Timing of events in STEMI patients treated with immediate PCI or standard medical therapy: Implications on optimisation of timing of treatment from the CARESS-in-AMI trial

Association between afterhours admission to the intensive care unit, strained capacity, and mortality: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) outside daytime hours has been shown to be variably associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU afterhours (22:00–06:59 h) in a large Canadian health region. We further hypothesized that the association between afterhours admission and mortality would be modified by indicators of strained ICU capacity.

Methods

This is a population-based cohort study of 12,265 adults admitted to nine ICUs in Alberta from June 2012 to December 2014. We used a path-analysis modeling strategy and mixed-effects multivariate regression analysis to evaluate direct and integrated associations (mediated through Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score) between afterhours admission (22:00–06:59 h) and ICU mortality. Further analysis examined the effects of strained ICU capacity and varied definitions of afterhours and weekend admissions. ICU occupancy ≥ 90% or clustering of admissions (≥ 0.15, defined as number of admissions 2 h before or after the index admission, divided by the number of ICU beds) were used as indicators of strained capacity.

Results

Of 12,265 admissions, 34.7% (n = 4251) occurred afterhours. The proportion of afterhours admissions varied amongst ICUs (range 26.7–37.8%). Patients admitted afterhours were younger (median (IQR) 58 (44–70) vs 60 (47–70) years, p < 0.0001), more likely to have a medical diagnosis (75.9% vs 72.1%, p < 0.0001), and had higher APACHE II scores (20.9 (8.6) vs 19.9 (8.3), p < 0.0001). Crude ICU mortality was greater for those admitted afterhours (15.9% vs 14.1%, p = 0.007), but following multivariate adjustment there was no direct or integrated effect on ICU mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.024; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.923–1.135, p = 0.658). Furthermore, direct and integrated analysis showed no association of afterhours admission and hospital mortality (p = 0.90) or hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.27), although ICU LOS was shorter (p = 0.049). Early-morning admission (00:00–06:59 h) with ICU occupancy ≥ 90% was associated with short-term (≤ 7 days) and all-cause ICU mortality.

Conclusions

One-third of critically ill patients are admitted to the ICU afterhours. Afterhours ICU admission was not associated with greater mortality risk in most circumstances but was sensitive to strained ICU capacity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2027-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Is There Still a Role for Fibrinolysis in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction?

OPINION STATEMENT

Fibrinolysis had long been the reference treatment in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). It was associated with a large reduction in mortality as compared with delayed or no reperfusion in patients managed early, within the first 2 hours from the onset of symptoms. Fibrinolysis also had well-known potential complications: cerebral haemorrhage, especially in patients beyond 75 years, and reinfarction. Primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) has overcome most of these limitations, but at a price: PCI-related delays that can reduce the expected benefit of primary PCI compared with fibrinolysis. That primary PCI is today the treatment of choice in patients with STEMI is no longer discussed. However, fibrinolysis should still maintain a role in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for three reasons. First, fibrinolysis is no longer a stand-alone treatment. Modern fibrinolytic strategies combine immediate fibrinolysis, loading dose of thienopyridines, and transfer to a PCI hospital for rescue or early PCI within 24 hours. These strategies capitalize on the hub-and-spoke networks that have, or should have, been built everywhere to implement primary PCI. The overall clinical results of these modern fibrinolytic strategies are now similar to those of primary PCI. Second, a substantial number of patients cannot be managed with primary PCI within the reasonable time thresholds set by the guidelines. In the case of long PCI-related delays, patients will benefit from fibrinolysis before or during transfer to a PCI hospital. Third, modern fibrinolytic strategies-immediate fibrinolysis followed by rescue or early PCI-may even offer the best results of all in a subset of patients. Patients of less than 75 years, managed within the first 2 hours and who cannot have immediate PCI, will fare better with a modern fibrinolytic strategy than with primary PCI. Guidelines advocate regional networks between hospitals with and without PCI capabilities, an efficient ambulance service and standardization of AMI management through shared protocols. These regional logistics of care are essential to take full advantage of fibrinolysis strategies. In order to check that these strategies are correctly applied, networks need ongoing registries, as well as benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives.

Lytic failure in the current pharmacointensive ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction care: insights from a pilot real-world study

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis remains a very acceptable reperfusion option for ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, it fails relatively frequently and unpredictably.

AIM AND METHODS

To investigate correlates of lytic failure (according to the standard ST resolution criterion) in current pharmacointensive STEMI care (dual antiplatelets with antithrombin), we analyzed retrospectively clinical data and echocardiographic left ventricular systolic function before initiation of reperfusion treatment in Killip I-III STEMI patients admitted to our 'spoke' intensive cardiac care unit between 1 January and 31 December 2010.

RESULTS

Of the 53 STEMI patients enrolled, 28% failed thrombolysis. Patients who did not reperfuse were less frequently active smokers (P < 0.05, odds ratio 4.33) and had a higher prevalence of hemodynamic instability [heart rate/SBP (i.e. shock index) >0.75; P < 0.05, odds ratio 13.45) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <45%; P < 0.005, odds ratio 11.14). In an exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, those variables were the only discriminators independently associated with lytic failure (adjusted odds ratio 8.74, 230.10, and 18.22, respectively, all P < 0.05). Moreover, the combined variables had a high accuracy for prediction of failed thrombolysis (all discriminators positive, 99% specificity and 83% positive predictive value).

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study indicates that thrombolysis still fails in about one-third of STEMI patients despite the current pharmacointensive approach and suggests that failed ST resolution might be independently associated with nonsmoking habit and pretreatment hemodynamic instability and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Larger trials are needed to verify the potential clinical implications of our preliminary observation.