Prevention and Management of Tuberculosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32:703-718. [PMID: 30146031 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.05.002]

Efficacy and safety of a preventive strategy against tuberculosis in liver transplantation recipients including the treatment of latent infection with moxifloxacin

BACKGROUND

Preventive management of tuberculosis in liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to difficulties in detecting and treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of a screening strategy for LTBI with the inclusion of moxifloxacin as treatment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center study of all LTs performed between 2016 and 2019 with a minimum 4-year follow-up and a standardized protocol for the evaluation of LTBI.

RESULTS

Pretransplant LTBI screening was performed in 191/218 (87.6%) patients, and LTBI was diagnosed in 27.2% of them. Treatment for LTBI was administered to 71.2% of the patients and included moxifloxacin in 75.6% of the cases. After a median follow-up of 1628 days, no cases of active tuberculosis occurred among moxifloxacin-treated patients. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile (0.46 vs. 0.38 episodes/1000 transplant-days; p =  .8) and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infection (0 vs. 0.7 episodes per 1000 transplant-days; p =  .08) were not significantly higher in comparison to patients who did not receive moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSION

A preventive strategy based on systematic LTBI screening and moxifloxacin treatment before LT in positive cases appears safe and effective in preventing the development of tuberculosis in LT recipients. However, our findings are limited by a small sample size; thus, larger studies are required to validate our observations.

IGRA-based INH regimen for prevention of active tuberculosis after kidney transplantation: A single-centre retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Interferon-gamma release Assay (IGRA)-based isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis strategy to prevent tuberculosis (TB) infection in kidney transplantation (KT) with a risk of TB occurrence.

METHODS

Adult KT recipients (KTRs) between June 2014 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The development of active TB after KT was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 925 KTRs, 111 (12.0%) developed active TB. Among the 501 KTRs at a risk of TB occurrence, 70 (14.0%) patients developed active TB, while 41 (9.7%) of 424 patients without risk factors developed active TB (P = 0.05). Two hundred thirty-nine KTRs received IGRA test with 62 (25.9%) were positive. None of IGRA positive patients (0/40) receiving INH prophylaxis developed active TB, whereas 8 out of 22 patients who had positive IGRA results without INH prophylaxis developed active TB (0 vs. 36.4%, P < 0.01). Of note, for those in risk group but with negative IGRA result, no active TB was found even without INH prophylaxis. Although alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in INH prevention group were higher than those before treatment, they did not exceed three-fold of limit of reference range.

CONCLUSIONS

IGRA-based INH treatment is an effective and safe protocol to prevent the development of active TB in KTRs.

Mycobacteria in Organ Transplant Recipients

This review describes the epidemiology and risk factors of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant recipients. We discuss the pre-transplant screening for risk of TB and management of latent TB in this population. We also discuss the challenges of management of TB and other difficult to treat mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium complex. The drugs for the management of these infections include rifamycins which have significant drug interactions with immunosuppressants and must be monitored closely.

Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of tuberculosis in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis to prevent tuberculosis (TB) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods: Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant studies that compared the effects among patients who received INH prophylaxis after transplantation.

Results: A total of 13 studies (involving 6,547 KTRs) were included in our analysis. We found that the risk of active TB infection (RR: 0.35, 95%CI 0.27–0.45, p &lt; 0.01) for KTRs was lower in the INH treatment group than in those without prophylaxis. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (RR: 0.93, 95%CI 0.67–1.28, p = 0.64), acute rejection (RR: 0.82, 95%CI 0.44–1.51, p = 0.52), and hepatotoxicity (RR: 1.25, 95%CI 0.94–1.65, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: Isoniazid prophylaxis is a safe and effective for KTRs on reactivation of latent TB infection.

Solid organ transplant recipients with tuberculosis disease in California, 2010 to 2020

Using California Tuberculosis (TB) Registry data from 2010-2020, we compared the presentation and outcomes of patients with TB aged >15 years with and without solid organ transplantation (SOT). We matched to the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for 1987-2020 and the estimated time from transplantation to the diagnosis of TB, the incidence of posttransplant TB, and the probability of death and graft failure in SOT recipients with TB, compared to those without TB. From 2010-2020, there were 148 posttransplant TB cases. Patients with posttransplant TB were more likely to have extrapulmonary disease and more than twice as likely to die as TB patients without SOT (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.9). The median time from transplantation to TB diagnosis was 1.2 years, with the shortest time among lung transplant recipients. The incidence of TB disease among Californians with SOT was 56.0 per 100 000 person-years. The risk of death was higher among SOT recipients with posttransplant TB than those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.0-4.1); the risk of graft failure was higher among kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant TB than those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-6.9). An increased risk of death and graft failure in SOT recipients with posttransplant TB highlights the need for enhanced pretransplant TB prevention.

