Influence of platelet reactivity and inflammation on peri-procedural myonecrosis in East Asian patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Relation of High Lipoprotein (a) Concentrations to Platelet Reactivity in Individuals with and Without Coronary Artery Disease

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the relationship between Lp(a) and platelet reactivity in primary and secondary prevention.

METHODS

Lp(a) was evaluated in 396 individuals with (82.3%) and without (17.7%) obstructive CAD. The population was divided into two groups according to Lp(a) concentrations with a cutoff value of 50 mg/dL. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow™ P2Y₁₂ assay. Platelet reactivity was also induced by arachidonic acid and collagen-epinephrine (C-EPI) and assessed by Multiplate™, platelet function analyzer™ 100 (PFA-100), and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) assays. Secondary objectives included the assessment of the primary endpoint in individuals with or without CAD.

RESULTS

Overall, 294 (74.2%) individuals had Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL [median (IQR) 13.2 (5.8-27.9) mg/dL] and 102 (25.8%) had Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL [82.5 (67.6-114.5) mg/dL], P < 0.001. Univariate analysis in the entire population revealed no differences in ADP-induced platelet reactivity between individuals with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (249.4 ± 43.8 PRU) versus Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL (243.1 ± 52.2 PRU), P = 0.277. Similar findings were present in individuals with (P = 0.228) and without (P = 0.669) CAD, and regardless of the agonist used or method of analysis (all P > 0.05). Finally, multivariable analysis did not show a significant association between ADP-induced platelet reactivity and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL [adjusted OR = 1.00 [(95% CI 0.99-1.01), P = 0.590].

CONCLUSION

In individuals with or without CAD, Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL was not associated with higher platelet reactivity.

Impact of increased inflammation biomarkers on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study

Background

The fact that each inflammatory indicator has a forecasting capacity on the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) has a controversial existence. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of inflammation biological indicators on PMI in a group of patients undergoing selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The study was carried out both in a retrospective and prospective manner in 7,413 and 1,189 subjects, respectively. In the retrospective cohort study, the association between inflammation biomarkers and PMI was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. WBC, CRP, and NLR were distributed using k-means clustering into a virtual variable “Inflammatory Trend”, and multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analysis were performed. In the prospective cohort study, the endpoints were PMI, cardiovascular death or cardiac arrest. The chi-square test was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR).

Results

In the retrospective cohort study, except WBC, CRP, NLR and virtual variable “Inflammatory trend” were independent risk factors for PMI. The subgroup analysis revealed that CRP can serve as the most stable predictor. In the prospective cohort study, WBC (RR =1.134, P=0.416) has no effect on the incidence of PMI. However, an elevation in the incidence of PMI was observed with an increase of NLR (RR =1.354, P=0.041) and CRP (RR =1.412, P=0.025).

Conclusions

In patients with elective PCI for single-vessel lesions, high CRP increases the risk for PMI. The increase of NLR was an independent risk factor for PMI, especially for patients with hypertension and under the age of 70. WBC has no influence on the occurrence of PMI.

Effect of platelet reactivity, endothelial function, and inflammatory status on outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris on clopidogrel therapy

Although high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is an important predictor of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary stenting, it is unknown whether endothelial dysfunction and HTPR are associated. We examined the platelet function, peripheral vascular function, endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) number, platelet activation markers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, and clinical outcomes in patients receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy. We consecutively enrolled 91 patients who underwent follow-up angiography because of chest discomfort. All patients took aspirin and clopidogrel for an average of 498 ± 138 days. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (maximal platelet aggregation by 5 μmol/L of adenosine diphosphate ≤50% in group 1 [optimal response] and >50% as group 2 [HTPR]). Flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (PWV), numbers of EPCs isolated from peripheral blood, platelet activation markers (soluble CD40 ligand and soluble P-selectin), and hs-CRP levels were assessed before follow-up angiography. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data between groups 1 (n = 59) and 2 (n = 32). Group 2 showed poorer flow-mediated dilation (6.1 ± 4.1% vs 12.9 ± 6.2%, p <0.001), pulse wave velocity (1925.4 ± 362.2 vs 1571.0 ± 306.5 ms, p <0.001), and lower circulating EPCs by flow cytometry (21.9 ± 14.7 vs 65.2 ± 30.1 per 10 fields, p <0.001) compared with group 1. Significantly higher levels of soluble CD40 ligand, soluble P-selectin, and hs-CRP were observed in group 2. In multivariate analysis, elevated hs-CRP level, but not HTPR, was independently associated with repeated PCI. In patients with angina, HTPR was associated endothelial dysfunction and elevated hs-CRP, although elevated hs-CRP level was significantly associated with poorer outcomes.