1
|
Klenotic PA, Yu EW. Structural analysis of resistance-nodulation cell division transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2024; 88:e0019823. [PMID: 38551344 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00198-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYInfectious bacteria have both intrinsic and acquired mechanisms to combat harmful biocides that enter the cell. Through adaptive pressures, many of these pathogens have become resistant to many, if not all, of the current antibiotics used today to treat these often deadly infections. One prominent mechanism is the upregulation of efflux systems, especially the resistance-nodulation-cell division class of exporters. These tripartite systems consist of an inner membrane transporter coupled with a periplasmic adaptor protein and an outer membrane channel to efficiently transport a diverse array of substrates from inside the cell to the extracellular space. Detailed mechanistic insight into how these inner membrane transporters recognize and shuttle their substrates can ultimately inform both new antibiotic and efflux pump inhibitor design. This review examines the structural basis of substrate recognition of these pumps and the molecular mechanisms underlying multidrug extrusion, which in turn mediate antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Klenotic
- Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Edward W Yu
- Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Butler MS, Henderson IR, Capon RJ, Blaskovich MAT. Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2023; 76:431-473. [PMID: 37291465 PMCID: PMC10248350 DOI: 10.1038/s41429-023-00629-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The need for new antibacterial drugs to treat the increasing global prevalence of drug-resistant bacterial infections has clearly attracted global attention, with a range of existing and upcoming funding, policy, and legislative initiatives designed to revive antibacterial R&D. It is essential to assess whether these programs are having any real-world impact and this review continues our systematic analyses that began in 2011. Direct-acting antibacterials (47), non-traditional small molecule antibacterials (5), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (10) under clinical development as of December 2022 are described, as are the three antibacterial drugs launched since 2020. Encouragingly, the increased number of early-stage clinical candidates observed in the 2019 review increased in 2022, although the number of first-time drug approvals from 2020 to 2022 was disappointingly low. It will be critical to monitor how many Phase-I and -II candidates move into Phase-III and beyond in the next few years. There was also an enhanced presence of novel antibacterial pharmacophores in early-stage trials, and at least 18 of the 26 phase-I candidates were targeted to treat Gram-negative bacteria infections. Despite the promising early-stage antibacterial pipeline, it is essential to maintain funding for antibacterial R&D and to ensure that plans to address late-stage pipeline issues succeed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Butler
- Centre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.
| | - Ian R Henderson
- Centre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Australia
| | - Robert J Capon
- Centre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Australia
| | - Mark A T Blaskovich
- Centre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
An Analysis of the Novel Fluorocycline TP-6076 Bound to Both the Ribosome and Multidrug Efflux Pump AdeJ from Acinetobacter baumannii. mBio 2021; 13:e0373221. [PMID: 35100868 PMCID: PMC8805024 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03732-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens continues to pose a serious global health threat. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of the Gram-negative organism Acinetobacter baumannii utilize a number of resistance determinants to evade current antibiotics. One of the major resistance mechanisms employed by these pathogens is the use of multidrug efflux pumps. These pumps extrude xenobiotics directly out of bacterial cells, resulting in treatment failures when common antibiotics are administered. Here, the structure of the novel tetracycline antibiotic TP-6076, bound to both the Acinetobacter drug efflux pump AdeJ and the ribosome from Acinetobacter baumannii, using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), is elucidated. In this work, the structure of the AdeJ-TP-6076 complex is solved, and we show that AdeJ utilizes a network of hydrophobic interactions to recognize this fluorocycline. Concomitant with this, we elucidate three structures of TP-6076 bound to the A. baumannii ribosome and determine that its binding is stabilized largely by electrostatic interactions. We then compare the differences in binding modes between TP-6076 and the related tetracycline antibiotic eravacycline in both targets. These differences suggest that modifications to the tetracycline core may be able to alter AdeJ binding while maintaining interactions with the ribosome. Together, this work highlights how different mechanisms are used to stabilize the binding of tetracycline-based compounds to unique bacterial targets and provides guidance for the future clinical development of tetracycline antibiotics. IMPORTANCE Treatment of antibiotic-resistant organisms such as A. baumannii represents an ongoing issue for modern medicine. The multidrug efflux pump AdeJ serves as a major resistance determinant in A. baumannii through its action of extruding antibiotics from the cell. In this work, we use cryo-EM to show how AdeJ recognizes the experimental tetracycline antibiotic TP-6076 and prevents this drug from interacting with the A. baumannii ribosome. Since AdeJ and the ribosome use different binding modes to stabilize interactions with TP-6076, exploiting these differences may guide future drug development for combating antibiotic-resistant A. baumannii and potentially other strains of MDR bacteria.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bassetti M, Labate L, Russo C, Vena A, Giacobbe DR. Therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat A cinetobacter baumannii infections: a 2020 perspective. