The concept of Big Four: Road map from snakebite epidemiology to antivenom efficacy

Snakebite Management: The Need of Reassessment, International Relations, and Effective Economic Measures to Reduce the Considerable SBE Burden

The sole treatment for snakebite envenomation (SBE), the anti-snake venom (ASV), suffers from considerable drawbacks, including side effects and limited species specificity. Additionally, despite its existence for more than a century, uniform availability of good quality ASV does not yet exist. The present review describes the journey of a SBE victim and highlights the global crisis of SBE management. A detailed analysis of the current ASV market has also been presented along with the worldwide snake distribution. The current production of country specific licensed ASV throughout the globe along with their manufacturers has been examined at the snake species level. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of on-ground situation of SBE management in antivenom manufacturing countries has been done using the most recent literature. Additionally, the export and import of different ASVs have been discussed in terms of procurement policies of individual countries, their shortcomings, along with the possible solution at the species level. It is interesting to note that in most countries, the existence of ASV is really either neglected or overstated, implying that it is there but unsuitable for use, or that it is not present but can be obtained from other countries. This highlights the urgent need of significant reassessment and international collaborations not just for development and production, but also for procurement, distribution, availability, and awareness. A PROMISE (Practical ROutes for Managing Indigenous Snakebite Envenoming) approach has also been introduced, offering simple, economical, and easy to adopt steps to efficiently alleviate the worldwide SBE burden.

Efficacy of a low dose of antivenom for severe neuroparalysis in Bungarus caeruleus (common krait) envenomation: a pilot study

Introduction

Despite the widespread use of antivenom for the treatment of snakebite envenoming in the Indian subcontinent, the ideal dose of antivenom has been a point of contention. Low-dose regimens can economize on a scarce resource in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed the effectiveness of a low-dose (10 vials) antivenom regimen compared to the usual 20 vials in patients with krait bite neuroparalysis requiring mechanical ventilation.

Methods

This study was a prospective controlled pilot study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in north India. Participants were eligible if they were ≥12 years old, had krait bite neurotoxicity, showed severe paralysis requiring mechanical ventilation, and had access to antivenom therapy within 24 h of the bite. The primary outcome was the duration of mechanical ventilation, and the secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital survival.

Results

Fifteen patients received 10 vials of antivenom, and 25 received 20 vials. The two treatment groups had similar baseline demographics, clinical and laboratory features, snakebite severity scores, and median time from snakebite to initiation of antivenom therapy. The low-dose regimen was as effective as the standard dose concerning the median duration of mechanical ventilation (41 h vs. 55 h, P = 0.094), the median length of stay (78 h vs. 85.5 h, P = 0.360), and in-hospital deaths (1 vs. 3, P = 1.000). The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was similar between the two groups (1 vs 3, P = 1.000).

Conclusion

A low dose of antivenom effectively treats patients with severe krait bite neuroparalysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of Indian polyvalent antivenom against the Indian snakes of clinical significance

Snakebite in India is a severe problem as it causes a mortality rate of 58,000 and a disability rate of 140,000 every year which is the highest among any other country. Antivenom is the primary therapy for snakebite, and its manufacturing techniques have essentially stayed unaltered for over a century. Indian polyvalent antivenom, a scientifically validated medicine for treating the toxic effects of snakebites, is available against the venom of the so-called Big Four snakes namely Spectacled cobra (Naja naja), Saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus), Russell's viper (Daboia russelli) and the Common krait (Bungarus caeruleus), responsible for majority of the deaths in India. India hosts many other species of snakes, including cobras, kraits, saw-scaled vipers, sea snakes, and pit vipers, responsible for clinically severe envenomation. Neutralization strategy has been applied to access the efficacy of antivenoms, crucial for reducing snake bite deaths and disabilities. This review aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the neutralization efficiency of the Polyvalent Antivenom (PAV) and focus on the factors that may contribute to the poor recognition of the antivenom towards the venom toxins. Reports focusing on the investigation of antivenom efficacy were searched and collected from several databases. Preclinical studies that reported the neutralization efficacy of the commercial antivenom against the medically important snakes of India were included. The articles were screened based on the inclusion criteria and 8 studies were shortlisted for meta-analysis. Pooled proportion was calculated for the antivenom efficacy reported by the studies and was found to be statistically significant with a 95% confidence interval. The heterogenicity in the venom toxicity and neutralization potency of the antivenom was evident in the overall estimate (proportion) and individual data. We provide comprehensive evidence on antivenom efficacy against medically important snakes from various parts of India which may aid in identifying the gaps in snake envenomation therapy and the need for novel potentially improved treatment of snakebites.