Neurohormones as markers of right- and left-sided cardiac dimensions and function in patients with untreated chronic heart failure

BNP predicts chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity and death: comparison with gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography

Cardiotoxicity is a dose-limiting side-effect of cancer chemotherapeutics such as anthracyclines. The drug-induced cardiac toxicity is currently monitored with repeated assessments of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using multigated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (MUGA) or echocardiography. However, the plasma cardiac biomarker B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been suggested for early identification of cardiac dysfunction. The aim of the study was to compare LVEF obtained by MUGA and plasma BNP as predictors of developing congestive heart failure (CHF) or death in a population of anthracycline-treated cancer patients.

Methods

We prospectively followed 333 cancer patients referred to our department for routine monitoring of LVEF with MUGA and measurement of BNP, January-December 2004. Study end points were hospitalization for CHF and death during follow-up 2004-2010. Data were obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry.

Results

During follow-up (mean 1,360 days), 21 of the patients were admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of CHF and 194 of the patients died. BNP levels were significantly higher and LVEF lower in the group of patients that developed CHF. Using cut-off points of BNP>100 pg/ml (HR 5.5; CI 1.8–17.2; p = 0.003) and LVEF <50% (HR 7.9; CI 3.0–21.4; p<0.001) both significantly predicted CHF. Using the same cut-off points only BNP (HR 1.9; CI 1.3-2.9; p = 0.002) and not LVEF (HR 1.1; CI 0.7–1.8; p = 0.58) was predictive of overall death. In multivariate Cox analysis both BNP and LVEF were independent predictors of CHF while age remained the only independent predictor of overall death.

Conclusion

In cancer patients treated with cardiotoxic chemotherapy both BNP and LVEF can significantly predict subsequent hospitalization with CHF. In addition, BNP and not LVEF has a prognostic value in detecting overall death. This prospective study based on the hitherto largest study population supports BNP as a clinical relevant method for monitoring chemotherapy-related cardiac failure and death.

A prospective study of brain natriuretic peptide levels in three subgroups: Stroke with hypertension, stroke without hypertension, and hypertension alone

Aim:

To study brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in three subgroups: patients having stroke with hypertension (HT), those having stroke without HT, and those with HT alone. We also tried to identify whether BNP levels predict the length of stay in hospital and mortality.

Materials and Methods:

The groups were formed by patients who had been admitted to the emergency department in the first 4–12 h after the onset of symptoms. There were 30 stroke patients with a history of HT (group I), 30 stroke patients without a history of HT (group II), and 20 HT patients without stroke (group III). Patients with congestive heart failure, chronic cor pulmonale, severe valvular heart disease, chronic renal failure, liver insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and those with a history of stroke were excluded from the study since these diseases can affect the plasma BNP levels.

Results:

The demographic characteristics, except the age distribution, were similar among the groups. The mean BNP levels in the three groups were 168.8 ± 223.9 pg/ml, 85.0 ± 75.1 pg/ml, and 84.8 ± 178.3 pg/ml, respectively. The differences between the groups were statistically significant.

Conclusion:

The mean BNP levels were affected by HT and/or stroke. The simultaneous presence of HT and stroke results in a more significant increase BNP than the presence of either stroke or HT alone. When diseases that can affect the plasma BNP levels are excluded, the BNP levels in stroke patients without a history of HT are similar to the levels seen in patients with only HT.

Independent effects of both right and left ventricular function on plasma brain natriuretic peptide

BACKGROUND

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increased in heart failure; however, the relative contribution of the right and left ventricles is largely unknown.

AIM

To investigate if right ventricular function has an independent influence on plasma BNP concentration.

METHODS

Right (RVEF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) were determined in 105 consecutive patients by first-pass radionuclide ventriculography (FP-RNV) and multiple ECG-gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV), respectively. BNP was analyzed by immunoassay.

