Improved coronary artery blood flow following the correction of systolic dyssynchrony with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Role of coronary flow regulation and cardiac-coronary coupling in mechanical dyssynchrony associated with right ventricular pacing

Mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) affects left ventricular (LV) mechanics and coronary perfusion. To understand the multifactorial effects of MD, we developed a computational model that bidirectionally couples the systemic circulation with the LV and coronary perfusion with flow regulation. In the model, coronary flow in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries affects the corresponding regional contractility based on a prescribed linear LV contractility-coronary flow relationship. The model is calibrated with experimental measurements of LV pressure and volume, as well as LAD and LCX flow rate waveforms acquired under regulated and fully dilated conditions from a swine under right atrial (RA) pacing. The calibrated model is applied to simulate MD. The model can simultaneously reproduce the reduction in mean LV pressure (39.3%), regulated flow (LAD: 7.9%; LCX: 1.9%), LAD passive flow (21.6%), and increase in LCX passive flow (15.9%). These changes are associated with right ventricular pacing compared with RA pacing measured in the same swine only when LV contractility is affected by flow alterations with a slope of 1.4 mmHg/mL² in a contractility-flow relationship. In sensitivity analyses, the model predicts that coronary flow reserve (CFR) decreases and increases in the LAD and LCX with increasing delay in LV free wall contraction. These findings suggest that asynchronous activation associated with MD impacts 1) the loading conditions that further affect the coronary flow, which may explain some of the changes in CFR, and 2) the coronary flow that reduces global contractility, which contributes to the reduction in LV pressure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A computational model that couples the systemic circulation of the left ventricular (LV) and coronary perfusion with flow regulation is developed to study the effects of mechanical dyssynchrony. The delayed contraction in the LV free wall with respect to the septum has a significant effect on LV function and coronary flow reserve.

Effects of Mechanical Dyssynchrony on Coronary Flow: Insights From a Computational Model of Coupled Coronary Perfusion With Systemic Circulation

Mechanical dyssynchrony affects left ventricular (LV) mechanics and coronary perfusion. Due to the confounding effects of their bi-directional interactions, the mechanisms behind these changes are difficult to isolate from experimental and clinical studies alone. Here, we develop and calibrate a closed-loop computational model that couples the systemic circulation, LV mechanics, and coronary perfusion. The model is applied to simulate the impact of mechanical dyssynchrony on coronary flow in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCX) territories caused by regional alterations in perfusion pressure and intramyocardial pressure (IMP). We also investigate the effects of regional coronary flow alterations on regional LV contractility in mechanical dyssynchrony based on prescribed contractility-flow relationships without considering autoregulation. The model predicts that LCX and LAD flows are reduced by 7.2%, and increased by 17.1%, respectively, in mechanical dyssynchrony with a systolic dyssynchrony index of 10% when the LAD's IMP is synchronous with the arterial pressure. The LAD flow is reduced by 11.6% only when its IMP is delayed with respect to the arterial pressure by 0.07 s. When contractility is sensitive to coronary flow, mechanical dyssynchrony can affect global LV mechanics, IMPs and contractility that in turn, further affect the coronary flow in a feedback loop that results in a substantial reduction of dP_LV/dt, indicative of ischemia. Taken together, these findings imply that regional IMPs play a significant role in affecting regional coronary flows in mechanical dyssynchrony and the changes in regional coronary flow may produce ischemia when contractility is sensitive to the changes in coronary flow.

Changes in contractility determine coronary haemodynamics in dyssynchronous left ventricular heart failure, not vice versa

BACKGROUND

Biventricular pacing has been shown to increase both cardiac contractility and coronary flow acutely but the causal relationship is unclear. We hypothesised that changes in coronary flow are secondary to changes in cardiac contractility. We sought to examine this relationship by modulating coronary flow and cardiac contractility.

METHODS

Contractility and lusitropy were altered by varying the location of pacing in 8 patients. Coronary autoregulation was transiently disabled with intracoronary adenosine. Simultaneous coronary flow velocity, coronary pressure and left ventricular pressure data were measured in the different pacing settings with and without hyperaemia and wave intensity analysis performed.

RESULTS

Multisite pacing was effective at altering left ventricular contractility and lusitropy (pos. dp/dtmax -13% to +10% and neg. dp/dtmax -15% to +17% compared to baseline). Intracoronary adenosine decreased microvascular resistance (362.5 mm Hg/s/m to 156.7 mm Hg/s/m, p < 0.001) and increased LAD flow velocity (22 cm/s vs 45 cm/s, p < 0.001) but did not acutely change contractility or lusitropy. The magnitude of the dominant accelerating wave, the Backward Expansion Wave, was proportional to the degree of contractility as well as lusitropy (r = 0.47, p < 0.01 and r = -0.50, p < 0.01). Perfusion efficiency (the proportion of accelerating waves) increased at hyperaemia (76% rest vs 81% hyperaemia, p = 0.04). Perfusion efficiency correlated with contractility and lusitropy at rest (r = 0.43 & -0.50 respectively, p = 0.01) and hyperaemia (r = 0.59 & -0.6, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Acutely increasing coronary flow with adenosine in patients with systolic heart failure does not increase contractility. Changes in coronary flow with biventricular pacing are likely to be a consequence of enhanced cardiac contractility from resynchronization and not vice versa.

Restoration of ventricular septal hypoperfusion by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND

Pacing from the right ventricular apex (RVA) is associated with cardiac dysfunction and shows electrophysiological features similar to left bundle branch block in which left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony impairs septal coronary artery perfusion.

