1
|
Bahl A, Gibson SM, Walton A. Optimizing Infusate Flow Patterns for Minimizing Vein Wall Trauma: An Exploratory Study with a Modified off-Axis Catheter Tip Opening. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2024; 20:559-566. [PMID: 39247171 PMCID: PMC11380876 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s479846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Modifying the PIVC tip to direct infusates toward areas of highest hemodilution may reduce vein wall damage. This study compared flow patterns between a traditional PIVC with a central opening and one with an off-axis aperture. Methods This was an exploratory observational analysis conducted at a tertiary care emergency department (ED) comparing flow patterns of two intravenous catheters: PIVC 1 (2.95 cm 20 gauge [Autoguard, Becton Dickinson]) and PIVC 2 (3.68 cm 20 gauge [Osprey, SkyDance Vascular]). Adult ED patients with PIVCs placed via traditional palpation/visualization method and with ultrasound capturing the flushing were eligible participants. Ultrasounds were reviewed to determine vein, catheter, and flow characteristics. The primary outcome was angle of the infusate leaving the catheter. Secondary outcomes included direction of catheter tip against vein wall, distance away from vein wall, vasospasm, and laminar/turbulent flow. Results Data from December 2023 included 28 catheters (10 PIVC 1, 18 PIVC 2). The average patient age was 53.7 years; 53.6% were female. Vein diameter/depth were similar: 0.35 cm/0.41 cm for PIVC 1 and 0.37 cm/0.47 cm for PIVC 2. The catheter tip pointed posteriorly towards the vein wall in 60% of PIVC 1 vs 11.1% in PIVC 2 (P=0.018). The angle of infusate flow away from the vein wall was 0.20° (SD 0.63) for PIVC 1 and 7.61° (SD 5.71) for PIVC 2 (P<0.001). Flow at 0° occurred in 90% of PIVC 1 vs 16.7% in PIVC 2 (P<0.001). Conclusion In this exploratory investigation, a peripheral vascular access device with an off-axis tip aperture of demonstrated a sharper infusate flow angle away from the vein wall compared to a traditional central opening device. This redirection may reduce vein wall trauma and complications, though further research is needed to pair clinical outcomes with this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Bahl
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA
| | | | - Alexis Walton
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu HG, Hyun A, Kang E, Marsh N, Corley A. Exploring clinicians' insertion experience with a new peripheral intravenous catheter in the emergency department. Australas Emerg Care 2024; 27:192-197. [PMID: 38490874 DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitals frequently introduce new medical devices. However, the process of clinicians adapting to these new vascular access devices has not been well explored. The study aims to explore clinicians' experience with the insertion of a new guidewire peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) introduced in the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS The study was conducted at two EDs in Queensland, Australia, utilising a qualitative explorative approach. Interviews were conducted with guidewire PIVC inserters, including ED doctors and nurses, and field notes were recorded by research nurses during insertions. Data analysis was performed using inductive content analysis, from which themes emerged. RESULTS The study compiled interviews from 10 participants and field notes from 191 observation episodes. Five key themes emerged, including diverse experience, barriers related to the learning process, factors influencing insertion success, and recommendations to enhance clinicians' acceptance. These themes suggest that the key to successful adoption by clinicians lies in designing user-friendly devices that align with familiar insertion techniques, facilitating a smooth transfer of learning. CONCLUSION Clinician adaptation to new devices is vital for optimal patient care. Emergency nurses and doctors prefer simplicity, safety, and familiarity when it comes to new devices. Providing comprehensive device training with diverse training resources, hands-on sessions, and continuous expert support, is likely to enhance clinician acceptance and the successful adoption of new devices in ED settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Grace Xu
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Areum Hyun
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Evelyn Kang
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicole Marsh
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Amanda Corley
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dobrescu A, Constantin AM, Pinte L, Chapman A, Ratajczak P, Klerings I, Emprechtinger R, Allegranzi B, Zingg W, Grayson ML, Toledo J, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B. Effectiveness and Safety of Measures to Prevent Infections and Other Complications Associated With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:1640-1655. [PMID: 38593192 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) contribute substantially to the global burden of infections. This systematic review assessed 24 infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions to prevent PIVC-associated infections and other complications. