In vitro activity of ‘old antibiotics’ against highly resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Challenges to Early Discharge of Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Infections by ESBL Producers: TMP/SMX as a Step-Down Therapy for Shorter Hospitalization and Lower Costs

Background

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing pathogens have increased and are treated with carbapenem in general. Carbapenem use is associated with prolonged hospitalization or daily outpatient visit. The aim of this study was to investigate patients with UTIs by ESBL-producing pathogens for early discharge using an old oral antibiotic, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), which is susceptible to ESBL-producing pathogens.

Methods

Data on UTIs caused by ESBL-producing pathogens from a single tertiary hospital were collected retrospectively. Patients who had been treated with intravenous carbapenems or oral TMP/SMX were included. Patients’ clinical and microbiological outcomes were compared between oral TMP/SMX and ertapenem treatment groups.

Results

A total of 103 patients were included, 21 of whom had been treated with TMP/SMX, whereas 82 with ertapenem. Clinical outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different (TMP/SMX: 90.5%; ertapenem: 84.1%, p = 0.73). The microbiological cure rate was higher in the TMP/SMX group than in the ertapenem group (90.5% vs 58.5%, respectively, p = 0.01). The mean duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the TMP/SMX group than in the ertapenem group (8.00 ± 10.50 days vs 14.00 ± 37.00 days, p = 0.07). The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was longer in the ertapenem group than in the TMP/SMX group (16.45 ± 4.77 vs 12.76 ± 5.37 days, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

For susceptible pathogens, TMP/SMX may enable early discharge as an effective oral antibiotic treatment option for UTIs caused by ESBL-positive pathogens. Additionally, use of oral antibiotics can shorten hospital stays and reduce medical costs.

A look at clinical trial design for new antimicrobials for the adult population

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance poses a substantial threat to global public health since it decreases the probability of effectively treating an infection and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality.Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of classical and novel trial designs for evaluating novel antibiotics for infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). An inductive literature search was performed using different keywords pertinent to the reviewed topics.Expert opinion: The need for active, effective compounds has strengthened regulatory, academic, and industry cooperation, leading to the recent approval of some novel anti-MDRO agents, with other promising compounds being also in the late phase of clinical development. Nonetheless, some important issues regarding the design of clinical trials have gained importance that are peculiar for novel anti-MDRO agents and should be addressed for continuing to guarantee the availability of effective treatments in the future. Very importantly, concerted cooperation with regulatory agencies will always be needed for continuously discussing and refining the acceptable level of evidence to be pursued through non-conventional and/or innovative trial designs or development strategies. Failure to do so would seriously pose the risk of perpetuating the unmet need for effective anti-MDRO agents.

No global increase in resistance to antibiotics: a snapshot of resistance from 2001 to 2016 in Marseille, France

Since effective empirical antibiotic therapy is a key factor for survival, local antibiotic resistance epidemiology is critical. We aimed to identify current trends in antibiotic resistance for key antibiotics obtained over 16 years (2001-2016) for invasive infections corresponding to empirical treatment in a large hospital centre in Marseille, France.From January 2014 to December 2016, we have collected all data on antibiotic susceptibility from public laboratory hospitals, and a retrospective analysis was performed on key antibiotics in blood cultures since 2001. A total of 99,932 antibiotic susceptibility testings (ASTs) were analysed, and proportion of pan-drug resistant (PDR = resistant to all antibiotics tested) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR = resistant to all except for two classes) strains were < 0.03 and 0.5%, respectively. Between 2001 and 2016, we found an increase of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins for E. coli invasive strains (0% vs 17.8%; p < 10^-5) and K. pneumoniae (8% vs 35.4%; p = 0.001) along with a decrease of methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (31% vs 19.8%; p = 0.006). Moreover, during the 3-year period, a significant increase of wild-type strains, susceptible to all antibiotics tested, was observed in invasive infections. Regarding bacteraemia involving Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus, empirical therapy is effective in > 99% cases. Active epidemiological surveillance is necessary because antibiotic resistance remains unpredictable.

Extremely and pandrug-resistant bacteria extra-deaths: myth or reality?

In 2009, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) estimated that multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections were responsible for 25,000 extra-deaths per year. In 2015, another report estimated that 12,500 extra-deaths were attributable to MDR bacteria every year in France. Recently, the United Nations claimed that resistance to antimicrobials was a global scourge, forecasting 10 million deaths in 2050. Surprisingly, our antibiotic resistance surveillance system in Marseille, France, did not allowed us to observe similar trends. We herein compared our data on extremely drug-resistant (XDR)/pandrug-resistant (PDR) patient extra-deaths to evaluations and predictions from these reports. First, we retrospectively collect and analyze antibiotic resistance data produced by our settings between November 2009 and March 2015 to look for 30-day deaths attributable to XDR/PDR strains belonging to 11 bacterial species/genus. In parallel, we performed a PubMed literature search to look for articles published prior to July 2016 and describing human deaths due to PDR strains. Overall, 35,723 patients were infected by at least one bacterial species/genus of interest and 85 by XDR/PDR strains. Of these patients, only one death was attributable to a XDR bacterial infection in a patient with strong comorbidities and two consecutive septic shocks. Our literature review shows that only four articles described human deaths due to PDR bacteria. All together, these data allowed us to conclude that there is a large discrepancy between the real count of deaths attributable to XDR/PDR bacteria and alarmist predictions.

