Instant dissolution of intracoronary thrombus by abciximab

Intracoronary Administration of Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Should This Be the Routine and Preferred Approach?

The authors have had experience with administering abciximab as an intracoronary bolus in 96 high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, specifically in situations in which there was anticipation of a high embolic load from thrombus/plaque burden at the site of the culprit lesion, saphenous vein graft culprit lesion, threatened abrupt closure, developing slow-flow, or no-reflow phenomena with distal embolization. Our uncontrolled data basically substantiate the safety of intracoronary administration of abciximab. The data summarizing the potential superiority of this method of administration of the drug and the likely mechanisms of this effect are summarized. These incite a need for reevaluation of the method of administration of the drug, especially in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions cases

The Optimal Route of Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Intravenous Versus Intracoronary

The use of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist Abciximab has over the years become an important part of the anticoagulant regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Abciximab is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, but other mechanisms, such as suppression of the inflammatory pathways, have also been proposed to contribute to the benefits of Abciximab.

The optimal route of administration, i.e. intravenous versus intracoronary, of the first dose has been questioned, but only tested in small, non-randomised and retrospective studies or studies with short follow-up. No definite conclusion can be made based on these studies.

In this review we present the current knowledge published about the intracoronary administration of Abciximab including the mechanisms behind the potential beneficial effects, and the safety. The emphasis will be on clinical trials rather than on studies on the pharmacological mechanisms, as the latter have been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere.

Our conclusion from this present review is that randomized trials of intracoronary versus intravenous bolus of Abciximab are needed.

Intracoronary abciximab use in patients undergoing PCI at a community hospital: a single operator experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of intracoronary (IC) abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, especially abciximab, during PCI has been shown to improve clinical and procedural outcomes in numerous studies. However, significant bleeding complications exist with its use and this has limited its standard use. Interest has grown in local (IC) use with studies showing safety and long-term effectiveness, especially in patients with high thrombus loads.

METHODS

A retrospective review of records in a database of patients who had PCI by a single operator at the Easton Hospital.

RESULTS

611 patients received IC abciximab, and there were no complications in 610 (98.3%) patients; only 1 had an allergic reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

IC abciximab is safe and has a unique role in the catheterization lab and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications who would benefit from its limited use.