Evaluation of total body weight and body mass index cut-offs for increased cefazolin dose for surgical prophylaxis

Effective Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery: The Relevance and Role of Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics

Appropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is an important measure in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs). Although antimicrobial pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PKPD) is integral to optimizing antibiotic dosing for the treatment of infections, there is less research on preventing infections postsurgery. Whereas clinical studies of SAP dose, preincision timing, and redosing are informative, it is difficult to isolate their effect on SSI outcomes. Antimicrobial PKPD aims to explain the complex relationship between antibiotic exposure during surgery and the subsequent development of SSI. It accounts for the many factors that influence the PKs and antibiotic concentrations in patients and considers the susceptibilities of bacteria most likely to contaminate the surgical site. This narrative review examines the relevance and role of PKPD in providing effective SAP. The dose-response relationship i.e., association between lower dose and SSI in cefazolin prophylaxis is discussed. A comprehensive review of the evidence for an antibiotic concentration-response (SSI) relationship in SAP is also presented. Finally, PKPD considerations for improving SAP are explored with a focus on cefazolin prophylaxis in adults and outstanding questions regarding its dose, preincision timing, and redosing during surgery.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentrations in patients with high body weight

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in patients with a high body weight. Cefazolin was administered by 0.5-h infusions to 11 patients with total body weight (TBW) ≥120 kg receiving 3 g q8h, and 12 patients with TBW <120 kg receiving 2 g q8h. Total and unbound serum concentration-time data obtained from serial blood samples were analysed simultaneously by population pharmacokinetic modelling using NONMEM. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated for various dosing regimens through Monte Carlo simulations based on the cumulative percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for the pathogen at steady state (fT_MIC) ≥40%, ≥60% and 100%. A two-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and allometric scaling of the central volume of distribution using TBW best characterized both total and unbound concentration-time data. Unbound clearance was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, and maximum protein binding constant was significantly associated with serum albumin concentration and body mass index (P <0.05). Based on unbound concentration-time profiles, all simulated regimens achieved PTA >90% at MIC values ≤2 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥40%, at MIC values ≤1 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥60%, and at MIC values ≤0.5 mg/L using fT_MIC of 100%. At fT_MIC ≥60%, 0.5-h infusion of cefazolin 1 g q8h achieved PTA <90% at MIC values ≥2 mg/L in patients with TBW≥120 kg; however, prolonged-infusion and higher-dose regimens improved PTA to >90%. Overall, cefazolin pharmacokinetics are altered considerably in obese patients. Higher-dose and/or prolonged-infusion cefazolin regimens should be considered in patients with TBW ≥120 kg, particularly those with less-susceptible Gram-negative infections.

Cefazolin prophylaxis in spine surgery: patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk for infection

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Perioperative antibiotics are critical in reducing the risk of postoperative spine infections. However, the efficacy and optimal weight-based prophylactic cefazolin dosing is unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine (1) if inadequate weight-based prophylactic dosing of cefazolin affects infection rates after spinal fusions, and (2) identify the optimal dosing of cefazolin.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Single center retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing posterior cervical or lumbar spinal fusion between January 2000 and October 2020 OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative surgical site infection status METHODS: Patients were grouped based on our institutionally derived dosing adequacy standards, 1 g for <60 kg, 2 g for 60 to 120 kg, and 3 g for >120 kg. Univariate comparisons and multivariate regressions identified the effect of inadequate dosing on infection rate. Patients were subsequently regrouped into cefazolin dose (grams) administered and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were compiled to determine the probability of infection based on cefazolin dose and patient weight. Alpha was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 2,643 patients met inclusion criteria and 95 infections (3.6%) were identified. The infection rate was higher in the inadequate dosing group (5.86% vs. 2.58%, p<.001). Adequate dosing was a predictor of decreased infections after lumbar fusion (OR: 0.43, p<.001), but not posterior cervical fusions (OR: 0.47, p=.065). Patients were subsequently regrouped into 1 g or 2 g of cefazolin administered resulting in a 5.01% and 2.77% infection rate, respectively (p=.005). The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval for one (0.850 [0.777-0.924]) and two (0.575 [0.493-0.657]) g of cefazolin demonstrated lower infection rates for patients given 2 g cefazolin.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving an inadequate weight-based dose of preoperative cefazolin had an increased risk of infection following spinal fusion surgery. Two grams prophylactic cefazolin significantly reduces the likelihood of infection.

