Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone ABT492 and ciprofloxacin with Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro dynamic model

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values

Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable in vitro activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of ~6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing (n = 37) and time-kill analysis (n = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC50 values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log2 dilutions (MIC50 values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug (fCmax) were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log10 CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log10 CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. IMPORTANCE Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (~7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Delafloxacin

Delafloxacin has recently received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. This article provides a balanced and comprehensive systematic critique of the literature in order to provide an up-to-date summary of its clinical pharmacology. Oral delafloxacin is rapidly absorbed and exhibits comparable exposure characteristics (300 mg intravenous versus 450 mg oral) between the two formulations, allowing easy transition from intravenous to oral therapy. The bioavailability is high (60-70%) and absorption is not affected by food intake, although further studies are required under clinically relevant conditions. Delafloxacin is primarily excreted renally (thus requiring renal dose adjustment in the setting of renal dysfunction), but also undergoes metabolism by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes in the formation of a conjugated metabolite. Few drug-drug interaction studies have been identified, although more systematic characterizations in vitro and in vivo are warranted. Delafloxacin is a concentration-dependent bactericidal agent that has in vitro susceptibility for gram-positive (notably potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms. In addition to acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the clinical utility of delafloxacin has also been studied in community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and gonorrhea, with potentially promising findings. Given its mild side effect profile, including an apparent lack of association with clinically important QTc prolongation, delafloxacin is generally well tolerated.

Profile of a Novel Anionic Fluoroquinolone-Delafloxacin

Fluoroquinolones have been in clinical use for over 50 years with significant efficacy. However, increasing resistance and emergence of some marked adverse events have limited their usage. The most recently approved class member, delafloxacin, is the only available anionic (non-zwitterionic) fluoroquinolone. Its unique molecular structure provides improved in vitro activity against most Gram-positive pathogens, including quinolone-resistant strains, which is further enhanced at acid pH. Delafloxacin shows favorable pharmacological properties, with about 60% bioavailability after oral administration, only mild inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A, and no evidence of cardiac- or phototoxicity in healthy volunteers (tested against positive controls). Its twice daily dosing, suitability for intravenous, oral, or switch dosing, the lack of many clinically significant drug-drug interactions, and acceptable adverse event profile in registration clinical trials supports its use in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and potentially in other infections, where resistance to other agents, safety, and/or the need for early discharge is of concern.

Delafloxacin: design, development and potential place in therapy

Delafloxacin (DLX) is a new fluoroquinolone pending approval, which has shown a good in vitro and in vivo activity against major pathogens associated with skin and soft tissue infections and community-acquired respiratory tract infections. DLX also shows good activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including those resistant to other fluoroquinolones, as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Its pharmacokinetic properties and excellent activity in acidic environments make DLX an alternative in the treatment of these and other infections. In this manuscript, a detailed analysis of this new fluoroquinolone is performed, from its chemical structure to its in vivo activity in recently published clinical trials. Its possible place in the current antimicrobial outlook and in other infectious models is also discussed.

Delafloxacin, a non-zwitterionic fluoroquinolone in Phase III of clinical development: evaluation of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy

Delafloxacin is a fluoroquinolone lacking a basic substituent in position 7. It shows MICs remarkably low against Gram-positive organisms and anaerobes and similar to those of ciprofloxacin against Gram-negative bacteria. It remains active against most fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, except enterococci. Its potency is further increased in acidic environments (found in many infection sites). Delafloxacin is active on staphylococci growing intracellularly or in biofilms. It is currently evaluated as an intravenous and intravenous/oral stepdown therapy in Phase III trials for the treatment of complicated skin/skin structure infections. It was also granted as Qualified Infectious Disease Product for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, due to its high activity on pneumococci and atypical pathogens.

NBTI 5463 is a novel bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor with activity against gram-negative bacteria and in vivo efficacy