Drug-level change and optimal dose adjustment of tacrolimus with the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the change in drug level and the need for dose adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor when it is used with rifabutin in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We aimed to analyze whether the drug level of tacrolimus significantly reduced after the use of rifabutin and to assess optimal adjustment of tacrolimus dose in SOT recipients.

METHODS

Of the SOT recipients in a tertiary referral center in South Korea in 2000-2019, 50 patients who maintained an unchanged dose of tacrolimus after the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.9 ± 11.5 years. The most commonly transplanted organ was the liver (66.0%). The most common indication of rifabutin use was for treating active tuberculosis (78.0%). After rifabutin initiation, the trough level of tacrolimus decreased significantly to the subtherapeutic range in 38 (76.0%) patients. The drug levels of these 38 patients dropped from 7.2 to 3.8 ng/mL (p < 0.001) after rifabutin treatment. In these patients, the median 1.5-fold increase in the tacrolimus dose was required to restore the drug level to the within-therapeutic range.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that careful tacrolimus drug-level monitoring and dose adjustment are necessary for most SOT recipients when rifabutin is administered for the treatment of mycobacterial disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Donor-derived TB after kidney transplantation: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is a possible serious complication of solid organ transplantation, associated with high mortality and morbidity. Post-transplant TB has varied pathogenesis with many approaches to its prevention, which is the most important way to reduce its incidence. Treatment of TB in organ recipients is challenging because of drug toxicity and interaction with immunosuppressants.

CASE REPORT

an 18-year-old woman that underwent kidney transplantation from a deceased donor and was discharged with fair renal function was readmitted at 37th postoperative day with fever. CT showed signs of miliary TB and fluid collection besides graft fistulization through the skin. The patient presented positive BAAR in the drained fluid and Koch's bacillus in the urine. She was treated with a four-drug regimen (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and etambutol), with great response and preserved graft function. We were informed that the recipient of the contralateral kidney also presented post-transplant TB, implying in a donor-derived origin.

CONCLUSION

TB is an important differential diagnosis for infectious complications in patients after solid-organ transplantation, especially in endemic regions. Its initial clinical presentation can be unspecific and it should be suspected in the presence of fever or formation of fluid collections. The suspicion of TB is the key to early diagnosis and satisfactory outcomes in post-transplant TB.

Incidence rate of active tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients: Data from a nationwide population cohort in a high-endemic country

BACKGROUND

The management of active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients is challenging given the pharmacological interaction and the potential delays in diagnosis due to atypical presentation. The incidence rates (IRs) of post-SOT TB from the whole recipients' cohort in a high-endemic country have not been evaluated.

METHODS

We established a SOT cohort (n = 15 598) and confirmed cases of TB between 2011 and 2015 from the Korean National Health Insurance Database using ICD-10 codes. After excluding 1302 and 180 SOT-recipients due to age (<18 years) and presence of pre-SOT TB and/or treatment for latent TB during wash-out period between 2006 and cohort entry, we analyzed 14 116 SOT recipients and 70 580 individuals with no history of SOT matched by age and sex. The hazard ratios (HRs) of IRs were adjusted for age, sex, low-income status, diabetes mellitus, chronic co-morbidities, and anti-TNF-α therapy.

RESULTS

The IR of TB was significantly higher (adjusted HR [aHR]: 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6) in SOT recipients (4.9/1000 person-years) than in non-SOT individuals (0.8/1000 person-years). Of the transplanted organs, the pancreas (pancreas alone and simultaneous pancreas-kidney) and lung had the highest IR (aHR: 16.3 [6.1-42.2] and 16.1 [5.9-43.8], respectively). The use of anti-thymocyte globulin and azathioprine was associated with a higher IR (aHR: 1.53 [1.01-2.43] and 3.92 [1.21-12.47], respectively), but basiliximab was associated with a lower IR (aHR: 0.67 [0.48-0.98]).

CONCLUSION

The IR of TB in SOT recipients, especially in the pancreas and lung, was significantly higher than that in the non-SOT population.

Latent tuberculosis screening before kidney transplantation in the South of Brazil

Background:

Tuberculosis (TB) is a prevalent infection after kidney transplantation (KT) in high-burden countries. Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening includes previous TB history, chest radiograph findings, and tuberculin test (TST) and/or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) results. We aimed to compare our routine LTBI screening of KT candidates and living donors (LD) with their IGRA results, and evaluate if this would improve isoniazid (INH) treatment referral.

