Iodide mumps

Management of iodine contrast induced salivary gland swelling (sialadenitis): experiences from an observational study

BACKGROUND

Iodine contrast-induced sialadenitis (CIS) is an uncommon adverse effect to iodine-containing contrast exposition. There is scarce literature about its clinical course and demography.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine the clinical course and management of CIS. (2) To understand if CIS might be as rare as reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 2-month prospective observational study was conducted in the emergency room of a tertiary institution. ENT physicians on call received clinical formation about CIS while emergency physicians did not. During the study period, patients admitted at the emergency room matching the clinical and radiological features of CIS, were included. Information about demographics, iodine exposure, diagnostic workup, clinical course, and management was analyzed.

RESULTS

ENT physicians on call detected 4 cases, however, emergency physicians did not. Patients were aged 68-76 years and presented a bilateral submandibular gland swelling debuting 12 to 72 h after an exposure to iodinated contrast. Characteristic ultrasonographic findings supported the diagnosis and the clinical course was self-limited after 60 to 150 h.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Physicians' familiarity with CIS allows its detection and avoids costly and potentially harmful therapeutic/diagnostic efforts. The incidence is probably underestimated; however, further incidence studies are needed.

A case of acute bilateral iodine-induced submandibular sialadenitis: Ultrasound findings

Acute sialadenitis is a rare adverse reaction to iodine-based contrast agents. Ultrasound (US) is usually the preferred imaging method to evaluate the salivary glands; along with clinical and anamnestic data, US allows the diagnosis of contrast-induced sialadenitis. We present a case of acute bilateral submandibular sialadenitis induced by intravenous administration of iodine-based contrast media for a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan diagnosed by US.

Characterization of Iodide-induced Sialadenitis: Meta-analysis of the Published Case Reports in the Medical Literature

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patient presentation of postcontrast sialadenitis and factors associated with its duration of symptoms through meta-analysis of case reports.

BACKGROUND

Acute iodide sialadenitis, or "iodide mumps," is a rare adverse reaction to iodinated contrast causing salivary gland swelling. The condition may be underdiagnosed, with researchers postulating that its true incidence may be close to 1-2%.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was a meta-analysis performed using PRISMA Reporting Standards. A literature search with no language restriction was performed of the Medline database, primarily through PubMed, using keywords: "iodide mumps," "iodide sialadenitis," "sialadenitis," "salivary enlargement," "contrast reaction," "parotid swelling," and "submandibular swelling." Matching case reports and case series were reviewed, and data regarding the subjects' demographics, renal function, contrast administration, and symptoms were extracted. Uni- and multivariate linear regression analyses were applied to assess the predicting factors of a prolonged symptoms duration.

RESULTS

Sixty-five case reports and case series were identified, with 77 cases of iodide-induced sialadenitis. Two cases were unpublished and from the author's institution. Reported subjects' median age was 63 years, and 61% (47/77) were males. Median time to onset was 16 hours, and symptoms resolved in a median of 3 days after the initial onset. Twenty-seven subjects (35%, 27/77) were reported to have an impaired renal function at baseline. Administration of nonionic, low osmolarity contrast medium was reported most frequently (53%, 41/77). There was no difference in resolution of symptoms among subjects with impaired versus normal renal function. Symptoms were resolved in all cases over a median of 3 days with no statistically significant difference between those who received therapeutic intervention and those who did not (p = 0.430). Older age and longer time to onset were significantly associated with longer duration of symptoms in both uni- and multivariate linear regression models, and presence of tenderness demonstrated statistical significance associated with longer duration of symptoms in the univariate model.

CONCLUSION

Postcontrast sialadenitis is a rare reaction to iodinated contrast media. Older age and a longer time to onset of symptoms are associated with longer duration of symptoms.

Acute Submandibular Swelling Complicating Arteriography With Iodide Contrast: A Case Report and Literature Review

Iodide mumps is an uncommon condition induced by iodide-containing contrast. We present the first reported case of iodide mumps in mainland China, which occurred after carotid artery intervention.The patient, a 65-year-old Chinese male, had a history of dizziness, hypertension, diabetes, and right arm weakness. He had no history of allergies and had never previously received iodide-containing contrast. The patient's kidney function and other laboratory findings were normal. He underwent stenting of the left internal carotid artery (LICA) opening and received approximately 250 mL of a nonionic contrast agent (ioversol). Approximately 5 hours after angioplasty, bilateral local swellings were noted near the mandible; the masses were moderately firm and nontender.Iodide mumps was diagnosed in the patient. Intravenous dexamethasone (10 mg) was administered. The submandibular glands had shrunk by 11 hours after angioplasty, and they gradually became softer. The mandibular salivary glands had completely recovered by 5 days after surgery.Iodide mumps represents a rare late reaction to iodine-containing contrast media. This condition can occur in any patient receiving any iodinated contrast agent and may recur upon repeated exposure, but self-resolution can be expected within 2 weeks. All clinicians who use contrast media or iodide should be aware of this condition.

Salivary gland disorders

Patients with salivary gland disease present with certain objective and/or subjective signs. An accurate diagnosis for these patients requires a range of techniques that includes the organized integration of information derived from their history, clinical examination, imaging, serology, and histopathology. This article highlights the signs and symptoms of the salivary gland disorders seen in the Salivary Gland Center, and emphasizes the methodology used to achieve a definitive diagnosis and therapy.

An Algorithm Approach to Diagnosing Bilateral Parotid Enlargement

Objective

This contemporary review aims to categorize the disease entities that cause bilateral parotid enlargement and to develop a question-based algorithm to improve diagnosis of bilateral parotid masses.

Data Sources

A PubMed search for bilateral and parotid showed 818 results. Of these, 68 relevant studies were reviewed to compile a list of disease processes that can cause bilateral parotid enlargement.

Review Methods

A total of 22 diseases entities were reviewed. The disease processes were initially grouped into 6 categories based on etiology: sialadenosis, infection, neoplasm, autoimmune, iatrogenic, and miscellaneous. For each lesion, the incidence, history, and physical examination were compiled in a matrix.

Conclusion

After reviewing the matrix, it was clear that grouping diseases based on specific history and physical findings limits the differential diagnosis. The most important factors included disease incidence, timing of onset, nodular or diffuse, pain, and overlying skin changes. With this algorithm, the differential diagnosis can be limited from 28 to 7 or fewer likely diagnoses for a given presentation.

Implications for Practice

Bilateral parotid disease has a wide differential diagnosis with an expanding number of available tests. An algorithm, based solely on data obtained from the history and physical examination in the first patient encounter, may reduce the differential and aid the clinician in deciding on further workup and treatment. Following the algorithm presented here should allow the clinician to arrive at a diagnosis rapidly without ordering unnecessary tests and wasting resources.