In-vitro activity of cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline and other comparative agents against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales: results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2017-2020

Eravacycline: a comprehensive review of in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, and real-world applications

INTRODUCTION

The escalating threat of multidrug-resistant organisms necessitates constant exploration for novel antimicrobial agents. Eravacycline has emerged as a promising solution due to its unique chemical structure, which enhances potency and expands its spectrum of activity.

AREA COVERED

This review provides a thorough examination of eravacycline, encompassing its in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, carbapenem-non-susceptible organisms, anaerobes, and other bacterial strains. Additionally, it evaluates evidence from clinical studies to establish its clinical effect and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline, belongs to the tetracyclines class. Similar to other tetracycline, eravacycline exerts its antibacterial action by reversibly binding to the bacterial ribosomal 30S subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates potent in vitro activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes, and multidrug-resistant organisms. Randomized controlled trials and its associated meta-analysis affirm eravacycline's efficacy in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections. Moreover, real-world studies showcase eravacycline's adaptability and effectiveness in diverse clinical conditions, emphasizing its utility beyond labeled indications. Despite common gastrointestinal adverse events, eravacycline maintains an overall favorable safety profile, reinforcing its status as a tolerable antibiotic. However, ongoing research is essential for refining eravacycline's role, exploring combination therapy, and assessing its performance against biofilms, in combating challenging bacterial infections.

Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR Acinetobacter baumannii. Monitoring global levels of cefiderocol non-susceptibility (CFDC-NS) is important.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically collate and examine studies investigating in vitro CFDC-NS and estimate the global prevalence of CFDC-NS against major Gram-negative pathogens.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Scopus, up to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible were studies reporting CFDC-NS in Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.

RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT

Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed the risk of bias on the population, setting, and measurement (susceptibility testing) domains.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Binomial-Normal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate CFDC-NS prevalence by species, coresistance phenotype, and breakpoint definition (EUCAST, CLSI, and FDA). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 78 studies reporting 82 035 clinical isolates were analysed (87% published between 2020 and 2023). CFDC-NS prevalence (EUCAST breakpoints) was low overall but varied by species (S. maltophilia 0.4% [95% CI 0.2-0.7%], Enterobacterales 3.0% [95% CI 1.5-6.0%], P. aeruginosa 1.4% [95% CI 0.5-4.0%]) and was highest for A. baumannii (8.8%, 95% CI 4.9-15.2%). CFDC-NS was much higher in CR Enterobacterales (12.4%, 95% CI 7.3-20.0%) and CR A. baumannii (13.2%, 95% CI 7.8-21.5%), but relatively low for CR P. aeruginosa (3.5%, 95% CI 1.6-7.8%). CFDC-NS was exceedingly high in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (38.8%, 95% CI 22.6-58.0%), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing A. baumannii (44.7%, 95% CI 34.5-55.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Enterobacterales (36.6%, 95% CI 22.7-53.1%). CFDC-NS varied considerably with breakpoint definition, predominantly among CR bacteria. Additional sources of heterogeneity were single-centre investigations and geographical regions.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC-NS prevalence is low overall, but alarmingly high for specific CR phenotypes circulating in some institutions or regions. Continuous surveillance and updating of global CFDC-NS estimates are imperative while cefiderocol is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. The need to harmonize EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints was evident.

Cefiderocol (Fetroja) as a Treatment for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

