Does linear ablation and defragmentation really improve the success rate of persistent AF? Follow-up results and electrophysiological findings from 169 consecutive patients

Right atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation: prevalence, clinical characteristics, electrophysiological mechanisms, and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, electrophysiological mechanisms, and long-term outcomes of right atrial tachycardia (AT) in patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

From March 2010 to December 2020, 220 consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation were referred for post-ablation AT recurrence. Thirty-five patients (35/220, 15.9%) with right AT recurrence (25 men; mean age 59.3 ± 10.2 years) were enrolled. These patients were divided into groups with right ATs exclusively (group 1) and right combined with left ATs (group 2).

RESULTS

Fifty-three ATs were mapped in all patients, with thirty-nine ATs originating from the right atrium. The detailed distribution of all right ATs was 22 in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI), 6 in the ostium of superior vein cava (SVC), 4 in the right free wall, 4 in the right anterior atrial septum, 2 in coronary sinus ostium, and 1 in crista terminalis. Group 2 had a significantly higher incidence of typical atrial flutter (AFL) than group 1 (11/12, 90.9% vs. 12/24, 50.0%, P = 0.03). During the mean follow-up of 43.6 ± 25.2 months after the index AT ablation, the recurrence rate of AT/AF was 22.9% (8/35), and it was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (8.3% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Right AT is relatively less common post-AF ablation. The CTI-dependent AFL and the ostium of SVC-derived focal AT constituted the major components of right ATs, suggesting the importance of ablation- and anatomy-related arrhythmogenic effects in the right atrium.

Ablation of "Background Tachycardia" in Long Standing Atrial Fibrillation: Improving the Outcomes by Unmasking a Residual Atrial Fibrillation Perpetuator

Background

Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent AF (LSAF) remains challenging. Since AF-Nest (AFN) description, we have observed that a stable, protected, fast source firing, namely "Background Tachycardia"(BT), could be hidden beneath the chaotic AF. Following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)+AFN ablation one or more BT may arise or be induced in 30-40% of patients, which could be the culprit forAF maintenance and ablation recurrences.

Methods and Results

We studied 114 patients, from 322 sequential LSAF regular ablations, having spontaneous or induced residual BT after EGM-guided PVI+AFN ablation of LSAF; 55.6±11y/o, 97males (85.1%), EF=65.5±8%, LA=42.8±6.7mm. Macroreentrant tachycardias were excluded. Pre-ablationAF 12-leads ECG Digital processing(DP) and spectral analysis(SA) was performed searching for BT before AF ablation and its correlation with BT during ablation.After PVI, 38.1±9 AFN sites/patient and 135 sustained BTs (1-3, 1.2±0.5/patient) were ablated. BT cycle length(CL) was 246.3±37.3ms. In 79 patients presenting suitable DP for SA, the BT-CL was 241.6±34.3ms with intra procedure BT-CL correlation r=0.83/p<0.01. Following BT ablation, AF could not be induced. During FU of 13→60 months(22.8±12m), AF freedom for BT RF(+) vs. BT RF(-) groups were 77.9% vs. 56.4% (p=0.009), respectively. There was no significant complication.

Conclusion

BT ablation following PVI and AFN ablation improved long-term outcomes ofLSAF ablation. BT is likely due to sustained microreentry, protected during AF by entry block. BT can be suspected by spectral analysis of the pre-ablation ECG and is likely one important AF perpetuator by causing electrical resonance of the AFN. This ablation strategy warrants randomized, multicenter investigation.

Benefits and risks of additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of additional complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear.

METHODS

Trials were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database, reviews, and reference lists of relevant papers. The primary end point was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after a single ablation.

RESULTS

We meta-analyzed 11 studies (total, n=983) using random-effects model to compare PVI (n=478) with PVI plus CFAE ablation (PVI+CFAE) (n=505). Additional CFAE ablation reduced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure (pooled RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61, 0.88; P=0.0007) at ≥ 3-month follow-up. There was no evidence of heterogeneity among studies (I(2)=33%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that additional CFAE ablation reduced rates of recurrence in nonparoxysmal AF (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47, 0.99; P=0.05), whereas had no effect on patients with paroxysmal AF (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.59, 1.06; P=0.12). Eight studies reported results of post-procedure ATs. The addition of CFAE ablation increased the rate of post-procedure ATs (RR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02, 3.07; P=0.04). Additional CFAE ablation significantly increased mean procedural times (245.4+75.7 vs. 189.5+62.3 min, P<0.001), mean fluoroscopy (72.1+25.6 vs. 59.5+19.3 min, P<0.001), and mean RF energy application times (75.3+38.6 vs. 53.2+27.5 min, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The adjunctive CFAE ablation could provide additional benefit in terms of reducing recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia for patients with nonparoxysmal AF but not for patients with paroxysmal AF after a single procedure with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The main risk of adjunctive CFAE ablation is the increasing rate of untraceable postablation ATs.