Effect of morphine use on oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction: Meta-analysis

Pain management considerations in patients living with both pain syndromes and cardiovascular diseases and disorders

Concomitant pain syndromes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and disorders are associated with significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, and neuropsychiatric disorders. There is an interplay between the mechanisms of pathophysiology of both CVD and pain syndromes. Patients with CVD (and/or disorders) as well as pain syndromes have an increased propensity for drug-drug/disease interactions. Therefore, an understanding of how to use pharmacotherapy to treat pain syndromes, in the context of patients who have diagnoses of CVD and/or disorders, is paramount to patients' success in achieving adequate pain control and appropriately managing CVD and/or disorders, all while decreasing the risk of adverse events (AEs) both from pharmacotherapy to treat pain and CVD (and/or disorders). Based on the appraisal of literature and authors' clinical expertise, it was determined that gabapentinoids, opioids, skeletal muscle relaxants, tricyclic antidepressants, clonidine, serotonin norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors, dronabinol, carbamazepine, second-generation antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, corticosteroids, and topical anesthetics have the most evidence for use in patients with CVD and/or disorders. However, the literature surrounding the use of pharmacotherapy for pain management is limited to retrospective studies and there is a lack of well-designed, prospective, randomized trials; this also includes head-to-head comparator studies. Unlike many CVD-related pharmacotherapy studies, data studying pain management in patients with CVD lacks standardized outcomes that are consistent among the pool of data. Overall, the decision to prescribe specific pain management therapies in patients with CVD and/or disorders should include assessment of pain severity, type of pain, drug-drug/disease interactions, adjuvant therapies required, and the risk or presence of AEs.

Negative Impact of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Morphine Dose on Ticagrelor Uptake and Pharmacodynamics: A Population PK/PD Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is widely used in patients with stable and acute coronary artery disease. Understanding the factors that influence its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) could improve therapeutic outcomes. We therefore performed a pooled population PK/PD analysis using individual patient data from two studies. We focused on the impact of morphine administration and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on the risk of high platelet reactivity (HPR) and dyspnea.

METHODS

A parent-metabolite population PK/PD model was developed based on data from 63 STEMI, 50 non-STEMI, and 25 chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. Simulations were then run to evaluate the risk of non-response and adverse events associated with the identified variability factors.

RESULTS

The final PK model consisted of first-order absorption with transit compartments, distribution with two compartments for ticagrelor and one compartment for AR-C124910XX (active metabolite of ticagrelor), and linear elimination for both drugs. The final PK/PD model was an indirect turnover model with production inhibition. Morphine dose and STEMI, independently, had a significant negative effect on the absorption rate (reduction of log([Formula: see text]) by 0.21×morphine dose (mg) and by 2.37 in STEMI patients, both p < 0.001), and the presence of STEMI significantly impacted both efficacy and potency (both p < 0.001). The simulations run with the validated model showed a high rate of non-response in patients with those covariates (RR 1.19 for morphine, 4.11 for STEMI and 5.73 for morphine and STEMI, all three p < 0.001). By increasing ticagrelor dosage, the negative morphine effect was reversible in patients without STEMI and just limited in patients with STEMI.

CONCLUSION

The developed population PK/PD model confirmed the negative impact of morphine administration and presence of STEMI on ticagrelor PK and antiplatelet effect. Increasing ticagrelor doses seems effective in morphine users without STEMI, whereas the STEMI effect is not entirely reversible.

Effects of morphine and P2Y inhibitor amongst patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

