The relevance of health related quality of life in paced patients

Patient Perceptions and Quality of Life in Pacemaker Recipients

Quality of life (QoL) reflects the multidimensional impact of a clinical condition and its treatment on patients’ daily lives. Although permanent cardiac pacemakers (PPMs) have made a significant contribution to the improvement of patients’ QoL, patients’ perceptions remain crucial after implantation. Hence, the present study was carried out to explore the QoL and the associated perceptions of PPM patients. A total of 150 PPM patients were enrolled. Data were collected using the Short Form–36 (SF-36) health survey, which also included patients’ characteristics. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The physical health score as measured by SF-36 was 42.9 ± 19.5 points, and the mental health score was 54.1 ± 26.6 points. Study participants had higher scores in emotional well-being (66.5 ± 18.8 points), and the lowest scores were in physical functioning (22.5 ± 10.7 points). The level of information about PPM was associated with physical role (p = 0.005), emotional role (p = 0.004), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.002), and general health (p = 0.001). Attendance at follow-up was associated with physical role (p = 0.015), emotional role (p = 0.014), social functioning (p = 0.003), and general health (p = 0.016). The belief that the device prevents disease deterioration was associated with physical role (p = 0.005), emotional role (p = 0.001), energy/fatigue (p = 0.010), emotional well-being (p = 0.004), social functioning (p = 0.001), pain (p = 0.005), and general health (p = 0.001). Dependency on the device was associated with energy/fatigue (p = 0.006), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), and social functioning (p = 0.002). Social difficulties due to the device were associated with emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.001), pain (p = 0.001), and general health (p = 0.004). Family support was associated with emotional role (p = 0.023) and general health (p = 0.036), while pain was associated with information about the family (p = 0.001). In conclusion, the present findings regarding factors associated with QoL provide key opportunities for interventions aimed at facilitating positive adjustments after PPM implantation.

[Evaluation of the quality-of-life of patients with pacemakers : experience of Burkina Faso about 120 patients paired with the collaboration of doctors from AUVERGNE (France)]

INTRODUCTION

In Burkina Faso, cardiac stimulation was introduced in October 2000 has grown over time.In orderto evaluate the effectiveness of stimulation on life, we proposed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with a pacemaker. GENERAL OBJECTIVE: to study the effect of the pacemaker on the quality of life of patients PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study aimed at describingthe wearers of a pacemaker for at least six months at the Yalgado OUEDRAOGO University Hospital and the Schiphramedical center.The AQUAREL questionnaire has been adapted to our context to establish a quality-of-life score.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 68 years with a female predominance (53.3%). Complete atrioventricular block was the main indication of stimulation in 55%. The average duration of implantation was 41.6 months with extremes of 8 and 128 months. The primo implantation was found in 79.1 % of patients against 18.3 % for a first change of case and2.5 % for a second change of housing. Double chamber stimulation was performed in 65% of cases. DDD mode was the most used followed by VVIR. The average quality of life score was 90.12. Negative predictors of quality of life were age and female.A correlation between quality-of-life score and age, hypertension and dyslipidemia was found (p< 0.05). On the other hand, no correlation between the number of implantation, the duration of implantation and the mode of stimulation was found (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

patients with a pacemaker have a good quality of life. However, quality-of-life is not correlated with the number of pacemakers, nor the duration and mode of stimulation.

Quality of life of patients undergoing conventional vs leadless pacemaker implantation: A multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemakers (L-PM) are an emerging effective and safe technology that offer an alternative to conventional pacemakers (C-PM) for right ventricular stimulation. However, there is little information about their potential benefits for quality of life (QoL) in patients with L-PM. We compared QoL between patients with L-PM and C-PM.

METHODS

The study population comprised patients undergoing single chamber pacemaker implantation from December 2016 to March 2018. The SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate QoL at baseline and at 6 months of followup. We also used a questionnaire consisted of 10 specific questions related to the implant procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients (64 C-PM; 42 L-PM) were included. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups (C-PM vs L-PM), except for age (81.5 vs 77.3 years; P = .012) and diabetes (38% vs 17%; P = .021). Baseline SF-36 scores did not differ between the groups. At 6 months followup, patients in the L-PM group scored significantly higher on physical function (63 vs 42; P < .001), physical role (64 vs 36; P = .004), and mental health (75 vs 65; P = .017), even after adjusting for covariates. Pacemaker-related discomfort and physical restrictions were significantly lower for the L-PM group.

CONCLUSION

L-PM is associated with better QoL than C-PM in both physical and mental health. Patients undergoing L-PM implantation reported less procedure-related discomfort, physical restriction, and preoccupation.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of AQUAREL on patients with permanent pacemaker: a cross-sectional study

Objective

The assessment of quality of life has significant impact in device therapy. This research was aimed to translate and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the AQUAREL questionnaire.

Results

We evaluated 32 patients during the cross-cultural adaptation stage and 20 patients during validity and reliability evaluation stages. Indonesian version of AQUAREL showed positive correlation between 6-min walking test and dyspnea domain (r = 0.228; p = 0.048), and showed negative correlation between NT pro-BNP and chest discomfort (r = − 0.231; p = 0.043) and dyspnea domain (r = − 0.268; p = 0.020). The total AQUAREL also showed positive moderate correlation toward total SF-36 (r = 0.543; p = 0.000). The internal consistency was good (Cronbach α = 0.728) and the repeatability between day 1 and day 8 was good, with moderate positive correlation (r = 0.581; p = 0.007).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4208-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.