Evaluating the Clinical Burden and Mortality Attributable to Antibiotic Resistance: The Disparity of Empirical Data and Simple Model Estimations

Given the proliferation of cataclysmic predictions about antibiotic resistance, cases of which are estimated to amount to 12500 per year in France, we herein decided to compare the empirical clinical microbiology data from our institution with estimates and predictions from 10 major international scientific articles and reports. The analysis of 7 years of antibiotic resistance data from 10 bacterial species and genera of clinical interest from our institution identified no deaths that were directly attributable to extremely drug-resistant bacteria. By comparing our observations to the 10 articles and reports studied herein, we concluded that their results lack empirical data. Interventions are urgently needed to significantly reduce both mortality and the healthcare costs associated with bacterial infections, including the implementation of local and national laboratory data-based surveillance systems for the routine surveillance of antibiotic resistance that would be helpful for a better understanding of how to manage antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the future.

An Update on Clinical Burden, Diagnostic Tools, and Therapeutic Options of Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen responsible for a variety of diseases ranging from mild skin and soft tissue infections, food poisoning to highly serious diseases such as osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and toxic shock syndrome. Proper diagnosis of pathogen and virulence factors is important for providing timely intervention in the therapy. Owing to the invasive nature of infections and the limited treatment options due to rampant spread of antibiotic-resistant strains, the trend for development of vaccines and antibody therapy is increasing at rapid rate than development of new antibiotics. In this article, we have discussed elaborately about the host-pathogen interactions, clinical burden due to S aureus infections, status of diagnostic tools, and treatment options in terms of prophylaxis and therapy.

In vitro activity of fosfomycin trometamol and other oral antibiotics against multidrug-resistant uropathogens

Clinical midstream and urinary catheter isolates (n = 106) of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus were tested against fosfomycin using the agar dilution method, the broth microdilution method and the gradient test described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Nitrofurantoin, co-trimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were tested using the gradient test alone. Breakpoints from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 2015 guidelines were used. Fosfomycin inhibited all of the ESBL-positive E. coli, P. mirabilis and meticillin-resistant S. saprophyticus strains isolated from urine, as well as 82% of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Substantial agreement for fosfomycin activity was found for the three test methods, particularly for Enterobacteriaceae. This study confirmed that fosfomycin has good in vitro activity against more common multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Fosfomycin could be a reliable empirical therapeutic option for uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by these organisms, and a valid option for sparing parenteral antibiotics, such as carbapenems.

Old antibiotics for multidrug-resistant pathogens: from in vitro activity to clinical outcomes

Antimicrobial resistance is a major and emerging threat worldwide. New antimicrobials have been unable to meet the resistance challenge, and treatment options are limited for a growing number of resistant pathogens. More and more clinicians are relying on older antimicrobials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Some older antimicrobials have maintained excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant pathogens. In some instances, use of older agents is limited by unfavourable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics and/or toxicities. In general, clinical data pertaining to the use of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens are scarce. Research efforts should be focused on the evaluation of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens as well as evaluating how these agents perform in complex patient populations with various and multiple co-morbid conditions.

Decreasing level of resistance in invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated in Marseille, January 2012-July 2015

Background

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative bacterial species well known for its capacity to cause infections in humans, and to carry and spread a wide variety of resistance genes including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes, carbapenem resistance genes, and colistin resistance genes. Recently, our real-time laboratory-based surveillance system MARSS (the Marseille Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance System) allowed us to observe a intringing dramatic decrease in the beta-lactam resistance level of the K. pneumoniae strains routinely isolated from patients hospitalized in our settings since 2013. Here we study the evolution of the prevalence of K. pneumoniae infections in Marseille university hospitals, France, from January 2012 to July 2015, and study their antibiotic resistance profiles.

Methods

We collected data referring to patients hostpitalized for K. pneumoniae infections in the 4 university hospitals of Marseille from January 2012 to July 2015. We then study their antibiotic resistance profiles according the clinical sites from which each strain was collected. Antibiotic consumption data from our four hospitals were also analyzed from January 2013 to July 2015.

Results

Overall, 4868 patients were admitted in our settings for K. pneumoniae infections over the study period. Overall, 40.1, 22.3, 25.6, 0.4, 29.9, 14.8, 27.3 and 37.0 % of the strains were resistant to amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and furan, respectively. 447 were invasive infections. The resistance level of our invasive strains was significantly lower than that presented by 11, 7, 10 and 11 other European countries included in the 2013 European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network report for ceftriaxone, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin, respectively, but significantly higher than that of 13, 1, 17 and 13 European countries for the same antibiotics. We also observed that the percentages of resistance of our invasive strains to three of the four antibiotics decreased over the study. In parallel, antibiotic consumption remained stable in our four hospitals from January 2013 to July 2015.

Conclusions

Altogether, our results underline that automated antibiotic-susceptibility testing results-based surveillance systems are crucial to better understand the evolving epidemiology of dangerous pathogenic bacterial species, like K. pneumoniae, at local scales.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2296-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Emergence of colistin-resistant bacteria in humans without colistin usage: a new worry and cause for vigilance

Colistin is currently regarded as one of the 'last-resort' antibiotics used for the treatment of critical infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. There have been numerous reports of the emergence of colistin resistance in patients, most of whom had previously received colistin therapy or with acquisition via nosocomial transmission. However, there are also ample reports of colistin resistance in humans who have not received the drug previously or without nosocomial transmission. We have also observed a similar occurrence in our study involving colistin resistance from several countries along with a similar phenomenon being reported by researchers. The observation of colistin resistance in humans without prior colistin exposure is of particularly great clinical importance and concern because of the current importance of colistin in clinical medicine. Colistin use and colistin-resistant bacteria in animals have been recently reported, suggesting that animals could also be a source of transmission of colistin-resistant bacteria to humans. This is a real worry and calls for clinicians to be aware and vigilant of this phenomenon and of the possibility of independent resistance to colistin in some patients.