P2Y inhibitor and morphine are widely used in caring for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are some concerns about the combination use due to interaction in metabolism. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether using morphine with antiplatelets in patients with ACS affects the clinical outcomes based on currently available evidence.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for comparative studies on this topic by using relevant keywords of ACS and morphine. Two authors independently extracted study information, mortality, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), major bleeding, and length of hospital stay. Then, they evaluated the quality of evidence independently. Meta-analysis was planned to be conducted in random-effects model. Risk ratio (RR) was used for most outcomes except hospital stay, and Peto odds ratio (POR) was used if there were any zero cells. Pooled estimate was presented with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (n = 73,033) met eligibility criteria, and there was non-significant difference in mortality between antiplatelet with and without morphine (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.78 to 1.64). Antiplatelet therapy without morphine significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.67 to 0.89; I-square = 0%), but increased the odds of major bleeding (POR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.04 to 3.35; I-square = 0%) as compared with the combined use of antiplatelet therapy and morphine.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there is no statistically significant difference in mortality in patients with ACS using morphine or not, but clinicians ought to make a trade-off between a lower risk of MACE and a higher risk of major bleeding before adding morphine to antiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelet Therapy Aims and Strategies in Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome or Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the mainstay treatment to reduce ischemic events, such as myocardial infarction or stroke, in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The development of potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (ticagrelor and prasugrel) has helped to further reduce ischemic events, particularly among high-risk patients. Meanwhile, the evolution of newer generations of drug-eluting stents are also improving outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Research studies on antiplatelet therapy in recent years have focused on balancing ischemic and bleeding risks through different strategies, which include P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy, escalation and de-escalation, and extended DAPT. Because results from the large number of clinical studies may sometimes appear conflicting, this review aims to summarize recent advances, and demonstrate that they are aligned by a general principle, namely, strategies may be adopted based on treatment aims for specific patients at several time points. Another aim of this review is to outline the important considerations for using antiplatelet therapy in Asian patients, in whom there is a greater prevalence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function mutations, and a common increased risk of bleeding, despite high platelet reactivity (the so-called "East Asian Paradox").

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2019

This paper is the forty-second consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2019 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

ANalgesic Efficacy and safety of MOrphiNe versus methoxyflurane in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the rationale and design of the ANEMON-SIRIO 3 study: a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The unfavourable influence of morphine on the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor resulting in weaker and retarded antiplatelet effect in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been previously shown. Replacing morphine with methoxyflurane, a potent, non-opioid analgesic agent, that does not weaken or delay the effect of antiplatelet agents may improve the clinical efficacy of treatment of patients with ACS.

METHODS

The ANEMON-SIRIO 3 study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised clinical trial aimed to test the analgesic efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane in patients with ACS. The study population will comprise patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST-elevation ACS admitted to the study centres with typical chest pain requiring analgesic treatment. Before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the patients with index ACS will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive methoxyflurane administered by inhalation, or to obtain morphine administered intravenously. Analgesic treatment will be followed by 300 mg loading dose of aspirin and 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. Patients will be assessed with regard to pain intensity according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale at baseline, 3 min after study drug administration and immediately after PCI. Moreover, patients will be actively monitored with regard to the occurrence of side effects of evaluated therapies, as well as adverse events that may be related to insufficient platelet inhibition (no-reflow phenomenon assessed immediately after PCI, administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during PCI, acute stent thrombosis).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be conducted in six Polish clinical centres from the beginning of in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04476173.

Effects of morphine on P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of morphine on P2Y₁₂ platelet inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to retrieve literature through 11th May 2019. Standardized weighted mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), P-value, and I² value were used to assess the strength of the association in this meta-analysis. Outcomes included platelet reactivity, high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), ticagrelor maximum concentration (Cmax), ticagrelor area under curve (AUC), death rate, reinfarction rate, stroke, stent thrombosis, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) hemorrhage, dyspnea, emesis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and pulmonary edema.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles were included in this study, containing 5688 patients (morphine group: n = 2014, control group: n = 3674). Results illustrated that the morphine group had a higher platelet reactivity (SMD: 0.834, 95%CI: 0.483-1.186, P < 0.001) and HRPR rate (RR: 1.994, 95%CI: 1.536-2.588, P < 0.001) than the control group, while the Cmax of ticagrelor (WMD: -481.838, 95%CI: -841.242-122.434, P = 0.009) was lower than that of the control group. The death rate of the morphine group was lower than that in the control group (RR: 0.561, 95%CI: 0.337-0.933, P = 0.026). The morphine group had a higher emesis rate than the control group (RR: 4.486, 95%CI: 2.263-8.891, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Morphine effectively suppresses the inhibition effect of P2Y₁₂ platelet inhibitors in patients with AMI.