Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status

Optimization of Left Ventricle Pace Maker Location Using Echo-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Models

Introduction

Cardiac pacing has been an effective treatment in the management of patients with bradyarrhythmia and tachyarrhythmia. Different pacemaker location has different responses, and pacemaker effectiveness to each individual can also be different. A novel image-based ventricle animal modeling approach was proposed to optimize ventricular pacemaker site for better cardiac outcome.

Method

One health female adult pig (weight 42.5 kg) was used to make a pacing animal model with different ventricle pacing locations. Ventricle surface electric signal, blood pressure and echo image were acquired 15 min after the pacemaker was implanted. Echo-based left ventricle fluid-structure interaction models were constructed to perform ventricle function analysis and investigate impact of pacemaker location on cardiac outcome. With the measured electric signal map from the pig associated with the actual pacemaker site, electric potential conduction of myocardium was modeled by material stiffening and softening in our model, with stiffening simulating contraction and softening simulating relaxation. Ventricle model without pacemaker (NP model) and three ventricle models with the following pacemaker locations were simulated: right ventricular apex (RVA model), posterior interventricular septum (PIVS model) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT model). Since higher peak flow velocity, flow shear stress (FSS), ventricle stress and strain are linked to better cardiac function, those data were collected for model comparisons.

Results

At the peak of filling, velocity magnitude, FSS, stress and strain for RVOT and PIVS models were 13%, 45%, 18%, 13% and 5%, 30%, 10%, 5% higher than NP model, respectively. At the peak of ejection, velocity magnitude, FSS, stress and strain for RVOT and PIVS models were 50%, 44%, 54%, 59% and 23%, 36%, 39%, 53% higher than NP model, respectively. RVA model had lower velocity, FSS, stress and strain than NP model. RVOT model had higher peak flow velocity and stress/strain than PIVS model. It indicated RVOT pacemaker site may be the best location.

Conclusion

This preliminary study indicated that RVOT model had the best performance among the four models compared. This modeling approach could be used as “virtual surgery” to try various pacemaker locations and avoid risky and dangerous surgical experiments on real patients.

Do the predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy add up?

Objective

Knowledge of factors causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is incomplete. We sought to estimate the incidence and predisposing factors for PICM and evaluate if the risk they portend adds up.

Methods

Single centre retrospective study where consecutive patients with preserved LVEF undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation between 2012 and 2018 were analysed.

Results

A total of 749 patients (68.4 % male; mean age 59.2 ± 14.08 years) were included in the analysis. PICM developed in 74 (9.9%) patients over a median follow up of 2.2 years (IQR 1.1–3.2). Pre-implant LVEF, paced QRS duration and RV pacing burden were independent predictors of PICM. Using 90 % specificity cut-off values for LVEF and paced QRS, and the value separating lowest tertile of RV pacing from the higher tertiles, three risk factors were identified: (i) baseline LVEF < 55 %, (ii) paced QRS duration > 160 msec, and (iii) RV pacing burden > 33 %. Patients with two or more risk factors were at the highest risk (OR 11.62, 95 % CI 4.62–29.21, p-value < 0.001) for developing PICM while those with one risk factor had an intermediate risk (OR 3.89, 95 % CI 1.62–9.34, p-value 0.002) when compared to those without any risk factors.

Conclusion

Low-normal baseline LVEF, wider paced QRS and higher RV pacing burden independently predicted the development of PICM. The presence of ≥2 factors increased the odds of PICM, twelve-fold. A narrower paced QRS, the only modifiable risk factor may help mitigate development of PICM.

Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report

INTRODUCTION

A dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD/R) for a sinus node disease is sometimes referred to as a physiological pacemaker as it maintains atrioventricular synchrony, however several clinical trials have proved its inferiority to a nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A subject of the study is a 74-year-old woman with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and a previously implanted physiological DDD/R pacemaker. The SSS was diagnosed because of patient's very slow sinus rhythm of about 36 bpm, and due to several episodes of dizziness. After the DDD/R implantation the percentage of atrial pacing approached 100%, with almost none ventricular pacing.

DIAGNOSES

Sick sinus syndrome, complete Bachmann's bundle block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was previously implanted with a physiological DDD/R pacemaker. Several years after the implantation, the atrial fibrillation was diagnosed and the pulmonary vein isolation was then performed by cryoablation. During the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation, the improvement of mitral filling parameters was assessed using echocardiography. Shortly thereafter the patient developed the persistent paroxysm of a typical atrial flutter which was successfully terminated using a radiofrequency ablation. No recurrence thereof has been observed ever since (24 months).

OUTCOMES

The atrial electrode of the pacing system was implanted within the low interatrial septal region that resulted in a reduced P-wave duration compared to native sinus rhythm P-waves. The said morphology was deformed because of the complete Bachmann bundle block. That approach, despite a nonphysiological direction of an atrial activation, yielded relatively short P-waves (paced P-wave: 179 ms vs intrinsic sinus P-wave: 237 ms). It also contributed to a significantly shorter PR interval (paced PR: 204 ms vs sinus rhythm PR: 254 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors took into consideration different aspects of alternative right atrial pacing sites. This report has shown that in some patients with a sinus node disease, low interatrial septal pacing can reduce the P-wave duration but does not prevent from the development of atrial arrhythmias.

Low interatrial septal pacing: A simple method

Background

Sinus node disease is associated with widespread structural and electrophysiological changes in the atria in addition to abnormalities at the sinus node. The atrial conduction disorder in patients with atrial pacing results in higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Studies have shown that low interatrial septal pacing is superior to right atrial appendage pacing in preventing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation in these patients. However, implantation of active fixation lead in low interatrial septal position is difficult and time consuming with conventional stylet, inhibiting application of this method in routine practice.

Method

The technique of implanting atrial pacing lead in low interatrial septum with hand-made stylet is presented in this study with emphasis on fluoroscopic landmark and electrocardiographic P wave pattern.

Results

The results indicate acute and short-term success of low interatrial septal pacing in 10 patients out of 11 patients without major complications. Pacing parameters during implantation and 3 months post procedure were within normal limits.

Conclusion

The initial favorable results of this study indicate low interatrial septal pacing with conventional active fixation lead using fluoroscopic landmark and electrocardiographic characteristics is feasible and reproducible with a simple technique.

Electrocardiographic features: Various atrial site pacing

Atrial pacing is done for either symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (SND) or for maintenance of atrio-ventricular synchrony in a dual chamber pacemaker. Conventionally, atrial lead is placed in the right atrial appendage. Atrial conduction disorder in patients with permanent pacing results in higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Atrial septal pacing has emerged as a solution to this problem. So, it is extremely important to understand the different features of paced P wave from various atrial pacing sites. Conventional right atrial appendage pacing in presence of atrial conduction disorder results in marked latency with prolonged P wave duration with reduced amplitude. The morphology is similar to sinus rhythm. Atrial septal pacing causes short and sharp P wave with negative polarity in inferior leads and positive polarity in lead V1 in lower septal pacing, whereas positive polarity in inferior leads and negative polarity in lead V1 during pacing from upper septum.