Early and six-month assessment of bi-ventricular functions following surgical closure of atrial septal defect

Mid-Term Outcome of Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling After Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Comparison Between Surgical and Device Groups

Right ventricular (RV) volume overload occurs in patients with significant atrial septal defect (ASD II) shunts, which can impair left ventricle (LV) filling, thus decreasing LV indices. However, after ASD II closure, the left ventricle regains near normal dimensions. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of LV reverse remodeling between device and surgical closure. We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiographic data of 222 patients with isolated ASD II who underwent surgical (95 patients) or device closure (127 patients) between January 2012 and December 2017. The ASD II was significantly larger in the surgical closure group (p < 0.001.) leading to a higher degree of paradoxical interventricular septal (IVS) movement. In contrast, the LV volume was larger in the device closure group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 19.5 months, the maximum LV systolic and diastolic volumes were reached at 1 year in the device closure group and 2 years in the surgical closure group. IVS motion normalized in 91% of the device closure group compared to 57% of the surgical closure group (p =  < 0.001). There was significant improvement in left ventricular indices and IVS motion after ASD II closure in both groups but more favorable in patients after device closure.

Assessment of Left Ventricular Function and Mitral Regurgitation Severity Early After Percutaneous Device Closure of the Atrial Septal Defect

BACKGROUND

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one the most prevalent forms of congenital heart disease in adults. Closure of ASDs eliminates left-to-right shunt and reduces right heart volumes, but the effects of ASD closure, on the left ventricle (LV) and mitral valve competence are somewhat inconsistent. Therefore, we designed this study to evaluate the early effect of percutaneous closure of ASD on LV function and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we enrolled 32 patients with ASD secundum who underwent percutaneous device closure in Tehran Heart Center. We used transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the procedure and TTE 24 hours after the procedure, then compared obtained LV parameters before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) increased significantly from 44.8 ± 2.4 to 45.8 ± 2.8 (P < 0.001). LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) also increased but was statistically insignificant (P = 0.063) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) remained nearly unchanged. Highest alteration was in right ventricular systolic pressure (12.4% decrease; P < 0.001) and mitral early Doppler/tissue Doppler velocity ratio (E/E') (9.7% increase; P = 0.010). The change in MR severity was insignificant using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P = 0.157).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that systolic functions do not change immediately. However, LVEDD and E/E' will increase immediately, resulting from the passage of all blood from the LA into the LV in the early diastole just after closure. We also observed the positive effect of device closure on reducing right ventricular systolic pressure, and at least it does not worsen MR early after the procedure.

Short-term outcomes after surgical versus trans catheter closure of atrial septal defects; a study from Iran

OBJECTIVES

Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) accounts for 10% of congenital cardiac defects. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the short-term outcomes of surgical versus trans catheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients who had surgical or trans catheter ASD closure. ASD closure outcomes such as hospital cost, length of hospital and ICU stay, residual ASDs, complications, readmission, hospital and three month mortality were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Between March 2010 and March 2016, total of 102 secundum ASD patients were treated in our center (71 patients surgical ASD closure and 31 patients trans catheter ASD closure). About 13.9% of patients (5/36) in the device group had failed procedural attempt for various reasons and these patients underwent surgery closure. Complete closure was observed in 26 of 31 patients (83.9%) in the device group and in 70 of 71 patients in the surgery group (98.6%). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.56 days for surgical group and 2.06 days for device group. The procedure cost for surgery was found to be 5.7% lower than trans catheter closure (patient payment). The complication rates were 18.3% for surgical group and 25.8% for the device group. Readmission after discharge was more common in surgery group (11.2 vs 6.4%). Hospital and three months mortality in both groups were zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Both trans catheter and surgical procedure are good methods of successful ASD closure. Considering that the surgical group patients were higher risk patients, mean total hospital cost of patient's procedures were significantly higher in device closure group, failed intervention rate and residual ASD were more common in device group and complications of device group were more serious; thus, appropriate patient selection is an important factor for successful device closure.