RESULTS

Mean LVEF was 0.51 (range 0.10-0.83) with 36% having a reduced LVEF (<0.50). Mean RVEF was 0.50 (range 0.26-0.78) with 43% having a reduced RVEF (<0.50). The mean LVEDVI was 92 ml/m2 with 22% above the upper normal limit (117 ml/m2). Mean BNP was 239 pg/ml range (0.63-2523). In univariate linear regression analysis LVEF, LVEDVI and RVEF all correlated significantly with log BNP (p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis only RVEF and LVEF remained significant. The parameter estimates of the final adjusted model indicated that RVEF and LVEF influence on log BNP were of the same magnitude.

CONCLUSION

BNP, which is a strong prognostic marker in heart failure, independently depends on both left and right ventricular systolic function. This might, at least in part, explain why BNP holds stronger prognostic value than LVEF alone.

Neurohormonal activation and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia

BACKGROUND

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are both increasingly used in the clinical management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Unfortunately, there is very limited data regarding the association between BNP and LVEF.

METHODS

BNP and LVEF were measured in 260 consecutive patients with suspected myocardial ischemia referred for rest/ergometry myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The correlation between BNP and LVEF was studied using Spearman's correlation test.

RESULTS

Median LVEF was 57% (IQR, 50 to 64), and median BNP level was 53 pg/ml (IQR, 24 to 109). LVEF and BNP levels showed a statistically significant, but overall weak correlation (r=0.274, p<0.001). The correlation seemed to depend on the presence of a myocardial scar, which was detected in 104 patients (40%), including 89 men (49% of men) and 15 women (20% of women). The correlation between BNP and LVEF was moderate in patients with a myocardial scar (r=-0.540, p<0.001), but very weak in patients without a scar (r=0.185, p=0.025). Moreover, the correlation between BNP and LVEF was moderate in men (r=-0.503, p<0.001), but not existent at all in women. In the overall cohort, BNP was not an accurate test to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The area under the ROC curve was 0.643 (95% CI, 0.563-0.723).

CONCLUSIONS

The BNP level and LVEF show only a weak correlation in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia. Neurohormonal and morphologic assessments provide different windows to the heart.

Neurohormonal modulation in heart failure of ischemic etiology: Correlates with left ventricular remodeling

The natural progression of heart failure (HF) is accompanied by the compensatory activation of cardiac and extracardiac neurohormonal systems and changes in the anatomy and function of the left ventricle. The processes of ventricular remodeling and neurohormonal activation are mutually influenced so that strong associations may be observed between circulating concentrations of biomarkers (especially the natriuretic peptides originating from the heart) and parameters of left ventricle size and function. Temporal changes in the concentration of natriuretic peptides convey incremental prognostic value compared with a single determination and are usually related to concomitant changes in markers of left ventricle remodeling in patients with chronic HF. Whether knowledge of biomarkers' concentration can improve the clinical outcome of patients with HF by helping in guiding and monitoring their therapy treatment is a stimulating working hypothesis still to be verified.

Nutrition and cardiac cachexia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Congestive heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in older persons. In advanced stages of the disease, congestive heart failure can be associated with serious complications such as cardiac cachexia (defined here as weight loss of more than 6% in 6 months). This review will discuss recent insights into the pathophysiology, anthropometric predictors and potential management of cardiac cachexia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac cachexia and the associated progressive weight loss are sometimes overlooked by care providers. A delay in diagnosis often results in further loss of vital tissues, progressive weakness, fall-related injuries and potentially long-term care institutionalization and/or death. Emerging data suggest that congestive heart failure is a dynamic disorder of many organ systems, including the myocardial, neurohormonal, immune, vascular, gastrointestinal, renal and musculoskeletal systems. It is becoming more widely appreciated that it is the deterioration of this interactive multisystem complex that results in the systemic inflammation and progressive wasting and atrophy of muscle and other organ tissues, which is the hallmark of cardiac cachexia.

SUMMARY

Cardiac cachexia in congestive heart failure patients may be associated with a low level of physical activity. A high systemic inflammatory state is another marker of cardiac cachexia. Prudent anti-inflammatory nutrition, dietary supplements and exercise can serve to ameliorate and/or potentially prevent progressive wasting. A better understanding of factors contributing to the development of cardiac cachexia will enable us to design preventive strategies and provide improved care for individuals with this debilitating condition.