The need for new antibiotics that address serious Gram-negative infections is well recognized. Our efforts with a series of novel bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitors (NBTIs) led to the discovery of NBTI 5463, an agent with improved activity over other NBTIs against Gram-negative bacteria, in particular against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (F. Reck, D. E. Ehmann, T. J. Dougherty, J. V. Newman, S. Hopkins, G. Stone, N. Agrawal, P. Ciaccio, J. McNulty, H. Barthlow, J. O'Donnell, K. Goteti, J. Breen, J. Comita-Prevoir, M. Cornebise, M. Cronin, C. J. Eyermann, B. Geng, G. R. Carr, L. Pandarinathan, X. Tang, A. Cottone, L. Zhao, N. Bezdenejnih-Snyder, submitted for publication). In the present work, NBTI 5463 demonstrated promising activity against a broad range of Gram-negative pathogens. In contrast to fluoroquinolones, the compound did not form a double-strand DNA cleavable complex with Escherichia coli DNA gyrase and DNA, but it was a potent inhibitor of both DNA gyrase and E. coli topoisomerase IV catalytic activities. In studies with P. aeruginosa, NBTI 5463 was bactericidal. Resistant mutants arose at a low rate, and the mutations were found exclusively in the nfxB gene, a regulator of the MexCD-OprJ efflux system. Levofloxacin-selected resistance mutations in GyrA did not result in decreased susceptibility to NBTI 5463. Animal infection studies demonstrated that NBTI 5463 was efficacious in mouse models of lung, thigh, and ascending urinary tract infections.

Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against a high inoculum of Escherichia coli in an in vitro infection model

OBJECTIVES

Escherichia coli is the leading bacterial species implicated in intra-abdominal infections. In these infections a high bacterial burden with pre-existing resistant mutants are likely to be encountered and resistance could be amplified with suboptimal dosing. Our objective was to investigate the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against a high inoculum of E. coli using an in vitro hollow fibre infection model (HFIM).

METHODS

Three wild-type strains of E. coli (ATCC 25922, MG1655 and EC28044) were studied by exposing approximately 2 x 10(8) cfu/mL (20 mL) to escalating dosing regimens of moxifloxacin (ranging from 30 to 400 mg, once daily). Serial samples were obtained from HFIM over 120 h to enumerate the total and resistant subpopulation. Quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC of resistant isolates were sequenced to confirm the mechanism of resistance.

RESULTS

The pre-exposure MIC of the three wild-type strains was 0.0625 mg/L. Simulated moxifloxacin concentration profiles in HFIM were satisfactory (r(2) >or= 0.94). Placebo experiments revealed natural mutants, but no resistance amplification. Regrowth and resistance amplification was observed between 30 mg/day (AUC/MIC = 47) and 80 mg/day dose (AUC/MIC = 117). Sustained bacterial suppression was achieved at >or=120 mg/day dose (AUC/MIC = 180). Point mutations in gyrA (D87G or S83L) were detected in resistant isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that suboptimal dosing may facilitate resistance amplification in a high inoculum of E. coli. The clinical dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) was adequate to suppress resistance development in three wild-type strains. Clinical relevance of these findings warrants further in vivo investigation.

Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone ABT492 and levofloxacin with Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro dynamic model

The kinetics of killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae exposed to ABT492 or levofloxacin were compared. S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and four ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates, S. pneumoniae 1149, 391, 79 and 804, were exposed to ABT492 and levofloxacin as a single dose in a dynamic model that simulates human pharmacokinetics of the quinolones. With S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 eight-fold ranging AUC/MIC ratios (60-500 h) were simulated for each quinolone. In addition, two larger AUC/MICs, i.e., 1080 and 2150 h for ABT492 and 1460 and 3660 h for levofloxacin which correspond to 100 and 200 mg doses of ABT492 and 200 and 500 mg doses of levofloxacin, respectively, were mimicked. Each ciprofloxacin-resistant organism was exposed to the clinical doses of ABT492 (400 mg) and levofloxacin (500 mg); the respective AUC/MIC ratios were from 580 to 3470 h and from 28 to 110 h. At comparable AUC/MICs (from 60 to 500 h), regrowth of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 followed initial killing, and the times to regrowth were longer with levofloxacin than ABT492. However, no regrowth of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 occurred at the higher AUC/MICs of ABT492 (1080 and 2150 h) and levofloxacin (1460 and 3660 h). Killing of S. pneumoniae 1149, 391 and 79 without bacterial regrowth, was provided by ABT492 (AUC/MIC 3470, 2310 and 1160 h, respectively) but not levofloxacin (AUC/MIC 55, 110 and 28 h, respectively). Regrowth of S. pneumoniae 804 was observed with both ABT492 and levofloxacin (AUC/MIC 580 and 55 h, respectively). Areas between the control growth curve and the time-kill curve (ABBCs) for ABT492 against S. pneumoniae 1149, 391 and 79 were 2.6-4.2 times larger than the respective ABBCs for levofloxacin, whereas similar ABBCs were found with S. pneumoniae 804 exposed to both quinolones. These findings predict significantly greater efficacy of ABT492 than levofloxacin at clinically achievable AUC/MIC ratios against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae and similar efficacies of the two quinolones against susceptible organisms.