German guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis in people who inject drugs: A scoping review of clinical guidelines

BACKGROUND

The incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) among people who inject drugs (PWID) is rising worldwide. Multiple clinical guidelines differ on the management of this condition, and few guidelines comment on treatment for primary substance use disorder (SUD). A comprehensive comparison of these guidelines is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a critical review identifying key differences in clinical guideline recommendations for treating IE among PWID, focusing on the inclusion of recommendations for SUD treatment and the presence of stigmatizing language.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Recently published, English-language, society-developed clinical guidelines for the treatment of IE among PWID.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

PubMed, Google Scholar, and CINAHL Plus databases.

CHARTING METHODS

In line with Arksey and O'Malley's framework, a scoping review was adapted using Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Two reviewers independently performed database searches for clinical guidelines published between 2007 and 2020 that commented on the management of IE among PWID.

RESULTS

Ten clinical guidelines were included in the final analysis. Treatment recommendations varied with some societies proposing nonstandard care due to concern for return to drug use. Three guidelines include reference to addiction treatment. Only one guideline specifies the use of opioid agonist therapy for treating opioid use disorder and identifies the benefits of an addiction specialist consultation. Acute withdrawal management is not mentioned in any guideline. All guidelines utilized stigmatizing language to describe PWID.

CONCLUSIONS

Most guidelines do not address SUD treatment, despite its effectiveness in reducing adverse health outcomes. Future guidelines should address SUD treatment using patient-first language.

Prospective comparison of perioperative antibiotic management protocols in oncological head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVES

The adequate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck cancer surgery is an important and easy applicable tool to decrease nosocomial morbidity and mortality by reducing the rate of infections. In the study a strictly perioperative antibiosis is compared with an extended postoperative prophylactic antibiosis. We aim to clarify the value of postoperative prophylactic antibiosis for the recovery and clinical course of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study 75 consecutive patients, who underwent major oncological head and neck surgery were included and divided in three groups, each containing 25 patients. The first group received peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (POAP) from the day of operation until the fifth day postoperatively. The second group was treated with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PEAP) only. The third group received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and increased local antiseptic care (PAPAC). General anamnestic data was collected, as well as duration of hospitalisation, stay on intensive care unit, rate and type of infections, surgical closure of the tracheostomy, and postoperative blood parameters.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in general diseases or extent of surgery between the groups. There were statistically significant fewer patients suffering from surgical site infections in subjects with POAP (n = 1) in comparison to PEAP (n = 9; p = 0.011) and PAPAC (n = 9; p = 0.011). In contrast, other nosocomial infections (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis) did not decrease under a prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Based on findings of the study, we recommend an extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing major oncological head and neck surgery.

Acute Haemophilus parainfluenzae endocarditis: a case report

Introduction

Numerous pathogens can cause infective endocarditis, including Haemophilus parainfluenzae. H. parainfluenzae is part of the H. aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae group that may cause about 3% of the total endocarditis cases, and is characterized by a subacute course and large vegetations.

Case presentation

Acute H. parainfluenzae endocarditis developed in a 54-year-old woman, with no underlying predisposing factors. The patient presented with fever of 3 days duration and a severe headache. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed multiple cerebral emboli with hemorrhagic foci. Upon suspicion of endocarditis, cardiac transesophageal ultrasonography was performed and revealed massive vegetations. The patient underwent emergency mitral valve replacement, and was further treated with ceftriaxone. Blood cultures grew H. parainfluenzae only after valve replacement, and a 6-week course of ceftriaxone was prescribed.

Conclusion

We underline the typical presentation of large vegetations in H. parainfluenzae endocarditis, which are associated with embolic phenomena and resulting severity. Although the majority of the few cases reported in the literature are subacute in progress, our case further underlines the possibility that H. parainfluenzae endocarditis may develop rapidly. Thus, awareness of the imaging characteristics of the pathogen may enhance early appropriate diagnosis and therapeutic response.

Streptococcal Infections

The streptococci are a large heterogeneous group of gram-positive spherically shaped bacteria widely distributed in nature. They include some of the most important agents of human disease as well as members of the normal human flora. Some streptococci have been associated mainly with disease in animals, while others have been domesticated and used for the culture of buttermilk, yogurt, and certain cheeses. Those known to cause human disease comprise two broad categories: First are the pyogenic streptococci, including the familiar β-hemolytic streptococci and the pneumococcus. These organisms are not generally part of the normal flora but cause acute, often severe, infections in normal hosts. Second are the more diverse enteric and oral streptococci, which are nearly always part of the normal flora and which are more frequently associated with opportunistic infections.

Aortic valve endocarditis due to abiotrophia defectiva: a rare etiology

Abiotrophia defectiva is a rare cause of infective endocarditis. Besides an association with often negative blood cultures and difficult treatment, high rates of relapse and higher mortality than endocarditis caused by other viridans streptococci are known features of this entity. We report on the surgical and medical management of the aortic valve endocarditis caused by Abiotrophia defectiva in a 19-year-old patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a patient to have Down syndrome and Abiotrophia defectiva endocarditis requiring aortic valve replacement.

Getting to the heart of the problem: serological and molecular techniques in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is diagnosed using the Duke criteria, which rely predominantly on cardiac imaging and recovery of a causative organism from the bloodstream. These criteria can be inconclusive, particularly when blood cultures remain sterile either due to the fastidious nature of the infecting organism or prior antibiotic therapy. Serology and, more recently, molecular techniques have been investigated as a solution to the problematic negative blood culture. The detection of elevated antibody levels has proved particularly useful in the diagnosis of those patients infected with organisms that cannot be cultured using standard laboratory methods, whilst molecular methods have been successfully used in the detection of both fastidious pathogens and those inhibited by prior antibiotic therapy. In view of recent and ongoing developments in the field of molecular diagnostics, these techniques will become increasingly important not only in the routine investigation of infectious disease, but specifically the diagnosis of endocarditis.

Future strategies for treating Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

Bloodstream infections are potentially life-threatening diseases. They can cause serious secondary infections, such as infective endocarditis and osteomyelitis, and may result in severe sepsis. One of the most critical determinants of survival is the induction of timely and effective antibiotic therapy. One of the leading causes of bloodstream infections is Staphylococcus aureus, with an increasing proportion of isolates being resistant to methicillin. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is associated with greater morbidity and mortality rates than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Standard-of-care antibiotic treatments for S. aureus bloodstream infections are limited by toxicity and/or differential efficacy against MRSA and MSSA, which makes the choice of empirical therapy difficult. New management strategies are required to address the challenges raised by S. aureus bloodstream infections and MRSA in particular. These may include the use of techniques that allow the early identification of complications arising from S. aureus bacteraemia, rapid pathogen identification to enable the administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy, and the identification of new drugs with novel modes of action that may circumvent antibiotic resistance and enable effective empirical treatment of both MSSA and MRSA infections.