Role of biochemical markers in diagnosis of myocardial infarction

The Role of Biochemical Cardiac Markers in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. Proteins are a component of cardiac biomarkers containing cell structures that are released into the circulation when a myocardial injury occurs. They are essential in the diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of patients who have chest pain, are thought to have acute coronary syndrome, or are experiencing acute heart failure exacerbations. There are numerous biochemical cardiac markers, but this article summarizes the basic role of major biochemical cardiac markers, including cardiac natriuretic peptides, cardiac troponins, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine kinase-MB, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, ischemia-modified albumin, lipoprotein (a), osteopontin (OPN), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), in AF. Atrial natriuretic peptide may serve as an indicator of atrial integrity, which may help to select appropriate treatment approaches for AF. Higher levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide are predictive of incidental AF. Increased troponin T release may indicate better clinical results following AF ablation. Similarly, CRP increases the risk of the AF-increasing calcium (Ca) influx in atrial myocytes, but not because of atrial fibrosis. Patients with postoperative AF have lower FABP3 gene expression in the atrium. Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) may play a causative role in the onset of AF and impact various cardiac tissues. Clinical trials for Lp(a)-lowering drugs should assess their impact on preventing AF. Also, OPN was highly expressed in the circulation of AF patients and further increased with the progression of AF. sST2 was a reliable predictor of new-onset AF and can improve the accuracy of the AF risk model. There is a greater chance that these cardiac biomarkers might be employed to enhance clinical risk stratification in AF.

A review of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury: Pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, genetics and pharmacological treatment

Cardiovascular diseases are known to be the most fatal diseases worldwide. Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is at the centre of the pathology of the most common cardiovascular diseases. According to the World Health Organization estimates, ischaemic heart disease is the leading global cause of death, causing more than 9 million deaths in 2016. After cardiovascular events, thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery are applied as treatment. However, after restoring coronary blood flow, myocardial I/R injury may occur. It is known that this damage occurs due to many pathophysiological mechanisms, especially increasing reactive oxygen types. Besides causing cardiomyocyte death through multiple mechanisms, it may be an important reason for affecting other cell types such as platelets, fibroblasts, endothelial and smooth muscle cells and immune cells. Also, polymorphonuclear leukocytes are associated with myocardial I/R damage during reperfusion. This damage may be insufficient in patients with co-morbidity, as it is demonstrated that it can be prevented by various endogenous antioxidant systems. In this context, the resulting data suggest that optimal cardioprotection may require a combination of additional or synergistic multi-target treatments. In this review, we discussed the pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, treatment and its relationship with genetics in myocardial I/R injury. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: This review summarized current information on myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury (pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, genetics and pharmacological therapy) for researchers and reveals guiding data for researchers, especially in the field of cardiovascular system and pharmacology.

Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives

PURPOSE

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause of death in the world. Comprehensive risk assessment of patients presenting with chest pain and eliminating undesirable results should decrease morbidity and mortality rates, increase the quality of life of patients, and decrease health expenditure in many countries. In this study, the advantages and disadvantages of the enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers used in the diagnosis of patients with AMI are given in historical sequence, and some candidate biomarkers - hFABP, GPBB, S100, PAPP-A, RP, TNF, IL6, IL18, CD40 ligand, MPO, MMP9, cell-adhesion molecules, oxidized LDL, glutathione, homocysteine, fibrinogen, and D-dimer procalcitonin - with a possible role in the diagnosis of AMI are discussed.

METHODS

The present study was carried out using meta-analyses, reviews of clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, and guidelines indexed in PubMed and Web of Science.

RESULTS

These numerous AMI biomarkers guide clinical applications (diagnostic methods, risk stratification, and treatment). Today, however, TnI remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of AMI. Details in the text will be given of many biomarkers for the diagnosis of AMI.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of routine enzymatic and nonenzymatic biomarkers and the literature evidence of other candidate biomarkers in the diagnosis of AMI, and discuss challenges and constraints that limit translational use from bench to bedside.