Plasma and Interstitial Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Cefazolin in Elective Bariatric Surgery Patients

Guidelines for surgical prophylactic dosing of cefazolin in bariatric surgery vary in terms of recommended dose. This study aimed to describe the plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) cefazolin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and to determine an optimum dosing regimen. Abdominal subcutaneous ISF concentrations (measured using microdialysis) and plasma samples were collected at regular time points after administration of cefazolin 2 g intravenously. Total and unbound cefazolin concentrations were assayed and then modeled using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo dosing simulations (n = 5,000) were used to define cefazolin dosing regimens able to achieve a fractional target attainment (FTA) of >95% in the ISF suitable for the MIC for Staphylococcus aureus in isolates of ≤2 mg · L^-1 and for a surgical duration of 4 h. Fourteen patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) bodyweight of 148 (35) kg and body mass index (BMI) of 48 kg · m^-2. Cefazolin protein binding ranged from 14 to 36% with variable penetration into ISF of 58% ± 56%. Cefazolin was best described as a four-compartment model including nonlinear protein binding. The mean central volume of distribution in the final model was 18.2 (SD 3.31) L, and the mean clearance was 32.4 (SD 20.2) L · h^-1. A standard 2-g dose achieved an FTA of >95% for all patients with BMIs ranging from 36 to 69 kg · m^-2. A 2-g prophylactic cefazolin dose achieves appropriate unbound plasma and ISF concentrations in obese and morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients.

An Overview of the Protein Binding of Cephalosporins in Human Body Fluids: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Protein binding can diminish the pharmacological effect of beta-lactam antibiotics. Only the free fraction has an antibacterial effect. The aim of this systematic literature review was to give an overview of the current knowledge of protein binding of cephalosporins in human body fluids as well as to describe patient characteristics influencing the level of protein binding.

Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the following search terms: “protein binding,” “beta-lactam antibiotic,” and “body fluid.” Only studies were included where protein binding was measured in humans in vivo.

Results: The majority of studies reporting protein binding were performed in serum or plasma. Other fluids included pericardial fluid, blister fluid, bronchial secretion, pleural exudate, wound exudate, cerebrospinal fluid, dialysate, and peritoneal fluid. Protein binding differs between diverse cephalosporins and between different patient categories. For cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefpiramide, and cefonicid a non-linear pattern in protein binding in serum or plasma was described. Several patient characteristics were associated with low serum albumin concentrations and were found to have lower protein binding compared to healthy volunteers. This was for critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery. While mean/median percentages of protein binding are lower in these patient groups, individual values may vary considerably. Age is not likely to influence protein binding by itself, however limited data suggest that lower protein binding in newborns. Obesity was not correlated with altered protein binding.

Discussion/Conclusion: Conclusions on protein binding in other body fluids than blood cannot be drawn due to the scarcity of data. In serum and plasma, there is a large variability in protein binding per cephalosporin and between different categories of patients. Several characteristics were identified which lead to a lower protein binding. The finding that some of the cephalosporins display a non-linear pattern of protein binding makes it even more difficult to predict the unbound concentrations in individual patients. Taken all these factors, it is recommended to measure unbound concentrations to optimize antibiotic exposure in individual patients.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021252776).

Effects of body weight, smoking status, and sex on plasma concentrations of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate

OBJECTIVES

Knowledge about the impact of body composition features on pharmacokinetics of newer long-acting injectable antipsychotics is limited.

