Helmet CPAP bundle: A narrative review of practical aspects and nursing interventions to improve patient's comfort

Humidification during Invasive and Non-Invasive Ventilation: A Starting Tool Kit for Correct Setting

The humidification process of medical gases plays a crucial role in both invasive and non-invasive ventilation, aiming to mitigate the complications arising from bronchial dryness. While passive humidification systems (HME) and active humidification systems are prevalent in routine clinical practice, there is a pressing need for further evaluation of their significance. Additionally, there is often an incomplete understanding of the operational mechanisms of these devices. The current review explores the historical evolution of gas conditioning in clinical practice, from early prototypes to contemporary active and passive humidification systems. It also discusses the physiological principles underlying humidity regulation and provides practical guidance for optimizing humidification parameters in both invasive and non-invasive ventilation modalities. The aim of this review is to elucidate the intricate interplay between temperature, humidity, and patient comfort, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches to gas conditioning.

Patients' recollections of helmet-CPAP treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

During the pandemic outbreak, helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was widely used as respiratory support for COVID-19 patients, inside and outside of intensive care units. The available literature suggests specific interventions to improve the comfort of patients treated with helmet-CPAP. Few reports are available on the experiences of patients undergoing this treatment.

AIM

This qualitative study aimed to explore the views and recollections of COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet-CPAP.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from the follow-up programme for COVID-19 patients discharged from an Italian general intensive care unit. Participants were interviewed by telephone. Data analysis followed the principles of thematic synthesis approach.

FINDINGS

We conducted 29 phone calls in patients eligible for the study. Five participants declared that they did not remember the time spent in hospital on helmet-CPAP. Twenty-four patients were then included. Two themes and six subthemes were generated from their interview data: (1) The helmet-CPAP as a life-saving treatment (subthemes: recognition of the usefulness of treatment and resilience); (2) the negative feelings related to helmet-CPAP application (subthemes: communication problems, entrapment, mental confusion, fear of dying). Each patient's experience was unique, but some discomfort elements such as noise, gas flow turbulence, choking sensation and thirst were found to be very common.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of helmet-CPAP treatment generated positive and negative memories and feelings in COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. The patients' experience has provided an overview of the main factors of discomfort. This can be a starting point for taking corrective measures to promote greater helmet tolerance and subsequent treatment success.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study has provided an insight into the patient's recollections about helmet-CPAP treatment during a worldwide pandemic. The findings suggested strict applications of interventions aimed to reduce some issues that participants reported, to improve their compliance to treatment. Results from this study could help nurses in understanding the needs of patients treated with helmet-CPAP and may foster a care focused on patient-centred outcomes.

Gas Humidification During Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Crossover Randomized Physiologic Study in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND

In the last decades, the use of the helmet interface to deliver noninvasive respiratory support has steadily increased. When delivering oxygen therapy, conditioning of inspired gas is mandatory, as the water content of medical gas is neglectable. To minimize the risk of airway damage, it is recommended to achieve an absolute humidity greater than 10 mg H2O/L. The primary aim of the study was to assess the performance of 3 different heated humidifiers to condition gas during helmet continuous positive airway pressure and to compare them with a setting without active humidification.

METHODS

We performed a crossover randomized physiological study in healthy volunteers. Absolute humidity, relative humidity, and temperature were measured during 4 steps (no humidification and the 3 heated humidifiers, performed in a randomized order) and at 3 time points (after 1, 5, and 10 minutes).

RESULTS

Eight subjects participated to the study. Without active humidification, absolute humidity was constantly below the recommended level. All humidifiers conditioned the inspired gases to an average absolute humidity greater than 10 mg H2O/L. Overall, the best performance, in terms of absolute humidity, was obtained with H900 (19.74 ± 0.50 mg H2O/L), followed by TurbH2O (-6.82 mg H2O/L vs H900; 95% confidence interval, -8.49 to -5.14; P < .05) and F&P 810 (-9.03 mg H2O/L vs H900; 95% confidence interval, -10.70 to -7.35; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Active humidification is required to achieve adequate conditioning of inspired gas during helmet continuous positive airway pressure. The choice between different humidifiers available on the market should be made according to the local needs and expertise.

Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Emergency Department: A Practical Guide

Helmet continuous positive airway pressure is a simple, noninvasive respiratory support strategy to treat several forms of acute respiratory failure, such as cardiogenic pulmonary edema and pneumonia. Recently, it has been largely used worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the increased use of helmet continuous positive airway pressure in the emergency department, we aimed to provide an updated practical guide for nurses and clinicians based on the latest available evidence. We focus our attention on how to set the respiratory circuit. Moreover, we discuss the interactions between flow generators, filters, and positive end-expiratory pressure valves and the consequences regarding the delivered gas flow, fraction of inspired oxygen, positive end-expiratory pressure, and noise level.

Midline catheters for blood gas and acid/base monitoring in critical patients: A prospective observational study

Background:

Arterial lines and central venous catheter (CVC) allow to monitor patients’ acid-base status and gas exchange. Their placement and maintenance may however be burdened by severe complications. Midline Catheters (MC) are peripheral venous accesses that are less invasive and easier to insert compared to CVC and arterial lines.

Methods:

A prospective observational study was performed including stabilized critical patients with clinical indication to midline positioning before intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. The primary aim was to assess if venous sampling from MCs can be a reliable alternative to CVC for pH and CO2 monitoring. The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlation between samplings from MC, CVC and arterial line with regards to pH, carbon dioxide tension (pCO2), lactates and electrolytes. Three samples from CVC, arterial line and MC were collected simultaneously. Agreement and correlation of the studied parameters between different sampling sites were explored.

Results:

40 patients were included in the analysis. A good agreement for pH and pCO2 was recorded between MC and CVC: mean differences were 0.001 (95% CI −0.006 to 0.007) and 0.7 (−0.1 to 1.5), percentage error 0.4% and 11.2%, respectively. Correlation between MC and both central venous and arterial samples for pH, pCO2, lactates and electrolytes was found to be moderate-to-strong (Pearson’s R coefficient range 0.59–0.99, p < 0.001 for all these parameters).

Conclusions:

In stabilized critical patients, midline catheters represent a reliable alternative to CVC and arterial lines to monitor acid-base disturbances, CO2 levels and electrolytes. The present findings add to the known advantages of MC, which might be considered a first-line vascular access for non-critical or stabilized patients who do not require infusion of vesicant or irritant drugs.