Biomarkers for early diagnosis of AKI in the ICU: ready for prime time use at the bedside?

Because of its still rising incidence and high mortality rate in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, early recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a critical issue. Surprisingly, effective biomarkers for early detection and hence appropriate and timely therapy of AKI have not yet entered the clinical arena. We performed a systematic search of the literature published between 1999 and 2011 on potential early biomarkers for acute renal failure/kidney injury in an at-risk adult and pediatric population following the Quorum Guidelines. Based on this review, recommendations for the clinical use of these biomarkers were proposed. In general, kidney biomarkers may aid to direct early aggressive treatment strategies for AKI thereby decreasing the associated high mortality. To date, however, sensitivity and specificity of individual biomarker assays are low and do not sustain their routine clinical use. "Kits" containing a combination of established biomarkers, in conjunction with measured glomerular filtration rate, may enhance diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in the future.

Septic AKI in ICU patients. diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment type, dosing, and timing: a comprehensive review of recent and future developments

Evidence is accumulating showing that septic acute kidney injury (AKI) is different from non-septic AKI. Specifically, a large body of research points to apoptotic processes underlying septic AKI. Unravelling the complex and intertwined apoptotic and immuno-inflammatory pathways at the cellular level will undoubtedly create new and exciting perspectives for the future development (e.g., caspase inhibition) or refinement (specific vasopressor use) of therapeutic strategies. Shock complicating sepsis may cause more AKI but also will render treatment of this condition in an hemodynamically unstable patient more difficult. Expert opinion, along with the aggregated results of two recent large randomized trials, favors continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) as preferential treatment for septic AKI (hemodynamically unstable). It is suggested that this approach might decrease the need for subsequent chronic dialysis. Large-scale introduction of citrate as an anticoagulant most likely will change CRRT management in intensive care units (ICU), because it not only significantly increases filter lifespan but also better preserves filter porosity. A possible role of citrate in reducing mortality and morbidity, mainly in surgical ICU patients, remains to be proven. Also, citrate administration in the predilution mode appears to be safe and exempt of relevant side effects, yet still requires rigorous monitoring. Current consensus exists about using a CRRT dose of 25 ml/kg/h in non-septic AKI. However, because patients should not be undertreated, this implies that doses as high as 30 to 35 ml/kg/h must be prescribed to account for eventual treatment interruptions. Awaiting results from large, ongoing trials, 35 ml/kg/h should remain the standard dose in septic AKI, particularly when shock is present. To date, exact timing of CRRT is not well defined. A widely accepted composite definition of timing is needed before an appropriate study challenging this major issue can be launched.

Acute kidney injury in the ICU: time has come for an early biomarker kit!

Early recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains a critical problem, with a rising incidence and a high mortality rate. As a consequence, the actual lack of an early and effective biomarker results in a significant delay in initiating appropriate therapy. The accurate diagnosis of AKI is especially problematic in critically-ill patients, in whom we know that renal function is in an unsteady state; therefore the validity of creatinine-based baseline assessment measures is reduced. Because the rationale for assessing AKI markers in critically-ill patients is strong at the present time, researchers are stimulated to establish a multidimensional AKI classification system. This system should in essence grade AKI severity. The most widely referenced classification is the RIFLE system. Thus, early recognition of AKI, well before changes in serum creatinine occur, has come under intensive research, because it is evidenced that even small increases in serum creatinine are associated with an increase in patient mortality. The development of a biomarker kit in which several early markers with different characteristics are combined, is essential. Multi-centre, randomized studies indicate a potential for early biomarkers able to diagnose AKI 48 hours before creatinine changes. In conclusion, time has come to leave serum creatinine behind as a marker of renal function in patients with AKI on the ICU. Only then will we be able to offer early goal-directed therapy for the kidney in the ICU setting.