Ankle-arm index as a predictor of lesion morphology and risk classification for coronary artery disease undergoing angioplasty

Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results From a Large Real-World Registry

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the significance of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

We evaluated 16,922 consecutive ACS patients who were prospectively included in a national ACS registry. The co-primary endpoint included 30 days major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (re-infarction, stroke, and/or cardiovascular death) and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

PAD patients were older (70±11 vs 63±13; p<0.01), male predominance (80% vs 77%; p=0.01), and more likely to sustain prior cardiovascular events. PAD patients were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (69% vs 83%; p<0.001) and revascularisation (80% vs 86%; p<0.001). Patients with PAD were more likely to sustain 30-day MACE (22% vs 14%; p<0.001) and mortality (10% vs 4.4%; p<0.001), as well as re-hospitalisation (23% vs 19%; p=0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, PAD remained an independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-2.06]). Patients with compared to those without PAD had 2.5 times higher 1-year mortality rate (22% vs 9%; p<0.001). Co-existence of PAD remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality after adjustment for potential confounders by multivariable regression analysis (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9). PAD was associated with a significant higher 1-year mortality rate across numerous sub-groups of patients including type of myocardial infarction (ST-elevation myocardial infarction vs non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), and whether the patient underwent revascularisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute coronary syndrome with concomitant PAD represents a high-risk subgroup that warrants special attention and a more tailored approach.

Relationship between SYNTAX score and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification in patients undergoing diagnostic angiography

Introduction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis and most patients with PAD also have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD).

Aim

There are no published data investigating the relationship between PAD and CAD complexity assessed by a well-accepted classification system such as the SYNTAX score (SS) or Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II).

Material and methods

The study population consisted of 72 patients who underwent coronary angiography for the assessment of CAD. At the same session, peripheral angiography was performed in cases of suspected PAD. A coronary lesion was defined as significant if it caused a 50% reduction of the luminal diameter by visual estimation in vessels ≥ 1.5 mm. The SYNTAX score was computed by dedicated software.

Results

Patients with peripheral artery disease were divided into four groups according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification. Numbers of patients with peripheral artery disease classified as A, B, C, and D by the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification were 27, 16, 18 and 11, respectively. SYNTAX scores for each group from A to D were 10 ±9, 11 ±10, 24 ±13 and 27 ±12, respectively; p for trend < 0.001.

Conclusions

Higher Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classification is associated with higher SYNTAX score in patients who underwent coronary and peripheral diagnostic angiography. It may suggest that arterial atherosclerotic disease complexity is a systemic panvascular phenomenon.

Long term prognostic value of subclinical carotid and femoral arterial wall lesions in patients with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction having percutaneous coronary intervention

The presence of clinical peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. However, there are few data regarding the impact of the presence and degree of the subclinical PAD on outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the grade of subclinical PAD in the setting of patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prediction of intermediate- and long-term clinical outcomes. A total of 971 consecutive patients without histories of clinical PAD who under went primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were included in a prospective follow-up. Subclinical PAD severity was blindly assessed on the basis of an ultrasound arterial morphologic classification defined with the assessment of wall carotid and femoral artery bifurcations. This classification included 4 increasing classes of subclinical carotid and femoral arterial wall lesions, and the total group was divided accordingly. Death and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were evaluated. During a median follow-up period of 40 months, a total of 109 patients (11.2%) died, 9 (2.8%) in class I, 12 (3.1%) in class II, 37 (23.7%) in class III, and 51 (49.0%) in class IV (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, mortality in class IV was sevenfold higher (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3 to 16.33, p <0.001) compared to class I and was also increased in class III (HR 5.38, 95% CI 2.42 to 11.92, p <0.001). Similar results were obtained for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in class IV (HR 7.50, 95% confidence interval 5.36 to 10.50, p <0.0001), class III (HR 6.44, 95% CI 4.45 to 9.32, p <0.001), and class II (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.43, p = 0.002). In conclusion, ultrasound arterial morphologic classification may be applied in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and can stratify patients for poor clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up.

A correlation study between ankle brachial pressure index and the severity of coronary artery disease

Previous studies have shown that there was a correlation between low ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and the presence of the coronary artery disease (CAD). However, few studies have investigated the correlation between ABPI and the severity of CAD by using a scoring system. The authors aimed to investigate this correlation by using ABPI and CAD diagnosed by coronary angiography (CAG). A total of 213 consecutive patients awaiting CAG in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital from July 2009 to November 2009 were enrolled in this study. The ABPI was measured before CAG. The severity of CAD was graded on CAG by using SYNTAX scores. The authors found a significantly negative correlation between ABPI and SYNTAX scores (correlation coefficient = -.172, P = .01). The authors concluded that ABPI appeared to correlate negatively with the severity of CAD in the Thai population.