Methods:

We evaluated adult KT candidates and LD with complete routine LTBI screening and QuantiFERON-TB® Gold In-Tube (QFT) testing. Blood samples were collected from April 4th, 2014 to October 31st, 2018, with follow-up until October 31st, 2019.

Results:

There were 116 KT recipients, with 30% QFT-positive results. Positive QFT was associated with past TB history (p=0.007), positive TST (p<0.0001), residual radiographic lesions (p=0.003), and diabetes (p=0.035). There were 25 LD, 40% had positive QFT. Positive QFT was associated with a positive TST (p=0.002). Positive QFT results increased INH referral in 80%. Post-transplant TB incidence was 2.6% in a median follow-up of 2 (1-33) months. No variables were associated with post-transplant TB. TB patients had inferior, although non-significant, 5-year graft survival (66.7% vs. 76.5%) (p = 0.402).

Conclusion:

In the present study, the association of QFT to our routine LTBI screening incremented INH treatment referral, but there was still a high incidence of post-transplant TB, possibly related to other forms of infection, such as new exposure and donor transmission.

Donor-Derived Tuberculosis: A Case Report and the Role of Communication Gaps in Transplantation Safety

Donor-derived tuberculosis (DD-TB) accounts for less than 5% of TB cases and is considered a rare event. In the transplant setting, the frequency of active TB is estimated to be 20 to 74 times higher than that in the general population, and it is associated with high mortality. In this context, the main strategy to minimize the risk of DD transmission is to identify high-risk donors. Despite screening recommendations, failures may result in a breakdown of safety that ends in the transmission of potentially fatal diseases. This report describes a case of DD-TB and emphasizes communication gaps that may occur between organ procurement organizations and transplant centers. Failure in reporting results, lack of exchanging information regarding recipients from the same donor, and inefficient communication between organ procurement organizations and transplant centers are lacks that may be prevented by a more efficient approach towards screening protocols and communication.

Risk stratification and management of QuantiFERON-positive solid-organ living donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor-derived disease with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is likely to become more common as donor pools expand due to increasing transplant volume coupled with patterns of migration and global mobility. Our article reviews the current literature and provides a rational approach for clinicians managing the scenario of a living donor who has epidemiologic risk factors for tuberculosis exposure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tuberculous bacilli, formerly thought to exist latently only in pulmonary granulomas, are now known reside dormant in nonpulmonary organs. Kidney and liver grafts are thus vectors for donor transmitted MTB disease. Donors with elevated risk for latent MTB disease can be identified with tuberculin skin testing or IFN-γ release assay screening in combination with a thorough history to identify risk factors for latent disease.

SUMMARY

Living donors with an elevated risk for prior MTB exposure provide an opportunity to treat latent disease prior to organ procurement and reduce the risk of donor transmitted disease and secondary morbidity. Improved identification of these high-risk donors can reduce both the incidence of posttransplant MTB disease and the risk of allograft compromise associated with treatment of latent and active disease in posttransplant recipients.

Tuberculosis in Pediatric Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients

Children undergoing solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from tuberculosis (TB) disease in the post-transplant period. Treatment of TB infection and disease in the post-transplant setting is complicated by immunosuppression and drug interactions. There are limited data that address the unique challenges for the management of TB in the pediatric transplant population. This review presents the current understanding of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention for pediatric transplant recipients with TB infection and disease. Further studies are needed to improve diagnosis of TB and optimize treatment outcomes for these patients.

Rifabutin for treating tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective observational study and literature review

BACKGROUND

The treatment of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is challenging owing to interactions between rifampin and immunosuppressive drugs. Rifabutin, a rifamycin with excellent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and that induces cytochrome p450 less, may facilitate treatment. We report our experience with rifabutin for treating TB in SOT recipients and review the available literature.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of all SOT recipients with TB between January 2000 and December 2019. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with and without rifabutin-containing regimens were compared and a literature review was conducted.

RESULTS

We included 31 SOT recipients with TB, among whom 22 (71%) were men and the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 50-20). There were no significant differences between patients treated with rifabutin (n = 12), rifampin (n = 14), and non-rifamycins (n = 5) in clinical cure rates (83.3%, 64.3%, and 100%, respectively; P = .21), side effects (25%, 37.5%, and 20%, respectively; P = .74), or mortality (16.7%, 35.7%, and 0%, respectively; P = .21). Only one patient, treated with rifampin, suffered graft rejection. The literature review identified 59 SOT recipients with TB treated with rifabutin-containing regimens from 8 publications. Overall, the clinical cure, graft rejection, and mortality rates were 93.2%, 5.1%, and 6.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifabutin-containing regimens offer a reliable alternative to rifampin when treating TB in SOT recipients.