With increasing resistance to conventional antibiotic treatments, especially among gram-negative bacilli, the search for new antibiotics has become critical on a global scale. Among infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria is hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which is nosocomial pneumonia in patients who have been hospitalized for more than 48 hours. HAP carries a high mortality rate and continues to be a challenge with regard to adequate treatment. The typical multidrug-resistant gram negatives found in HAP include Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Many new antibiotics have been studied and tested against these pathogens as possible solutions, and the search continues. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, is effective against these pathogens. Cefiderocol is an iron-chelating agent that makes use of iron pumps on the membrane of bacteria via a catechol moiety on the C3 side chain of the molecule. This allows for easy access into the cytoplasm, where it can inhibit peptidoglycan synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins. Cefiderocol displays linear pharmacokinetics and is mainly excreted through the kidneys. It is well tolerated in healthy individuals but may need adjustments of dosage in patients with impaired renal function. Studies have shown that both healthy subjects and those with impaired renal function experienced some adverse effects, including nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and increased creatinine kinase; however, these adverse effects were limited and experienced in placebo groups. It has demonstrated efficacy in treating infections caused by many multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens and has demonstrated high stability against many classes of b-lactamases. There have been multiple phase 3 trials, such as the CREDIBLE-CR trial and the APEKS-NP trial, that demonstrated efficacy in treated nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram negatives, such as carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, compared to the best available treatment. While clinical data remain limited, a few studies are showing clinical efficacy and few adverse effects. Cefiderocol demonstrated effectivity in treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative pneumonia in patients with multiple comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease, chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Cefiderocol shows promise as a novel antimicrobial agent in treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative in HAP.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol, Cefepime-Zidebactam, and β-Lactam Combinations Versus Other Antibiotic Classes Against Various Sequence Types of Clinically Isolated Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Aim: This study aimed to establish the in vitro efficacy and susceptibility profiles of new β-lactam antibiotics against clinically isolated carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) strains. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 nonduplicated CPKP isolates were tested against cefiderocol, cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, tigecycline, and other 20 antibiotics by broth microdilution. The carbapenemase genes were identified using PCR and sequencing, while multilocus sequence typing established the bacterial strains. Results: Three significant sequence types (STs), including ST147, ST16, and ST11, were shown to be the dominant STs, which occupied ∼90% of the tested population. Three carbapenemase genes, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-181, and blaOXA-232, were detected. The blaNDM-1 was found in ST147 and ST16 but not in ST11, while the blaOXA-232 was not detected in ST147. The majority of ST16 isolates contained both blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-232, which was not seen in other strains. Cefiderocol, cefepime-zidebactam, and tigecycline were the most active agents against CPKP. Both MIC50 and MIC90 of these three antibiotics remained within the susceptible categories, while nearly all other antibiotics were in the resistant levels. However, in ST11, which carried only blaOXA genes without blaNDM-1, ceftazidime-avibactam was effective with the MIC90 at 2 μg/mL. In addition, amikacin was shown to have good activity in ST11. In contrast, gentamicin was active in only ST16 and ST147. Conclusions: This study is the first report that demonstrates the prevalence of CPKP, distribution of strains, resistant genes, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in northern Thailand. These data would contribute to appropriate individual treatment and the selection of infection control strategies.

Impact of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) on antimicrobial activity of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and on virulence of Escherichia coli isolates

In a healthy gut microbiota, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced. The antibacterial action of SCFAs against intestinal pathogens makes them useful for ensuring the safety of food and human health. In this study, we aimed to assess the in vitro inhibitory activity of SCFAs, and to report, for the first time, their impact on the activity of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were determined against E. coli clinical isolates recovered from gastrointestinal infections. Cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefepime/enmetazobactam are new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that were studied for their combined therapeutic effects. Also, the effects of pH and concentration of SCFAs were evaluated on in vitro bacterial growth and expression of genes encoding for motility, adhesion, invasion, and biofilm formation. SCFAs were tested at concentrations of 12 mM at pH 7.4 (ileum-conditions), in addition to 60 mM and 123 mM, at pH 6.5 (colon-conditions). The tested SCFAs showed the same MIC (3750 μg ml-1 ≃ 60 mM) against all isolates. Furthermore, the addition of SCFAs to the tested β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations greatly restored the susceptibility of the isolates. SCFAs had significant effect on bacterial growth and virulence in a pH and concentration-dependent manner; low ileal concentration potentiated E. coli growth, while higher colonic concentration significantly suppressed growth and down-regulated the expression of virulence genes (fliC, ipaH, FimH, BssS). Therefore, the significant inhibitory effect of colonic SCFAs on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations might lead to the development of promising treatment strategies.

Antibacterial Activity of Eravacycline Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Isolates in China: An in vitro Study

Objective

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic being developed for the treatment of serious infections, with a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB). However, the in vitro activity of eravacycline against CRGNB has not been well known in China. In this study, we analysed the antibacterial activity of eravacycline against CRGNB isolates in order to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment.

Methods

A total of 346 isolates of CRGNB were collected from two different tertiary care hospitals in Zhejiang, China. Carbapenem resistance genes of all isolates were detected by polymerase chain reaction. And we analysed the in vitro activity of eravacycline against CRGNB by antimicrobial susceptibility tests. In addition, the time-kill curves were generated to evaluate the antibacterial effect of tigecycline and eravacycline.

Results

Four different types of carbapenem-resistant isolates were collected, including 50 Escherichia coli isolates, 160 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 42 Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates, and 94 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. The carbapenem resistance genes were identified in 346 isolates, including bla _KPC-2 (48.0%), bla _OXA-23 (27.2%), bla _NDM-1 (23.1%), and bla _NDM-16 (0.3%). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results showed that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 346 isolates were within the sensitivity range (≤0.0625~16 mg/L) and that the MIC₅₀ or MIC₉₀ of eravacycline was generally approximately 2-fold lower than tigecycline. In addition, the time-kill curves showed that the bactericidal effect of eravacycline was stronger than that of tigecycline against four different types of isolates.