Ankle–Brachial Index and Coronary Artery Lesion Complexity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

We investigated the relationship between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) complexity in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Consecutive patients with first time diagnosis of ACS (n = 150) were enrolled. SYNTAX score (SS), a marker of CAD complexity, was assessed by dedicated computer software and diagnosis of PAD was established by ankle–brachial index (ABI) value. SYNTAX score was higher in patients with overt and borderline PAD (ABI ≤ 0.99) than normal participants (ABI 1-1.29; 16.7 ± 8.2 vs 10.1 ± 5.5; P < .001). In addition, there was a strong negative correlation between ABI and SS ( r = –.46; P < .001).We have demonstrated increased CAD complexity in patients with ACS and PAD and strong correlation between degree of PAD and coronary lesion complexity.

Usefulness of an abnormal ankle-brachial index for detecting multivessel coronary disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The presence of peripheral arterial disease in patients with coronary artery disease is associated with a poor cardiovascular outcome. However, the majority of affected patients are asymptomatic and the condition is underdiagnosed. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) provides a simple method of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of an abnormal ABI for identifying multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

We analyzed data on all ACS patients included in the PAMISCA multicenter study (with 94 participating hospitals) who underwent catheterization during admission. Patients were diagnosed with multivessel coronary disease if two or more major epicardial vessels or the left main coronary artery, or both, were affected. An ABI <or=0.9 or >1.4 was considered abnormal.

RESULTS

The study included 1031 patients with a mean age of 67.7 years. Of these, 542 had multivessel disease (52.6%). Compare with those without multivessel disease, these patients were older (66.6 years vs. 62.6 years; P< .001), had higher prevalences of hypertension (65.9% vs. 56.2%; P< .005), diabetes mellitus (40.6% vs. 26.0%; P< .001) and hypercholesterolemia (89.1% vs. 80.4%; P< .001), and were more likely to have a history of cardiovascular disease (30.1% vs. 13.9%; P< .001) or an abnormal ABI (45.4% vs. 30.3%; P< .001). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of an abnormal ABI was associated with an increased risk of multivessel disease (odds ratio=1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.15; P< .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, an abnormal ABI was independently associated with the risk of multivessel coronary artery disease.

Impact of clinical and subclinical peripheral arterial disease in mid-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome

Observational studies report poor prognosis of patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the presence of previous peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but data on subclinical PAD are scarce. This study was designed to assess the predictive value of clinical and subclinical PAD in the follow-up of patients after an ACS. We included 1,054 patients hospitalized for an ACS who survived the acute phase. Patients were divided into 3 groups: clinical PAD (previously diagnosed PAD or intermittent claudication), subclinical PAD (defined as ankle-brachial index <or=0.9 or >1.4), and no PAD. Clinical PAD was present in 150 patients (14.2%) and 298 cases of subclinical PAD were detected (28.3%). Patients with PAD (clinical and subclinical PAD) were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus than those without PAD. During the 1-year follow-up, 59 patients died (5.6%). Previous PAD (hazard ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval 1.96 to 9.82, p <0.001) and subclinical PAD (hazard ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 5.23, p <0.05) were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Moreover, patients with clinical PAD had higher rates of major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, angina, and heart failure) than patients with subclinical PAD or without PAD. In conclusion, beyond clinical PAD, measurement of ankle-brachial index after ACS provides substantial information on intermediate-term prognosis.

Role of ankle-brachial pressure index as a predictor of coronary artery disease severity in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported a close correlation between low ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) and various cardiovascular risk factors. However, despite the well-established potential hazards of consequent coronary artery disease (CAD), no data exist on the relationship between ABPI and the severity of CAD, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

A total of 840 patients ranging from 35 to 87 years of age (mean [+/- SD] 63.9+/-10.2 years) with suspected CAD in a clinical practice were enrolled. All patients underwent ABPI measurements and coronary angiography. Patients were divided into four groups according to the results of ABPI measurements and the presence or absence of DM: group A had an ABPI value of at least 0.9 but no DM (A-/D-); group B had an ABPI value of at least 0.9 and DM (A-/D+); group C had an ABPI of less than 0.9 but no DM (A+/D-); and group D had an ABPI value of less than 0.9 and DM (A+/D+).

