Divergent effects of rofecoxib on endothelial function and inflammation in acute coronary syndromes

Mechanisms of non-opioid analgesics beyond cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibition

Non-opioid analgesics including both selective and non-selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors and acetaminophen are the most widely used treatments for pain. Inhibition of COX is thought to be largely responsible for both the therapeutic and adverse effects of this class of drugs. Accumulating evidence over the past two decades has demonstrated effects of non-opioids beyond the inhibition of COX and prostaglandin synthesis that might also explain their therapeutic and adverse effects. These include their interaction with endocannabinoids, nitric oxide, monoaminergic, and cholinergic systems. Moreover, the recent development of microarray technology that allows the study of human gene expression suggests multiple pathways that may be related to the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of non-opioids. The present review will discuss the multiple actions of non-opioids and their interactions with these systems during inflammation and pain, suggesting that COX inhibition is an incomplete explanation for the actions of non-opioids and proposes the involvement of multiple selective targets for their analgesic, as well as, their adverse effects.

COX-1 and vascular disease

Since the discovery of the pivotal role of cyclooxygenase (COX) in the metabolism of arachidonic acid, vascular biologists have been confronted with the duality of this system. Indeed, one substrate (arachidonic acid) transformed by one enzyme (COX) yields end products (endoperoxides) that exist only very briefly before being metabolized to more stable prostanoids by a set of specific downstream synthases that were initially believed to be tissue specific. For instance, platelets contain mainly the synthase that produces thromboxane A(2) (a potent proaggregatory and vasoconstrictor substance), whereas endothelial cells contain mainly the enzyme that generates prostacyclin (an equally potent antiaggregatory and vasodilator substance). The overproduction of thromboxane A(2) by platelets leads to thrombosis; endothelial cells resist vascular occlusion by producing prostacyclin. This duality of the metabolism of arachidonic acid has dominated our thinking about atherothrombosis for decades, and rightfully still does. As scientific understanding progressed, it became evident that two isoforms of COX exist: COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 was initially considered to be the "good," constitutive isoform, whereas COX-2 appeared to be mainly a "bad" inducible enzyme involved in inflammatory responses. However, more recently, the unexpected events resulting from the widespread use of selective COX-2 inhibitors has suggested that, from a cardiovascular point of view, the products of COX-2 exert a protective role and that this isoform cannot necessarily be regarded as "bad." Likewise, evidence has emerged that initiation of the metabolism of arachidonic acid by COX-1 is not necessarily a "good" thing in terms of vascular protection. This brief review focuses on the potential contribution of endothelial COX-1 to vascular dysfunction. It is based on a number of review articles, to which the reader will be referred in order to identify the original references to the statements made; these references are not cited here because of space limitations.

Nitric oxide and cardiovascular effects: new insights in the role of nitric oxide for the management of osteoarthritis

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important mediator in both health and disease. In addition to its effects on vascular tone and platelet function, it plays roles in inflammation and pain perception that may be of relevance in osteoarthritis. Many patients with osteoarthritis take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) long term for pain control. Over recent years concern has been raised about the possible cardiovascular side effects of NSAIDs. The reasons for this possible increased cardiovascular risk with NSAIDs are not yet entirely clear, although changes in blood pressure, renal salt handling and platelet function may contribute. Recently, drugs that chemically link a NSAID with a NO donating moiety (cyclo-oxygenase-inhibiting NO-donating drugs [CINODs]) were developed. NO is an important mediator of endothelial function, acting as a vasodilator and an inhibitor of platelet aggregation, and having anti-inflammatory properties. The potential benefits of CINODs include the combination of effective analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions with NO release, which might counterbalance any adverse cardiovascular effects of NSAIDs. Effects of CINODs in animal studies include inhibition of vasopressor responses, blood pressure reduction in hypertensive rats and inhibition of platelet aggregation. CINODs may also reduce ischemic damage to compromised myocardial tissue. In addition, endothelial dysfunction is a recognized feature of inflammatory arthritides, and therefore a drug that might provide slow release of NO to the vasculature while treating pain is an attractive prospect in these conditions. Further studies of the effects of CINODs in humans are required, but these agents represent a potential exciting advance in the management of osteoarthritis.