METHODS

We analyzed steady-state plasma concentrations of paliperidone in different body mass index (BMI), age, sex, and smoking status patient subgroups treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). Paliperidone plasma concentrations and dose-adjusted-plasma concentrations (C/D) from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database of PP1M-treated patients were compared among normal BMI, overweight, and obese patients as well as between females vs. males, elderly vs. non-elderly, and smokers vs. non-smokers using non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

In a total of 183 PP1M-treated patients, we found highly variable paliperidone plasma concentrations between individuals but no significant effect of PP1M dose or dosing intervals (p> 0.05). C/D ratios were similar in 54 obese, 82 overweight, and 47 normal BMI patients (p> 0.05). Females had 13.7% higher C/D ratios compared to males, yet this difference was not significant (p> 0.05). No differences were found between elderly vs. non-elderly patients or for smokers vs. non-smokers (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that age, sex, smoking, or body weight may not substantially affect pharmacokinetic indices of PP1M. The high interindividual variation of plasma concentrations implies that TDM may be helpful to enhance PP1M efficacy and tolerability.

Perioperative administration of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese and non-obese patients: a pharmacokinetic study in plasma and interstitial fluid

OBJECTIVES

To assess plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen obese and 15 non-obese patients received an IV short infusion of 2 g cefazolin and 0.5 g metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis. Plasma and microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue were sampled until 8 h after dosing. Drug concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated non-compartmentally.

RESULTS

In obese patients (BMI 39.5-69.3 kg/m2) compared with non-obese patients (BMI 18.7-29.8 kg/m2), mean Cmax of total cefazolin in plasma was lower (115 versus 174 mg/L) and Vss was higher (19.4 versus 14.2 L). The mean differences in t½ (2.7 versus 2.4 h), CL (5.14 versus 4.63 L/h) and AUC∞ (402 versus 450 mg·h/L) were not significant. The influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole was similar (Cmax 8.99 versus 14.7 mg/L, Vss 73.9 versus 51.8 L, t½ 11.9 versus 9.1 h, CL 4.62 versus 4.13 L/h, AUC∞ 116 versus 127 mg·h/L). Regarding interstitial fluid (ISF), mean concentrations of cefazolin remained >4 mg/L until 6 h in both groups, and those of metronidazole up to 8 h in the non-obese group. In obese patients, the mean ISF concentrations of metronidazole were between 3 and 3.5 mg/L throughout the measuring interval.

CONCLUSIONS

During the time of surgery, cefazolin concentrations in plasma and ISF of subcutaneous tissue were lower in obese patients, but not clinically relevant. Regarding metronidazole, the respective differences were higher, and may influence dosing of metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis in obese patients.

Deep surgical site infections following double-dose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in adult obese orthopedic patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI). Based on retrospective comparisons and pharmacology, many orthopedic centers have adopted weight- or body mass index (BMI)-related antibiotic prophylaxis.

METHODS

Double-dose prophylaxis was introduced in March 2017 for patients weighting >80 kg. The period April 2014 to March 2017 ('before') was compared to the period March 2017 to June 2019 ('after') regarding the impact on deep SSIs.

RESULTS

A total of 9318 surgeries 'before' were compared to 7455 interventions 'after' the introduction of double-dose prophylaxis. Baseline demographic characteristics (age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and duration of surgery) were similar. In the period 'after', 3088 cases (3088/16 773; 18%) received double-dose prophylaxis. Overall, 82 deep SSIs were observed (0.5%). The pathogens were resistant to the standard cefuroxime prophylaxis in 30 cases (30/82; 37%). Excluding these prophylaxis-resistant cases and all of the five hematogenous SSIs, the remaining 47 SSIs (57%) could have been prevented by the preceding prophylaxis. Double-dosing of parenteral cefuroxime from 1.5 g to 3.0 g in obese patients did not reduce deep SSIs (hazard ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.6). In the direct group comparison among obese patients >80 kg, the double-dose prophylaxis equally failed to alter the SSI risk (3088/16 726 non-infections vs 8/47 SSI despite double-dose prophylaxis; Chi-square test, P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center before-and-after study with almost 17 000 orthopedic surgeries in adult patients, systemic doubling of the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients clinically failed to reduce the overall deep SSI risk.

Surgical site infection rate is higher following hip and knee arthroplasty when cefazolin is underdosed

PURPOSE

While many guidelines recommend higher doses of cefazolin for patients with higher body weights, there are scant outcome data showing the benefit of higher doses. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates by dose of cefazolin used for surgical prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty were analyzed.