RESULTS

Age was significantly higher in the A+ (groups C and D) than the A- patients (groups A and B). Moreover, men predominated in all four groups. Comparisons of sex distribution among the four groups revealed that group D had the highest percentage of women, while group A had the lowest. Total cholesterol level did not differ among the four groups, although group D tended to have the highest result. Patients in group D had the highest percentages of hypertension, hypercholesterol, hypertriglyceride, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among the four groups. Group D exhibited the highest triglyceride and uric acid levels, the lowest high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and the highest metabolic syndrome criteria number and percentage of metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, group D had the highest mean lesion numbers, mean numbers of target vessel involvement, stenoses with type C classification and complex morphology lesions (chronic total occlusion, diffuse or calcified lesions) among the four groups. There were still significant differences in lesion numbers (P<0.001) and numbers of target vessel involvement (P<0.001) for ABPI predicting CAD severity after controlling for the effects of DM and age. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of using an ABPI of less than 0.9 to predict CAD differed significantly between patients with and without DM.

CONCLUSIONS

ABPI is a useful noninvasive tool for predicting CAD severity, even in patients with DM.

Additive value of diabetes and peripheral arterial disease in the risk stratification of patients admitted after an acute coronary syndrome: a subanalysis of the PAMISCA Study

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in the use of non-invasive methods for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis to better identify patients with high risk of cardiovascular events The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with increased risk of events but their value in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patient has not been ascertained.

METHODS

We performed a subanalysis of the PAMISCA study, designed to investigate the prevalence of PAD in patients admitted to Spanish hospitals with a diagnosis of an ACS.

RESULTS

A total of 1410 patients were analysed (71.4% men, age 66 +/- 11.9 years, 35% DM). The prevalence of PAD was higher in DM vs. no-DM (41.5% vs. 30.6% respectively, p < 0.001). Patients with PAD and DM had more in-hospital cardiac complications such as atrial fibrillation/flutter, recurrent myocardial ischaemia and heart failure and a trend towards higher in-hospital mortality (p = 0.08). Non-DM patients with PAD and DM without PAD shared similar cardiac complications and the group without neither PAD nor DM had the best prognosis. In patients without PAD, DM was an independent predictor of three-vessel coronary disease (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.5, p < 0.05) after adjustment by age, sex, low density lipoproteins (LDL), smoking and the previous myocardial infarction. However, in PAD patients, DM failed to be an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.6-1.6, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrence of DM and PAD helps identify patients with an adverse risk profile.

Large and Small Vessels Atherosclerosis: Similarities and Differences

Atherosclerosis is a systemic, multifocal disease leading to a various symptoms and clinical events. Beyond disparities related to the organs involved, some differences might exist according to whether the lesions occur in the large (proximal) or small (distal) arteries. Atherosclerotic lesions occur predominantly in the large vessels first, and more distal lesions occur with aging. Proximal lesions are usually more evolving, especially with higher rates of unstable plaques in the proximal segments of coronary arteries. Racial differences regarding lesion distribution exist, with higher rates of distal lesions observed in races other than caucaians. Despite conflicting results found in each vascular territory, there is a suggestion of a stronger association between large vessel disease and smoking and dyslipidemia, whereas diabetes appears more specific for small vessel disease. Hypertension is more frequently reported in intracranial than in extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Preliminary studies report inflammatory markers preferably associated to large-vessel atherosclerosis. Proximal lesions in 1 territory are more frequently associated with concomitant lesions in other territories. Geometric, hemodynamic, and histologic particularities in large and small vessels may at least partially explain these differences, and some recent data point out different biologic properties of the endothelium according to its location.

Ankle-arm index is a useful test for clinical practice in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Although a low ankle-arm index (AAI) has been reported to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in several populations, no data exist concerning the impact of AAI for outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) in the clinical setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study enrolled 840 outpatients (age range 35-87 years, mean age 63.9+/-10.2) with suspected CAD. All patients underwent AAI measurements and coronary angiography, and based on the AAI values, they were divided into group A (AAI <0.9; n=191; CAD positive, 181) and group B (AAI >or=0.9; n=649; CAD positive, 509). Metabolic syndrome (MS), obesity, and level of the inflammatory biomarker high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were compared between the 2 groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values in predicting CAD with an AAI value <0.9 in all patients were 26.2%, 93.3%, 94.8% and 21.6%, respectively. The patients in group A was significantly older and there was a higher female-to-male ratio than in group B. The presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, current smoking status, and levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level, uric acid and hsCRP differed significantly between the 2 groups. Group A had a higher percentage of high LDL-cholesterol level, high waist-to-hip ratio and more positive cases of MS than group B. Multivariate logistical regression analysis showed that AAI was related to MS, high levels of hsCRP (>3 mg/L) and uric acid (>7 mg/dl) with odds ratios of 1.769, 3.907 and 2.580, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The AAI test is an effective tool in predicting CAD in outpatients in clinical practise.