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:167-177. [PMID: 32915685 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of severe infections due to Acinetobacter baumannii with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-AB), which exhibits resistance to all β-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactamases inhibitor combinations, and fluoroquinolones, remains a challenge for clinicians. AREAS COVERED The present perspective provides a personal view on both current and future agents for the treatment of severe DTR-AB infections. EXPERT OPINION We currently are in a transition era for the treatment of DTR-AB infections, where in the past 20 years, polymyxin-based regimens have become the most used approach (although possibly suboptimal, there were few or no alternatives) and where in the next 20 years, polymyxins will likely be replaced by less toxic novel agents as first-line choices. Two novel antimicrobial agents have been recently approved that show activity against DTR-AB, cefiderocol and eravacycline, while durlobactam/sulbactam is in phase-3 of clinical development. In the near future, these agents could become important first-line choices for the treatment of DTR-AB within approved indications, or for off-label indications in the absence of dependable alternatives. Good-quality post-marketing experiences remain necessary for arising clinically relevant questions and guiding the design of further dedicated randomized controlled trials to stably optimize the use of novel agents for DTR-AB infections in the next decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino - IRCCS , Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura Labate
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino - IRCCS , Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Russo
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino - IRCCS , Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Vena
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino - IRCCS , Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2020; 73:329-364. [PMID: 32152527 PMCID: PMC7223789 DOI: 10.1038/s41429-020-0291-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The development of new and effective antibacterial drugs to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria, especially Gram-negative (G−ve) pathogens, is acknowledged as one of the world’s most pressing health issues; however, the discovery and development of new, nontoxic antibacterials is not a straightforward scientific task, which is compounded by a challenging economic model. This review lists the antibacterials, β-lactamase/β-lactam inhibitor (BLI) combinations, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) first launched around the world since 2009 and details the seven new antibiotics and two new β-lactam/BLI combinations launched since 2016. The development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, lead source, and administration route for the 44 small molecule antibacterials, eight β-lactamase/BLI combinations, and one antibody drug conjugate (ADC) being evaluated in worldwide clinical trials at the end of October 2019 are described. Compounds discontinued from clinical development since 2016 and new antibacterial pharmacophores are also reviewed. There has been an increase in the number of early stage clinical candidates, which has been fueled by antibiotic-focused funding agencies; however, there is still a significant gap in the pipeline for the development of new antibacterials with activity against β-metallolactamases, orally administered with broad spectrum G−ve activity, and new treatments for MDR Acinetobacter and gonorrhea.
Collapse
|
6
|
Critical analysis of antibacterial agents in clinical development. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:286-298. [PMID: 32152509 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-020-0340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The antibacterial agents currently in clinical development are predominantly derivatives of well-established antibiotic classes and were selected to address the class-specific resistance mechanisms and determinants that were known at the time of their discovery. Many of these agents aim to target the antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens listed by the WHO, including Gram-negative bacteria in the critical priority category, such as carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Enterobacterales. Although some current compounds in the pipeline have exhibited increased susceptibility rates in surveillance studies that depend on geography, pre-existing cross-resistance both within and across antibacterial classes limits the activity of many of the new agents against the most extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative pathogens. In particular, cross-resistance to unrelated classes may occur by co-selection of resistant strains, thus leading to the rapid emergence and subsequent spread of resistance. There is a continued need for innovation and new-class antibacterial agents in order to provide effective therapeutic options against infections specifically caused by XDR and PDR Gram-negative bacteria.
Collapse
|
7
|
Otsuka Y. Potent Antibiotics Active against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2020; 68:182-190. [DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c19-00842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
8
|
Seifert H, Stefanik D, Olesky M, Higgins PG. In vitro activity of the novel fluorocycline TP-6076 against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019; 55:105829. [PMID: 31669740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The activity of the novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic TP-6076 against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates with defined carbapenem resistance mechanisms was compared against reference antimicrobials with known activity against Acinetobacter spp. The susceptibility of 323 non-duplicate CRAB isolates to TP-6076, amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM), cefepime, colistin, doxycycline, eravacycline, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, rifampicin, sulbactam, tigecycline, tobramycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) was determined by the broth microdilution method. TP-6076 showed greater activity than comparator antimicrobials of the tetracycline class, SAM, levofloxacin, amikacin, tobramycin, SXT and colistin. MIC50 and MIC90 values for TP-6076 were 0.06 mg/L and 0.25 mg/L, respectively. In comparison, doxycycline, eravacycline, minocycline and tigecycline MIC50/90 values were 32/≥64, 0.5/1, 4/8 and 1/2 mg/L, respectively. Compared with other compounds, TP-6076 was the most active antimicrobial against CRAB, including isolates that were resistant to other anti-Acinetobacter reference drugs including SAM, colistin, the aminoglycosides amikacin and tobramycin, and levofloxacin. TP-6076 is a promising new agent that may be a useful addition to the limited armamentarium of drugs targeting this problematic pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Seifert
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.