Conclusion

Our research indicated that eravacycline had a good antibacterial effect on CRGNB, which could provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections in the future.

Comparative in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant isolates of K. pneumoniae

Introduction. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are characterized by the World Health Organization as pathogens for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Omadacycline and eravacycline are two novel antibacterials within the tetracycline class.

Gap Statement. There are limited data regarding the comparison of the activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against K. pneumoniae isolates with different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.

Aim. Our objective was to compare the in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against a collection of K. pneumoniae isolates, including non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant strains.

Methodology. Ninety-four K. pneumoniae isolates, including 30 non-ESBL-producing, 30 ESBL-producing and 34 carbapenem-resistant (22 carrying bla OXA-48, 12 carrying bla NDM) strains were included in the study. ESBL and carbapenemase genes were detected by conventional PCR. Omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline MICs were determined by the gradient diffusion method and interpreted using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-defined breakpoints.

Results. Overall, the percentage of tigecycline-susceptible strains (97.9 %) was higher than the percentage of omadacyline-susceptible (75.5 %) and eravacycline-susceptible (72.3 %) strains. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates were 83.3 % among non-ESBL-producing isolates and 66.7 % among ESBL-producing isolates. The most common ESBL gene detected was blaCTX -M (90 %), followed by bla TEM (50 %) and bla SHV (50 %). The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rate among isolates carrying bla TEM was 33.3 %, whereas it was 100 % among isolates that do not carry bla TEM. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates among carbapenem-resistant isolates were 76.5 and 67.6 %, respectively. The omadacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 77.3 and 75.0 %, respectively. The eravacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 68.2 and 66.7 %, respectively. One carbapenem-resistant isolate was intermediate and one ESBL-producing isolate was resistant to tigecycline.

Conclusion. Overall, tigecycline was the most active tetracycline against isolates. Omadacycline and eravacycline showed excellent activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates that do not carry bla TEM. Omadacycline showed reasonable activity against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying bla OXA-48 or bla NDM.

Treatment of MDR Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: Ongoing and Prospective

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious public health concern across the world. Gram-negative resistance has propagated over the globe via various methods, the most challenging of which include extended-spectrum β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC enzymes. Gram-negative bacterial infections are difficult to treat in critically extremely sick persons. Resistance to different antibiotic treatments nearly always lowers the probability of proper empirical coverage, sometimes resulting in severe outcomes. Multidrug resistance can be combated with varying degrees of success using a combination of older drugs with high toxicity levels and novel therapeutics. The current therapies for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are discussed in this review, which includes innovative medications, older pharmaceuticals, creative combinations of the two, and therapeutic targets.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Systematic Review of Currently Available Evidence

Cefiderocol is a novel synthetic siderophore-conjugated antibiotic that hijacks the bacterial iron transport systems facilitating drug entry into cells, achieving high periplasmic concentrations. This systematic review analyzed the currently available literature on cefiderocol. It summarized in vitro susceptibility data, in vivo antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), clinical efficacy, safety and resistance mechanisms of cefiderocol. Cefiderocol has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant isolates. But New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)- positive isolates showed significantly higher MICs than other carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, with a susceptible rate of 83.4% for cefiderocol. Cefiderocol is well-tolerated, and the PK/PD target values can be achieved using a standard dose regimen or adjusted doses according to renal function. Clinical trials demonstrated that cefiderocol was non-inferiority to the comparator drugs in treating complicated urinary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia. Case reports and series showed that cefiderocol was a promising therapeutic agent in carbapenem-resistant infections. However, resistant isolates and reduced susceptibility during treatment to cefiderocol have already been reported. In conclusion, cefiderocol is a promising powerful weapon for treating MDR recalcitrant infections.

Place in Therapy of the Newly Available Armamentarium for Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Proposal of a Prescription Algorithm

The worldwide propagation of antimicrobial resistance represents one of the biggest threats to global health and development. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negatives and Enterobacterales, present a heterogeneous and mutating spread. Infections by MDRO are often associated with an unfavorable outcome, especially among critically ill populations. The polymyxins represented the backbone of antibiotic regimens for Gram-negative MDROs in recent decades, but their use presents multiple pitfalls. Luckily, new agents with potent activity against MDROs have become available in recent times and more are yet to come. Now, we have the duty to make the best use of these new therapeutic tools in order not to prematurely compromise their effectiveness and at the same time improve patients’ outcomes. We reviewed the current literature on ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and cefiderocol, focusing on antimicrobial spectrum, on the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance development and on the main in vitro and clinical experiences available so far. Subsequently, we performed a step-by-step construction of a speculative algorithm for a reasoned prescription of these new antibiotics, contemplating both empirical and targeted use. Attention was specifically posed on patients with life-risk conditions and in settings with elevated prevalence of MDRO.