significant differences in numeric rating scale scores, rescue opioid dosage (piritramide i.v.) or in complications were present.

CONCLUSIONS

This one-size-fits-all simplified pain management approach did not improve patient well-being or any other outcome but highlighted the importance of adequate pain management and a sufficient nurse-to-patient ratio.

Less Induction Time and Postoperative Pain Using Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia With or Without the Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to analyze anesthetic induction time and postoperative pain using spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with or without the use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that spinal anesthesia would be beneficial with respect to induction time and postoperative pain and that PNBs would complement this effect.

METHODS

Patients were stratified according to demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA), and opioid intake and divided into: (A) general anesthesia without PNB; (B) general anesthesia with PNB; (C) spinal anesthesia without PNB; and (D) spinal anesthesia with PNB. Endpoints were anesthetic induction time, opioid consumption, and pain. Of 559 patients, 348 (62.3%) received general anesthesia (consisting of group A with 46 and group B with 302 patients), and 211 (37.7%) spinal anesthesia (consisting of group C with 117 and group D with 94 patients).

RESULTS

We observed significantly lower total opioid intake 48 hours postoperative when applying spinal anesthesia by 2.08 mg (P < .05) of intravenous morphine-equivalent, and a reduction of 7.0 minutes (P < .05) until skin incision. The application of a PNB achieved a reduction of piritramide intake of 3.59 mg (P < .05) 48 hours postoperative and lengthened induction time by 8.5 minutes (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically shorter anesthetic induction times without clinical relevance, but lower postoperative opioid dosages with clinical relevance were observed for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. The additional application of PNBs led to a lower need for opioids and lower pain levels in the early postoperative phase.

Effects of preoperative oral care on bacterial colonisation and halitosis in patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of single-dose chlorhexidine oral care on bacterial colonisation and halitosis in patients undergoing elective surgery.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

We conducted a two-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. The intervention group (n = 102) received preoperative oral care with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, and the control group (n = 105) received standard care. The data of the microbiological cultures between the groups were compared at the time of tracheal intubation, at extubation and 30 min after surgery. The presence of halitosis was measured using a survey questionnaire administered to the anaesthesia nurses assigned to the patients.

RESULTS

At baseline, no significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups for bacterial colonisation or halitosis. After the intervention, there was no significant difference in microbiological culture, including gram-positive, gram-negative bacilli and cocci results, between the two groups (p > 0.05). The presence of halitosis in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group during intubation (p < 0.0001) and at 30 min after surgery (p < 0.02). Regression analysis indicated that receiving oral was protective towards halitosis, while poor oral health was a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative oral care using a single dose of chlorhexidine significantly improved the patients' halitosis in the perioperative period, but no significant effect was found on bacterial colonisation. Further studies are needed regarding the safe use of chlorhexidine for oral care.

IMPLICATION FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Oral hygiene using chlorhexidine could be beneficial in improving halitosis for anaesthesia personnel who take care of intubated adult patients undergoing elective surgery with general anaesthesia.

Effect of nociception level index-guided intra-operative analgesia on early postoperative pain and opioid consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute postoperative pain remains a critical treatment priority and has prompted a search for technologies and techniques to assist with intra-operative analgesic monitoring and management. Anaesthetists traditionally rely on clinical judgement to guide intra-operative analgesia, but several emerging technologies such as the nociception level index herald the possibility of routine intra-operative analgesia monitoring. However, the impact of devices like nociception level index on postoperative outcomes has not been proven. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles which compared nociception level index-guided analgesia to standard care. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and opioid consumption during the first 60-120 min after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Ten studies, collectively including 662 patients and published between 2019 and 2023, met inclusion criteria for both the qualitative systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis. Risk of methodological bias was generally low or unclear, and six studies reported a significant conflict of interest relevant to their findings. Our meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. It found statistically significant benefits of nociception level index-guided analgesia for early postoperative pain (mean (95%CI) difference -0.46 (-0.88 to -0.03) on an 11-point scale, p = 0.03), and opioid requirement (mean (95%CI) difference -1.04 (-1.94 to -0.15) mg intravenous morphine equivalent, p = 0.02). Our meta-analysis of the current literature finds that nociception level index-guided analgesia statistically significantly reduces reported postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption but fails to show clinically relevant outcomes. We found no evidence that nociception level index-guided analgesia affected postoperative nausea and vomiting nor duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit.

