Certification in emergency nursing associated with vital signs attitudes and practices

Pediatric vital signs monitoring in hospital wards: Recognition systems and factors influencing nurses' attitudes and practices

AIMS

To describe: 1) systems in place for recognition and response to deteriorating children in Italy, 2) attitudes and practices of registered nurses (RN) towards vital signs (VS) monitoring in pediatric wards, 3) the associations of nurses attitudes and pratices with nurses' and organizational characteristics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicentre cross-sectional correlational study. Data were collected between January-May 2020 using: an adapted version of the 'Survey on Recognition and Response Systems in Australia', and the 'Ped-V Scale'. Descriptive and adjusted linear regression analysis was performed, accounting for clustering.

RESULTS

Ten Italian hospitals participated, 432 RNs responded to the Ped-V scale (response rate = 52%). Five (50%) hospitals had a VS policy in place, three hospitals (30%) had a Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS), almost all hospitals had a system in place to respond to deteriorating children. Following multivariate regression analysis, having a PEWS was significantly associated with Ped-V scale 'Workload', 'Clinical competence', 'Standardization' dimensions; gender was associated with 'key indicators' and pediatric surgical ward with 'Clinical competence'.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of VS policies and PEWS was not consistent across hospitals caring for children in Italy. Nurses' attitudes and practices (i.e., perception of workload, and clinical competence) were significantly lower in hospitals with increased complexity of care/PEWS. Gender was significantly associated with knowledge scores.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

System strategies to improve nurses' attitudes and practices towards VS monitoring and education are warranted to support effective behaviors towards VS monitoring, their interpretation, and appropriate communication to activate the efferent limb of the rapid response system.

Attitudes and practices towards vital signs monitoring on paediatric wards: Cross-validation of the Ped-V scale

PURPOSE

To develop and psychometrically test an instrument measuring the attitudes and practices towards vital signs (VS) monitoring in nurses caring for children on paediatric wards (Ped-V scale).

DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a multicentre cross-validation study with a cross-sectional design. The Ped-V scale was developed by adapting the V-scale to the paediatric context and administered to a convenience sample of clinical nurses working in paediatric wards from January to May 2020. The content validity of the Ped-V scale was evaluated by a group of 10 experts. The psychometric properties of the scale were tested through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

Overall, 10 Italian hospitals participated in the study, and 640 questionnaires were completed (87% female). At EFA a 30-item version of the scale and four factors emerged. This solution was confirmed at CFA: F1) 'Inaccuracy of VS monitoring and workload'; F2) 'Clinical competence and communication'; F3) 'Standardization and protocol adherence'; F4) 'Misconceptions about key indicators'. Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.63 and 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ped-V scale is valid and reliable for use in the paediatric context to identify barriers concerning nurses' self-efficacy, competences, and knowledge of clinical indicators of paediatric critical deterioration, attitudes towards accuracy, standardization, communication to senior team members and the appropriate use of technology in paediatric VS monitoring.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The Ped-V scale may assist in identifying gaps in nurses' attitudes and devising strategies to change nurses' beliefs, knowledge, skills and decreasing individual, local cultural or organizational barriers towards VS monitoring.

Emergency Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Blood Sample Hemolysis Prevention: An Exploratory Descriptive Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to identify emergency nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to blood sample hemolysis prevention and explore associations between these factors and demographic characteristics. The current state is unknown. Understanding baseline knowledge, attitudes, and practices addresses a gap in the literature.

METHOD

An exploratory, descriptive design with cross-sectional survey methodology employing a study-specific instrument was used.

RESULTS

Request for participation email was sent to a random sample of 5000 Emergency Nurses Association members, and 427 usable surveys were returned (response rate = 8.5%). Mean years in nursing was 13.85 (standard deviation = 10.78), and 226 (52.9%) were certified emergency nurses. Only 85 participants (19.9%) answered all 3 knowledge questions correctly. Answering the 3 knowledge questions correctly was significantly associated with being a certified emergency nurse (χ² = 7.15, P < .01). Participant responses to attitude items about the sequelae of blood sample hemolysis were skewed toward agreement, and most attitude items were associated with whom participants reported as being primarily responsible for phlebotomy. Emergency nurses remain primarily responsible for phlebotomy as well as addressing hemolyzed samples, but few reported that blood sample hemolysis was addressed at a departmental level.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that emergency nurses lack some knowledge related to blood sample hemolysis prevention best practices. Attitudes toward phlebotomy practices may be 1 reason practice has not changed. Every effort should be made to prevent hemolyzed blood samples to decrease delays and costs in emergency care.

Explaining transgression in respiratory rate observation methods in the emergency department: A classic grounded theory analysis

BACKGROUND

Abnormal respiratory rates are one of the first indicators of clinical deterioration in emergency department(ED) patients. Despite the importance of respiratory rate observations, this vital sign is often inaccurately recorded on ED observation charts, compromising patient safety. Concurrently, there is a paucity of research reporting why this phenomenon occurs.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a substantive theory explaining ED registered nurses' reasoning when they miss or misreport respiratory rate observations.

DESIGN

This research project employed a classic grounded theory analysis of qualitative data.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-nine registered nurses currently working in EDs within Australia. Data collected included detailed responses from individual interviews and open-ended responses from an online questionnaire.

METHODS

Classic grounded theory (CGT) research methods were utilised, therefore coding was central to the abstraction of data and its reintegration as theory. Constant comparison synonymous with CGT methods were employed to code data. This approach facilitated the identification of the main concern of the participants and aided in the generation of theory explaining how the participants processed this issue.

RESULTS

The main concern identified is that ED registered nurses do not believe that collecting an accurate respiratory rate for ALL patients at EVERY round of observations is a requirement, and yet organizational requirements often dictate that a value for the respiratory rate be included each time vital signs are collected. The theory 'Rationalising Transgression', explains how participants continually resolve this problem. The study found that despite feeling professionally conflicted, nurses often erroneously record respiratory rate observations, and then rationalise this behaviour by employing strategies that adjust the significance of the organisational requirement. These strategies include; Compensating, when nurses believe they are compensating for errant behaviour by enhancing the patient's outcome; Minimalizing, when nurses believe that the patient's outcome would be no different if they recorded an accurate respiratory rate or not and; Trivialising, a strategy that sanctions negligent behaviour and occurs when nurses 'cut corners' to get the job done. Nurses' use these strategies to titrate the level ofemotional discomfort associated with erroneous behaviour, thereby rationalising transgression CONCLUSION: This research reveals that despite continuing education regarding gold standard guidelines for respiratory rate collection, suboptimal practice continues. Ideally, to combat this transgression, a culture shift must occur regarding nurses' understanding of acceptable practice methods. Nurses must receive education in a way that permeates their understanding of the relationship between the regular collection of accurate respiratory rate observations and optimal patient outcomes.