Explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics in hospitalized older patients

Assessment of the impact of telehealth intervention in patients with bone and joint infection

OBJECTIVES

Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment.

RESULTS

Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10.

CONCLUSION

TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.

One Hundred Explicit Definitions of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions of Antibiotics in Hospitalized Older Patients: The Results of an Expert Consensus Study

BACKGROUND

In geriatrics, explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) are useful for optimizing drug use.

OBJECTIVE

To produce an expert consensus on explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs for hospitalized older patients.

METHODS

We conducted a Delphi survey involving French experts on antibiotic stewardship in hospital settings. During the survey's rounds, the experts gave their opinion on each explicit definition, and could suggest new definitions. Definitions with a 1-to-9 Likert score of between 7 and 9 from at least 75% of the participants were adopted. The results were discussed during consensus meetings after each round.

RESULTS

Of the 155 invited experts, 128 (82.6%) participated in the whole survey: 59 (46%) infectious diseases specialists, 45 (35%) geriatricians, and 24 (19%) other specialists. In Round 1, 65 explicit definitions were adopted and 21 new definitions were suggested. In Round 2, 35 other explicit definitions were adopted. The results were validated during consensus meetings (with 44 participants after Round 1, and 54 after Round 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to have provided a list of explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for hospitalized older patients. It might help to disseminate key messages to prescribers and reduce inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics.

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics in geriatric psychiatry-a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Older patients are frequently affected by infectious diseases and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of consecutively prescribed antibiotics. Particularly within geriatric psychiatry, high rates of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) have been described, significantly complicating pharmacological treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of antibiotic PIPs in geriatric psychiatry.

Methods

Medication charts of 139 patient cases (mean age 78.8 years; 69.8% female) receiving antibiotic treatment on a geriatric psychiatric ward were analyzed. Utilizing previously published definitions of antibiotic PIPs, adequacy of the antibiotic prescriptions was subsequently assessed.

Results

16.3% of all screened patient cases (139/851) received an antibiotic treatment during their inpatient stay. 59.5% of antibiotic prescriptions were due to urinary tract infections, followed by pulmonary (13.3%) and skin and soft tissue infections (11.3%). 46.7% of all antibiotic prescriptions fulfilled at least one PIP criterium, with the prescription of an antibiotic course for more than seven days as the most common PIP (15.3%).

Discussion

Antibiotic PIPs can be considered as a frequent phenomenon in geriatric psychiatry. Especially the use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins should be discussed critically due to their extensive side effect profiles. Due to the special characteristics of geriatric psychiatric patients, international guidelines on the use of antibiotics should consider frailty and psychotropic polypharmacy of this patient population more closely.