Aminoglycosides in critically ill patients: which dosing regimens for which pathogens?

Population Pharmacokinetics and AUC-Guided Dosing of Tobramycin in the Treatment of Infections Caused by Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria

PURPOSE

Tobramycin (TOB) exhibits variable pharmacokinetic properties due to the clinical condition of patients. This study aimed to investigate the AUC-guided dosing of TOB based on population pharmacokinetic analysis in the treatment of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2020 after obtaining approval from our institutional review board. For 53 patients who received therapeutic drug monitoring of TOB, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed with covariates of estimated glomerular filtration rate using serum creatinine (eGFRcre) on clearance (CL) and weight on both CL and V_d in exponential error modeling (CL = 2.84 × [weight/70] × eGFRcre^0.568, interindividual variability [IIV] = 31.1%; V_d = 26.3 × [weight/70], IIV = 20.2%; residual variability = 28.8%).

FINDINGS

The final regression model for predicting 30-day mortality was developed with risk factors of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose to MIC ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 0.996; 95% CI, 0.968-1.003) and serum albumin (OR = 0.137; 95% CI, 0.022-0.632). The final regression model for predicting acute kidney injury was developed with the risk factors of C-reactive protein (OR = 1.136; 95% CI, 1.040-1.266) and AUC during a 72-hour period after the first dose (OR = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000-1.001). A dose of 8 or 15 mg/kg was beneficial for achievement of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose/MIC >80 and trough concentration <1 µg/mL in patients with preserved kidney function and TOB CL >4.47 L/h/70 kg in the events of MIC of 1 or 2 µg/mL, respectively. We propose that the first dose of 15, 11, 10, 8, and 7 mg/kg for eGFRcre >90, 60 to 89, 45 to 59, 30 to 44, and 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m² be followed by therapeutic drug monitoring at peak and 24 hours after the first dose.

IMPLICATIONS

This study suggests that TOB use encourages the replacement of trough- and peak-targeted dosing with AUC-guided dosing.

Development of a Predictive Dosing Nomogram to Achieve PK/PD Targets of Amikacin Initial Dose in Critically Ill Patients: A Non-Parametric Approach

French guidelines recommend reaching an amikacin concentration of ≥8 × MIC 1 h after beginning infusion (C_1h), with MIC = 8 mg/L for probabilistic therapy. We aimed to elaborate a nomogram guiding clinicians in choosing the right first amikacin dose for ICU patients in septic shock. A total of 138 patients with 407 observations were prospectively recruited. A population pharmacokinetic model was built using a non-parametric, non-linear mixed-effects approach. The total body weight (TBW) influenced the central compartment volume, and the glomerular filtration rate (according to the CKD-EPI formula) influenced its clearance. A dosing nomogram was produced using Monte Carlo simulations of the amikacin amount needed to achieve a C_1h ≥ 8 × MIC. The dosing nomogram recommended amikacin doses from 1700 mg to 4200 mg and from 28 mg/kg to 49 mg/kg depending on the patient's TBW and renal clearance. However, a C_through ≤ 2.5 mg/L 24 h and 48 h after an optimal dose of amikacin was obtained with probabilities of 0.20 and 0.81, respectively. Doses ≥ 30 mg/kg are required to achieve a C_1h ≥ 8 × MIC with MIC = 8 mg/L. Targeting a MIC = 8 mg/L should depend on local ecology.

Systematic review of high-dose amikacin regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on EUCAST dosing recommendations

BACKGROUND

Updated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) amikacin breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa included revised dosing recommendations of 25-30 mg/kg to achieve key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, higher than recommended in the British National Formulary. The objectives of this review were to identify clinical evidence for high-dose amikacin regimens and to determine drug exposures that are related to adverse events and toxicity.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in October 2021 and updated in May 2022 using electronic databases for any study reporting adult participants treated with amikacin at doses ≥20 mg/kg/day. Reference lists of included papers were also screened for potential papers. Data were extracted for pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes, presented in a summary table and consolidated narratively. Meta-analysis was not possible. Each study was assessed for bias before, during and after the intervention using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies (total 501 participants in 10 reports) were identified and included, eight of which were observational studies. Assessment of bias showed substantial flaws. Dosing regimens ranged from 25 to 30 mg/kg/day. Six studies adjusted the dose in obesity when participants had a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m². Target peak serum concentrations ranged from 60 mg/L to 80 mg/L and 59.6-81.8% of patients achieved these targets, but there was no information on clinical outcomes. Two studies reported the impact of high-dose amikacin on renal function. No studies reporting auditory or vestibular toxicity were identified.

