Resolution of Primary Aortic Thrombosis after Dabigatran therapy-A New Hope for the Rare and Old Disease

Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant Therapy for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Growth and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Intraluminal thrombi in the abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were demonstrated to increase aneurysm growth. The effect of treatments on thrombus reduction upon AAA enlargement and clinical endpoints is uncertain Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy on AAA growth and clinical outcomes.

METHOD

A total of 357 patients with AAAs were enrolled in this study. They were divided into 2 groups based on their medical therapies. Patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy were assigned to group 1 (n = 234) and group 2 (n = 92), respectively.

RESULTS

The greatest reduction in thrombus diameter change was observed in patients with anticoagulant therapy (group 1, -2.26 mm; group 2, -8.16 mm; P =.001). The greatest aneurysmal enlargement was found in patients with antiplatelet therapy. There was less AAA progression with anticoagulant therapy than with the other therapy (group 1, 2.08 mm; group 2, 1.31 mm P =.027. The more operational need was observed in patients with antiplatelet therapy than in patients with anticoagulant therapy ( group 1 67, group 2 16, P =.036) Conclusion: In our study, it was revealed that anticoagulant therapy has been associated with decreased thrombus diameter and less aneurysmal enlargement compared with antiplatelet therapy. Furthermore, this beneficial effect on the thrombus size and aneurysmal diameter decreased the operational need in patients with anticoagulant therapy.

Surgical management of primary aortic thrombus in thoracic aorta

Background

Primary aortic thrombus (PAT) in the absence of underlying aortic pathology such as atherosclerosis or aneurysm is quite rare and presents with various symptoms related to distal embolization. Treatment options include anticoagulation alone, open surgical thrombectomy, endovascular repair, and a combination of these approaches. The optimal management strategy remains controversial.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2020, 10 patients (6 females; mean age, 49.1 years) presented to our institution with PAT in the thoracic aorta. All 10 patients were active tobacco users, and 6 patients were found to have an underlying hypercoagulable state. Locations of the PAT included the ascending aorta in 4 patients, the descending thoracic aorta in 3 patients, and the aortic root, aortic arch, and thoracoabdominal aorta in 1 patient each. At presentation, 2 patients had developed myocardial infarction, and 2 others had cerebral infarction. All patients but 1, who was managed medically for PAT, underwent open surgical thrombectomy via either sternotomy or left thoracotomy. Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 2 patients and pulmonary thromboembolectomy in 1 patient. There were no operative deaths. During a median follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients developed recurrent PAT, owing primarily to poor compliance with anticoagulation. One patient required redo open thrombectomy. Two patients had mesenteric ischemia necessitating small bowel resection.

Conclusions

Open surgical thrombectomy of the thoracic aorta can be performed with low mortality and morbidity; however, PAT can recur, especially in patients who have difficulty managing anticoagulation.

Mobile thrombus of the abdominal aorta: a narrative review

A primary aortic mural thrombus (PAMT) is defined as a thrombus attached to the aortic wall in the absence of any atherosclerotic or aneurysmal disease of the aorta or any cardiac source of embolus. It is a rare entity that has high morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus on the ideal treatment of PAMT. The objective of this paper is to review the possibilities for treatment of mobile abdominal aortic mural thrombus. Endovascular therapy and open surgery appear to be the best options for treatment of mobile abdominal aortic mural thrombus. Thus, in patients with favorable anatomy, endovascular therapy is probably the treatment choice, while in those with unfavorable anatomy, open surgery is probably the best option for treatment of a mobile abdominal aortic thrombus. It is important to emphasize that anticoagulation alone can be used as a non-aggressive option and, if this fails, endovascular or surgical methods can then be employed.

Management of an acute cerebral embolic infarct with thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in the presence of an aortic arch floating thrombus

An aortic arch floating thrombus is a rare cause of embolic ischaemic cerebral infarction. Previously, thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy has been used to treat acute cerebral infarction in this context; however, combination therapy using both modalities is yet to be published. The optimal management of aortic arch floating thrombi is debated. Endovascular removal, thrombolysis, vitamin K antagonists and recently, direct oral anticoagulants have been utilised to treat aortic arch floating thrombi. Herein, we highlight the case of a patient presenting with dense hemiparesis, dysphasia and chest pain. CT imaging revealed a left middle cerebral artery thrombus and concurrent aortic arch floating thrombus. He was successfully treated with acute thrombolysis and subsequent mechanical thrombectomy of the cerebral thrombus resulting in resolution of his neurological symptoms. Repeat imaging demonstrated persistence of the aortic arch floating thrombus despite thrombolysis. The aortic arch floating thrombus was managed successfully with direct oral anticoagulant therapy.