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, WHO Global Index Medicus, CINAHL, and reference lists for controlled studies from 1 January 1980-16 March 2023. We dually selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (COE). For outcomes with 3 or more trials, we conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS 105 studies met our prespecified eligibility criteria, addressing 16 of the 24 research questions; no studies were identified for 8 research questions. Based on findings of low to high COE, wearing gloves reduced the risk of overall adverse events related to insertion compared with no gloves (1 non-randomized controlled trial [non-RCT]; adjusted risk ratio [RR], .52; 95% CI, .33-.85), and catheter removal based on defined schedules potentially resulted in a lower phlebitis/thrombophlebitis incidence (10 RCTs; RR, 0.74, 95% credible interval, .49-1.01) compared with clinically indicated removal in adults. In neonates, chlorhexidine reduced the phlebitis score compared with non-chlorhexidine-containing disinfection (1 RCT; 0.14 vs 0.68; P = .003). No statistically significant differences were found for other measures. CONCLUSIONS Despite their frequent use and concern about PIVC-associated complications, this review underscores the urgent need for more high-quality studies on effective IPC methods regarding safe PIVC management. In the absence of valid evidence, adherence to standard precaution measures and documentation remain the most important principles to curb PIVC complications. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/exdb4).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Dobrescu
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Cochrane Austria, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Alexandru Marian Constantin
- Department of Internal Medicine Clinical Hospital Colentina, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Larisa Pinte
- Department of Internal Medicine Clinical Hospital Colentina, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrea Chapman
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Cochrane Austria, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Piotr Ratajczak
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Social Pharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Irma Klerings
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Cochrane Austria, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Robert Emprechtinger
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), BIH QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedetta Allegranzi
- Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Walter Zingg
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Lindsay Grayson
- Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joao Toledo
- Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- High Impact Epidemics, WHO Health Emergencies Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gerald Gartlehner
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Cochrane Austria, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria
- Center for Public Health Methods, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Cochrane Austria, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marsh N, Larsen EN, Ullman AJ, Mihala G, Cooke M, Chopra V, Ray-Barruel G, Rickard CM. Peripheral intravenous catheter infection and failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 151:104673. [PMID: 38142634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral intravenous catheters are the most frequently used invasive device in nursing practice, yet are commonly associated with complications. We performed a systematic review to determine the prevalence of peripheral intravenous catheter infection and all-cause failure. METHODS The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched for observational studies and randomised controlled trials that reported peripheral intravenous catheter related infections or failure. The review was limited to English language and articles published from the year 2000. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects models. Meta-analysis of observation studies in epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane process for randomised controlled trials were used to guide the review. Prospero registration number: CRD42022349956. FINDINGS Our search retrieved 34,725 studies. Of these, 41 observational studies and 28 randomised controlled trials (478,586 peripheral intravenous catheters) met inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of catheter-associated bloodstream infections was 0.028 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.081; 38 studies), or 4.40 catheter-associated bloodstream infections per 100,000 catheter-days (20 studies, 95 % CI: 3.47-5.58). Local infection was reported in 0.150 % of peripheral intravenous catheters (95 % CI: 0.047-0.479, 30 studies) with an incidence rate of 65.1 per 100,000 catheter-days (16 studies; 95 % CI: 49.2-86.2). All cause peripheral intravenous catheter failure before treatment completion occurred in 36.4 % of catheters (95 % CI: 31.7-41.3, 53 studies) with an overall incidence rate of 4.42 per 100 catheter days (78,891 catheter days; 19 studies; 95 % CI: 4.27-4.57). INTERPRETATION Peripheral intravenous catheter failure is a significant worldwide problem, affecting one in three catheters. Per peripheral intravenous catheter, infection occurrence was low, however, with over two billion catheters used globally each year, the absolute number of infections and associated burden remains high. Substantial and systemwide efforts are needed to address peripheral intravenous catheter infection and failure and the sequelae of treatment disruption, increased health costs and poor patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Marsh
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Emily N Larsen
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda J Ullman
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Children's Health Research, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gabor Mihala
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marie Cooke
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vineet Chopra
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America; The Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Gillian Ray-Barruel
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Herston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Claire M Rickard
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Herston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|