CONCLUSION

All included papers were limited by a significant risk of bias, while methodological and reporting heterogeneity made drawing conclusions challenging. Lack of information on the impact on renal function or ototoxicity means high-dose regimens should be used cautiously in older people. There is a need for a consensus guideline for high-dose amikacin to be written.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42021250022).

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a small therapeutic window that is currently used primarily as part of short-term empirical combination therapy. Gentamicin dosing schemes still need refinement, especially for subpopulations where pharmacokinetics can differ from pharmacokinetics in the general adult population: obese patients, critically ill patients, paediatric patients, neonates, elderly patients and patients on dialysis. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in these patient populations and the consequences for optimal dosing of gentamicin for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, highlighting new insights from the last 10 years. In this period, several new population pharmacokinetic studies have focused on these subpopulations, providing insights into the typical values of the most relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, the variability of these parameters and possible explanations for this variability, although unexplained variability often remains high. Both dosing schemes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets varied widely between these studies. A gentamicin starting dose of 7 mg/kg based on total body weight (or on adjusted body weight in obese patients) appears to be the optimal strategy for increasing the probability of target attainment (PTA) after the first administration for the most commonly used PK/PD targets in adults and children older than 1 month, including critically ill patients. However, evidence that increasing the PTA results in higher efficacy is lacking; no studies were identified that show a correlation between estimated or predicted PK/PD target attainment and clinical success. Although it is unclear if performing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimization of the PTA is of clinical value, it is recommended in patients with highly variable pharmacokinetics, including patients from all subpopulations that are critically ill (such as elderly, children and neonates) and patients on intermittent haemodialysis. In addition, TDM for optimization of the dosing interval, targeting a trough concentration of at least < 2 mg/L but preferably < 0.5–1 mg/L, has proven to reduce nephrotoxicity and is therefore recommended in all patients receiving more than one dose of gentamicin. The usefulness of the daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve for predicting nephrotoxicity should be further investigated. Additionally, more research is needed on the optimal PK/PD targets for efficacy in the clinical situations in which gentamicin is currently used, that is, as monotherapy for urinary tract infections or as part of short-term combination therapy.

Amikacin in emergency surgery: How to dose it optimally?

Amikacin is still a recommended option in emergency surgery. Current guidelines have suggested an amikacin dose of 15-20 mg/kg/24 h for intra-abdominal infections (IAI). Our objectives were to analyse amikacin pharmacokinetics (PK) and dosage requirements in patients who underwent emergency surgery, and to identify an optimal dosing approach. We performed a retrospective data analysis of patients who received amikacin for emergency surgery over 2.5 years, with measurement of both peak (C_max) and trough (C_min) concentration after the first dose. The BestDose software was used to analyse amikacin concentrations and simulate various alternative dosage regimens in each patient. We compared concentration estimates with target values: C_max > 64 mg/L and C_min < 2.5 mg/L at 24 h. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify determinants of C_max target attainment (TA) and optimal dose. Data from 84 patients, including 62 with IAI, were analysed. Despite a median initial dose of 25 mg/kg, 32% of patients did not achieve the C_max target. An amikacin dose ≤ 21.5 mg/kg was the primary predictor of failure to achieve the target. A dose of 30 mg kg of total or corrected body weight, as well as a fixed dose of 2500 mg would result in the highest TA. The primary determinants of the optimal dose were ideal body weight, age, and renal function. To conclude, recommended dosages of amikacin in emergency surgery are not optimal. A fixed initial dose of 2500 mg could simplify and optimise dosing in this setting.