| | - Danuta Stefanik
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Melanie Olesky
- Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul G Higgins
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Butler DA, Biagi M, Tan X, Qasmieh S, Bulman ZP, Wenzler E. Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Resistance by Any Other Name Would Still be Hard to Treat. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2019; 21:46. [PMID: 31734740 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-019-0706-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) is an infamous nosocomial pathogen with a seemingly limitless capacity for antimicrobial resistance, leading to few treatment options and poor clinical outcomes. The debatably low pathogenicity and virulence of AB are juxtaposed by its exceptionally high rate of infection-related mortality, likely due to delays in time to effective antimicrobial therapy secondary to its predilection for resistance to first-line agents. Recent studies of AB and its infections have led to a burgeoning understanding of this critical microbial threat and provided clinicians with new ammunition for which to target this elusive pathogen. This review will provide an update on the virulence, resistance, diagnosis, and treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) AB. RECENT FINDINGS Advances in bacterial genomics have led to a deeper understanding of the unique mechanisms of resistance often present in MDR AB and how they may be exploited by new antimicrobials or optimized combinations of existing agents. Further, improvements in rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and their more pervasive use in combination with antimicrobial stewardship interventions have allowed for more rapid diagnosis of AB and decreases in time to effective therapy. Unfortunately, there remains a paucity of high-quality clinical data for which to inform the optimal treatment of MDR AB infections. In fact, recently completed studies have failed to identify a combination regimen that is consistently superior to monotherapy, despite the benefits demonstrated in vitro. Encouragingly, new and updated guidelines offer strategies for the treatment of MDR AB and may help to harmonize the use of high toxicity agents such as the polymyxins. Finally, new antimicrobial agents such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have promising in vitro activity against MDR AB but their place in therapy for these infections remains to be determined. Notwithstanding available clinical trial data, polymyxin-based combination therapies with either a carbapenem, minocycline, or eravacycline remain the treatment of choice for MDR, particularly carbapenem-resistant, AB. Incorporating antimicrobial stewardship intervention with RDTs relevant to MDR AB can help avoid potentially toxic combination therapies and catalyze the most important modifiable risk factor for mortality-time to effective therapy. Further research efforts into pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based dose optimization and clinical outcomes data for MDR AB continue to be desperately needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Butler
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Mark Biagi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Xing Tan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Samah Qasmieh
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Zackery P Bulman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Eric Wenzler
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Room 164 (M/C 886), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Many antibiotics available in the clinic today directly inhibit bacterial translation. Despite the past success of such drugs, their efficacy is diminishing with the spread of antibiotic resistance. Through the use of ribosomal modifications, ribosomal protection proteins, translation elongation factors and mistranslation, many pathogens are able to establish resistance to common therapeutics. However, current efforts in drug discovery are focused on overcoming these obstacles through the modification or discovery of new treatment options. Here, we provide an overview for common mechanisms of resistance to translation-targeting drugs and summarize several important breakthroughs in recent drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Witzky
- 1 Department of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA.,2 Center for RNA Biology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA
| | - Rodney Tollerson
- 2 Center for RNA Biology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA.,3 Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA
| | - Michael Ibba
- 2 Center for RNA Biology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA.,3 Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Isler B, Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Paterson DL. New Treatment Options against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:e01110-18. [PMID: 30323035 PMCID: PMC6325237 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01110-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a perilous nosocomial pathogen causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Current treatment options for CRAB are limited and suffer from pharmacokinetic limitations, such as high toxicity and low plasma levels. As a result, CRAB is declared as the top priority pathogen by the World Health Organization for the investment in new drugs. This urgent need for new therapies, in combination with faster FDA approval process, accelerated new drug development and placed several drug candidates in the pipeline. This article reviews available information about the new drugs and other therapeutic options focusing on agents in clinical or late-stage preclinical studies for the treatment of CRAB, and it evaluates their expected benefits and potential shortcomings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcu Isler
- Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yohei Doi
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert A Bonomo
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Western Reserve University Veterans Affairs Center of Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology (Case VA CARES), Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David L Paterson
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|