Local Periarticular Infiltration with Dexmedetomidine Results in Superior Patient Well-Being after Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with a Follow-Up of Two Years

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare local periarticular infiltration (LIA) with ultra-sound guided regional anesthesia (USRA) with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine as an additive agent in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the LIA group received local periarticular infiltration into the knee joint. The USRA group received two single-shot USRA blocks. Functional outcomes and satisfaction (range of movement, Knee Society Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford Knee Score, and Forgotten Joint Score), including well-being, were analyzed preoperatively and at five days, six weeks, and one and two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups at six weeks and one and two years after the implementation of TKA. A moderate correlation was observed in the LIA group regarding well-being and pain on day five. Six weeks postoperatively, the LIA group showed significantly superior well-being but worse pain scores. No differences between the groups in well-being and functional outcomes could be observed one and two years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with LIA had superior postoperative well-being in the early postoperative phase of up to six weeks. Furthermore, LIA patients had similar functionality compared to patients treated with USRA but experienced significantly more pain six weeks postoperatively. LIA leads to improved short-term well-being, which is potentially beneficial for faster knee recovery. We believe that LIA benefits fast-track knee recovery with respect to improved short-term well-being, higher practicability, and faster application.

Development of the Thirst Discomfort Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

BACKGROUND

Thirst is a sensation associated with a dry mouth and the desire or craving to drink water. Surgical patients are among those hospitalized individuals who are at high risk of developing both osmotic and hypovolemic thirst.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a new measurement tool for evaluating the thirst-related discomfort of surgical patients and to assess its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients admitted to the surgical clinics of a research hospital in Turkey between January and March 2022. The new measurement tool was developed in several stages: a pilot implementation phase with 51 patients and the main implementation phase with 198 patients. Data were collected by means of face-to-face interviews with patients. Exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22, and IBM SPSS Amos.

RESULTS

The final Thirst Discomfort Scale consisted of 12 items in 3 subdimensions. The Cronbach α values of the scale subdimensions ranged from 0.787 to 0.848, and the Cronbach α value for the scale as a whole was 0.886. The scale explained 66.237% of the total variance of the data.

CONCLUSION

The Thirst Discomfort Scale consisting of 12 items and 3 subdimensions is a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating thirst-related discomfort of surgical patients.

Effect of menthol lozenges after extubation on thirst, nausea, physiological parameters, and comfort in cardiovascular surgery patients: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of post-extubation oral menthol lozenges on thirst, nausea, physiological parameters, and comfort level in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

The study was a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

This study included 119 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a training and research hospital. Patients in the intervention group (n = 59) received menthol lozenges at 30, 60, and 90 min after extubation. Patients in the control group (n = 60) received standard care and treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of the study was the change in post-extubation thirst assessed by Visual Analogue Scale after using menthol lozenges compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were changes in post-extubation physiological parameters and nausea severity assessed by Visual Analogue Scale compared to baseline, and comfort level assessed with Shortened General Comfort Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Between-group comparisons showed that the intervention group had significantly lower thirst scores at all time points and nausea at the first assessment (p < 0.05) and significantly higher comfort scores (p < 0.05) than the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in physiological parameters at baseline or any of the postoperative assessments (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the use of menthol lozenges effectively increased comfort level by reducing post-extubation thirst and nausea, but had no effect on physiological parameters.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses should be vigilant for complaints such as thirst, nausea, and discomfort in patients after extubation. Nurses' administration of menthol lozenges to patients may help reduce post-extubation thirst, nausea, and discomfort.

A qualitative study of nurses' perception on patients' thirst in intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Thirst is a prevalent and intense symptom among patients in intensive care units. Occurrence of thirst in the intensive care unit cannot be avoided because of the nature of critical illnesses and their treatments like the side effects of administered medication or dehydration. In the intensive care unit, nurses have the opportunity and responsibility to prevent and reduce thirst by recognizing the different types of thirst. Thus, knowing nurses' perception on patients' thirst is crucial.

OBJECTIVES

Exploration of intensive care nurses' perception on patients' thirst.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

Data were collected from December 2020 to January 2021 and analyzed by using a phenomenographic methodology. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen nurses, in Chongqing, China, aged 25-48 years, were interviewed. Four themes emerged: (1) perceived barriers for thirst; (2) perceived signs of thirst; (3) perceived reasons of thirst; (4) perceived consequences for thirst. Overall nurses' perception of patients' thirst is poor. Nurses give a low priority and insufficient attention to the issue of thirst in intensive care patients.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care nurses' perception on thirst in patients should be evaluated and, if necessary, this issue should be given more attention in training in order to create sufficient awareness about the topic.