Consideration of height-based tobramycin dosing regimens for the treatment of adult cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

AIMS

Some population pharmacokinetic models have been developed using height to explain some of the interindividual variability in tobramycin pharmacokinetics in cystic fibrosis patients. However, their predictive performance when extrapolated to other clinical centres is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to externally evaluate the predictability of tobramycin population pharmacokinetic models with an independent dataset and perform simulations using previously recommended height-based dosing regimens.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through the PubMed database to identify relevant population pharmacokinetic models. Tobramycin plasma concentration data from April 2014 to November 2019 were retrospectively collected from the Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Canada. External evaluations were performed using NONMEM® v7.5 and RStudio® v1.3.1073. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment of C_max /MIC ratios for several dosing regimens.

RESULTS

The validation dataset included 27 patients and 143 concentration samples. Three models were evaluated. Only the ones by Crass et al. and Alghanem et al. performed satisfactorily in terms of prediction-based diagnostics with MDPE values of -3.4% and 29.3% and MDAPE values of 19.0 and 29.5%, respectively. In simulation-based evaluations, both pcVPC and NPDE showed no evidence of model misspecification. Our simulations suggest that patients treated with a once-daily dose of 3.4 mg/cm should produce peak and trough levels consistent with current guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the models by Crass et al. and Alghanem et al. are appropriate for simulation-based applications to aid individualized dosing in our population and that height-based dosing regimens could be considered in cystic fibrosis patients.

Quantification and Explanation of the Variability of First-Dose Amikacin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis

BACKGROUND

There may be a difference between the determinants of amikacin exposure in emergency department (ED) versus intensive care (ICU) patients, and the peak amikacin concentration varies widely between patients. Moreover, when the first dose of antimicrobials is administered to septic patients admitted to the ED, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors have just been initiated. Nevertheless, population pharmacokinetic modelling data for amikacin in ED patients are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the interindividual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients admitted to the ED and to identify the patient characteristics that explain this IIV.

METHODS

Patients presenting at the ED with severe sepsis or septic shock were randomly assigned to receive amikacin 25 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg intravenously. Blood samples were collected at 1, 6 and 24 h after the onset of the first amikacin infusion. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on 279 amikacin concentrations from 97 patients. The IIV in clearance (CL) and central distribution volume (V₁) were 71% and 26%, respectively. Body mass index (BMI), serum total protein level, serum sodium level, and fluid balance 24 h after amikacin administration explained 30% of the IIV in V₁, leaving 18% of the IIV unexplained. BMI and creatinine clearance according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation 24 h after amikacin administration explained 46% of the IIV in CL, and 39% remained unexplained.

CONCLUSION

The IIV of amikacin pharmacokinetics in ED patients is large. Higher doses may be considered in patients with low serum sodium levels, low total protein levels, or a high fluid balance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02365272.

Antibiotics in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses

BACKGROUND

Lower respiratory tract infections are common in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and are frequently caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resulting in chronic lung inflammation and fibrosis. The progression of multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa and alterations in the pharmacokinetics of many antibiotics in CF make optimal antimicrobial therapy a challenge, as reflected by high between- and inter-individual variability (IIV).

OBJECTIVES

This review provides a synthesis of population pharmacokinetic models for various antibiotics prescribed in adult CF patients, and aims at identifying the most reported structural models, covariates and sources of variability influencing the dose-concentration relationship.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, from inception to August 2020, and articles were retained if they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 19 articles were included in this review. One-, two- and three-compartment models were reported to best describe the pharmacokinetics of various antibiotics. The most common covariates were lean body mass and creatinine clearance. After covariate inclusion, the IIV (range) in total body clearance was 27.2% (10.40-59.7%) and 25.9% (18.0-33.9%) for β-lactams and aminoglycosides, respectively. IIV in total body clearance was estimated at 36.3% for linezolid and 22.4% for telavancin. The IIV (range) in volume of distribution was 29.4% (8.8-45.9%) and 15.2 (11.6-18.0%) for β-lactams and aminoglycosides, respectively, and 26.9% for telavancin. The median (range) of residual variability for all studies, using a combined (proportional and additive) model, was 12.7% (0.384-30.80%) and 0.126 mg/L (0.007-1.88 mg/L), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first review that highlights key aspects of different population pharmacokinetic models of antibiotics prescribed in adult CF patients, effectively proposing relevant information for clinicians and researchers to optimize antibiotic therapy in CF.