Assessment of validity of the 'Culprit Score' for predicting the culprit lesion in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction

New Electrocardiographic Score for Predicting the Site of Coronary Artery Occlusion in Inferior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background

An electrocardiogram (ECG) was used to determine the type of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and locate the culprit vessel. Inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI) patients with the right coronary artery (RCA) as the culprit vessel may have a worse clinical prognosis than the left circumflex artery (LCx). We aimed to develop a new, simple, accurate scoring system to localize the RCA.

Methods

From January 2018 to January 2020, patients were admitted to the Department of Cardiology of TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital and the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University due to IWMI and coronary angiography confirmed that the infarct-related vessel was a single RCA or LCx. ECG of patients before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was collected to quantitatively analyze the characteristics of ST-segment deviation in non-inferior wall leads (N-IWL) and establish the RCA score in N-IWL.

Results

149 patients were enrolled, including 83 in the RCA group and 66 in the LCx group. Finally, ST-segment depression (ST↓) lead I, aVR, V1, and V6, and ST↓≥ 1mm in lead V4 were found to be associated with the location of the RCA. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the N-IWL RCA scoring system were 77.1%, 72.7%, and 0.83, respectively. The diagnostic ability of the scoring system was better than that of other algorithms and scoring systems.

Conclusion

ECG helps identify the RCA in patients with IWMI before PCI. The N-IWL RCA score may help identify the culprit vessel as the RCA in patients with IWMI.

Identifying the culprit artery via 12-lead electrocardiogram in inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is mostly caused by acute occlusion of right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex artery (LCX). Several methods and algorithms using 12-lead ECG were developed to localize the lesion in inferior wall STEMI. However, the diagnostic properties of these methods remain under-recognized.

AIMS

The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic properties among the methods of identifying culprit artery in inferior wall STEMI using 12-lead ECG.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to calculate the pooled sensitive, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each method.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 4414 participants were included in the analysis. Methods using double leads had better diagnostic properties, especially ST-segment elevation (STE) in III > II [with pooled sensitivity 0.89 (0.84-0.93), specificity 0.68 (0.57-0.79), DOR 17 (9-32), AUC 0.88 (0.85-0.91)], ST-segment depression (STD) in aVL > I [with pooled sensitivity 0.82 (0.72-0.90), specificity 0.69 (0.48-0.86), DOR 11 (4-29), AUC 0.85 (0.81-0.88)], and STD V3/STE III ≤1.2 [with pooled sensitivity 0.88 (0.78-0.95), specificity 0.59 (0.42-0.75), DOR 12 (5-27), AUC 0.82 (0.78-0.85)]. Diagnostic algorithms, including Jim score[pooled sensitivity 0.70 (0.55-0.85), specificity 0.88 (0.75-0.96)], Fiol's algorithm [pooled sensitivity 0.54 (0.44-0.62), specificity 0.92 (0.88-0.96)] and Tierala's algorithm [pooled sensitivity 0.60 (0.49-0.71), specificity 0.91 (0.86-0.96)], were not superior to these simple methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that diagnostic methods using double leads had better properties. STE in III > II together with STD in aVL > I may be the most ideal method, for its accuracy and convenience.