Population pharmacokinetics of ticarcillin in critically ill patients receiving extended daily diafiltration

Scoping review of drug dosing recommendations in sustained low-efficiency dialysis

The objective of this scoping review was to answer the question, "What has been published describing drug dosing in sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED)?" PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on November 18, 2022. Methodology followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-texts of citations identified related to drug dosing and SLED. Exclusion criteria included case reports, conference abstracts, pediatrics, treatment dialysis, and non-human subjects. A standardized data extraction sheet was used to collate and summarize data. The quality of evidence was evaluated by two investigators using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A total of 230 citations were identified for screening. Of these, 29 studies met criteria for inclusion after full-text review. Four drug groups including beta-lactam antibiotics, non-beta-lactam antibiotics, antifungals, and levetiracetam were identified. Dialysate rates, dialysis durations, and medication doses used varied widely across studies. Outcomes and pharmacokinetic parameters that were assessed were also heterogenous. Drug dosing in SLED is challenging and there is minimal evidence available to guide appropriate dosing. Larger studies are needed to more accurately determine how to appropriately dose medications in SLED. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be used in all patients on SLED when available.

Antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and dosing in critically ill adults receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy: A systematic review

Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is gaining popularity as a renal replacement modality in intensive care units, but there is a relative lack of guidance regarding antimicrobial clearance and dosing when compared with other modalities. The objectives of this systematic review were to: (1) identify and describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of relevant antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT, (2) evaluate the quality of evidence supporting these data, and (3) propose dosing recommendations based on the synthesis of these data. A search strategy for multiple databases was designed and executed to identify relevant published evidence describing the PK of antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Quality assessment, evaluation of reporting, and relevant data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Synthesis of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes, dosing recommendations from study authors, and physicochemical properties of included antibiotics were assessed by investigators in addition to the quality of evidence to develop dosing recommendations. Thirty-nine studies enrolling 452 patients met criteria for inclusion and provided PK and/or PD data for 20 antimicrobials in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Nineteen studies describe both PK and PD outcomes. Vancomycin (12 studies, 171 patients), meropenem (7 studies, 84 patients), and piperacillin/tazobactam (5 studies, 56 patients) were the most frequent antimicrobials encountered. The quality of evidence was deemed strong for 7/20 antimicrobials, and strong dosing recommendations were determined for 9/20 antimicrobials. This systematic review updates and addresses issues of quality in previous systematic reviews on this topic. Despite an overall low quality of evidence, strong recommendations were able to be made for almost half of the identified antimicrobials. Knowledge gaps persist for many antimicrobials, and higher quality studies (i.e., population PK studies with assessment of PD target attainment) are needed to address these gaps.