Ventricular septal pacing: Optimum method to position the lead

[Lead placement in cardiac implantable electronic devices]

The implantation of electrodes for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) requires profound technical understanding and precise execution. The positioning of electrodes in the right ventricle and atrium has significant implications for patient safety and the effectiveness of CIED therapy. Particular focus is given to the distinction between apical and septal stimulation in ventricular positioning. Based on current data, this article provides a practice-oriented guide that leads implanters through the individual steps of electrode positioning. The implantation of electrodes for physiological stimulation (cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT, and conduction system pacing, CSP) is not addressed in this article.

Translation of Tools and Techniques from the Adult Electrophysiology World to Pediatric Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

This article reviews various opportunities to translate established and novel tools and techniques used in adult electrophysiology to pediatrics and the adult congenital heart disease population. There is a specific focus on preoperative management of special population, implantation techniques, and postoperative programming of devices.

Biventricular Function is Impaired in Right Ventricular Septal Pacing-A Prospective Study Using Myocardial Strain Imaging

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is known to occur after right ventricular (RV) pacing; the effect on RV function is less well studied. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of RV mid-septal pacing upon RV function using the novel parameters of speckle-tracking derived RV global longitudinal strain (RV GLS) and RV free wall strain (RV FWS), as well as the conventional parameters RV fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (RV S').

METHODS

Thirty-two (32) consecutive patients with normal baseline LV and RV function requiring permanent pacemaker insertion (for high-grade AV block or sinus node dysfunction) were prospectively recruited. Echocardiography was performed prior to implantation, at 1 day, 1 month and 1 year after implantation, with 29 patients completing follow-up.

RESULTS

After 1 year, three patients (10%) with otherwise normal RV parameters developed abnormal RV strain patterns. Compared to 1 day after implantation, at 1 year significant reductions were observed in mean RV GLS (-24.8 to -21.8%) RV S' (15.1 to 12.2 cm/s), TAPSE (24.2 to 21.9 mm), RV GLS (-24.8 to -21.8%), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (66.0 to 57.9%), LV GLS (-19.9 to 17.0), all p<0.01. There was a non-significant reduction for RV FWS (-29.0 to -26.7%, p=0.06) and there was no change in RV FAC (49.1 to 46.9%, p=0.24).

CONCLUSION

We report abnormalities of RV strain developing 1 year after pacemaker insertion. Measurement of myocardial strain is emerging as an additional method to detect patients at risk of RV dysfunction in those who have undergone pacemaker implantation.

Exploratory use of intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography to guide implantation of the leadless pacemaker

Background

Fluoroscopy is the standard tool for transvenous implantation of traditional and leadless pacemakers (LPs). LPs are used to avoid complications of conventional pacemakers, but there still is a 6.5% risk of major complications. Mid-right ventricular (RV) septal device implantation is suggested to decrease the risk, but helpful cardiac landmarks cannot be visualized under fluoroscopy. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an alternative intraprocedural imaging method.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the spatial relationship of the LP to cardiac landmarks via TEE and their correlations with electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters, and to outline an intraprocedural method to confirm mid-RV nonapical lead positioning.

Methods

Fifty-six patients undergoing implantation of LP with TEE guidance were enrolled in the study. Device position was evaluated by fluoroscopy, ECG, and TEE. Distances between the device and cardiac landmarks were measured by TEE and analyzed with ECG parameters with and without RV pacing.

Results

Mid-RV septal positioning was achieved in all patients. TEE transgastric view (0°-40°/90°-130°) was the optimal view for visualizing device position. Mean tricuspid valve-LP distance was 4.9 ± 0.9 cm, mean pulmonary valve-LP distance was 4.2 ± 1 cm, and calculated RV apex-LP distance was 2.9 ± 1 cm. Mean LP paced QRS width was 160.8 ± 28 ms and increased from 117.2 ± 34 ms at baseline. LP RV pacing resulted in left bundle branch block pattern on ECG and 37.8% QRS widening by 43.5 ± 29 ms.

Conclusion

TEE may guide LP implantation in the nonapical mid-RV position. Further studies are required to establish whether this technique reduces implant complications compared with conventional fluoroscopy.

Short Term Outcomes with Dual Chamber versus Single Chamber Pacing for Atrioventricular Block - A Crossover Trial

A total of 42 patients were studied for primary outcomes of quality of life and 6MWD between VVIR and DDD modes. At end of 2 months after device implantation, randomization was done and the device was programmed to VVIR or DDD modes. At the end of 2 months in this mode QOL and functional was assessed and the patient was switched to other mode. The same protocol was followed at the end of 2 months. We found no difference in functional capacity and quality of life between the two pacing modes. None of the patients developed pacemaker syndrome and there was no preference for any of the modes.

Clinical outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing pacemaker: 3-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Left ventricular function can be affected by chronic ventricular pacing. Different right ventricular (RV) pacing sites have shown heterogeneous clinical outcomes. We investigated these factors in patients receiving permanent pacemaker (PPM) implants.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective analysis of PPM use in South Korea, included all patients undergoing de novo transvenous PPM implantation for atrioventricular block from 2017 to 2019. Clinical characteristics, 12-lead electrocardiograms, echocardiography, and laboratory parameters were evaluated. Composite outcomes are defined by two coprimary endpoints: (1) hospitalizations and (2) cardiac death by heart failure during follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were 167 patients (66 males; overall mean age 75.3 ± 11.9 years), divided into two groups according to the pacing site: 83 apical RV (RVA) vs. 84 septal RV (RVS). There were no significant baseline differences. Paced QRS duration (pQRSd) increased with RVA (168.5 ± 20.1 vs. 159.1 ± 16.3 ms; p < 0.001). Over a median 31-month follow-up, there were 15 hospitalizations and 2 deaths. More patients with RVA were hospitalized or died (16% vs. 5%, respectively; p = 0.049). In Cox proportional regression analysis, pQRSd (hazard ratio [HR] 1.046; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.091; p = 0.033), and diastolic dysfunction (HR 7.343; 95% CI 2.035-26.494; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of composite clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RVS placement shortened the pQRSd and improved clinical outcomes. However, the determinants of these were pQRSd and diastolic dysfunction. Therefore, clinicians should try to shorten the pQRSd when implanting a PPM, and patients with diastolic dysfunction should be monitored intensively.