Inflammatory and non-invasive vascular markers: the multimarker approach for risk stratification in coronary artery disease

Current thinking supports the notion that several inflammatory proteins intervene with endothelium and haemostatic factors leading to plaque formation and rupture. Of these, C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) promote atherogenesis by inducing monocyte-macrophage activation, foam cell formation, platelet activation, tissue factor expression, release of other procoagulant cytokines or downregulation of atheroprotective cytokines such as interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor b-1 (TGFb-1). CRP, MSCF and IL-6 are interrelated and have been found in increased blood concentrations in CAD. Increased levels of CRP and IL-6 predict a higher cardiovascular event rate in the general population and in addition to high MCSF or low TGFb-1 predict adverse outcome in CAD patients independently of traditional risk factors. Moreover, in CAD patients, the predictive value of MCSF is additive and beyond that of CRP suggesting the need of a "multimarker approach" in assessing cardiovascular risk. Accumulating evidence supports the utility of non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, namely carotid intimal media thickness, flow mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, augmentation index or pulse wave velocity, in the prediction of cardiovascular risk particularly in primary prevention settings. The combination of these non-invasive tests has been shown to improve their prognostic accuracy compared to each other alone. Although several therapeutic strategies like vaccination against antigens promoting atherogenesis, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, statins, and ACE inhibitors may reduce the levels of these inflammatory markers and improve the non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, the impact on cardiovascular risk resulting from these changes is unknown. The combination of an established inflammatory marker such as CRP or a vascular marker such as IMT with novel biochemical and vascular markers of cardiovascular disease may offer additive prognostic information for adverse outcome.

Melanoma inhibition by cyclooxygenase inhibitors: role of interleukin-6 suppression, a putative mechanism of action, and clinical implications

Melanoma progression is often associated with supranormal levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Il-6 is an important growth factor for many cases of melanoma. A recent case report by Lejeune et al. [Melanoma Res 2006;16:263-265] of remission of an advanced melanoma during treatment with the cyclooxygenase, (COX) inhibitor rofecoxib can be explained by rofcoxib-mediated lowering of tumor-produced Il-6. Several examples of rofecoxib's ability to lower Il-6 in humans have been published recently in other settings, and many reports indicate that other commonly used COX inhibitors like aspirin, diclofenac, etodolac, indomethacin, naproxen, and many others, also lower Il-6 in humans. These studies are reviewed. The likely mechanism of COX inhibition leading to Il-6 lowering is due to the tendency for Il-6 levels to be controlled by intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Adenylate cyclase is the rate-limiting enzyme in cAMP synthesis. Because adenylate cyclase activity is allosterically enhanced when it binds prostaglandin E, the latter increases Il-6. COX inhibition lowers prostaglandin E levels. This lowers intracellular cAMP levels. Lower cAMP results in lower Il-6 synthesis, lower levels of a required growth factor. Controlled studies are needed to define the role of COX inhibitors in melanoma treatment.

Effect of colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily) on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein independent of aspirin and atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary artery disease

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, elevated levels of biomarkers of inflammation, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) > or = 2.0 mg/L, are predictors of future vascular events. Because long-term low-dose colchicine is a safe and effective means of dampening inflammation, we conducted an open-label pilot study to determine whether it could significantly lower hs-CRP in patients with stable coronary artery disease in whom hs-CRP was > or = 2.0 mg/L despite taking both aspirin and high-dose atorvastatin therapy. Plasma hs-CRP was measured in 200 patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin and atorvastatin. In 64 patients, hs-CRP was > or = 2.0 mg/L. In 20 of these patients, hs-CRP was measured again at 2 weeks (no treatment group), and in 44 patients, hs-CRP was measured again after 4 weeks of open-label colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily (treatment group). In the no treatment group, mean baseline hs-CRP did not decrease significantly, measuring 4.28 +/- 2.03 mg/L at baseline and 3.70 +/- 2.30 mg/L after repeated measurement (mean change 11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -30% to +9%, p = NS). In contrast, hs-CRP decreased in all patients administered colchicine, with mean baseline hs-CRP decreasing from 4.58 +/- 2.05 to 1.78 +/- 1.38 mg/L (p <0.001), an absolute decrease of 2.80 mg/L (95% CI 2.40 to 3.65 mg/L) and a relative decrease of 60% (95% CI 54% to 67%). In 28 patients (64%) in this group, the decrease in hs-CRP was >50% from baseline, and in 31 patients (70%), hs-CRP decreased to <2.0 mg/L. No significant side effects were reported. In conclusion, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily) can effectively decrease hs-CRP in patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease and increased hs-CRP independent of aspirin and atorvastatin use. Additional controlled studies are warranted to confirm this observation and determine whether long-term use of low-dose colchicine can improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced vascular disease.