METHODS

Analysis of patient data entered into New Zealand's national, prospective, surveillance and quality improvement SSI Improvement Programme database for the period July 2013 through December 2017 was conducted. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network SSI definitions were used, and patients were followed for 90 days after surgery. Underdosing was defined as use of 1 g of cefazolin in patients weighing 80 kg or more or a cefazolin dose of <3 g in those weighing 120 kg or more.

RESULTS

There were 38,288 procedures where cefazolin was used for prophylaxis; patient body weight was known for all these procedures. Of the 1,840 patients who received 1 g of cefazolin, 676 (37%) weighed 80 kg or more. Of the 2,011 patients weighing 120 kg or more, 1,464 (73%) were underdosed. After multivariable analysis, male gender, higher total surgical risk scores, performance of revision and hip arthroplasties, and cefazolin underdosing were associated with higher SSI rates. For the 2,106 underdosed patients, the odds ratio for SSI was 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.61-2.99; P < 0.0001). The number of higher-weight patients needed to treat to prevent 1 SSI was 83, with an estimated cost of <NZ$500 to prevent 1 infection costing an estimated NZ$40,000.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty and with weights of ≥80 kg and those with weights of ≥120 kg should receive cefazolin doses of 2 g and ≥3 g, respectively, for SSI prophylaxis. The question of whether a dose of ≥4 g is needed in patients weighing 120 kg or more or who are above a given body mass index threshold (eg, >35 kg/m2 or >40 kg/m2) remains unanswered.

Severe Obesity Increases Risk of Infection After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in an increased number of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) performed in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity negatively affects (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate, and (3) patient-reported outcome in rTHA.

METHODS

In this registry-based study, we prospectively followed 444 rTHAs (cup: n = 265, stem: n = 57, both: n = 122) performed in a specialized high-volume orthopedic center between 2013 and 2015. The number of complications, and reoperation and revision surgery was registered until 5 years postoperatively. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on BMI to nonobese (<30 kg/m², n = 328), obese (30-35 kg/m², n = 82), and severe obese (≥35 kg/m², n = 34).

RESULTS

Severe obese patients, but not obese patients, had higher risks of complications and re-revision than nonobese patients. In particular, the risk of infection following rTHA was higher in severe obese patients (24%) compared to nonobese patients (3%; relative risk, 7.7). Severe obese patients had overall poorer OHS than nonobese patients, but improvement in OHS did not differ between severe obese and nonobese patients. No differences between obese and nonobese groups on OHS were observed.

CONCLUSION

In our study, severe obesity was associated with an increased risk of infection following rTHA. Patients with high BMI should be counseled appropriately before surgery.

Sex and body weight are major determinants of venlafaxine pharmacokinetics

We assessed the effect of body weight and BMI on plasma concentrations of venlafaxine (VEN), O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN), active moiety (AM=VEN+ODVEN), and dose-corrected plasma concentrations (C/D). A database containing concentrations of VEN and ODVEN including 737 of 1594 eligible patients was analyzed. Analyses included sex, body weight, and BMI as well as concentrations of VEN, ODVEN, AM, and C/D. A positive correlation was detected between body weight and daily dosage (rs=0.168, P<0.001). A negative correlation was found between body weight and AM (rs=-0.124, P=0.001) and ODVEN (rs=-0.137, P<0.001). Negative correlations were also found between body weight and C/D ratios (C/D VEN: rs=-0.134, P<0.001, C/D ODVEN: rs=-0.239, P<0.001, C/D AM: rs=-0.256, P<0.001). No correlations were detected between BMI and concentrations for VEN, ODVEN, and AM. Comparing low-BMI (<20 kg/m²), medium-BMI (20-29.9 kg/m²), and high-BMI (≥30 kg/m²) groups, higher values of some pharmacokinetic variables in the lower BMI group did not remain significant after controlling for sex. Women had higher VEN, ODVEN, AM, and C/D values for AM, VEN, and ODVEN than men (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Our results highlight the role of different pharmacokinetically relevant parameters and foremost of sex as mediators for the effect of BMI on VEN metabolism.