Impact of transglutaminase treatment given to the skim milk before or after microfiltration on the functionality of micellar casein concentrate used in process cheese product and comparison with rennet casein

Transglutaminase Crosslinked Milk Protein Concentrate and Micellar Casein Concentrate: Impact on the Functionality of Imitation Mozzarella Cheese Manufactured on a Small Scale Using a Rapid Visco Analyzer

In dairy-based imitation mozzarella cheese (IMC) formulations, intact casein is critical and imparts IMC with a firm and elastic, stringy, melted texture. Rennet casein (RCN) is the desired ingredient to provide intact casein in IMC and is preferred over milk protein concentrate (MPC) and micellar casein concentrate (MCC). Transglutaminase (TGase), a crosslinking enzyme, alters the physical properties of MPC or MCC and may change IMC functionality. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of TGase-crosslinked MPC and MCC powders on the functionality of IMCs. The TGase treatment included TGase at 0.3 (L) and 3.0 (H) units/g of protein and a control (C) with no TGase addition. Each IMC formulation was balanced for constituents and was produced in a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA). The MCC or MPC powder with high TGase enzyme in IMC formulation did not form an emulsion. The IMC containing TGase-treated powders had a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher RVA-viscosity during manufacture and transition temperature (TT), and a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower Schreiber melt test area. The IMC made from MPC (with or without TGase) had lower TT values and Schreiber melt test area as compared with that made from MCC. The TGase-treated MPC and MCC, when used for IMC manufacture, were comparable to IMC manufactured with RCN in texture and some measured melted characteristics. In conclusion, TGase treatment alters the melt characteristics of MCC and MPC in IMC applications.

Changes in Milk Protein Functionality at Low Temperatures and Rennet Concentrations

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of low-concentration rennet on the chemical, rheological characteristics, and protein fractions of skim milk (SM) at 4 ± 1 °C. Skimmed milk (SM) was divided into four lots of 500 mL, and diluted rennet (1:10,000) was added at different levels at 4 ± 1 °C. The treatments included control (no rennet), T1 (0.001 mL/rennet), T2 (0.01 mL rennet), and T3 (0.1 mL rennet) treatments, which were incubated for 24 h. The sampling was performed at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h, and the SM after incubation time was heated to 73 °C/16 s to denature the rennet enzyme. Skim milk samples (SMS) (control and rennet-added samples) were evaluated for proximate composition, capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE), hydrodynamic diameter, zeta potential, and rheology at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Foaming ability, foaming stability, water-holding capacity (WHC), oil emulsifying activity (OEA), and emulsion stability (ES) were performed at 0, 12, and 24 h of incubation time. There was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in non-proteins by 0.50% and in non-casein nitrogen by 0.81% as incubation progressed. The results showed that aggregation or curd was not formed during storage time. The CGE data indicated that increasing the rennet concentration had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on decreasing κ-CN, and breakdown increased at higher levels of rennet usage. There was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the hydrodynamic diameter and a decrease in the zeta potential values in rennet-added samples at the end of the incubation time (24 h). The rheological results showed no changes in the storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G″), or viscosity values. Increasing the rennet amount and storage time led to a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the foaming ability and foaming stability and a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the oil emulsifying activity and emulsion stability of rennet-added SMS. This study concluded that milk protein functionality can be changed without aggregating or curd formation, and rennet milk can be processed.

Manufacture of a novel cultured micellar casein concentrate ingredient for emulsifying salt free process cheese products applications

Micellar casein concentrate (MCC) is a high protein ingredient that is typically produced using 3 stages of microfiltration with a 3× concentration factor and diafiltration. Acid curd is an acid protein concentrate, which can be obtained by precipitating the casein at pH 4.6 (isoelectric point) using starter cultures or direct acids without the use of rennet. Process cheese product (PCP) is a dairy food prepared by blending dairy ingredients with nondairy ingredients and then heating the mixture to get a product with an extended shelf-life. Emulsifying salts are critical for the desired functional characteristics of PCP because of their role in calcium sequestration and pH adjustment. The objectives of this study were to develop a process to produce a novel cultured micellar casein concentrate ingredient (cMCC; culture-based acid curd) and to produce PCP without emulsifying salts using different combinations of protein from cMCC and MCC in the formulations (2.0:1.0, 1.9:1.1, and 1.8:1.2). Skim milk was pasteurized at 76°C for 16 s and then microfiltered in 3 microfiltration stages using graded permeability ceramic membranes to produce liquid MCC (11.15% total protein; TPr and 14.06% total solids; TS). Part of the liquid MCC was spray dried to produce MCC powder (75.77% TPr and 97.84% TS). The rest of the MCC was used to produce cMCC (86.9% TPr and 96.4% TS). Three PCP treatments were formulated with different ratios of cMCC:MCC, including 2.0:1.0, 1.9:1.1, and 1.8:1.2 on the protein basis. The composition of PCP was targeted to 19.0% protein, 45.0% moisture, 30.0% fat, and 2.4% salt. This trial was repeated 3 times using different batches of cMCC and MCC powders. All PCP were evaluated for their final functional properties. No significant differences were detected in the composition of PCP made with different ratios of cMCC and MCC except for the pH. The pH was expected to increase slightly with elevating the MCC amount in the PCP formulations. The end apparent viscosity was significantly higher in 2.0:1.0 formulation (4,305 cP) compared with 1.9:1.1 (2,408 cP) and 1.8:1.2 (2,499 cP). The hardness ranged from 407 to 512 g with no significant differences within the formulations. However, the melting temperature showed significant differences with 2.0:1.0 having the highest melting temperature (54.0°C), whereas 1.9:1.1 and 1.8:1.2 showed 43.0 and 42.0°C melting temperature, respectively. The melting diameter (38.8 to 43.9 mm) and melt area (1,183.9 to 1,538.6 mm²) did not show any differences in different PCP formulations. The PCP made with a 2.0:1.0 ratio of protein from cMCC and MCC showed better functional properties compared with other formulations.