Screening of donors and recipients for infections prior to solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is a brief overview of current guidelines on screening donors and candidates for bacterial, fungal, parasitic and viral infections prior to solid organ transplantation. The pretransplant period is an important time to evaluate infection exposure risk based on social history as well as to offer vaccinations.

RECENT FINDINGS

One of the major changes in the past few years has been increased utilization of increased Public Health Service risk, HIV positive, and hepatitis C-positive donors. There has also been increased attention to donor and recipient risks for geographically associated infections, such as endemic fungal infections and flaviviruses.

SUMMARY

Screening for donors and candidates prior to organ transplantation can identify and address infection risks. Diagnosing infections in a timely manner can help guide treatment and additional testing. Use of necessary prophylactic treatment in organ recipients can prevent reactivation of latent infections and improve posttransplant outcomes.

Diagnostic Tests for Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Diagnosing latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is important globally for TB prevention. LTBI diagnosis requires a positive test for infection and negative evaluation for active disease. Current tests measure an immunologic response and include the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON. The IGRAs are preferred in bacille Calmette-Guérin-vaccinated populations. The TST is still used when cost or logistical advantages over the IGRAs exist. Both TST and IGRAs have low positive predictive values. Tests that differentiate the TB spectrum and better predict future TB risk are needed.

Latent Tuberculosis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies to Prevent Disease Activation in an Endemic Population

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) affects one-fourth of the world´s population. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at an elevated risk of developing active tuberculosis infection (ATBI). In this retrospective study of donors and HSCT recipients who underwent transplantation between February 2000 and June 2018, our aim was to determine the prevalence of LTBI and ATBI and to describe diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in an HSCT population in an endemic region. The cohort of 409 participants included 125 allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) recipients, 165 autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) recipients, and 119 HSCT donors. Patients were evaluated pre-HSCT with tuberculin skin test and thoracic imaging. LTBI was diagnosed in 26.2% of the cohort. Cases represented 20% of the auto-HSCT population, 20% of the allo-HSCT population, and 41.2% of the donor population. Pre-HSCT evaluation to rule out ATBI was performed in 62.6% of the cohort; all results were negative. Isoniazid was administered to 73.3% of those with LTBI. Within subgroups, 91.7% of HSCT recipients and 51% of donors received treatment. The median duration of therapy pre-HSCT was 70 days in recipients and 48 days in donors. The incidence of post-HSCT ATBI was 0 at 1-year follow-up. The incidence of LTBI in our population was higher than expected and still might have been underestimated owing to diagnostic test limitations. The absence of incident ATBI suggests that recipients, as opposed to donors, must receive LTBI treatment. Prevention of infectious complications in the HSCT population should be prioritized to improve clinical outcomes. Prospective data from collaborative working groups is needed to determine the best diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in this vulnerable patient population.

Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in the United States

Although considerable progress has been made in reducing US tuberculosis incidence, the goal of eliminating the disease from the United States remains elusive. A continued focus on preventing new tuberculosis infections while also identifying and treating persons with existing tuberculosis infection is needed. Continued vigilance to ensure ongoing control of tuberculosis transmission remains key.

Infectious Complications of Transplant Tourism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline the impact of transplant tourism on the type and severity of post-transplant infections that may be seem in returning transplant tourists. This review outlines infections that might be expected and provides recommendations on screening tests that may assist in the diagnosis and management of such patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplant tourists may develop unusual or resistant infections that pose a public health risk in their home country. The practice of transplant tourism is associated with a significantly increased risk of surgical and infectious complications after transplant. Returning transplant tourists require a thorough evaluation for active and latent infections. Transplant centers must be vigilant for new and emerging pathogens in this population.

Fluoroquinolones for the treatment of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in liver transplantation

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is the best treatment option for end-stage organ disease. Newer immunosuppressive agents have reduced the incidence of graft rejection but have increased the risk of infection, particularly due to the reactivation of latent infections due to opportunistic agents such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Active tuberculosis (TB) after SOT is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Most cases of posttransplant TB are secondary to reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) due to the effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Risk minimization strategies have been developed to diagnose LTBI and initiate treatment prior to transplantation. Isoniazid with vitamin B6 supplementation is the treatment of choice. However, liver transplantation (LT) candidates and recipients have an increased risk of isoniazid-induced liver toxicity, leading to lower treatment completion rates than in other SOT populations. Fluoroquinolones (FQs) exhibit good in vitro antimycobacterial activity and a lower risk of drug-induced liver injury than isoniazid. In the present review, we highlight the disease burden posed by posttransplant TB and summarize the emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of FQs for the treatment of LTBI in LT recipients and candidates.