Mutant prevention concentration: a new tool for choosing treatment in nontuberculous mycobacterial infections

Comparing the minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention concentrations of selected antibiotics against animal isolates of Pasteurella multocida and Salmonella typhimurium

Historically, the use of antibiotics was not well regulated in veterinary medicine. The emergence of antibiotic resistance (ABR) in pathogenic bacteria in human and veterinary medicine has driven the need for greater antibiotic stewardship. The preservation of certain antibiotic classes for use exclusively in humans, especially in cases of multidrug resistance, has highlighted the need for veterinarians to reduce its use and redefine dosage regimens of antibiotics to ensure efficacy and guard against the development of ABR pathogens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the lowest concentration of an antibiotic drug that will prevent the growth of a bacterium, is recognised as a method to assist in antibiotic dosage determination. Minimum inhibitory concentrations sometimes fail to deal with first-step mutants in bacterial populations; therefore dosing regimens based solely on MIC can lead to the development of ABR. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is the minimum inhibitory antibiotic concentration of the most resistant first-step mutant. Mutant prevention concentration determination as a complementary and sometimes preferable alternative to MIC determination for veterinarians when managing bacterial pathogens. The results of this study focused on livestock pathogens and antibiotics used to treat them, which had a MIC value of 0.25 µg/mL for enrofloxacin against all 27 isolates of Salmonella typhimurium. The MPC values were 0.50 µg/mL, with the exception of five isolates that had MPC values of 4.00 µg/mL. The MPC test yielded 65.52% (18 isolates) Salmonella isolates with florfenicol MICs in the sensitive range, while 11 isolates were in the resistant range. Seventeen isolates (58.62%) of Pasteurella multocida had MIC values in the susceptible range and 41.38% (12 isolates) had an intermediate MIC value. Mutant prevention concentration determinations as done in this study is effective for the antibiotic treatment of bacterial infections and minimising the development of resistance. The MPC method can be used to better control to prevent the development of antibiotic drug resistance used in animals.

Selection of appropriate analytical tools to determine the potency and bioactivity of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance

Antibiotics are the chemotherapeutic agents that kill or inhibit the pathogenic microorganisms. Resistance of microorganism to antibiotics is a growing problem around the world due to indiscriminate and irrational use of antibiotics. In order to overcome the resistance problem and to safely use antibiotics, the correct measurement of potency and bioactivity of antibiotics is essential. Microbiological assay and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method are used to quantify the potency of antibiotics. HPLC method is commonly used for the quantification of potency of antibiotics, but unable to determine the bioactivity; whereas microbiological assay estimates both potency and bioactivity of antibiotics. Additionally, bioassay is used to estimate the effective dose against antibiotic resistant microbes.

Simultaneously, microbiological assay addresses the several parameters such as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), mutation prevention concentration (MPC) and critical concentration (Ccr) which are used to describe the potency in a more informative way. Microbiological assay is a simple, sensitive, precise and cost effective method which gives reproducible results similar to HPLC. However, the HPLC cannot be a complete substitute for microbiological assay and both methods have their own significance to obtain more realistic and precise results.

Mutant prevention concentration of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is a new concept meant to face the increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance by using antibiotic concentrations able to prevent the selection of single-step resistant mutants. In the present study, the MPCs of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin were evaluated against fully susceptible strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Additionally, representative single-step mutants arising after exposure to sub-MPC antibiotic concentrations were investigated for molecular basis of their fluoroquinolone resistance phenotypes. MPC value was recorded when more than 10(10) CFU/mL were spread on Muëller Hinton Agar supplemented with different antibiotic concentrations (from 1X to 16X MIC value). MICs of original strains as well as single-step mutants were determined in presence or absence of the Efflux Pump Inhibitor Phe-Arg-beta-naphthylamide (PAbetaN). Moreover point mutations in the QRDR of the gyrA and parC genes were investigated by sequencing. The enrofloxacin MPC values were 4-16-fold higher than ciprofloxacin values. E. coli and S. Typhimurium representative single-step mutants showed reduced susceptibilities associated with point mutations in the QRDR of the gyrA gene or efflux pump system. P. aeruginosa mutants showed resistance phenotypes associated predominantly with efflux pump system activity. According to in vitro MPC data, ciprofloxacin showed a better efficacy than enrofloxacin, in preventing the selection of E. coli, S. Typhimurium and P. aeruginosa single-step mutants. However, in relation to AUC/MPC ratio, the MPC concept can be applied in vivo to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin for E. coli and S. Typhimurium but not for P. aeruginosa.

La fenêtre de mutation pour le couple « pneumocoque–fluoroquinolone ». Apport des modèles expérimentaux

Low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones (in vitro susceptible but with topoisomerase mutation, parC) is currently rare among pneumococci in France. However, this resistance is more frequently observed in previously exposed patients and therapeutic failure has been reported. These issues were investigated by using a humanized model of experimental pneumonia induced by pneumococci exhibiting this low-level resistance profile. The results are as follows: 1) when the pneumonia is due to a wild type pneumococcus, humanized ciprofloxacin treatment is not effective because of resistant mutants with parC mutation; moreover, levoflaxin treatment is less bactericidal than gatiflo- or moxifloxacin (-4 vs -6 log CFU/g); 2) when an efflux strain is used, levo-treatment is not efficient but there are no mutants, a gatiflo-treatment is combined when mutants appear and moxiflo-treatment is effective; 3) when the pneumonia is induced with susceptible parC strains, treatment with either levo, or gati, or moxifloxacin is completely ineffective because resistant mutants appear (acquisition of another gyrA mutation). Measure of the mutation prevention concentration (MPC) allows anticipating these results since the mutation window can be determined. These results stress the necessity to identify patients with such pneumococcal strains in order to avoid therapeutic failure and the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistant mutants.

Usefulness of various antibiotics against Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare, measured by their mutant prevention concentration

This study looked the selection of resistant mutants in Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare during antibiotic treatment. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of 20 Mycobacterium avium and 12 Mycobacterium intracellulare isolates was determined. Fifty percent of Mycobacterium avium strains had MPC (MPC50) values lower than 16, 64, 40, 55 and 60 mg/L for rifabutin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively. In the case of Mycobacterium intracellulare, 50% had MPC (MPC50) values below 60, 30, 35, 16, 2.5 and 14 mg/L for linezolid, rifabutin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and clarithromycin, respectively. The high capacity for selecting resistant mutants of all the antibiotics studied emphasises the need to restore the immune system if necessary and to administer combined treatments in order to cure patients.