METHODS

A total of 62 non-ischemic patients with an implanted pacemaker at the RVA with a pacing rate of >95% were studied. LV septal coronary perfusion as indicated by the LV septal perfusion index was measured by electrocardiography (ECG)-gated single-photon emission computed tomography for all patients at baseline and for patients who were upgraded to CRT at 6months after CRT. Relationships among LV septal perfusion index, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the patients with permanent RVA pacing, 28 of 62 (45%) had impaired septal perfusion (i.e., septal perfusion index <0.9). The LV septal perfusion index was significantly correlated with both QRS duration (r=-0.763, p<0.001) and LV ejection fraction (r=0.462, p=0.001). Eleven patients were upgraded to CRT. CRT significantly improved the LV septal perfusion index from 0.63 (SD=0.13) to 0.89 (SD=0.19) (p<0.001)and cardiac function: LV end-systolic volume from 102.3mL (SD=70.0) to 179.7mL (SD=118.4) (p=0.002) and LV ejection fraction from 22.5 (SD=8.9%) to 38.4% (SD=13.9%) (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of the non-ischemic patients with permanent RVA pacing presenting with prolonged QRS duration and LV dysfunction developed LV septal hypoperfusion. Both septal perfusion and LV function improved in patients who were upgraded to CRT.

Effects of Epicardial and Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Coronary Flow: Insights From Wave Intensity Analysis

Background

The increase in global coronary flow seen with conventional biventricular pacing is mediated by an increase in the dominant backward expansion wave (BEW). Little is known about the determinants of flow in the left‐sided epicardial coronary arteries beyond this or the effect of endocardial pacing stimulation on coronary physiology.

Methods and Results

Eleven patients with a chronically implanted biventricular pacemaker underwent an acute hemodynamic and electrophysiological study. Five of 11 patients also took part in a left ventricular endocardial pacing protocol at the same time. Conventional biventricular pacing, delivered epicardially from the coronary sinus, resulted in a 9% increase in flow (average peak velocity) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), mediated by a 13% increase in the area under the BEW (P=0.004). Endocardial pacing resulted in a 27% increase in LAD flow, mediated by a 112% increase in the area under the forward compression wave (FCW) and a 43% increase in the area under the BEW (P=0.048 and P=0.036, respectively). There were no significant changes in circumflex parameters. Conventional biventricular pacing resulted in homogenization of timing of coronary flow compared with baseline (mean difference in time to peak in the LAD versus circumflex artery: FCW 39 ms [baseline] versus 3 ms [conventional biventricular pacing], P=0.008; BEW 47 ms [baseline] versus 8 ms [conventional biventricular pacing], P=0.004).

Conclusions

Epicardial and endocardial pacing result in increased coronary flow in the left anterior descending artery and homogenization of the timing of waves that determine flow in the LAD and the circumflex artery. The increase in both the FCW and the BEW with endocardial pacing may be the result of a more physiological activation pattern than that of epicardial pacing, which resulted in an increase of only the BEW.

Reduction in coronary microvascular resistance through cardiac resynchronization and its impact on chronic reverse remodelling of left ventricle in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) induces mechanical dyssynchrony, thereby compromising the coronary circulation in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. We sought to examine the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on coronary flow dynamics and left ventricular (LV) function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class, III or IV; LV ejection fraction, ≤35%; QRS duration, ≥130 ms) were enrolled. One week after implantation of the CRT device, coronary flow velocity and pressure in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) were measured invasively, before and after inducing hyperemia by adenosine triphosphate administration, with two programming modes: sequential atrial and biventricular pacing (BiV) and atrial pacing in patients with LBBB or sequential atrial and right ventricular pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block (Control). We assessed hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR, mean distal pressure divided by hyperemic average peak velocity) and the relationship between the change in HMR and mid-term LV reverse remodelling. Hyperemic microvascular resistance was lower during BiV than during Control (LAD: 1.76 ± 0.47 vs. 1.54 ± 0.45, P < 0.001; LCx: 1.92 ± 0.42 vs. 1.73 ± 0.31, P = 0.003). The CRT-induced change in HMR of the LCx correlated with the percentage change in LV ejection fraction (R = -0.598, P = 0.011) and LV end-systolic volume (R = 0.609, P = 0.010) before and 6 months after CRT.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves coronary flow circulation by reducing microvascular resistance, which might be associated with LV reverse remodelling.

Current concepts relating coronary flow, myocardial perfusion and metabolism in left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves mortality and symptoms in heart failure patients with electromechanically dyssynchronous ventricles. There is a 50% non-response rate and reproducible biomarkers to predict non-response have not been forthcoming. Therefore, there has been increasing interest in the pathophysiological effects of dyssynchrony particularly focusing on coronary flow, myocardial perfusion and metabolism. Studies suggest that dyssynchronous electrical activation effects coronary flow throughout the coronary vasculature from the epicardial arteries to the microvascular bed and that these changes can be corrected by CRT. The effect of both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony on myocardial perfusion is unclear with some studies suggesting there is a reduction in septal perfusion whilst others propose that there is an increase in lateral perfusion. Better understanding of these effects offers the possibility for better prediction of non-response. CRT appears to improve homogeneity in myocardial perfusion where heterogeneity is described in the initial substrate. Novel approaches to the identification of non-responders via metabolic phenotyping both invasively and non-invasively have been encouraging. There remains a need for further research to clarify the interaction of coronary flow with perfusion and metabolism in patients who undergo CRT.