Should computed tomography coronary angiography be aborted when the calcium score exceeds a certain threshold in patients with chest pain?

Relationship between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Coronary Stenosis

Background

The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is commonly employed to quantify the degree of calcification in coronary atherosclerosis. Indeed, increased coronary stenosis severity is associated with a progressive increase in CACS.

Objectives

This study sought to explore the association between CACS and coronary stenosis of ≥50% and ≥70%.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data collected between July 1, 2017, and March 3, 2022, at Jiangmen Central Hospital. A total of 208 patients, presenting with both symptomatic and asymptomatic manifestations and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), were included. Statistical analyses included ROC curve assessments, subgroup analyses based on age, and comparisons of CACS values against the presence of coronary stenosis ≥50% and ≥70%.

Results

Ultimately, 208 patients were included, with a median age of 65.0 years and a median CACS of 115.7 (interquartile range: 13.7-369.4). A CACS threshold of ≥1300 demonstrated a specificity of 100% for coronary stenosis of ≥50%. Notably, the percentage of patients with obstructive CAD showing CACS = 0 was significantly higher in those under 65 years (15.1%) compared to patients over 65 years (3.8%) (P=0.005). The inflection point, at which the risk probability for coronary stenosis of ≥50% shifted from being a protective factor to a risk factor, was observed when CACS fell within the range of 63.3 to 66.0.

Conclusion

CACS demonstrates good performance for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.

Impact of inhalation aromatherapy with Damask Rose (Rosa damascena) on stress, anxiety and hemodynamic parameters of patients undergoing coronary angiography: a single blind randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Coronary arteries angiography is used commonly for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. In spite of the low risk of coronary artery angiography method, it could lead to stress, anxiety and consequently hemodynamic changes in patients. This study aimed to assess the effects of inhalation aromatherapy with Rosa damascena on stress, anxiety, and hemodynamic parameters of patients undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS

A single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 98 patients in Besat Educational Hospital, Hamadan, Iran. Before coronary angiography, patients at aromatherapy group inhaled five drops of 40% Rosa damascena for 20 min and in the control group, patients inhaled distilled water. Stress, anxiety, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before and after the intervention using DASS-21 questionnaire and checklist.

RESULTS

Data were analysed by SPSS 16 software using descriptive and inferential statistics such as paired t-test and non-parametric tests. There were significant differences in terms of stress and anxiety severity in patients at aromatherapy group (p=0.005) and control group (p=0.001). There were significant differences in terms of hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (p=0.001), mean arterial pressure (p=0.001), systolic (p=0.003) and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.001) and SpO₂ (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhalation aromatherapy with Rosa damascena can significantly decrease stress and anxiety severity and improve hemodynamic parameters of patients undergoing coronary angiography.

REGISTRY NUMBER

This study has registered with the number IRCT201702019759N8 at Iranian Registry Clinical Trial.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Severe Calcification

Our aim was to analyze its diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with high coronary calcium score (CCS). A total of 113 patients with CCS > 400 were included. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as stenosis ≥ 50%. Invasive coronary angiography and major cardiovascular events were recorded. The CCS and heart rate during the acquisition were significantly lower in the diagnostic coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) group. The cut-off value of CCS to establish the diagnostic utility of CCTA was 878. The rate of cardiovascular events was 9.3%. The positive predictive value of CCTA to detect significant CAD was 73.5% and the negative predictive value for predicting cardiovascular events was 96%. In patients with high CCS, CCTA is useful to evaluate CAD, especially when the CCS is lower or equal to 878; moreover, the prognostic value of CCTA is better in patients where significant CAD has been ruled out.

Impact of Calcium Score on Agreement Between Multidetector Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, contradictory results have been reported regarding the effect of coronary artery calcium score (CS) on the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT. Our aim was to assess the agreement of MDCT and ICA and to evaluate the influence of CS on this agreement.

METHODS

We enrolled 266 consecutive patients who underwent evaluation with 64-slice MDCT and ICA. Standard CS software tools were used to calculate the Agatston score. Stenosis was qualitatively classified as mild, moderate, or severe by 1 blinded observer and the results were compared with those of ICA, which was used as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 65.4 ± 11.2 years, and 188 patients (70.3%) were men. A total of 484 segments with coronary stenosis ≥ mild were qualitatively evaluated and quantified with MDCT. Noninvasive measurements were concordant with ICA in 402 stenoses (83.05%; Kappa, 0.684), with no significant differences between vessels and with no statistically significant influence of CS on this agreement (OR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.76-1.09; P = .21). Multidetector computed tomography had high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value on a per-segment, per-vessel, and per-patient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-ICA using MDCT showed good agreement with ICA in the qualitative quantification coronary stenosis and CS had no significant impact on this agreement.

Coronary computed tomography angiography and calcium scoring in routine clinical practice for identification of patients who require revascularization

BACKGROUND

The predictive value of CCTA to predict coronary artery disease is high in particular in the absence of coronary calcification. However, the consideration of both CCTA and the calcium score, in addition to the risk factors to determine the indication for coronary revascularization, has not been yet studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 2302 patients (mean age: 60±9.8 years, 46% men), without known coronary artery disease (CAD), who underwent 320-row CCTA. Logistic regression, c-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess the role of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in predicting revascularization after CCTA.

RESULTS

The revascularization rates were 0.75% in patients with a CACS of 0, and there were no adverse events during the follow-up period. The revascularization rates were 3.3% in patients with a CACS of 1-99, 15.4% in patients with a CACS of 100-399, 25.6% in patients with a CACS of 400-999, and 42.4% in patients with a CACS≥1000. The crude and adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for revascularization per CACS group category were 2.89 (2.53-2.3) and 2.71 (2.33-3.15), respectively; the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.85 (0.83-0.88). The addition of CACS to conventional risk factors improved the accuracy of risk prediction model for revascularization (AUC 0.74 vs 0.63, P=0.001), but it did not reclassify a substantial proportion of patients with positive CACS to risk categories (NRI=-0.023, P=0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The 320-row CCTA might rule out CAD in low- to intermediate-risk patients. However, its accuracy in identifying patients who require revascularization is limited. The CACS added to the conventional risk factors did not improve the identification of patients who require revascularization.